WILL SENATE FIGHT?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000200310061-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 3, 1999
Sequence Number: 
61
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 1, 1963
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000200310061-2.pdf234.55 KB
Body: 
San iti ZA~A 4i J. ttp~WAtb w?bi, U "blcAer i ne?; IN r:wbr^*Ficit is an institution developed, by mo let`n civi lsaflon to present the nwsi:thedai~.;t to inform and lea b fb op nlori 4 , z~ and to furnth rGhaf epon..'," governnieirte which v 941 titutloa has ever baen able provides; tar -THE TR $UNE CREDO WILL SENATE FIGHT? The state department has shown its contempt for the prerogatives of the Sen- ate and its indifference to security risks within its own ranks by dismissing its chief security evaluations officer. It did so in the face of a direct.warning carried by a member of the Senate internal secu- rity subcommittee to Secretary of State. Rusk. The victim of the purge, Otto F. Otepka, is a veteran of 27 years of government service. For the last 10 he has been the department employes. So well and effi- Chairrnan~astlanil of the subcommittee ous service award. ka by every means at my cut rnand h t compla i But, as Sen. Dodd of Connecticut has against accusations whic ' `" askdde, said, in the topsy-turvy world of the state effect, that he told the truth whe.}n~ J._ L... CnnnFn c. ,.~1MfNM.f.dOiY?, nepartment, the idea ut to: caI.cn use cop and not the culprit. So' charges were There can be no doubt'; that k jsG gaged in conduct unbecoming a diplomatic ministration to conduct a purge of.;ptribta . officer-namely, in collaborating with the The subcommittee feels that the often mts-t; Senate security, subcommittee. He was used doctrine of executive privilege cant' accused of'having disclosed secret depart- be claimed only by the President, '-not by ment documents to-senators. any burocrat who feels like thwarting wili r s'` a p es te In the department it was said that Otep gress. We trust that the Sen ka "is out of step with the times." A this central point, for if it lets theissue.g o,..' h by default, Congress will soon find itsdif it "W rk d k e are not w c esman rema , spo e hunting any more. We have no security hamstrung by the burocracy In looking risks, and he knows it." The Senate sub- into any facet of public business whatso- , ever. It would be salutary if it Invoked:its f ti i itt a ti i 0 k sm. s c ees re c on s 411 o ep comm _ powers to punish for contempt. to picture Castro as the "liberator" of Cuba and not as a Communist hardly per- efforts to safeguard Mr. Otepka's-career. thru avenues of appeal whiei, ultimately: in th thi ki k t th ' h d i n y ere s no ng a suade t t e permit reviews of his case by Secretary department, Rusk and President Kennedy. We have no valuate the in to i b t It h een ry g nce e as s great faith that there will be sympathy for security practices, or lack of them, in the. department. Itwas hampered by a depart- Mr. Otepka in any of these quarters, for meat order, Issued under the cloak of it is obvious the administration was out, . "executive privilege," directing that state to get him, and did. These are the kind department officials remain away from the of rewards a lcyal American can expect subcommittee and give it no information. from a crowd which pn always find ex- d with the sub cuses for Khrushchev, or Tito, but none erat l coo f Ate ree y p e for a vigorous anti-Communist. committee. Sanitized - Approved For Release : CIA-RDP7-5-00149R00020031`0061-2