LETTER TO THE HONORABLE DANIEL K. INOUYE FROM GEORGE BUSH
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
33
Document Creation Date:
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 12, 2003
Sequence Number:
2
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 20, 1977
Content Type:
LETTER
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4.pdf | 1.69 MB |
Body:
Approved For- glease 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80MO016Q0, Qgf20 % 06
1". i;, 1 -4j ------ A--
ILLEGIB
2 0 JAN 1977
Sincerely,
sf George Bush
25X1
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
I E"Cudvo PWS.Istry
7~/
Thank you for your letters of November 29 and December 20, 1976,
received on 5 January 1977, acknowlec?rling our notification on releases
of funds from our Reserve for Contingencies.
we have now received Office of 1anagement and Budget approval for
the release of from the Reserve for Contingencies for funding
of the Presiden ialr inr, ing of December 3, 1976. Our notification to the
Committee of this fact is furnished in the interest of keeping the Committee
fully and currently informed with respect to withdrawals from the Reserve.
As you know, the notification and briefing process of the Committee
on operations requiring Presidential Findings under the Flughes-Ryan
Amendment and involving withdrawal from the Contingency Reserve are
overlapping. First, when a Finding is made the Co mittee is immediately
notified of that fact, the country involved and the amount and source of
funding required. Second, at the convenience of the Committee the
Director of Central Intelligence provides a more detailed report on the
scope and description of the operation. Finally, the Committee is notified
of the fact that the Office of Management and Budget has approved a
release from the Reserve for Contingencies and the amount approved.
I believe the procedures outlined, above assure that the Committee
is kept fully and currently informed on these matters and provide in a
timely fashion the information required by the Committee to fulfill its
responsibilities.
I would like to take this opportunity to note my observation that
Agency officers and members of your Committee and staff have a very close
and candid working relationship. I am confident that this kind of
cooperation will continue to the benefit of both the Agency and the Committee.
Crig dresses E
- rolved" 2elgasef 904102/ CIA-RDP80M001gA66&e6 i2006b4n i fished
Approved Fo el LkiZO I/UF/119.t R13PAOMM5A0906001.?MU-. ?__~
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505 C-
OLC 76-3315/b
Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D, C. 20510
In response to your letter of 11 November x.976 concerning the
propriety and consequences of CIA's liaison with foreign intelligence
services, I met with Bill Miller on 29 November 1976 to discuss how
the Agency might satisfy the Committee's needs in this highly sensitive
area. Mr. Miller elaborated on the Committee's interests, and I
agreed to provide the Committee a paper discussing the principal
questions of concern which he identified. Enclosed is a memorandum
covering these points.
I would be happy to discuss this matter with you further.
Sincerely,
E. H. Knoche
Acting Director
25X1
Downgraded to Unclassified
when separated from Enclosure
Distribution:
Orig - Adse
1 - Acting DCI 1 - OLC/Subj
I - ER 1 - OLC / Chrono
OLC/D:'F M/ksn 21 Jan 77
ryA wIA+*"
Approved For Releast
2004/02/19: C1A-RDP80 M 00165A000600120002-4
ILLEGIB
()U)TloZV
m
v~ :~ ."te"a ~ 2
25X1 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Next 4 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Approved For Release 20Q4/Q2/1$ CIA-RDP80M00165A0600120002-4
CI NTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
OLC 76-3315/b
1 JAN 11177
:>u vw 3'Claistry
I would be happy to discuss this matter wi.f:h you further.
Sincerely,
Honorable Daniel K,. Inouye, Chairman
Select Con-unittee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D. C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In response to your letter of 11 Novernber 1976 concerning the
propriety and consequences of CIA's liaison %,-,;h foreign intelligence
services, I met with Bill Miller on 29 November 19/6 to discuss how
the Agency Haight satisfy the Committee's needs in i{hiis highly ~.ens:~ti_ve
area. Mr. Miller elaborated on the Committee's interests, and I
agreed to provide the Committee a paper discussing the principal
questions of concern which he identified. Enclosed is a.na.emora.ndum
point:_:.
covering these
E. 11. Knoche
Acting Director
25X1
Enclosure
Downgraded to Unclassified _
when separated from Enclosure
Distribution:
Orig - Ads c
1 - Acting DCI 1 - OLC/Subj.
1-ER 1-OLC/Ctirono-
OLC/DI-M/ksn 21 Jan 77
Approved For Release
c, e
is ;'`, ,
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Next 11 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Approved For Rele
Approved For Rele
jqf~M.+AlI ?Y00 5A0006001200
- 4w
TO: ER
ROOM NO.
BUILDING
REMARKS:
FROM:
ROOM NO. BUI DI G T
se 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165 O0O66OO1200
I FORM NO 24 1 REPLACES FORM 36-8 FEB 55 WHICH MAY BE USED.
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 CIA-RDP80M00165A0UO600T2QDU2=41
ROOM NO. BUILDING EXTENSION
Approved Fbr ReleasFNwl Qq /19 :W ,M00165A00060012000214
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE 5/13/77
TO:
OLC/Sue
ROOM NO. BUILDING
REMARKS:
At your conveni
ence, please
check status of
this memo.
ER 77-6210
Thanks/
Sophie/ER
FROM:
Aaarov==ele a 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80M00165A0 0600120002-4
Mr. E. Henry Knoche
SELECT COMMITTEE OM INTELI.IGENCM
(!" YRsuAsr TO s. Rts, 4*. MTw ceetanC3s)
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20510
February 4, 1977
Acting Director of Central Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C, 20505
Questions have been raised recently in the press
conflict of interest provisions in the executive branch
to employees of United States intelligence agencies.
The Select Committee on Intelligence would very much
appreciate a description of the conflict of interest,
.provisions which apply to employees of intelligence
agencies tinder your cognizance and the differences, if
any, between these provisions and those applicable to
(see attached article) about the applicability of
'less sensitive government agencies!
Enclosure
laniel K. noUye
Chairman A
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Cni#e .~ a cz . iencxf e
UNCLA551FIE1-':CONFIDENTIAL: SECRET
Appfbg_ For R6IaHI4/02/:h RD 040 QOQ01~4
;. ~.- :''E CUTIV SE TABIAT. .;--
-
ACTION
'? INFO
.-'DATE
INITIAL
1
/DCI . a
X
~. mar= ,
2
A (ocI: i
- X
-~'
3
D/DCI/IC
X
4
DDS&T-
~~
.. = X
5
DDt
r
6
DDA
::
7
DDO.-4 `
8
D/
DCI/NI
(
,,
~~
10
LC
X
12
Compt
a t
13
D/Pium
M
14
D/5
15
DTIi
16
Asst/DCI
..X.
17
AO/DCI
18
C/IPS
19
20
21
22
DCI/ x5
D/EEO
x
25X1
4ppr,oved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A0006001-20002-4'
f
, Routing Slip
UNCLASSIFIED IFIDENTIAL
ApprovedFor Release 04!0211 - PBDMOOi6571
201 D/EEO
25X1
25X1 Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
DANIEL K, U E f#AWL11J,aCJ,R,htlli~. se 2004/02/19 :I 80M01,~
JAKE Fi~J1YtS7a`{~I,/t
_C; A~R k1
OIRCH BAYH, IND. CLIFFORD P. CASE, J,
ADLAI E. STEVENSON, ILL. STROM THURMOND, S.C.
WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY. MAINE MARK O. HATFIELD, OREG.
WALTER D. HUDDLESTON. KY. BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DEL. ROBERT T. STAFPORD. VT.
ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD.
GARY HART, COLO.
TOP SECRET
' J CnUeb %fafez, .. enctf e
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
(PURSUANT TO S. RES. 400. IIITH CONGRESS)
WASHINGTON, D.G. 20510
February 25, 1977
IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO R#6614
Adm. Stansfield Turner
Director of Central Intelligence Designate
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C. 20505
I have received the November 30 letter of Mr. Cary
indicating the opposition of the CIA to the release to
Ambassador Edward M. Korry of his executive session
testimony of February 24, 1976 before the Senate Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect
to Intelligence Activities.
It is my intention to raise the question of providing
Mr. Korry with a copy of his testimony with the full Select
Committee on Intelligence. For this purpose I would like
to have your objections to specific portions of the testi-
mony, release of which you believe would jeopardize
national security or intelligence sources and methods.
25X1
The Select Committee staff has reviewed the Korry
transcript and marked certain portions for deletion. Among
these are those portions suggested by the CIA in a letter
to Senator Church of March 31, 1976. The staff has also
marked certain language related to 25X1
25X1
which apparently was overlooked in t He Agency's initial
revi e staff marked for deletion the names
of I Iwhen it appeared that Ambassador Korry
himse wis e to have these people protected.
Approved Fob- " Release
TOP SECRET
C~Opy r15
00 /0 /'!9 (A; 1 1q 0165A000601J12
Approved For RqWAiW2b04/0fft%"
TOP SECRET
Adm. Stansfield Turner
February 25, 1977
Page 2
I am providin& you again with a copy of the transcript
and with a copy of the deletions discussed above so that
the Agency will have every opportunity to express its views
as to the release of the transcript or any portions of
the transcript. I hope, however, that you will attempt to
be as specific as possible in your comments. The Committee's
release of his transcript to Ambassador Korry would not
constitute an endorsement of his testimony, but it would
raise the possibility that the transcript would be read by
persons not cleared for access to classified material. I
am concerned, therefore, that specific facts not now
publicly known, release of which is likely-to be substan-
tially harmful to the national security or to the personal
security of any person, should be deleted from the trans-
cript prior to its release. I would appreciate your
assistance.
Enclosures
TOP SECRET
Approved F- Refea100i4Q2l~ PNQ0165A000600120002-4
UNCLASSIFIED when b 4 GQ dS?br ReJhasetf210 k/Q~/i~p: # t Bi~MO@46 ~~Qtl~Oi~AI^ or declassi-
fied when filled in form is detached fro'lKcontrolled document.
CONTROL AND COVER SHEET FOR TOP SECRET DOCUMENT
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION REGISTRY
SOURCE CIA CONTROL NO.
g
DOC. NO. DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED
DOC. DATE S o 77 ' i.__._
COPY NO. 90/ '. LOGGED BY
NUMBER OF PAGE tft"t #. 'E4ti*71i1~
NUMBER O~F9 ATTACHMENTS
ATTENTION: This form will be placed on top of and attached to each Top Secret document received by the Central Intelligence Agency
or classified Top Secret within the CIA and will remain attached to the document until such time as it is downgraded, destroyed, or
transmitted outside of CIA. Access to Top Secret matter is limited to Top Secret Control personnel and those individuals whose official
duties relate to the matter. Top Secret Control Officers who receive and/or release the attached Top Secret material will sign this form
and indicate period of custody in the left-hand columns provided. Each individual who sees the Top Secret document will sign and
indicate the date of handling in the right-hand columns.
REFERRED TO
RECEIVED
RELEASED
SEEN BY
OFFICE
SIGNATURE
DATE
TIME
DATE
TIME
SIGNATURE
OFFICE/DIV.
DATE
25X1
NOTICE OF DETACHMENT: When this form is detached from Top Secret material it shall be completed in the appropriate spaces below
and transmitted to Central Top Secret Control for record.
DOWNGRADED DESTROYED DISPATCHED (OUTSIDE CIA)
TO BY (Signature) TO
BY (Signature) WITNESSED BY (Signature) BY (Signature)
OFFICE q ?o IFSved For e?lease 2004/02/19: CI ~tII5P80M00 A&0600120002-4 DATE
TOP SECRET
FORM 26 u8E PREVIOUS EDITIONS. TOP SECRET (40)
6-73
Approved For Rase 2004/02/19: CIA-RDP80M001654W06
THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505
Office of Legislative Counsel
OLC 76-3246/a
3 0 NOV 1976
Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D. C. 20510`
-C 39,E
This is in response to your request of 5 November 1976 for
the position of this Agency on the release to former Ambassador
Korry of his 24 February 1976 testimony before the Senate Select
Committee on Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence
Activities. As your letter indicates, in April of this year CIA
objected to release of any part of this testimony to former Ambassador
Korry. Our position has not changed. Release to former Ambassador
Korry is equivalent to public release. This Agency has consistently
opposed the public release and discussion of sensitive intelligence
operations, such as the program discussed in considerable detail in
this testimony. This position is consistent with the responsibility of
the Director of Central Intelligence to protect intelligence sources and
methods t ruin unauthorized disclosure and the view of this Agency that.
public discussion of such activities simply is contrary to the interests
of the Goveernment.
Sincerely,
George L. Cary
Legislative Counsel
Distribution:
Orig - Adse
1 - A/DDCI
1 - Mr. Elder, Ex. Sec. CFI
1 - OLC/Subj
P4-'- OLC / Chrono
OLC/DFMVM/ksn (23 Nov 76
Retyped: (29 Nov 76)
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4
ve F~ a 2c~641 211 !'CIA' SECR_T 20002-4
w
Routing Slip
8 D/DCI/Nl
9 GC /o encl
10 LC X
11 IG
12 Comet
c
o enc
w
2 1DDCI X w /o encl
3 D/DCI/IC
4 DDS&T
F 5 DDI
6 DDA
DDO . X o enc1
17 AO/DCI
18 C/IPS
DCI/SS
19
20 D/EEO
21
.22
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
ACTION INFO DATE
Please develop DCI response.
Approved :For Release 2004/02/19 `: C-IA-RDP8OM00y 002-4
l
l
25X1
ate
D
3637 (7-76)
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : IC A-RDP8PM00165A000600120002-4
25X1
pproved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RD, P. NO
FORM IOI EDITIONS PREVIOUS
00120002-4
Approved F0s?.
UNCLASSIFIED
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
Routing Slip
ACTION
1
L11
L
6
Ll
7
10 LC ` r ~? cases
11 IG
9 C.
8
1131 'D/Pens a
12 ccmpt ~~~
16 Asst/DCI
H ~~ D/EEO
21
17 MDCIISS i8 19
FJEEV4EJ
22
SU
SPENSE
Remarks:
cM'77
ADDroved For Release 2004/02/19: CFA-RDP80M001'
?l e'cleei~~~ respanse.
viarca 197,
25X1
Approved For Rely Dk4iSIK - I~14 LP80MOO165AO0000600
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
2 4 F
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
i ec th' RP.'
With reference to your letter of 14 February, enclosing
a Manchester Guardian article speculating as to the-possibility
of CIA involvement in the building of new airfiel?ds in Rhodesia:
I wish to assure you that no covert U.S. assistance is being
provided to Mr. Ian Smith for the building of airfields or for
any other purpose, and there is no basis for Mr. Smith to
anticipate any such assistance. We have had intelligence reports
of Rhodesian construction at eight airfields over the past year.
Sincerely,
E. H. Knoche
Acting Director
Distribution:
Original - addressee
1 - Acting DCI
1 - Asst/DCI
E R
1 - OLC Su sect
1 - OLC Chrono
1 -- OLC/C&R/Chrono
OLC/C&RII hvm (typed 18 February 1977)
Retyped:O/ADCI:skm (24 Feb 1977).- 'I
25X1
Approved For Release ~~Ifq:?t ltj5:lqzrpprMO0165tOOO6OOl2OOO2-4
>V6~~11~71 ?? .Yr?YN~4 ~. A: !,n ~~"~??A. v4 _.~j.Y-~~.t?~ Y:Jr~`~'?.-? . _ .. ..-
4r ''.; xirl?#iv.l tir_Rel aie.2004/0 1%: CIA-RDP80M00165AQ006Ob1200132-4
to Jn~3s1C~ : ~Z t -. p.
for /!~ tai ~4 TyR?il*`'
:: ;: -- - ? ?~~ ~? ~??~ impiement the Kissinger agreement that if Mr Smith does contemplate the
? ?. new British conference terms was the unilaterally with so-called, African unthinkable and go back on hiy rejec-
1; genuine surprise with whtch'Mr Ivor 'moderates. What does matter is how tion;'they might ponder the incredible
Richard.reacted to the demolitiiin' of South Af
a
i
r
c
reacts to such md Afic' fi
oves, anrasirst whte military coup,
his hopesf for an,'early:returnto on the dour face of Mr John Vorster 'Whither Rhodesia? The Govern,
Geneva- there is = in Rhodesian eyes the _ment remains in a precarious pasibon.
There are cynics in Salisbury who silent smile of assent
The security forces are stretched tight
-? feel thaf"the conference' chairman ': B
a ~__.t _ .
e
Sith
,m his - -' of C'P "'??p- looking for covert American assistance
Jl~ pointment to increase the burden of -
Britain's envoy to the United Nations. things. thq way of the Central
haulm went four wear? mnnatm Intelligence Agency. After all, white
r,
secondment to the Rhodesia con- ratio is oir unism not
ference, was genuinely saddened and fighting atio co a hurt by ivhat he rp,.ar,1a. tl 6 GIIft s . but he probably soon on will l be), and who
another settlement saga,. "11"1 1719 rnose lour new undeniably
Mr Richard was truly convinced strategic airfields that have emerged in
-that the Rhodesian leader would, convinced ,the bush recently? If journalists ask in
ur Salisbury these days about the air-
the end of "11-of the best years of
o
, fields, officials tend to gaze fixidly at
lives, " gracefully bow to the historic ;.7 _ _ , ?
recalcitrant cousin whose-rebellious ?'-' -F_ between the majority and the
v
my a massive chap a of heart by
ganisa on o "The past is another country, The
_tion in the world and he is going to African Unity will accept what they "things differently there." ' ?' ? f ??
stick. to.: it. More importantly, the see a3 .a half-way settlernent.'r..'
Rhodesian security forcess will fight for
g r so cop-i Richard may reflect on i.. P. Hartley's
forced settlement terms,.. then Nlr veniently provided, and there is limp= words, which were not written en about,
-Smith certainly did. He made an ly no way that most Rhodesian
ab
agreement with the most powerful na- nationalists or the Or f f Rhodesia but might well have been,
?
refused the comforts of the fold. Mr Smith sees no salvation in the -. The an with whom Mr Smith in-
Buried deep in the Foreign Office surrender of white power and privilege, tends to conduct this exercise, Bishop
files must be, a scribbled memoran- t' However, such realities did come as Abel Muzorewa, has resisted all bian-ments dum from a departing mandarin who a surprise to Mr Richard, who was government. to hold any talks with the
raked against the lunacy of such perhaps a little too forthright for the find t n-the end, the
diplomacy towards the rebel regime. Foreign Office's taste in recognising the Bishop may find that he needs Mr
Nothing would or will force Mr Smith, :end of the road when he came to it.:' Smith as much as the Prime Minister
his Cabinet, his white electorate and Although Whitehall seems to be ur' _ needs him.,.,; ,;_.. i rd "
the arm to accept pnfettered African ` ins g We have never closed the door, It is
y a the battered British conference , Wilson.who has been doing that for the
rule except for morale-busting team into further negotiations with Mr '.last four months." Mr Smith said that
.pressure of the kind that can break a Vorster, the Geneva conference cannot on March 27,1966. Substitute Richard
government's will- to. resist its- own 'be resumed with' the "reasonable -,for Wilson and exactly the same words
destruction; #t,-' b P
; rosPects for success" which the
characterise the Government's as
The pressure was there.: last Foreign Secretary requires for second- titude to the constitutional issue. It is
.September, applied by South. Africa stage talks in Switzerland. The Rhode- always somebody else's fault. Nothing
and America, but if Dr Kissinger did. sain Government has nailed its colours changes. Both Mr Wilson and Mr
not see the gaping loopholes in his en- to the mast which Dr Kissin e
,
e
y
?`"'""p ? Minister that happiness was a hand- - power- transferri reason laced with dire threats of pain- ng, transitional
behaviour could, and would. be tamed
-- -- ,s, vursla s militarr - - - '??~ `~+ A.LA ~/ 1~J
` . !1. r. 3:,iS9 -53:cn?i;,- r7 '5 lr:2C,C, r t: :?i.:` n? , ~?ri.:, _ . r, y - ? .-, . ?. .
dG
` -' '''' ?, :~a, : rio3t o '~Ret 2flQ4fO ~19~*~ 4At= R8o d?11~6k~?@ot~fl i oi~U$ shin
r::_._~%s.__..zy t c' ?,: ai _ ?f_ -- -taken-1h e~natiQn-b.v_storm
tsecause, as Mr Richard pointed out at
Geneva, several times, no reasonable
among the regular forces, but
elsewhere morale varies from the
!"shoot it out to the last cartridge" can-
didates to the young married couples
with small children' who are openly- =
fearful of the future, It is the question
of morale, rather than, of military
defeat, that most. concerns the
authorities:
The emigration rate, totallinga net
Ions pf 6,000 Rhodesians last year, can
only'get worse. In the industrial and
:_ .
commercial sectors confid
ence
th
ss
emselves
""
think? Who else?" - - " -- `
caught between fear of radical
None of this will corneas a surprise ' nationalist rule and a future without
-
to such African leaders as President an, internationally recognised settle.,
-white minority. to unending warfare
with guerrillas representing a restless, Nyerere of Tanzania who have long - menu.? :. ?..
-rebellious majority,,',:-r? -looked on in appalled silence -as Mr Smith is therefore expected to
This was.a miscalculation as fatal as successive British envoys trailed out to move with reasonable speed to meet at
Britain's. persistent misreading, of Salisbury to tell the Rhodesian Prime least . some requirements of the
politician could commit a dispirited
white politics in Rhodesia. From the
r
' racial; discrimination (but not, one
moment that a cold-ridden Mr Smith
huskily declared UDI at-1.15 pm on tl~/'.)ames MacMenus``, notes, the most contentious eon.
November 11. 1965, he was treated by .. - . blatantly requirement to abolish the
the British Government as a in $aliSbu '-- - . blatantly unfair. division of land
:a power-sharing
and ultimat
l
Approved For Ruse 2004/OF I [ I tM00165AQW60
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D. C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
ocv v. .ga~Vy
o your letter of 14 February,
enclosing a Manchester Guard article speculating as to
the possibility of CIA invo vement in the building of new
airfields in Rhodesia: ish to assure you that no covert
U. S. assistance is be ''g provided to Mr. Ian Smith for the
building of airfield, or for any other purpose, and there is
no basis for Mr Smith to anticipate any such assistance. We
have had inte igence reports of Rhodesian construction at
eight airf ire ds over the past year.
Sincerely,
. H. Knoche
Acting Director
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/02/19 : CIA-RDP80M00165A000600120002-4`7>>s 196"
^ UNCLASSIFIA~ Q It "4AL ~ & LJ SECRET
roveC r RIBWbY2004/02/19: CIA-RD M 20002-4
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Manchester"Guardian article
FROM:
EXTENSION NO.
ST
OLC
6
ATE
A
TO. (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
OFFICER'S
COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
INITIALS
to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
RECEIVED
FORWARDED
1.
Acting DCI
2.
t f
4.
LL 2. ys.~
5.
6.
9.
10.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Approved For Rel
ase 200
4/02/19 :
IA-RDP
OM00165A000600120002-4
FORM
3-62
61 0 USEDE Sug ^ SECRET F-1 CONFIDENTIAL ^ UINTERNAL
SE ONLY ^ UNCLASSIFIED
T
HOWARDIEL C. INO J ., E W Ie44 or lease 2004/
BIRC7, DA", IND. CLIFFORD P. CASE, NJ.
AOLM E. STEVENSON, JR., ILL STROM THURMOND, S.C.
WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, MAINE MARK O. HATFIELD, ORES.
WALTER D. HUDOLESTON, KY. BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.
JOSEPH R. BIDER, JR., DEL ROBERT T. STAFFORD, VT.
ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. JAKE GARN. UTAH
GARY HART, COLO. '
MIKE MANSFIELD. MONT., EX OFFICIO
HUGH SCOTT, PA.. EX OFFICIO
WILLIAM G. MILLER. STAFF DIRECTOR
HOWARD S. LIERENGOOD, MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR
MICHAEL J. MADIGAN, MINORITY COUNSEL
'J Gnzf eb Zf cxfez #encif e
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
(PURSUANT TO B. RES. 400, 11TH CONGRESS)
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510
January 11, 1977
IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO P.# 6136
25X1
25X1
The Horiorable George Bush
Director of'Central Intelligence
Washington, D. C.
Dear George:
As you know, the Budget. Subcommittee of.the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence will begin
the formal budget authorization process toward the
end of January. In anticipation of these delibera-
tions, the Subcommittee felt it would be to our mutual
benefit if the Intelligence Community was advised' 'of
our expectations in this regard.
The Subcommittee would like to initiate the pro-
cess with the DCI presenting two substantive brief-
ings in late January. The first should be a_ broad
intelligence appraisal of the activities of foreign
states which impact on our national security. In
particular, the presentation should emphasize
significant developments in foreign nation activities
in the past year, areas of 'special concern to U. S.
national security-in/the future, and how ?intelli-'
gence can and cannot contribute to these areas.
The second briefing should present a general appraisal
of the state of U. S. intelligence. Emphasis here
should be focused on major substantive issues facing
intelligence planning and current management --- such
as: gaps and limitations in intelligence support to
decisionmakers; the changes in foreign developments
and U. S. decisionmaker needs which are or will impose
new demands on intelligence; current and projected
intelligence capabilities; and the implications of
25X1
Approved ForteIease 2004/02/19: R 001
The Honorable George Bush.
January 11, 1977
Page two
these factors for tUie or?gaura.zati.on, personnel, ' campbs-
iti an, technolog: cal. invesi me:nt. and performance of
U. S. intelligence in th.e raid.-:. (five year) and long-
term (ten to fifteen year
These sessions will ?, _ followed by a ser~.es of
budget hearings with apprupr ia.te in tell.:.F once corrmmun
ity officials beginning in early to mid.-February.. It
is requested that the, DC