USE OF ARMED FORCES IN POLITICAL CRISES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
6
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 4, 2013
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1953
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0.pdf558.96 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 COUNTRY SUBJECT PLACE ACQUIRED Czechoslovakia Use of Armed. 50X1 TY IN MATION REPORT NO. DATE DISTR. NO. OF PAGES Na0FENCL.S. (LISTED BELOW) 50X1 /6 atirt 3 50X1 Forces in Political Crises .50X1? DATE ACQUIRED BY SOURCE DATE OF INFORMATION 50X1 THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT NO. 50:00 1. When STALIN and GOTTWALD died, all the units in the 3rd Tank Divisions were ordered to cancel all passes ana leaves. When STALIN died s six men out of my group of 36 communications technicians 50:00 were on leave. The order forbidding absences from the unit was in force until four days after STALIN's funeral. On neither occasion were any other special security Precautions enforced bY the division, as far as I could judge. \ 2, Enlisted man and officers living in the barracks could not have their own radios unless they obtained special permission from the division commander. The reason given for this rule was the need to save elec- tricity. I never knew anyone who had asked for or who had been given permission to have his own radio. In effect, the only miliary person-, mel who had access to radios they could tune themselves were communi- cations personnel using official radios with earphones, and married and other officers billeted outside the barracks. SICURITY INFORMATION Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 RESTRICTED Security Information WARNING.?Material on the reverse of this sheet may carry a classification of CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, or TOP SECRET. EXPLANATORY NOTE Date of Info.?The date or dates on which, or between which, the events described in the report occurred or the conditions described existed. Place Acquired.?The place where the information was first acquired by a controlled indi- vidual. A date following in parentheses indicates when the information was acquired. Source Description.?A description of the individual from whom, and, when pertinent, of any other individual through whom the information was received. Source Evaluation.?An indication of the reliability of a source, expressed either verbally or by means of a letter inserted parenthetically in the source description. Reliability includes com- petence, objectivity, honesty, and other factors likely to affect the accuracy of the source's reports. The source evaluation is definitive in the sense that it reflects everything known about the source, including his previous record of reporting. If the report was received from one source through another, each is evaluated separately. The key follows: A: Completely reliable. B: Usually reliable. C: Fairly reliable. D: Not usually reliable. E: Not reliable (applied to sources of doubtful honesty or loyalty, regardless of their compe- tence). F: Reliability cannot be judged (applied to untested or insufficiently tested sources). Appraisal of Content.?A tentative opinion by the issuing office as to the probable truth of the report, expressed either verbally or by means of a number from 1 through 6. It is based on immediately available information which may or may not be complete, and does not purport to constitute final evaluation. The key follows: 1: Confirmed by other independent and reliable sources. 2: Probably true. 3: Possibly true. 4: Doubtful. 5: Probably false. 6: Cannot be judged. Documentary: Based on an original document which has been seen by a staff member of the issuing office. The appraisal of content is independent of the source evaluation. A "B" source may submit a "4" report; and "E" source may submit a "1" report. Reliable sources tend to produce accurate reports, and conversely a series of accurate reports tends to establish the reliability of the source, but there is no necessary correlation in any particular instance. RESTRICTED Security Information U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1953--O-2651B2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R01)n7nn9nn9n_n anvl Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 50X1 SECRET -2- 3. At 0700 hours on the morning of 31 May 1953 I received a telephone 50X1 te11in6 vie that effective at once all leaves ana passes oe solaiers were canceled. No reason was given for the order. At the time, only two soldiers out of 60 in the company were absent on passes. I was supposed to send them telegrams to return at once, but as I knew that they were not far away' and would return anyway that evening, I did not think it necessary to send the telegrams. I did not make any announcement of the order to the men, but planned instead only to tell individuals who asked for passes that the battalion had issued orders saying no one could leave for the time );)eing. 4. At 1100 hours I heard the news of the currency reform on the radio. Within five minutes of this broadcast, I received another telephone call from the battalion giving the contents of an Army order of the day about the currency reform. In the same call, the political Officer of the battalion also gave detailed instructions to the political officer in my unit, a non-commissioned officer, as to what he was to tell the soldiers about why the change was necessary. In addition, the officer stated that for the next few days, until further orders were given, SNB and militiamen would be making checks at night on the roads near the frontier. My unit had to be informed of this because border guard units usually have instructions to arrest anyone from outside the area found near the frontier, includ- ing members of the SNB and the militia. The order restricting passes remained in force for one week. 5. The issuance of orders forbidding absence from the units was a fairly common occurrence. Such an order was received a few hours after the news of STALIN's death was broadcast and was kept in effect Until four days after STALIN had been buried. The order issued after GOTTWALD died was in force until only one day after the funeral. The orders issued when STALIN and GOTTWALD died were applied as soon as received. Orders canceling passes before big holidays were always issued to PS units. They were issued about five days before the Christmas, New Year's, Easter and May Day holidays, to be put into force three days before the holiday and to stay in effect until a few days after the holiday, 6. 50X1 50X1 As far as I know, these orders restricting the liberty of the soldiers were the only ones received during the time Of the currency reform. 50:00 I was told by an acquaintance in a nearby village 50X1 Some weeks later, sometime. during the week of the currency reform the students from his school or class (60 in all) were sent to Ostrava to overawe the . local population. The acquaintance did not say how long he was in Ostrava or how many other soldiers were there, but he did say he had heard that other officer training school classes elsewhere had been called from their studies in the same way at this time. He said that: he did not see any disorder in Ostrava and that while it was there, his unit did nothing except march about under arms. 7. Apart from the restriction on absence from the camp area, Ldo not know or any special security arrangements in my unit at the time of the .currency reform. I was told by a civilian friend, however, thateen Monday, 1 June 1953, there was. a police check point between the airfield and Pilsen and that no one without special papers could pats this point. My friend was a driver for the state coal mines. His car as turned back. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 RESTRICTED Security Information WARNING.?Material on the reverse of this sheet may carry a classification of CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, or TOP SECRET. EXPLANATORY NOTE Date of Info.?The date or dates on which, or between which, the events described in the report occurred or the conditions described existed. Place Acquired.?The place where the information was first acquired by a controlled indi- vidual. A date following in parentheses indicates when the information was acquired. Source Description.?A description of the individual from whom, and, when pertinent, of any other individual through whom the information was received. Source Evaluation.?An indication of the reliability of a source, expressed either verbally or by means of a letter inserted parenthetically in the source description. Reliability includes com- petence, objectivity, honesty, and other factors likely to affect the accuracy of the source's reports. The source evaluation is definitive in the sense that it reflects everything known about the source, including his previous record of reporting. If the report was received from one source through another, each is evaluated separately. The key follows: A: Completely reliable. B: Usually reliable. C: Fairly reliable. D: Not usually reliable. E: Not reliable (applied to sources of doubtful honesty or loyalty, regardless of their compe- tence). F: Reliability cannot be judged (applied to untested or insufficiently tested sources). Appraisal of Content.?A tentative opinion by the issuing office as to the probable truth of the report, expressed either verbally or by means of a number from 1 through 6. It is based on immediately available information which may or may not be complete, and does not purport to constitute final evaluation. The key follows: 1: Confirmed by other independent and reliable sources. 2: Probably true. 3: Possibly true. 4: Doubtful. 5: Probably false. 6: Cannot be judged. Documentary: Based on an original document which has been seen by a staff member of the issuing office. The appraisal of content is independent of the source evaluation. A "B" source may submit a "4" report; and "E" source may submit a "1" report. Reliable sources tend to produce accurate reports, and conversely a series of accurate reports tends to establish the reliability of the source, but there is no necessary correlation in any particular instance. RESTRICTED Security Information U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1953-0- 265182 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R00070n7snn9n_n Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R0002002r5n0020-0 SECRET -.3- 8. About two weeks after the currency .reform, 50X1 One of the Men in the ward, a member of a Technical Labor Battalion (Ptebonmy technicky?prapor), had heard from a friend of his that at the beginning of the rioting in Eileen . the 'soldiers in one of the barracks in the city had been called into formation With their arms ne had been marched to the aceve of the riot and then, Without, any explanation being given, had immedistely been marched 'back to the barracks and confined to their quartets for the next-leW days The man in the hospital conjectured that the officer in charge of the troops must either have been given a last minute Order not to use the soldiers against the rioters have refused to USe.the'reoldiers in this way, or have decided that it was not safe to try to use the soldiers against the rioters. 9. After all the excitement had passed, I talked with a friend whose Judgement I respect about what might have been done against the COmmunists during the riots. We decided that three or four armed Czechs dressed in US uniforms and driving a jeep painted with US Army markings could have driven up to any military post in the area and, with no fighting at all, have brought practically every soldier 50X1 they met over to their side0 the jeep could have been driven directly up to the gate, where almost certainly the guards would have immediately gone over to the crew of the jeep as soon as they were identified as wearing US uniforms. The crew could then have driven on into the camp area and persuaded the rest of - the soldiers to join them. 50X1 10. 50X1 50X1 I did not hear anything about the Interior Guard (VS) doing anything during the rioting in Pilsen. I know that there was an Interior Guard unit at Pilsen, because sometime during July 1953 I went to the SkodaWorks at Pilsen to pick up some bottles of oxygen for the There were four or five members of the VS at the gate of the Skoda Works and there were a few more inside the courtyard. This was nothing new, however, as I also remember having seen members of the VS there early in the spring. 11. I do not recall just when I heard of the currency reform. I heard that orders had been issued canceling all passes and leaves while I was on guard duty Sunday evening, 31 May 1953. The only other special precaution taken in my unit that I remember was the arrange- 50X1 ment to double the guard during the hours of dark- ness, There were usually about 30 soldiers on guard duty around the field. For two or three days, the guard was increased to 60. The restriction on passes or leaves lasted for 14 days. 12. I do not remember when I heard that there were riots in Pilsen. The news of what was happening in Pilsen reached the soldiers from chauffeurs and others who had occasion during the day to drive offi- cers to and from the city. Soon after I learned about the riots (I do not remember how soon) I heard that the riots had been put down by the factory militia and by members of the border guard. There was a fair amount of excitement among the soldiers at what was happening in the city, but apparently the soldiers did not give any thought to what they might do themselves. The soldiers doing guard duty were issued their arms and ammunition in the usual way, and there did not seem to be any out-of-the-ordinary control of access to the weapons rooms in the barracks. 13. The soldiers were not particularly disturbed by the money reform. Most of the soldiers did not have any money before, and they did not have any after. The soldiers did not think the money reform affected them much one way or another. The most money any one sol- dier changed in my unit was 8,000 crowns. Soldiers with little or no money of their own changed money for their better-off comrades. SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0 RESTRICTED Security Information WARNING.?Material on the reverse of this sheet may carry a classification of CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, or TOP SECRET. EXPLANATORY NOTE Date of Info.?The date or dates on which, or between which, the events described in the report occurred or the conditions described existed. Place Acquired.--The place where the information was first acquired by a controlled indi- vidual. A date following in parentheses indicates when the information was acquired. Source Description.?A description of the individual from whom, and, when pertinent, of any other individual through whom the information was received. Source Evaluation.?An indication of the reliability of a source, expressed either verbally or by means of a letter inserted parenthetically in the source description. Reliability includes com- petence, objectivity, honesty, and other factors likely to affect the accuracy of the source's reports. The source evaluation is definitive in the sense that it reflects everything known about the source, including his previous record of reporting. If the report was received from one source through another, each is evaluated separately. The key follows: A: Completely reliable. B: Usually reliable. C: Fairly reliable. D: Not usually reliable. E: Not reliable (applied to sources of doubtful honesty or loyalty, regardless of their compe- tence). F: Reliability cannot be judged (applied to untested or insufficiently tested sources). Appraisal of Content.?A tentative opinion by the issuing office as to the probable truth of the report, expressed either verbally or by means of a number from 1 through 6. It is based on immediately available information which may or may not be complete, and does not purport to constitute final evaluation. The key follows: 1: Confirmed by other independent and reliable sources. 2: Probably true. 3: Possibly true. 4: Doubtful. 5: Probably false. 6: Cannot be judged. Documentary: Based on an original document which has been seen by a staff member of the issuing office. The appraisal of content is independent of the source evaluation. A "B" source may submit a "4" report; and "E" source may submit a "1" report. Reliable sources tend to produce accurate reports, and conversely a series of accurate reports tends to establish the reliability of the source, but there is no necessary correlation in any particular instance. RESTRICTED Security Information U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE .1953-0-285182 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release @ 50-Yr 2013/06/19: CIA-RDP82-00046R000200250020-0