A NEW LOW FOR CASTRO

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP64B00346R000200170001-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 13, 2004
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 25, 1961
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP64B00346R000200170001-5.pdf358.63 KB
Body: 
? X808 Approved For Release 2004/03/11 :CIA-RDP64 003468000200170001-5 CONGRESSIONAL .RECORD - PPENDIX When President Kennedy meets with So- viet Premier Khrushchev in Europe next month, he will be succumbing to the delu- sion whlch has bedazzled all his recent pred- ecessors---Ghat the only way to deal with the Russians is at the top. Axxd he will be defying the lessons of his- tory, ignoring the insulting treatment given President Eisenhower in Parts just a year ago, and reversing ttxe advice given by the Secretary of State, in a magazine artlcle pub- lished before the election. The President will be facing his formidable adversary in a p:xrticularly weak bargaining position. Since his lnatzguration, U.S. policy has experienced a series of humiliating set- backs-in Ctiba. in Laos and in the failure to reach agreement in the G' eneva talks on a nu- clear-test ban. Even though responsibility for these reversals may lie largely with the previous administration, the Kennedy record is unlikely to impress Khrushchev, to whom only action and results matter. Moreover. the Soviet positiotl'on the eve of a top-level meeting has never been stronger. Khrushchev possesses an absolute nuclear deterrent and massive, well-equipped con- ventional forces. Gagarin's orbital flight has demonstrated the Soviet lead in space. Laos has fallen into the dictator's lap, and his Cuban puppet has easily repelled a U.S.-sup- ported invasion attempt. Khrushchev and the Soviet press have never sounded more confident. O1Rcia1 circles in Washington suggest pri- vately that the purpose of the meeting is to permit the President to sound out Khru- shchev's intentions and to warn him that U.S. patience is not unlimited.. On the first count nothing is apt to be discovered that was not clearly spelled out in the manifesto of the 81 Communist parties which met in Moscow last December: active pursuit of the goal of world domination, avoidance of gen- eral war, support of "national liberation movements." ' It would be unrealistic to ex- pect Khrushchev to tip his hand on tactics or priorities. As for warnings, Khrushchev might be forgiven if he took them with a grain of salt, He will not have forgotten Kennedy's brave words about Laos. He will have no intention of taking any action which would constitute a pretext for nuclear war. But he will have no intention of failing to exploit any situa- tion which seems to offer a possibility for Communist gains-and the possibilities are many: Vietnam, South Korea, Iran, and the Congo, among others. A Soviet maneuver at Geneva indicates one line of preparation for the talks with Kenxtedy. The Soviet delegate threatened that the Soviet Union would resume nuclear testing, alleging that recent French tests in the Sahara were a subterfuge to provide in- formation for Britain and the United States. This is the old Soviet trick of raising the ante before a negotiation in order to prepare for a fallback to an already adva,need position. The U.S.S.R. has the basic nuclear weapons and does not have the American passion for refl.nement; hence it has no need to resume testing. But it wlll insist on a veto on in- spection, hoping to induce the United States to break off the talks and resume testing. Thus the President would be faced with the uxlhappy alternatives of continuing the fruitless negotiations with no prospect of agreement in the lace of strong internal pressures to terminate them, or of bringing them to an end and being blamed by world opinion for iailuie to resolve i;his issue. Collapse of the test-ban talks would make prospects bleak for progress~in arms control. Again the United States would be held re- sponsible. In these circumstances, critics are not wanting in Washington who question the advisability of holding talks at this time. Ori the demonstrable premise that the-only thing Moscow respects is strength, they sug- Mai ,25 gest that the United States should rather 1a~""'~ building up its military power and explorin, means for exploiting the major crack in the Communist armor-the dissatisfaction and will to freedom of the subject people of the Soviet empire, both in Eastern Europe and iu Asia. As .East Germany, Poland, and Hun- gary have already shoyvn, it is here that the most convinced freedom fighters will be found. once again that we are confronted with a tyrant similar to Hitler and not un- like the notorious? gangsters ~vho seek ransom for their hostages. Many citi- zens already have voiced their abhor- rence at dealing with this Cammtlni:st dictator. On May 2Q, 1961, the Emporia, Kans., Gazette; well known to many citizens of our Nation far its editorial excellence, characterized the Cuban dictator most appropriately in 'an editorial which speaks for itself: A NEW LOW FOR CASTRO In the latest episode of Mr, Castro's serial- ized program designed to make enemies and infuriate people, he has surpassed all previ- ous efforts to gain Yecognition for himself as one of history's most celebrated paranoiacs. The bearded Prime Minister, currently stxf- fering from delusions of both persecution and grandeur, has offered to exchange the prisoners captured during the recent abor- tive invasion of Ctxba for 500 bulldozers from the United States. This, indisputably, is a Castro first. Who else but a sick ham with a dirty beard could offer to eXChange human beings for earth- moving machines? The Castro government has claimed that more than 1,000 invaders were captured dur- ing the April 17 fighting, although the actual number probably is less. The fate of these captives, judging from, past Castro actions, is no less tenuous -than that of former Ba- tista officials after the fall ~of their govern- ment. Today, the captives are goods to Ue bar- tered for machinery. Tomorrow, only Castro knows what indignities await them. Still, in the end-and there will be an end for Castro-these prisoners may have accom- plashed mare as pawns in Castro's confused international politics than they could have as revolutlonary soldiers. .For even the most complacent free-world citizens cannot help but be shocked Uy the callous disregard for the dignity of humaxt life. In its awn right, Castro's action is even more repulsive thaxi the mass executions he ordered after assuming power. The fact that he could consider trading human beings for machines is thisgratesque. When the curtain falls on the last act of Castro's drawn-out tragicomedy, this regent action, along with the executions, must stand as evidence that his crimes were as inexcusable as any perpetrated by Hitler's lieutenants or Stalin's stooges.-G. L. DeB. A Deck Stacked Against Kennedy? EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF " HON. BRUCE ALDER OF TEXAS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, May 25, 1961 Mr. ALDER. Mr. Speaker, while many of us wait with anxious concern the outcome of the meeting between the President and the Soviet dictator, I rec- ommend careful attention to an analy- sis of the forthcgming meeting which appeared in the i1'.S. News & World Re- port, -issue of May 29, 1961: A DECK STACKID~ AGAINST KENNEDY? (The following analysis is by Francis B. Stevens, former Dfi'ector oP the Office of Eastern European Affairs, U.S. State Depart- ment, and now on the staff of U.S. News & World Report: ) The Panama Canal and United States- Panama Relations EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. ADAM C. POWELL OF NEW YORK IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, May 25, 1961 Mr. POWELL. Mr. Speaker, with the countries of Latin America aflame with discontent and unrest it behooves all of us to learn all we can about the living standards of the people south of us, their cultures and their national aspirations. One of these countries should be of par- ticular concern to every American be- cause of its geographic position at the crossroads of the world, and because of the most peculiar manner in which it is linked to our country. I refer to the Republic of Panama through whose lands we cut an inter- oceanic canal almost 50 years ago, join- ing the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. This engineering feat had defied man for several centuries and while it has brought great prestige to our country in a polit- ical, commercial and military sense, it is an accomplishments that established our relationship more securely with Latin America than we would like to admit. I have always maintained a close in- terest in the people and political develop- ment of that beautiful little country which I visited officially back in 1947 as chairman of a Special Investigating Committee of Education and Labor. At that time I prepared a detailed study for the Congress regarding the deplor- able working conditions of the West In- dians and other non-United States citi- zehs on the Canal Zone, and the dis- criminatory policies which our Govern- ment practiced against this lal?ge body of nonwhite workers. As many of my constituents in New York are originally from the Repullic of Panama I have watched with un- abated interest United States-Panama relations. I am pleased to note that certain fundamental changes have taken place on the Canal Zone in socioeconomic matters; but there are still areas of conflict between Panama and the United States. I do not think that these re- maining sore spots could be mare ob- jectively treated than in the two speech- es of Ambassador George W. Wester- man, Panama's U.N. delegate to the United Nations. Dr, Westerman has not only repre- sented his country at the United Nations in a superior way but he has traveled up and down these United States lec- turing before same of our most dis- tinguished forums on United States- Approved For Release 2004/03/11 :CIA-RDP64B00346R000200170001-5 Approved For Release 2004/03/11 :CIA-RDP64B00346R000200170001-5 196j CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -APPENDIX it be teacher, doctor, shoemaker, or druggist, we must support our country and the whole free world from communism. We cannot do .this without the help of every individual American. We need not only professional people, but all those willing to give them- selves in any service for the safety and wel- fare of our country and its people. We, the youth of this country, have to learn to respect and appreciate our American demflcracy today. Ii we do not, the defense of international freedom in the world of tomorrow has no chance of survival. Congressman Thomas B. Curtis Proposes Action To Meet Unemployment Problems EXTENSION 'OF REMARKS os HON. ROBERT P. GRIFFIN OF MICHIGAN IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, May 25, 1961 Mr. GRIFFIN. Mr. Speaker, the need to retrain and relocate workers who for various reasons have lost their jobs is a serious problem facing the Nation. One of our colleagues, the able gentleman from Missouri [Mr. CveTlsl, who is the senior House Republican on -the Joint Economic Committee and a member of the Ways and Means Committee, .has been very active in this field. For many months last year and this year, he has been busy compiling information and interviewing knowledgeable persons in an effort to provide. the Congress with constructive suggestions. Too often,. quite? thorough .legislative work is ,seldom given recognition in the hurry-lxp life we lead. For that reason, I was pleased to read a recent article con- cerning the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. CURTISI written by the noted labor editor of the North American Newspa- per Alliance, Martin Arundel. This article appeared on April 27, 1961, in the Louisville (Ky.) Times, the Charleston (W. Va.) Gazette and the New Haven (Conn.) Register, and in other papers throughout the. country. I also read with special interest an edi- torial in the Louisville Times, of May 2, 1961, t~cknowledging that our colleague from .Missouri [Mr. Cuxxls] is on .the right track, and that his novel approach is worthy of the closest study and con- sideraiton by the administration and the Congress. Mr. Speaker, I believe the newspaper items to which I have referred should be called to the attention of the Congress and) accordingly, they are set forth below [From the New Haven (Conn.) Register, Apr. 28, 1961 ] PROPOSAL WOVLD AID JOBLESS IN LEARNING MODERN SKILLS WASHINGTON.-Representative THOMAS B. CURTIS will soon introduce a bill that would tackle hard-core unemployment by en- cou4aging displaced workers to learn new skills. Right now, the Missouri Republican charged, 44 States in effect penalize Jobless workers who want to learn a new trade. They are deprived of unemployment benefits as soon as they enroll in a voca- tional or other kind pf school, he said in an interview. "in an area where no Jobe are to lie had," CoRTIS pointed out, "this means that the unemployed are- encouraged by the Govern- ment to sit back and do nothing in order to collect their weekly checks." Representative CURTI3 said his bill would do three things: 1. Teach new and needed skills to persons who lost their Jobs because of technological advances (automation); 2. Allow them to draw Jobless benefits for the duration of their retraining; .FUNDS TO RELOCATE 3. Provide funds for them to relocate in areas where their newly acquired skills are in demand. The legislation also would enlarge and bring up to date vocational and apprentice- slI}p training programs for young men and women. It would stress the technical skills required in the age of automation, Cvaxrs said he would propose that the - program be financed by Federal funds and that it be run by the States. "It will probably cost a lot more than the present program, but exactly how much I would not venture to estimate at tine pres- ent time," GvRTIS said. He added, "But in the long run it will be worth any cost, for it will help get rid of the technological un- employment problem and raise the produc- tivity growth of the Nation's economy to the yearly 4 to 5 percent desired increase." CIIRTI3 said his proposed legislation would. be in the form of an amendment to the unemployment compensation section of the Federal Social Security Act. He said he will introduce it as "soon as the technical legis- lative language is ironed out." C'i (7RTIa, in his sixth term, is the senior Republican member of the House Ways and Means subcommittee which handles unem- ployment compensation bills, and is the ranking Republican from the House on the Automation Subcommittee of the Joint Sen- ate-House Economic Committee. , DIFFERENT APPROACH The Missourian said his approach to the hard-care unemployment problem differed from the conventional one this way: "`The conventional approach assumes that large-scale unemployment is almost entirely due to ,economic downturns ,and that the idle will return to their Jobs as soon as business picks up. "My thinking based on an abundance of testimony by experts before congressional committees studying the "subject, is that heavy unemployment is due more to tech- nological advances in industrial production methods," he said. "This is particularly true in the age of automation," CURTIS continued. "A worker loses his Job in a recession and when the re- cession ends the work he formerly did is now being done by fewer men operating new and faster machines. That Is unemployment brought about by automation." PREPARE FOR NEW Under his proposed plan, the unemployed would take courses that would give them the know-how to perform new Jobs, often in the same company and sometimes 1n other in- dustries, Congressman (.'URTIS said. C:URTIS explained his program would re- quire detailed planning by Federal and State unemployment agencies, in conjunction with industry and unions. His proposal, for in- stance, would tail for the U.S. Department of Labor to overhaul substantially its present system of cataloging the scores of job skills. "There are many Job skills that the Labor Department has no record of, particularly in automated industries," CURTIS pointed out. [From the Louisville (xy.) Times of May 2, 1961] RECOVERY WON'T MEAN JOBS FOR EVERYBODY Business, so almost everyone is saying, is picking up. What is more, most of the eco- A3807 nomic experts believe tha"$ the upturn is stronger than the ordinary seasonal rise in business activity. They think that the bot- tom of the. recession has been reached and that a recovery is in progress that will carry the economy to new heights. They differ in their estimates of the strength and speed of the upturn, but they are virtually unani- m_ ous in their opinion that it is underway. Unfortunately, they are virtually unani- mous about something else. Almost without exception the economic experts and observ- ers fear that even when business has at- tained new peaks, a very substantial number of Americans will remain unemployed. A New York Times story early in Apr11 reported, "Most of the President's economic advisers are convinced that the country will enter 1962 with no significant drop in the present level of b.5 million Jobless workers: ' The tragic center of this problem lies in the amount of chronic unemployment, which continues to rise despite an overall trend of prosperity and increased production. Ac- cording to the National Planning Association, the number of chronically unemployed rose from about half a million in the third quar- ter of 1953 to nearly 2 million in the first quarter of 1961. Early in April, the number of persons who had been out of work for 15 weeks or more was nearly 1.9 million. Eight hundred thou- sand had been out of work far more than 6 months. Perhaps a third of these men and women are in the 45-to-64 age group, and in the context of our times that means they are older workers. Complicating, the problem for these people is that in the dec- ade of the sixties, they will- be competing for Jabs with millions of new workers, the begin- ning of the generation born since World War II. And the competition will be taking place in an era of economic change: of new tech- nology and automation, of economic advances abroad, of movement of industry to new loca- tions. The problem is vast and complex and we don't expect anyone to oiler quick, complete solutions. But Representative THOMAS Cvaxrs, a Missouri Republican, is at least taking a crack at it--and on what seem to be sensible lines. He plane to Introduce legislation that would encourage the Jobless to learn new skills. The legislation itself has not yet been written, but Cuaxrs says there are three things he wants his bill to do: first, teach new skills to those who lost their Jobs because of automation; second, let theril draw unemployment pay while learning (he says 44 States deprive workers of unemployment benefits as soon as they enroll in a school); third, provide Punds to let the workers relocate in areas where-their new skills are needed. Many workers, it is likely, would be un- willing or unable to learn new trades. Oth- ers would be unwilling to move to greener pastures. But others, the more imaginative, the more intelligent, would be helped. We hope Congress gives CuRTIS' proposals sym- pathetic study. EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. GARNER E. SHRIVER OF KANSAS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, May 25, 1961 Mr. SHRIVER. Mr. Speaker, the peoples of the world have been given a vivid example of the gangster tactics being used by the Communist regime of Castro in Cuba. Castro's offer to trade .Cuban prisoners for tractors reveals Approved For Release 2004/03/11 :CIA-RDP64B00346R000200170001-5