DEPARTMENT OF STATE BULLETIN 24 OCTOBER 1949

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 8, 2001
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 24, 1949
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0.pdf333.84 KB
Body: 
Tase 2001 /08 #e ,RM 5QR ft4Pft9%1 iQPi ,M0free- THE UNITED NATIONS AND SPECIALIZED AGENCIES Continued doms specified in the treaty of peace. persecutions of persons for so-called "anti-demo- cratic" statements or for "inciting against democ- racy," a choice of words which would be amusing if it did not cloak injustice and tragedy for many innocent human beings. The opposition news- papers have vanished one by one and freedom of the press has ceased to exist. The process of per- verting the judiciary for political purposes pro- ceeds apace. And the Communist regime, having no further democratic opposition to destroy, is now busily engaged in wide-scale purges of Com- munist collaborators who have become suspect and of the cadres of the Communist Party organiza- tion itself. The recent trial of so-called spies and traitors in Budapest was not, properly speaking, a trial at all but a phase of the political strategy of the Cominform with intended effects far beyond the borders of Hungary. Whatever may have been the character and the record of the accused, the point which concerns us here is that the entire procedure, with its staged denunciations and re- cited confessions and its ludicrous falsifications (and here I need only to refer to the supposed con- spiracies involving American officials), illustrates the fact that in Hungary today the individual citi- zen, whether a Communist Party boss or anyone else, cannot obtain justice, a fair trial, or any rec- ognition of his rights as a human being. Bulgaria Essentially, the same situation prevails in Bul- garia. In that country also the regime has con- tinued to strive to consolidate its power through the suppression of all independent opinion. The campaign designed to reduce the freedom of the Churches has continued. My government has received a number of reliable reports that early in July of this year a second group of Protestant ministers was tried, this time in secrecy, perhaps from fear of a world-wide reaction such as fol- lowed the trial of the 15 pastors the preceding March. The usual paraphernalia, including "confessions" recited by the defendants, were again present. These trials are a further mani- festation of the obvious determination of the Bul- garian Government to destroy the independence of these Protestant sects and the integrity of their religious faith and to break their normal ties with their fellow Christians in other parts of the world. In Bulgaria also there have been elections, the local elections of May 1949 featuring a single bal- lot of candidates nominated only by organizations associated with the Fatherland Front, which is dominated by the Bulgarian Communist Party. The elections were held under the direct supervi- sion of the electoral committees appointed by the same Fatherland Front. Bulgaria remains without democratic opposi- tion parties, without a press free to criticize the Rumania Since the question of the observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Rumania has now been added to our agenda, I shall comment briefly on the actions of the Rumanian Govern- ment which, in the view of the Government of the United States, also constitute deliberate and per- sistent violation of article 3 of the treaty of peace. Freedom of political opinion, one of the basic freedoms guaranteed in the treaty, has virtually ceased to exist in Rumania. As a result of a sys- tematic campaign, the Rumanian regime succeeded in destroying all democratic political parties. The largest of the opposition parties, the National Peasant Party, was officially suppressed following the arrest of its leaders. The National Liberal Party and the Independent Social Democratic Party, while never formally suppressed, were effectively blocked from all political activities through arrests of most of their leaders and through intimidation. The Rumanian Government did not hesitate to convert the country's judicial system into an in- strument of its oppressive policy. The most widely known, although by no means the only dem- onstration of this policy, was the trial, conviction, and sentence for treason, of Maniu and other lead- ers of the National Peasant Party in October and November 1947. In a note delivered to the Ruma- nian Government at the time, my government pointed to the transparent political motivation of this so-called judicial proceeding. The defend- ants were denied a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal and deprived of the guaran- ties necessary for their defense. They were denied, for example, the right of counsel of their own choice and were subjected to a violent govern- ment-inspired campaign of public excitation against them both before and during the trial. The subjugation of the judiciary has now been made complete through the abuse of the authority of the Government to control the transfer and tenure of judges, through intimidation of judges, and through the system of politically controlled "people's courts." The police power of the state has been exercised in disregard of those basic civil liberties of the peoples in Rumania which the peace treaty was to safeguard. In the prisons are many men and women arrested without warrant, held indefintely without charge and without trial. Freedom of press and publication, guaranteed by the peace treaties, is nonexistent. By official censorship, by discrimination in the distribution of newsprint, by governmental ownership or monopoly control of printing establishments and radio facilities, and by other devices, any sub- stantive criticism whatsoever of the Govenment has been prevented. Only those public media October 24, 1949 State Dept. declassification & release instructions on file Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0 Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0 Special Insert in Information Bulletin, Issue No. 170, Sept. 20, 1949 Reprinted from that issue US H ECA REPRESENTATIVE FOR GERMANY OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER DEPUTY U.S. HIGH COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY USI SECRETARY ALLIED GEN.SEG'T. STAFF SECRETARY POLIC't~~ t5 ECA SPECIAL MISSION OFFICE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS PROGRAM DIVISION H FOOD & AGRICULTURE DIVISION TRADE 13, PAYMENTS DIVISION PROPERTY DIVISION JOINT EXPORT-IMPORT (IN LIQUIDATION I -I OFFICE OF POLITICAL AFFAIRS I FOREIGN RELATIONS DIVISION TRAVEL CONTROL DIVISION (CTB) PROTOCOL DIVISION INTERNAL POLITICAL 8 GOVERNMENTAL DIVISION SUPERVISING CONSUL-GENERAL DISPLACED POPULATIONS DIVISION I CML AVIATION J DIVISION ?ECA REPRESENTATIVE FOR GERMANY -BY EXECUTIVE ORDER, MR. JOIN 'A MCCLO Y. AS US HIGH CO1ABSSIONER FOR GERMANY, ALSO SERVES AS ECA REPRESENTATIVE FOR GERMANY. UNDER THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND IN COORDINATION WITH THE US. SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR EUROPE (SUB C , HO EVER,TO CRNSLA.TATICN WITH AND ULTIMATE ORECTION BY THE PRESIDENT. ) ORGANIZATION CHART OFFICE OF THE G H C O M M I S S I O NER F O R G E R M A N Y OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL LEGAL ADVICE DIVISION NISTRATION OF JUSTICE DIVISION LEGISLATION DIVISION DECARTEUZATION 8 DECONCENTRATION DMSION L PRISONS DIVISION ICE OF CHIEF TO US. OBSERVERS FRENCH/UK LAENDERi US ELEMENT MUTARY SECURITY BOA~ SECRETARIAT MILITARY DIV. FENTIFIC RESEARCH DIV. LANOCOMMISSIONER FOR BAVARIA ?JS ELEMENTS, COAL CONTROL GROW AND STEEL CONTROL GROUP, RECEIVE POLLY GUDANCE FROM DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS& FOR TRIPARTITE ACTIVITIES, T H E GROUPS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO THE ECONOMICS COMNITTEE,ALLIED HIGH GOMMISSIOAL Department of State Bulletin OFFICE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION 8 CLITORAL RELATIONS DIVISION EXCHANGES DIVISION INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC RELATIONS DIVISION US HIGH COMMISSION COURTS COU9T OF APPEALS DISTRICT COURTS LAND COMMISSIONER FOR WUERTT- BADEN ALLIED HIGH COMMISSION OFFICE OF LABOR AFFAIRS LAND COMMISSIONER FOR BREMEN T-1 - US. COMMANDER IN BERLIN OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE Ir- REPORTS 8 ANALYSIS DIVISION ARMED FORCES DIVISION H BUDGET a FINANCE DIVISION I REPORTS a STATISTICS PERSON ONNEL COMfaU IICNTIONS OPERATING FACILITIES wIN (j)us ELEMENT RECEIVES POLICY GUIDANCE FROM DIRECTOR ECONOMIC AFFAI R SS 44 HE US COMMANDER, BERLIN SERVES AS THE REPRESENTATIVE IN BERLIN OF THE 4 ENCY IS ADMINISTRATIVELY RESPONSIBLE TO FOREIGN TRADE AND E XC HANG E U HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR GERMANY; FOR MILITARY MATTERS HE REPORTS TO THE COMMITTEE, ALLIED HIGH COMMISSION, DURING UCUIDATION COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, EUROPEAN COMMAND. October 24, 1949 621 Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0 Approved-For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP57-00384RO01300070003-0 h I I THE UNITED NATIONS AND SPECIALIZED AGENCIES Continued which are responsive to government direction and render active service to ti-.e purposes of the regime are permitted to opera ce. This prevention of the free expression of opinion is extended to public meetings, which in practice can be held only by oganizations approved by the regime. Finally, in its determination to bring all aspects of Rumanian life into the totalitarian pattern, the Rumanian Government has been employing many forms of pressure to compel subservience r'v religious groups. Religious worship, guaran- ,,,.,,1 by the peace treaties, means, in our view, more than a formal participation in religious ritual. It requires freedom to teach and express views based on religious precepts, freedom to asso- ciate with those of like belief, freedom to worship with clergy chosen without arbitrary govern- mental interference. The decree concerning the activities of cults in Rumania, of February 11, 1949, vests in the Government an unprecedented degree of control over all religious groups and activities, and the Government has not hesitated to exercise it. The Rumanian Government has purged large numbers of priests of the Orthodox Church and seen to it that persons devoted to the Communist Party are appointed to high church offices. Sim- ilarly, the Roman Catholic Church in Rumania has been subjected to such persecution that, at present, none of its bishops is in a position to exer- cise his rightful religious functions. The Catholic Church in Rumania today has been reduced to virtual inactivity by a variety of measures cal- culated to cripple its organization, such as the arrests of priests, dissolution of religious orders, and prohibition of normal activities in the field of welfare and education. The most glaring example of the Government's infringement of religious freedom has been the official dissolution and absorption by the Ru- manian Orthodox Church of the Greek Catholic or Uniate Church. This dissolution was accom- plished by a governmental decree following a virulent campaign and a sham procedure designed has become of the freedom of more than one million communicants of the Greek Catholic Church to worship God as they please? The Jewish religious community in Rumania has been subjected to similar oppressive treatment. Its former chief rabbi was forced out of office, to be replaced by a Communist sympathizer with little religious training or standing in the community. U.S. NOTES OF PROTEST e contours of the deliberate policies when . III t view of the United States are contrary to the treaty obligations of the three governments. As I have said, the General Assembly is already on record as favoring the settlement of these issues through the machinery provided in the treaties of peace themselves for the resolution of disputes arising out of the interpretation or execution of the treaties. The United States continues to sup- port this approach and believes that we should fol- low it through to a clear and definite conclusion. In its resolution of April 30, of this year, the General Assembly expressed the hope that the signatories of the peace treaties would diligently carry out the procedures envisaged in the treaties. The Government of the United States has asked the Secretary-General to circulate to all members of the Assembly copies of the diplomatic correspond- ence disclosing the efforts on the part of my government, in accordance with the Assembly reso- lution, to put the treaty machinery in motion.3 Analogous efforts were made by several other sig- natories of the peace treaties, whose delegations will, no doubt, wish to describe to the Committee the steps they also have taken in this matter. On April 2 of this year the United States for- mally charged Bulgaria, Hungary, and Rumania with violations of the human-rights clauses of the treaties and requested that remedial measures be taken. The three governments denied that they had violated the treaties and indicated their un- willingness to adopt remedial measures. It was obvious from the replies of the three governments that they were not prepared to explore the matter further through diplomatic channels. As a next step, the United States Government informed them that in its view disputes had arisen concerning the interpretation and execution of the treaties of peace. In notes delivered on May 31, by the United States Legations in Sofia, Budapest, and Bucha- rest, the United States invoked the relevant treaty articles, providing first for the settlement of such disputes by the heads of diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and the United States in the three capitals. The United States chiefs of mission requested their British and Soviet colleagues to meet with them to con- sider the disputes in accordance with the procedure clearly specified in the treaties. The British Min- isters indicated their willingness to do so. How- ever, the Soviet Government declined to authorize its Ambassadors to discuss the matter on the ground that the three ex-enemy states had ful- filled their obligations under the treaties and that the measures complained of were justified under the treaties and, in any case, were within the do- mestic jurisdiction of those states. The Soviet Government rejected a further request by the United States Government to reconsider its position. I have limited myself here to an outline in broad 'BULLETIN Of Oct. 10, 1949, p. 541. 622 Department of State Bulletin Approved For Release 2001/08/24: CIA-RDP57-00384R001300070003-0