(Sanitized)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 124
• Document Creation Date: December 15, 2016
• Document Release Date: March 9, 2004
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: January 14, 1953
• Content Type: NOTES

Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
State Dept. review completed
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 25X1
k Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-Q 0059A000100030001-6 N%Mdl
S-E-C-R-E-T
IA.C-D
7 August 1951
DATA ON EUROPEAN INDUSTRY
On 3 May 1951 the IAC approved the proposal in IAC-D-19
to take steps to preserve data on European industry. The
attached paper reports the action which has been taken in
this matter.
JAMES Q. REBER
Secretary
Intelligence Advisory Committee
S-E-C.-R-E-T
IAC-D-19 1
7 August 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
~.. ~" S-E-C-R-E-T
IA CD-19 1
7 August 1151
DATA ON EUROPEAN INDUSTRY
25X1
25X1
1, Tbp v authorized by the IAC on 3 May 1951 was carried.
out byl f the Industrial. Register between 8 May
and 19 June, 1951.
3. Findings of the Survey: The following are the outstanding
items:
a. Unique industrial and biographic data exist in very
great quantity many different stations under jurisdiction
of the IAC agencies and the ECA. These should be carefully
screened by competent specialists, and those of greatest
importance should be microfilmed for IAC use in Washington.
b. Unclassified publications of great importance to
economic research are to be found in any stations, ,hough
not available in Washington. They include such items as manu-
facturers' catalogs, trade directories, and local publications.
Many are readily procurable through open channels overseas.
They should. be carefully screened, and direct procurement of
the important items should be undertaken.
c. U.S. officials overseas feel even more keenly than those
in Washington the need for a coordinated effort to bring together,
safeguard, and analyze the industrial and biographic data in their
custody.
25X1 4, CIA has equipped, and staffed a Microfilm Team for this purpose
under the leadership of 11 ill depart for Europe
25X1 on or about 13 August 195 to be followed in a week or zen days by
the members of the team.
25X1
S-E-C- i-E-T
IAC-D-19 1
7 August 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
25X1
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 25X1
L Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Next 1 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Next 5 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 25X1 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Next 2 Page(s) In Document Exempt
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
Security Information
IAC -D -67
18 February 1953
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
1. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the report (Tab A) of the
scientific panel convened as a result of the action taken by the
Intelligence Advisory Committee on 4 December (IAC-M-90, paragraph
3A) on this subject. Attached to the report are a summary of evi-
dence presented (Tab B) and a list of the personnel participating
(Tab C).
2. It is proposed to transmit copies of this report to the
Secretary of Defense; the Director, Federal Civil Defense Adminis-
tration; and the Chairman, National Security Resources Board for
their information and such action as-they may feel necessary.
3. The results of the panel's studies have moved CIA to conclude
that no National Security Council Intelligence Directive on this sub-
ject is warranted.
4. Please inform the undersigned by 25 February 1953 if you do
not concur in the action and conclusions contained in paragraphs 2
and 3, above.
JAMES Q. REBER
Secretary
S -E -C -R -E -T
IAC--D-67
18 February 1953
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Re(0'4/'ikDP67-00059A000100030001-6
TAB A
REPORT OF SCIENTIFI PANEL
ON
UNIDENT'IED FLYING O I J CTS
1v shan't to the regrist of the Assistant Director for Scientific
Intelligence, they' undersigned ?'enel of Scientific Consultants has met to
evaluate aay possible threat t) national security posed by Unidentified
Flying Objects l,.ying e and to make re com ndatio ns thereon
The Panel b.as
gence ages.
":,red the tierce' as presented by cognizant intel.l.i-
? .-,,,' -riI,y the - it Tech! ... gal Intelligence Center, and has
reviewed a ;, lieation f the b~ t documented i.nei ents
a, .es u1t of its ; nsideration s, the panel concludes:
p?resented on U ni.dentif'ied. ling
ett; sho ki no i. ndi.cat?? .an that these phenomena constitute
t to national seeur: ty.
We fi.r .y'
phenct na
e s: d;;tribute.&:' :Le to foreign artifacts capable of hostile
acts, and t hrst. t .ere Y.s no ev ,fence that the phenouen?. indicate a need
fcar the reb iijiOn o:?.' current at, tentific concepts
3
lieve that there ; .3 no residuum of cases which indicates
Tine Panei, rtwther c ac 31 a
au That the eonti4 ued emphasis on the reporting of
these pp:;enooezaa does, in i hese parlous ti o, result in a
threat to the orderly fun:, -tioning of the protective organs
of the body politic y
We cite as a plea the clogg. ag of channels of n. unication by irrelevant
reports, the danger of being .:, eat 'by continued. false alarms to ignore real
;;ECK T
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004ft26:EPA-DP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Security 3nforaticn
indications of hostile action, and the _ultivation of a morbid national.
psychology in which skillful hostile propaganda could induce hysterical
behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority.
4. In order most effectively to strengthen the national facilities
for the timely recognition and the appropriate handling of true indications
of hostile action, and to minimize the concomitant dangers alluded to
above, the Panel recommends:
a. That the national security agencies take immediate steps
to strip the Unidentified Flying Cbjects of the special status they
have been given and the aura of mystery they have unfortunately
acquired;
b. That the national security agencies institute policies
on intelligence, training, and public education designed to prepare
the material defenses and the morale of the country to recognize
most promptly and to react most effectively to true indications
of hostile intent or action.
We suggest that these aims may be achieved by an integrated program
designed to reassure the public of the total lads of evidence of inimical
forces behind the phenomena, to train w~ersonnel to recognize and reject
false indications quickly and effectively, and to strengthen regular
channels for the evaluation of and pros-apt reaction to true indications
of hostile measures.
Ligy'd V. Berkner
Associated Universities, Inc.
. P. Robertson , Chairm.n. BrookhS. A. Goudsmit
s 6jaInstituOfTeCth010&Y
aven National lab ories
s Luis W. Alvsre
University or fornia /Thornton Pa!e
Johns Hopki.na University
Approved For Release 2004/06/245 C&IF I96T-00059AO00100030001-6
-2-
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET TAB B
Security Information
SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANFZ ON
UNtDII4TIFTED FLYING OBJICTS
14 ?? 17 January 1953
K2=3 WED
1, Sewentybfive case histories of sightings 1951 - 1952 (selected by
ATIC as those best documented).
ATTC Status and Progress Reports of Prof t GW E and Project
SUE HOOK (code names for ATIC study of subject)
3. Progress Reports of Project STORK (code acme for Battelle
Institute contract work supporting ATIC).
4. gory Report of Sightings at Balloman Air Force Base, New Mexico.
5. Report of USAF Research 'Center, Cambridge, Mass., Investigation of
00reen Fireball" Phmomena (Project T,iD. I E) .
6. Outline of Investigation of U.F.O.?a Proposed by Kirtland Air Force
Base (Project POUNCE).
7. Motion picture Films of sightings at Tremonton, Utah, 2 July 1952
and Great Pills, Montana, August 1950.
8. spy Report of $9 selected cases of sightings of various
categories (Formations, Blinking Lights, Havering, etc.).
9. Draft of manuals "How to make a FL!OBRPT", prepared at ATIC.
10. Chart Showing Plot of Geographic Location of Unexplained Sightings
in the United States during 1952.
11. Chart Showing Balloon launching Sites in the United States.
12? Charts Showing Selected Actual Balloon Flight Paths and Relation
to Reported Sightings.
13. Charts Showing Frequency of Reports of Sightings, 190 a- 19520
1k. Charts Showing Categories Ikplanatione, of Sightings.
15. Xodachrome Transparencies of Polyethylene Film Balloons in Bright
Sunlight Showing High Reflectivity.
SECRET
Approved For Release 20111~4 -;4NW6*0059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 200,'09/944c ATRDP67-00059A000100030001-6
Security Information
TAB B
16. Motion picture of eeagulle to bright wunlight showing high reflectivity's
t7? Inte111gearee Reports Relating to U.S.S.R, Interest in U. S. Sightings.
38. Samples of Official USA Reporting Forms and Copies of Pertinent
Aar Foe, Armor and Navy Ordsra Relating to Subject,
3.9. Simopas Pol hhylene "Pin ' Balloon (54 inches square).
20. 5Veriations In Rader Corm g&' JARP 201 (Manuea illustrating unusual
operating char oteeriet toe of Service radar).
21. laeoelleneoas official letters and foreign intelligernoe reports
dealing with subject.
22. Oepies of popular Published vorka dealing with subject (articles
in peariodioale,, newspaper clippings and books),
Approved For Releases i 4d MW-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release Ar4i 6&*: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Security Information
SCIJ VTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL ON
UNIDII'iTIFIED PLYIIG OBJ 7CTS
14 .. 17 January 1953
MWERS
GANIZATYQN
Dr. U. P. Robertson (Chairmsn) Califormu Institute
of Technology
Dr. Iuia W. Alvares University of
Cal;ifa
Dr. Lloyd V. Berkner Associated Univer-
mities, Ism.
Dr. Samuel Goudsmit Brookhaven National
&abgratories
Dr. Thornton Page Office of Research
Operations, Johns
Hop Uaivoraity
Dr. J. Allen Hynek Ohio State Univer-
sity
Mr. Frederick C. Durant Arthur D. I&ttle,
Inc.
Brig. Gen. William M. Garland Corr ng General,
AT
Dr. H. Marshall Chadwell Assistant Director,
0/SI, CIA
Mir. Ralph L. Clark Deputy Assistant
Director, 0/SI, CIA
SECRET
Security Information
TAB C
P~IEIIfD QF_COMPE EzV!
Physics, weapons
system
Physics, radar
Geophysics
Atomic structure,
statistical
psob1 a
Aatronoan r, Astro?
pbysic"
Astroncnr
Rockets, guided
missiles
Scientific and
technical intelli-
gems
Scientific and,
technical intelli-
geaes
Scientific and
technical intelli?
genre
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Releass:V%t/a6X4: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
8 Mwity Ifatarmst3on
TAN 0
aATI0I
loo Philip 0e strong
Chiefs 0peratian
saseatia and
Staff, 0/81, cu
ti hntc 1 intelli-
*o stephen T. Poaaony
Acting Chief, Spseial
Sesen iti a
shady Gratip, DIY
t4ohnioal intelli-
LISA
6
Capt. F.tiw rd T. Ruppelt: USAF
Chief, Aerial Phhnametet Soieastifie and
Bs*x h, ATLC, SW tee 'eel iatelllo.
gars.
W. Jn Dewey Ta et, 3`r.
The EVkTI Corporation Aro fqg.
Lt. R. S. Aeeehem, USN
USN Phots Interrretaw Photo lnteolreta-tloa
tion LabaeatAry,
liaaaeon U
*. Romy visa
1R . f to Interprets. Photo interprstatien
tion Labwmteey,
Aeaeartia
Approved For Rg S AM A-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For ReleaseZO'041F6124~CNT-IA 67-00059A000100q Q13& 82
23 April 1954
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Survey of U. S. Information Agency's Intelligence Needs
1. The Director of Central Intelligence, on request of the
Director of the U. S. Information Agency, and with the full support
of the Department of State, has agreed to appoint an officer to
conduct a survey of the U. S. Information Agency's essential intelli-
gence needs. It is recognized that the U. S. Information Agency,
in view of its recently acquired independent status, has a need for
intelligence in order to fulfill its overseas information mission.
Likewise, the U, S. Information Agency can probably provide
resources useful to the Intelligence community.
2. There is attached at Tab A the Terms of Reference for
this survey, which will be conducted under the direction of Mr.
Richard Bissell, Special Assistant to the DCI for Planning and
Coordination.
3. It will be of undoubted assistance to the successful conclu-
sion of this survey to have the advice of the IAC members and
such information as they may have which bears on this question.
Moreover, many IAC agencies have related needs for intelligence
in support of propaganda and psychological warfare and an interest
in the effects of any proposed arrangements on the respective
agencies. Hence it would be appreciated if each IAC member would
notify the undersigned as to a representative with whom Mr. Bissell's
designee may work.
Secretary
25X1
IAC-D-82
23 April 1954
Approved For'Release 2p&f2Q1-&Cf7-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/b /2 7. &ARDP67-00059A C00 ( 94 Ir-D-82' ;1 AUG
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Report of Survey of USIA's Intelligence Needs and Assets
1. Copy of. subject report is attached. It was transmitted by
the DCI to the Director, USIA, on 23 July, and accepted by the latter
on 30 July 1954.
2. The IAC will note that three recommendations require
IAC action. One of these (Part 1, paragraph 4c, page 4, and Tab A,
paragraph A) is that the IAC approve a proposed distribution of
NIE's and NIS to USIA. IAC action on the recommendation respecting
NIS is being sought through IAC-D-45/55, to be circulated 6 August.
IAC action on the recommendation respecting NIE's is being sought
through IAC-D-82/2, to be circulated 6 August.
.3. The other two recommendations requiring IAC action
(Part 1, paragraph 4b, page 4, and Part 2, paragraph 4, page 5) are
that the IAC approve the statement of "Types of Intelligence and
Intelligence Information Required to Meet USIA's Essential Needs"
(Part. i, paragraph 3c, pp. 1-3) as (a) the basis for providing intelli-
gence and intelligence information needed by USIA. and (b) as a. basis
for providing intelligence support to meet related needs of other
agencies. The IAC will be asked to approve these two recommenda-
tions at an early meeting.
Secretary
IAC-D-82/1
5 August 1954
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/0S/,24.., DP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/296fi O0059A000100030001-6
Index
REPORT OF THE SURVEY OF INTELLIGENCE NEEDS AND ASSETS
OF THE UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
Page
I. CONCLUSIONS OF THE SURVEY
Part 1..... Identification of Intelligence Needs . . . . . . . . . 1
Part 2,........ Related Needs of Other Agencies . . . . . . ... . 5
Part 3..... Organizational Arrangements . .
.......... 6
Part 4..... USIA Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
II. HOW THE SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED 12
III. APPENDICES
Tab A..... List of Intelligence Publications and
Recommended Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Tab B..... Functions of the Proposed USIA Intelligence
Organization . . . . . . . . . 17
Tab C..... Letter, Director of Central Intellgence, to
Director, USIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Tab D....... Letter, Director, USIA, to Director of
Central Intelligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Tab E..... Terms of Reference for USIA's Intelligence
Needs . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Tab F..... "Survey of USIA's Intelligence Needs, "
IAC-D-82. . 26
Tab G..... List of Persons Consulted . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Tab H..... Basic Documents Considered by the Survey
Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Tab I..... Case Study on Thailand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Annex A: Psychological Offensive
for Thailand . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Annex B: Intelligence Annex to Psycho-
logical Offensive for Thailand. . . 43
Annex C: List of Intelligence Products
Relating to Thailand . . . . . . . 51
- 1 -
Approved For Release 2004/06/2t ZAP0059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24GJM$WrtkJ0059A000100030001-6
III.
APPENDICES (Continued)
Page
Tab J..... Case Study on India . . . . . . . .
Annex A: Intelligence Annex for a
Psychological Program for
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
Annex B: List of Intelligence Products
Relating to India . . . . . . .
64
Annex C: List of Research Projects
Relating to India . . . . . . . .
75
Approved For Release 2004/01 X kPAJ7-00059AO00100030001-6
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
L' WHAT THE SURVEY TEAM CONCLUDES AND RECOMMENDS
(The conclusions and recommendations in the fou'. parts which
follow are based directly on the Terms of Reference,. Tab E,
Which are quoted in their entirety herein. )
Part 1
Intelligence Needs
IDENTIFICATION OF INTELLIGENCE NEEDS
1. Problem: To identify the types of intelligence and intelligence
information required to meet the U, S. Information Agency's
essential needs.
2. Discussion: Consideration' of this problem has included the question:
"What are the U. S. Information Agency's essential intelligence needs
to support its policy, programs, field and. media operations, evalu-
ation and training?" Each of these six major functional areas of
USIA will need, in varying degrees, intelligence of the types listed
below. In the case of USIA's evaluation of its program, it has
been found by the Survey to be especially necessary to distinguish'
between. the function of making. evaluation judgments and the
function of providing intelligence essential to such judgments.
3. Conclusions:.
a. The types of intelligence and intelligence information required
to:x eet USIA's essential needs have been identified as set
forth in paragraph c below.
(These types, deal solely with foreign intelligence or intelli.-
gence information and do not deal with USIA's needs. for "
"Americana, " i. e., domestic information on the U. S.)
b. The required intelligence is not now adequate in character,
and particularly in quantity, to meet the needs.
c. USIA has essential:needs for the following types of intelligence
and- intelligence information:
1) Selected segments of 'societies: selected classes,
groups, organizations (public and. private), and: their
leadership, present and potential.
a) Size, composition, ideologies and attitudes, predis-
posifi'ons,'a' d reactions to! (1) the Vtdted States, the
USSR and other countries. of:gr.eatbst significance and
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CII4=RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part 1
Intelligence Needs
Conclusions, (continued)
their basic policies, (2) critical foreign and internal problems.
b) The patterns of influence among groups, organizations,
and leaders (including the government); specifically, who
is 'influential, on whom, how, and how much.
2) Media Research and-Analysis:
a) Communications habits and types of media in the country
(press, publications, radio, motion pictures, TV).
b) Organizational aspects of each medium, including location,
key personnel, finance, distribution and exhibition outlets, and
a description-of the facilities of the media.
c) The political orientation of the media.
d) The content of the communications output by the media.
e) Location, size and type of audience receiving the output
of the media.
f) The reactions of the audience to the media, and why.
Foreign Propaganda, both friendly and unfriendly, including
exchange of persons or cultural exchange.
a) Facilities and personnel.
b) Program content and plans.
c) Estimates of probable courses of foreign propaganda.
d) Analyses of foreign propaganda vulnerabilities.
4) Impact of factors affecting public opinion and attitudes and the
net impact of such .factors on the people of a country. Such
factors would include historical attitudes of a people, and the
influence of current domestic and foreign official and unofficial
activities.
5) Descriptive Detail, that is, unclassified or declassified intelli-
gence information to supplement the content of USIA. media with
items of local interest in order to make the output appear more
interesting and more authoritative, particularly in denied areas.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CTA-TZDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL .
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A0001000 Od-S
Intelligence Needs
Conclusions (continued)
6.) International Communism:
a) International organizations, personalities, programs,
fiscal support, methods and success or failure of operations.
b) Local applications, including counterespionage infor-
mation, with emphasis on communications facilities.
d. It is recognized that intelligence and intelligence information perti-
nent to the needs described above can usefully be provided USIA
in the following three basic forms of intelligence, which are
normally used for production for other purposes:
1) Intelligence Estimates, including National Intelligence
Estimates (intelligence covering the broad aspects of
national policy and national security) and estimates of
probable developments, capabilities and intentions re-
garding specific countries or areas
2) Basic Intelligence, including National Intelligence Surveys,
that is, factual intelligence which results from the colla-
tion of encyclopedic information of a more or less
permanent or static nature and general interest which, as
a result of evaluation and interpretation,. is determined
to be the best available.
Current Intelligence, that-is, spot information or intelli-
gence of all types and forms of immediate interest and
value to operating or policy staffs, which is used by
them usually without the delays incident to complete
evaluation or interpretation.
4) Intelligence Reports' nn Specialised Subj cts
e. USIA needs certain intelligence publications currently produced
by the IAC agencies. A list of such publications, with recom-
mended distribution, is attached at Tab A.
No elements of.USIA, especially Field and Media operations,
should be sent masses of intelligence. Rather.- annotated bibliog-
raphies of available finished intelligence (e.g., Annex C to Tab I,
Annex B to Tab J) should be made available to the media and the
field for their review and selection of those items which they wish
to have made available for their review and possible retention.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24 -CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
Part 1
Intelligence Needs
4, Recommendations
a. That the Director of USIA approve the statement of
"Types of Intelligence and Intelligence Information Required
to Meet USIA's Essential Needs" (Contlusion 3c, pp. 1-3) as the
basis for requesting intelligent: and intelligence information
for USIA..
b. That the IAC agencies approve Conclusion :3c as the basis
for. providing intelligence and intelligence information needed
by USIA. (Action: DCI, with appropriate IAG members.)
c. That the JAG approve the recommended distribution of
National Intelligence (Tab A). (Action: DCI and the IAC.)
d. That CIA and State approve the recommended distribution
of certain of their intelligence publications (Tab A). (Action:
DCI, State/Special Assistant, Intelligence.)
e. That USIA arrange directly with the military intelligence
agencies for receipt of certain of.their intelligence publications.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
W*W
Part Z
Related Needs of
Other Agencies
RELATED Nom: EEDS OF OTHER AGENCIES
1. Problem: To determine the extent to which the types of intelligence
and telligence information required,to meet the essential needs of
USIA are related to the essential needs of other US programs.
Discussion: Consideration of this problem has included the original
specific question: "Is the intelligence and intelligence information
required to support a covert psychological warfare program and the
US Information Agency program so similar that it, could be provided
most efficiently by a single organization? If ego, where should that
organization be?" It has become clear in the course of the Survey
that this question is too4imited and should be inclusive, as is the
statement of the problem above, of other related US pro grams. (The
relationship of foreign propaganda analysis to other intelligence sup-
port is being studied separately from this survey.)
3. Conclusions:
a. The types of intelligence and intelligence information identified
as required to meet the essential needs of USIA are substantially.
those required to meet the needs of CIA/DDP4except for detailed 25X1
"operational intelligence" and "CE information,. which should be
provided by DDP), the Public Affairs Staff of the State Department,:
and to a lesser extent (because of requirements bearing upon enemy
military personnel, which should be met by the military intelligence
agencies) the "psywar" programs of the Armed Services.
b. Therefore, to the extent that these types of intelligence and intel-
ligence information meet the needs Of agencies. with related missions,
these agencies should be served'in the main by a single organization
:(See Part 3) . To, assure the provision of intelligence and to supple-
ment the service provided,by the: central organization, USIA should
have its own intelligence unit. That unit is recommended below, see
Part 3 and Tab. B,
.
4. Recornmendat ons
That the appropriate IAC members approve conclusions 3a and b above
as a basis for providing intelligence. support to meet the related needs '
of other agencies. (Action DCI with .appropri.ate IAC member s . )
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part 3
Organizational.
Arrangements
ORGANIZATIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
Problem: To recommend the organizational arrangements, and
sources and magnitude of funds, required to provide
the US Information Agency with such essential intelli-
gende and intelligence information as can be obtained
and which can be made, available.
2. . Discussion:` Consideration of this problem has included the following
questions:
a. Are the. present mechanise sand, the interdepart-
mental arrangements adequately responsive .to the U.S.
Information Agency's essential needs ?
b. What present facilities and resources in the Gov-
ernment not now utilized by or. made available to the U. S.
Information Agency could be more effectively utilized
by the U. S. Information Agency' in order to satisfy its
intelligence needs ?
c. If the U. S. Information Agency needs an intelli-
gence staff, what should be the order of magnitude of
such a staff ?
d. Should the U.S. Information Agency be a member
of the IAC 7
e. Are revisions required in' NSC Intelligence Direc-
tives
f, What security arrangements are required to meet
solutions to the above problems, and in particular, how
can the needs of the U. S. Information Agency for de-
classification of pertinent intelligence. best be achieved?
3. Conclusions
a. The intelligence required for USIA activities does not differ in
and from the intelligence required to support the political, econo-
mic, and military activities.of the government. USIA does, however,
require. the intelligence identified in Part 1, paragraph 3r above, with
an emphasis, a detail, and a form not normally required in intelli-
gence produced for other purposes.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part 3
Organizational
Arrangements
b. In the main, provision of the types of intelligence and intelligence
information required to meet the essential needs of USIA has been the
primary responsibility of the Department of State, which has utilized
its own resources and those resources supported or contributed by
other agencies, as established in NSCID-3. Production by State has,
of course, been supplemented by productionby other intelligence units
maintained by agencies with related, needs.
c. The total.available intelligence of the types required by USIA
and similar comsumers has been inadequate in character, and particularly
in quantity, to meet the needs of these consumers. This inadequacy has
been most marked with respect to basic intelligence and special reports
based thereon (as distinguished from intelligence estimates and current
intelligence.) Therefore the production of basic intelligence in the fields
set forth in Part 13. c above should be increased, along with that of
special reports based substantially thereon. The USIA should also be
given wider access to intelligence estimates and to current intelligence
as recommended in Part 14. d above to meet its needs for these forms
of intelligence.
d. On the basis of the allocation of responsibilities within the Intelli-
gence Community presently set forth in NSCID'3, the Department of
State should continue to provide the major part of the intelligence required
by the USIA, and by other consumers with similar needs. If it is to dis-
charge this function, its production of intelligence should be increased
mainly by an expansion of the NIS both topically and in depth of detail,
'particularly to include increased and more adequate intelligence on
"International Communism.''
e. To meet its remaining needs, the USIA should have an intelligence
organization designed to ensure that full use is made of the resources of
the intelligence community and to be responsive to those USIA needs
which cairinot be met by the community. The recommended functions and
TbO for a USIA intelligence organization are set forth at Tab B and
Annex A thereto4 "Intelligence" means foreign intelligence in this survey.
Nevertheless, USIA may find it desirable to include in the proposed USIA
intelligence organization the function of providing "Americana, " i. e.,
domestic information on the U. S.
f. In drawing a definite line between the State Department's function of
providing basin intelligence and special reports and that of the USIA's
Approved For Release 2004/06/247 CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part 3
Organizational
Arrangements
25X1
25X1
intelligence organization, the basic principle should be to ensure the
fullest use of the Department of State's analytical staff and to avoid
any duplication by the new USIA organization. Accordingly, the State
Department should continue to produce such special reports and analyses
required by USIA and similar consumers as can efficiently be turned
out by the Department's analytical staff without competing with its
basic responsibilities or its ability to meet the State Department's own
specialized needs. In general terms the analytical functions of the
proposed USIA intelligence organization should be limited to: (a) the
tailoring of basic intelligence to its special needs, and (b) the per-
formance of analyses which by reason of some special circumstances
cannot efficiently and conveniently be performed elsewhere in the
intelligence community.
g. The Survey has found it especially necessary to distinguish between
the function of making evaluation judgments and that of providing the
intelligence essential to such judgments (see Part I, paragraph 2 above),
and has concluded.;.P.would not be desirable to place the responsibility
for making evaluation judgxrients on the USIA's programs within the
USIA intelligence organization. That responsibility properly. should be
integrated with the executive functions of the Agency or discharged by
a separate staff.
h. USIA operations in the field (USIS) require intelligence support;
in addition to such support as can be provided from Washington, some
local support can be provided. The needs for such support and the
possibilities of meetin those needs locally vary greatly between posts
and programs.
j. USIA should not become a member of the IAC at this time because:
(1) It is not believed that the contribution which USIA could make
to National Intelligence Estimates is one which would be sufficiently
different from the contributions of the present IAC members.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFJDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part 3
Organizational
Arrangements
25X1
25X1
(2) The interagency arrangements recommended by this report
can be effected without USIA membership on the IAC.
(3) Whenever matters within the purview of USIA are to be
discussed by the IA.C, the DCI can invite USIA participation, as
provided in NSCID-l. (Similar USIA representation should be
obtained by the I AC subcommittees on basic intelligence defectors,
and foreign language publications.)
k. The question of IAC membership should be reexamined after a
sufficient amount of time has passed for the implementation of this
report.
1. No revisions in the NSCIDs are required to enable the intelligence
needs of the USIA and similar consumers to be adequately met as
proposed in this Survey, that is in a manner which reflects the present
allocation of responsibilities as among the various agencies that make
up the intelligence community.
M. To obtain the intelligence and intelligence information required
to meet its essential needs, the USIA should make such adjustments as
are necessary in its security standards for personnel and handling of
information.
Recommendations:
a. That the Department of State, as the appropriate agency under
NSCID-3, expand and redirect the resources of its intelligence
organization so as to accomplish the additional production, princi-
pally under the NIS program, recommended above. This will require
the use for these purposes of additional funds and personnel over and
above those now available in the Department of State or elsewhere.
Eventually the additional outlay required under the NIS program
might amount tol or possibly even more. Because of pro-
blems of recruitment and production planning, however, only
to I land 30 to 40 additional slots over and above those originally
budgeted will be required for these purposes in the Fiscal Year 1955.
Except insofar as these resources can be made available by the curtail-
ment of other activities in the Department of State's intelligence
organization or elsewhere, the necessary funds should be provided
by the Central Intelligence Agency through the NIS program pending.
a reexamination of the method of financing that program.
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Part3
Organizational
Arrangements
b. That USIA establish an intelligence organization, separate from
the Department of State, with functions and, organization, as set forth
in Tab B and Annex A to Tab B, and with funds provided by USIA's
regular appropriations. Until a sufficient amount of time has passed
for the implementation of this report the organization should have a
T/O of an order of magnitude of 70 to 90 positions.
c. That the following organizations now under the administration
of USIA be abolished: CPI, VOA Library & Research, Photo and
IPS Libraries, and that part of IEV which has been engaged inthe
collection and production of intelligence. The slots and money thus
freed will be enough to meet a T/O of the order of magnitude described
above.
d. That USIA be invited to participate in pertinent activities of the
IAC subcommittees on basic intelligence, defectors, and foreign
language publications. (Action: DCI, with Chairmen of the NIS,
IDC, and FLP subcommittees.)
25X1
f. That USIA inform the intelligence agencies as to USIA Is present
security practices in order to assure safe handling of classified
intelligence and information,and make such adjustments as may be
necessary to insure the necessary freedom of exchange and discussion.
(Action: Director, USIA, in consultation with each intelligence agency.)
Approved For Release 2004/06/241 CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 CONFIDENTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
Part 4
USIA Assets
U O
R AA S S E
1. Problem: To recommend measures to insure that such
intelligence or intelligence information produced or collected by the
U. S. Information Agency is made available to the IAC agencies.
2. Discussion: Consideration of this problem has included
the questions: "Is there any important intelligence available uniquely
to the U. S. ;Information Agency which is not known to the intelligence'
community? Is there likely to be any such under new arrangements?"
3. Conclusions:
a. USIS missions are in a position to add significantly
to the collection of intelligence information for USIA and
related consumers.
b. Requirements upon USIS x d.ssions. for such collection
should be carefully drawn, levied in moderation, and coordinated
in Washington by USIA with the Department of State,
c. In the field USIS reporting should be coordinated
with reporting by other sections of the Embassy.
d. USIA should screen and disseminate its intelligence
and intelligence information to .U. S. agencies concerned.
e. USIA may well develop information. collecting
techniques useful to related programs and t? intelligence. Such
nformation and techniques should be made available to U. S.
agencies concerned.
ec.om endatione:
a. That USIS reporting be conducted under the direction
of the. USIA intelligence organization in coordination with thte
State Department.
b.. That such reporting bo coordinated in the field
by, the Chief of the U. S. Mis sio'n, as is his responsibility
generally.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
 Approved For Release 2004/06/f4OW"t L00059A000100030001-6
25X1
II HOW THE SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED
1. By an exchange of letters in April 1954 (Tabs C and D) the
Director of Central Intelligence and the Director of the United
States Information Agency agreed that the former should conduct
a survey of USIA's intelligence needs and assets and submit
recommendations on how those needs should be met and those
assets used. The terms of reference for the Survey are at
Tab E.
2. The DCI appointed, as Director of the Survey, Mr. Richard
Bissell, Special Assistant to the Director for Planning and
Coordination.
3. To accomplish his assignment, Mr. Bissell established
his survey team which devoted the major part of its time to the
conduct of the survey during the eight weeks which then ensued.
4. The IAC Agencies were invited to participate. (Tab F,
IAC-D-82). In addition, Mr. Bissell requested USIA, the Operations
Coordinating Board, and DDP/CIA to designate an official in their
respective areas on whom the Survey could call for assistance
and advice, and who would be in a position to arrange for interviews
and conferences with their officials who had an interest in the
problems faced by the Survey.
5. The following are the officials who were thus appointed:
USIA
OCB
DDP/CIA
IAC /State:
Army:
Navy:
Mr. Henry Loomis
Dr. Horace S. Craig
Mr. Fisher Howe
Mr. Yaro J. Skalnik
Lt. Comdr. A. Christopher
Major Thomas B. Johnson
- 12 -
Approved For Release 2004/06/24 I/ f p AAQ0059A000100030001-6
 Approved.For Release 2004/069QNf(fi2 1$, t-00059A000100030001-6
JIG;
AEC:
FBI:
Captain P. C. Staley, USN
Dr. Charles Reichardt
Mr. Meffert W. Kuhrtz
25X1
6. As may be observed from the records of interviews and
conferences, Mr. Loomis, Mr. Howe, Mr. Craig andi
were invited to attend as observers as many Survey meetings as
possible, since the solutions to the problems would require
primarily the understanding and cooperation of the most interested
agencies represented by these officials. They were of course,
free to ask questions and to enter into the discussions.
7. In conducting its investigation to determine the needs for
intelligence: on the part of USIA, the Survey Team initially sought
to understand as fully as possible the functions of the various
components of USIA, to discern what they considered were their
needs, and to help them articulate needs previously onlyevaguely
phrased.
8. The Survey Team interviewed or held conferences with
over 100 individuals from'all components of USIA /Washington,
VOA /New York,(where two days were spent), the Department
of State (Public Affairs Staff, Political desks, Intelligence area),
;Operations Coordinating Board (staff), CIA /DD?P, PAOs, USIS
Missions in Europe' (Ten.:days to coverr London, Paris, Vienna,
. unich)'and in' Latin America (Ten days to cover Rio, Trinidad,..
andMexico City.) (See Tab G.)
9. The Survey Team reviewed examples of both raw and finished
intelligence in this field, as well as documents bearing upon the
organizational aspects of this problem.' A"selectiox of the latter
is listed at Tab H.
10. In order to relate the statement of need to specific USIA
operations, Thailand and India were selected as case studies.
Memoranda explaining these stddies, with their conclusions, are
submitted separately (see Tabs I and J ).
Approved For Release 2004/0 Ag7-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A0.00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL Tab A
List.of.of Intelligence Publications and Recommended Distribution
Note: Access to the intelligence publications listed
below should be provided to each, official,
though this need not necessarily mean the dis-
tribution of a separate copy to each.
The dissemination recommended in this list is
subject to USIA's meeting the originating agency's
security standards for handling of classified
material. It is also subject to whatever controls
over dissemination and use of intelligence and
information are imposed by the originating
agency and, in the case of National Intelligence,
the IAC..
A. National
National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs and SNIES)
Dissemination:
Washington: Director, Deputy Director, SA/ Director.
Area and Deputy Area Directors, Chief
and Area Chiefs of IOP, It, Chiefs and
Deputy Chiefs of Media.
Field: Based upon area through the Department
and ?Ambas sador to the PAO and Deputy
PAO. The standard letter from
Mr. Armstrong to the Chiefs of Mission
which transmits national estimates
should be revised to include reference
of the estimate to and solicitation of
comment from the PAO.
NalInttelliencerSurveys (NISs)
Dissemination:
Washington: Should be readily available to all mem-
bers of USIA except administrative
employees.
Field: Should be readily available to PAO staff,
according to area, except foreign nationals.
Approved For Release 2004/#7 &Wdt 67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/fP. I PML-00059A000100030001-6rab A
B. CIA
OCI Rail y (Secret)
Dissemination-
Washington
921-y-:
Director, Deputy Director, SA/Director
Area & Deputy Area Directors, Chief
and. Area Chiefs of IOP, I I, Chiefs and
Deputy Chiefs of Media.
OCI Weekly (Secret)
Dissemination:
Wa.sl ingtton.
Same as OCI Daily
Field PAO staffs, except foreign nationals.
CIA Library Relaorts (Biblicgraphies.of selected books,
pamphlets, or intelligence documents)
Dissemination..
Washington
Off.
I I om for use in levying requirements
based upon the statement of USIA?s
essential intelligence needs and to
prepare appropriate annotated biblidgm
raphies for USIA.
Intelligence Publications Index
Di s s eminAtiox7
Same as CIA Library Reports.
FD.D Publications
Dissemination:
Washington: Director, Deputy Director, SA/Director,
I I9 IOP, and the area and media staffs.
Field: T
PAO staffs,
Approved For Release 2004/
~/&&-/R9PL67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/02 MNAM lF DAC7-00059A00O1 010001-6
C. State Department
Daily Summary (Secret) (daily)
Current Foreign Relations (weekly)
Psychological Intelligence Digest (biweekly)
Soviet Affairs (monthly)
International Communism (monthly)
Dissemination:
Washington: Director, Deputy Director, SA/Director
Area and Deputy Area Directors, IOP,
II, Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs of Media.
Field: To PAO staffs except foreign nationals.
These publications are already avail-
able to the missions.
D. Other Intelligence Publications Produced by the IAC and Agencies
Such other intelligence publications as are provided to USIA
against the statement of USIA's essential intelligence needs
should be disseminated according to needs.
-16-
Approved For Release 2004/06/4 At 00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/f4D ! 4 00059A000100030001-6
TAB B
FUNCTIONS OF THE PROPOSED 'USIA INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION
1. Major Functions
A. Assure the provision. to USIA of the intellig-ence,or intelligence
information required to support its planning, execution, and
review of operations.
B. Maintain liaison with the, intelligence collection and production
offices of the Intelligence. Advisory Committee agencies and
other agencies of the Government, as necessary, to represent
USIA?s interests in intelligence collection and production.
Acquire through established channels intelligence information
reports, publications, and documents as required to support
the operations of USIA. Analyze. this material to ensure
dissemination to appropriate desks for. immediate application
to USIA plans, programs and projects ?being developed.
C. Coordinate within USIA and with. PIRS/State and other: agencies,
USIA's interests in external research pr.ojects. Keep currently
informed of, provide a central sourcek of information on,,and
assess the capabilities of external research projects of current
or potential interest to USIA.. Arrange,,for contract research
when any intelligence support requirement can best be satisfied
outside the Government.
D. Conduct original research and prepare evaluated reports in
support of USIA program. w~en requirements cannot be satisfied
by OIR/State, elsewhere within the Government, or by external
research.
E. provide such library and reference fa.cilitiea, necessary for USIA
operations as cannot be provided by utilization. of existing facl)w
itiee of other agencies.
t. in carrying out the above, the USIA Intelligence Qrganizatio%
should consult directly with USIA components and keep advised
of and arrange for the satisfaction of intelligence support
requirements.
Approved For Release 2004/06/?b f~~&0059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06MNig & I'-00059A000100030001-6
Tab B
II. Functians of Components
A. Intelligence Acquisition and Dissemination Division
1. Establishes and coordinates programs to make, available
to USIA intelligence produced and information collected
by IAC and non-IAG agencies of the United States
Government.
2. Accepts and coordinates specific and long-range require-
ments from elements of USIA and other agencies for
intelligence support; satisfies these requirements by:
a. Identification, location, and procurement of exist-
ing intelligence;
b. Analysis and dissemination of incoming intelligence
materials;
c. Requesting the production of new intelligence by
IAC research, foreign and domestic field collection,
or National -Estimate preparation;
d. Levying requirements for collection on USIS missions
and other agencies.
3. Maintains continuing liaison with IAC agencies' research
and support activities in order to be advised of and
coordinate with all intelligence programs of interest and
possible benefit to USIA.
4. Serves as the control. point for dissemination, use, and
declassification requests for intelligence materials
required to meet USIA?s needs.
15. External Research Division
1. Develops, defines, and coordinates USIA requirements
which are suitable for external research action; negotiates
with requestors and contractor to relate requirements to
the contractor?s resources.
2. Monitors the research'programs of quasi-governmental
and private institutions, foundations, and individuals to
Approved For Release 2004/06/ ~7L00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/cNV fti-00059A00010003a-B
ensure that USIA. requirements are included within the
scope of proposed projects whenever ?feas4ble, 'and that
research products of. inter e s t to USIA. are -made _#vailable,
upon completion, to appropriate USIA elements'.
Maintains continuing liaison with the (JCB staff, Off e.'.oV
Intelligence Research, Department of State; Department .
,of Defense; CIA; and any other Government agency Iwvitl},
external research activities of interest to USIA.
C. Research Division
1. Receives and analymes specific requests from elements
of USIA for intelligence support requiring original re.
search>or..the collaation'of research data.
Consults directly with requesting offices to determine
their specific needs; advises on intelligence support
capabilities and on the progress of research.
3. ' Determines which phases of required research can be
accomplished by other United States Government
agencies, or by external contract;. coordinates such
reseaTch.through the appropriate components of USIA.
4. Conducts original research and produces evaluated
reports in accordance with intelligence support research
requirements which cannot be answered by OIR/State,
elsewhere. within the Government or by external research.
5. Assists other branches of the division in locating unusual
intelligences support materials (especially foreign
lang%age, documents) pertaining to special areas or
subjects:
6. Maintains awara.aesa~#?Q developing situationrr'e2n an
area, world-.wider, #r4 `fctioo basis in brdar to
anticpate imtellige>' ce support needs of USIA.
brar~ D isiQn
w~rl.warl i.i.~M~YlA4.! wr^r.'
cuss hry for USIA op4rations as la",$not be provie d by
utilliation of ~eXEisting library facilities of other agencies.
Approved For Release 2004/06f ) '1 7-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/fADtJ) LS' k1.00059A000100030001-6
Tab B
2. Maintains liaison with other existing libraries
to assure that their services are made.. available
to USIA whenever possible, thus avoiding dupli-
cation of :existing available library services.
Approved For Release 2004/06/?b fP
'&0059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06MNOOGIO J-00059AO0010003000~-6
b -B
Az -A
organizational Chart for P;Opos.ed USIA Iatextligence Or_ganiza.tion
(xI)
Director
Deputy Director
Intelligence
Acquisition &
Di ss-eminat&om
Division
(11/AD)
External
Rya$:eaucb
Diviaian
( fER)
Research
!%vis.i'on
(II/R)
Approved For Release 2004/06/2 ,qAL00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/2i9L4f T'N60059A000100030001-tab C
22 April 1954
Mr. Theodore C. Streibert
Director,
United States Information Agency
Washington 25, D. C
Dear Mr. Streibert:
As you know, there have been several recent
informal discussions between USIA and CIA officials regarding
USIA's essential intelligence needs. Your representatives
have proposed that I appoint an officer to conduct a survey
which would identify those needs and recommend measures to
meet them.
In response to this request I have appointed
Mr? Richard Bissell, my Special Assistant for Planning and
Coordination, to direct such a survey. It is my understanding
that the terms of reference attached are agreeable to the Depart-
ment of State as well as to CIA, If they are also in accord with
your thinking, then the survey can begin promptly.
You will note that these terms of reference include
questions of mutual interest to the Intelligence Advisory Com-
mittee agencies. Consequently, I will inform the IAG of this
survey and ask each member to designate an official who can'
work with Mr. Bissell, and with Mr. James C. Reber, whom
Mr. Bissell has requested to carry the main burden of this task.
Sincerely yours,
/s/
ALLEN W. DULLES
Approved For Release 2004/06/2to A- 0059A000100030001-6
-22-
 Approved For Release 2004/06/2CLNR%60059A00010003--
UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE DIRECTOR
CONFIDEN'T'IAL
April 23, 1954
Dear Mr.' Dullest
Thank you for your letter of April 22 in which you agree
that a survey of the essential intelligence needs of the U. S.
Information Agency should be conducted under your auspices. I
am pleased that you have appointed your Special Assistant,
Mr. Richard Bissell, as director of the survey.
The terms of reference which were attached to your letter
are entirely satisfactory to met,, I believe that when the
questions, outlined in the surve} '.have beep answered we should
be in a position to know clearly'what is, needed and how best to go
about meeting, those needs. .1, _ too, am interested that any con-
tribution which this Agency can make to the intelligence effort
of the Government should be made. I recognize the interest of
other Intelligence Advisory Committee agencies in this matter,
and welcome their participation as you deemapproprlate,
.-I have requested the officials of this Agency to assist
Mr. "Bissell in as y,,possible way..
Sincerely yours,
Is/
Theodore. 'C,, rtr?eibe:rt
Director
Mr. Allen W. Dulles,
Director of Central Intelligence,
Central Intelligence Agency,
Washington 25, D. C. -23-
Approved For Release 2004/06/& IlbA7L00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/20059A00010003a8A
Terms of Reference for
U, S. Information Agency's Intelligence Needs
1. In view .of the U. S. Information Agency's mission and
functions, as stated in the U. S. Information and -Educational
.Exchange Act of 1948, as amended; in the President's Message
to the Congress of 1 June 1953, and in NSC 165/1, 24 October
1953, the survey shall:
a. Identify the types of intelligence and intelligence
information required to meet the U. S. Information
Agency's essential needs.
b. Recommend the organizational arrangements,
and sources and magnitude of funds, required to provide
the U. S. Information Agency with such essential intelli-
gence and intelligence information as can be obtained
and which can be made available.
c. Recommend measures to insure that such in-
telligence or intelligence information produced or col-
lected by the U. S. Information Agency is made available
to the IAC agencies.
In conducting the survey, the related needs of all intelligence
agencies for similar intelligence and intelligence information
should be taken into account, as well as the resources both in
Washington and in the field.
2. Among specific problems to be included in the survey are:
1) What are the U. S. Information Agency's essential
intelligence needs to support its policy, programs, field
and media operations, evaluation and training?
2) Are the present mechanisms and interdepartmental
arrangements adequately responsive to the U. S. Informa-
tion Agency's essential needs?
3) What present facilities and resources in the Gov-
ernment not now utilized by or made available to the U. S.
Info*mation Agency could be more effectively utilized by
24-
Approved For Release 2004/06/240,Q7fAL00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004106124cW -%059A000100030001-6
the U. S. Information Agency in order to satisfy its intelligence needs ?
4) Is there any important intelligence available uniquely to the
U. S. Information Agency which is not known to the intelligence
community? Is there likely to be any such under new arrangements?
5) Is the intelligence and intelligence information required to
support a covert psychological warfare program and the U. S.
Information Agency program so similar that it could be provided
most efficiently by a single organization? If so, where should that
organization be?
6) If the U. S. Information Agency needs an intelligence
staff,. what should be the order of magnitude of such a staff?
7) Should the U. S. Information Agency be a member of the
8) Are revisions required in NSC Intelligence Directives?
9) What security arrangements are required to meet solutions
to the above problems, and in particular, how can the needs of the
U. S. Information Agency for declassification of pertinent intelli-
gence best be achieved?
Approved For Release 2004/06/2,4ffit00059A000100030001-6
 TabF
Approved For Release 2004/06/W.t1W00059A000100030001-6
IAC-D-82
23 April 1954
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Survey of U. S. Information Agency s Intelligence, Needs
1. The Director of Central Intelligence, on request of the
Director of the U. S. Information Agency, and with the full support
of the Department of State, has agreed to appoint an officer. to
conduct a survey of the U. S. Information Ageancy?s. .ssential intelli-
gence needs. It is recognized.that the U. S. Information Agency,
in view of its recently acquired independent status, has a need for
intelligence in order to fulfill its overseas. information mission.
Likewise, the U. S. Information Agency can probably provide.
resources useful to the Intelligence community,
2. There is attached at Tab A the Terms of Reference for
this survey. 'which will be conducted under the direction'.f Mr.
Richard Bissell, Special Assistant to the DGI for Planuirng and
Coordination.
3. It will be of undoubted assistance to the successful conclu-
sion of this survey to have the advice of the IAG members and.
such information as they may have which bears on this question.
Moreover, many YA.C agencies have related needs for Intelligence
in support of propaganda and psychological warfare and an interest
in 1he effects of any proposed arrangements on the respective
agencies. Hence it would be appreciated if each IAC member would
notify the undersigned as to 'a representative with whom Mr. Bissell's
designee may work..
acre ry
25X1
Approved For Release 2004/06/2 f7AQ0059A0001000 11 ~g2
p1 wil 1954
 Approved For Release 2004/OCOJVF&FkKbk7-00059AO001' ' O6b1-6
USIA SURVEY
List of Persons Consulted
Theodore C. Streibert
Abbot Washburn
Henry. Loomis
Andrew H. Berding
William S. Peterson
Ralph Hilton
Robert W. Ehrman
Leonard `Ware
Robert C. Hickok
Robert Delaney
.D, Elton Trueblood
Bernard Wiegman
IRI
.r Antonio A. Micocci
Lewis M.' Nixon
Louis T, Olorn
Edward F. Lethen, Jr.
John M. Vebber
Leo Lowenthal
Robert A. Bauer
Alexander Barmine
John Armitage
Spencer, M. King
Christopher Squire
Gerald F. Dooher
John Nalley
H. Roth Newpher
Vestel Lott
'Barry Zorthian
Dorothy Crook
Robert Mayer
Joseph .C. Walsh
.Director
Deputyc Director
SA/Director
Assistant Director
Far Eastern Division
Chief, American Republics Division
Chief Near East Division.
Near East Division
Chief, European Division
Soviet Orbit Division
Religious. Advisor
.Labor Advisor
Chief
Acting Chief, Research and Evaluation
Chief, Intelligence
Former Acting Assistant Director
Program Manager
Former Director,, Evaluation Staff
Chief, European Division
Chief, Russian Branch
European Division.'.
Chief, East Europe Branch
East Europe,. Czechoslovak Service
Chief, Near East, South Asia and Africa Div.
Far East Division
Chief, Research. and Library Branch
Chief, Central Program: Services Division
Chief, News Branch
Chief, Talks and Features Branch
Talk's and Features Branch
Chief, Security; '
.Approved For Release 2004/06/2 j ~, 00594000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/C gQh(F W67-00059A0001000pOb'01-6.
Tab G
IPS
Harlan Logan'
John A. Hutchison
Herbert P. McGushin
Leo J. Pinkus
John E. Dineen
Chief
Deputy Chief
Chief Editorial Division
Chief General. Service Branch
Chief, Special Materials Section
Franklin L. Burdette
Richard A. Humphrey
Franklin B. Steiner
Andrew W.' Smith, Jr.
TurUer S. Shelton
I0S
Charles M. Noone
Area Directors
William Clark
Frank Gram
..' Ned E. Nordness
Charles K. Meffly
Saxton Bradford
Chief
Deputy Chief
Chief, Translation Branch
Chief
Deputy Chief
Chief
Assistant Director for American Republics
Deputy Assistant Director American
. Republic s
.A a sistant- Director, for Europe
Deputy Assistant Director for Europe
Assistant Director for Far East
Interviewed in Washington- -Private Personnel
Lloyd Free.
Princeton Research Center
Interviewed in Washington- -Field Personnel
Eugene J. Rachlis
Daniel E. Moore
Lawrence S. Morris
European Service Center
Chief Provincial Officer,. Thailand
Chief Cultural Affairs Officer, Paris
Approved For Release 2004/06/24C.& 0059A000100030001-6,
 Approved For Release 2004/06/240?Wf4J0059A00.01000+QQf6
25X1
Field Personnel- Continued
Laurence P. Dalcher
William D. Killea
Stefan P. Munsing
William J. Handley
Emily E. Krueger
Fisher Howe
Allan Evans
Jesse M.. Ma, cKnight
.Walter K. Schwinn
Sidney Buford
George A. Pope
Fred Shipman
Kenneth P. Landon
Evron Kirkpatrick
Dr. Horace Craig
Wallace Irwin
Neilson C. Debevoise
Charles Taquey
AMY
Col. Edward S. Berry
Yaro J. Skalnik
JIC
Captain P. C. Staley
Chief Information Officer, Austria (Vienna)
PAO, Guadalajara
Director of Amerika Hazes (Berlin)
Deputy PAO, New Delhi
Planning and Evaluation Officer, New Delhi
Deputy Special Assistant Intelligence
Director, OIR
Special Assistant to Assistant Secretary-
Public Affairs
Special. Assistant to Assistant Secretary-
Public Affairs
Director, OLI
Acting Chief, IAD/OLI
Assistant Chief for Records/DC
Officer in Charge Thai and Malayan Affairs,
PSA
Deputy Director,. OIR, for Psychological
Intelligence
Approved For Release 2004/06/240&p74`P059A000100030001-6
-2:9-
 Approved For Release 2004/06/2~bQ,P~~A~0059A0001000Ya01011
err ~ Nav
Lt. Comdrt feasible.
Conversely, no short range activities will,be..md4rtsksn. which is:ne``in o,-_
ntstent with loner-range goa)s.
8. Every effort will be made to assist tks d S wrnmeett so
develop a strong, efficient information organisation. c*parieda; sf effect ve
operations. USIS will work, to the greatest extant paetible, with and
th
h
o
roug
this
rganisation and Other lndoiogs
genu a ao~ -d4rits'tmWest, colonialism.
($)
In respect of group thinking ?
"a. What are the stereotypes current?
b. What ideals do they intend to serve ?
5. In respect of communicat.ons ?
a. Are there. formal media?
V. Who is in control of productibn''facilitiee and how
susceptible to :influence ?
-49-
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000,100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/06/2 : SECRET
ai6 I
Annex B
How are groi opinions. iQrrxie'4. and influenced ?
What "rituals" shape aiiM' crystallize group thinking ?
e. What kinds of *formation do the membera. xpect to
receive through each formal or informal mediujna.?
f. What are the. sources of the information relayed through
these media?
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/06/ZA~c9-FP67-00059A000100030001-6
List of Intelligence Products Relating to Thailand
January 1952 through May, 1954
with selected items 1950-1951
(These products were prepared by OIR/State and the
Office of the Coordinator for Psychological Intelligence)
Tab I , Annex C
NOTE: Each project is listed only once under its primary de-
scription though it may, in addition, meet specific requirements
under other categories.
I. A. Segments of Society
1) The status of organized labor in Southeast Asia:
Thailand. April 3, 1950. Restricted. (OIR-5181.3)
2) Education in Thailand. March 9, .1950. Restricted.
(DRF-IP-314).
Political opportunities for Chinese Communists in
Thailand. August 21, 1950. Secret. (OIR-5151)
4) Totalitarian aspects of political parties in Indo-
china, British Malaysia, and Thailand.
October 23, 1950. Confidential. (DRF-212)
5) Data on ethnic groups for use in psychological warfare:
Thailand.. March 7, 1951. Restricted. (Contribution
to CS5. 12)
6) Overseas Chinese as a propaganda target group:
Thailand. August 7, 1951. Confidential. (Contri-
bution to P-area study)
7) Labor organization in Thailand. August 29, 1951.
Secret. (DRF-DR-241)
8) Buddhist institutions in Thailand and their intelli-
gence aspect. August 20, 1952. Secret. (IR-5625.9S-IX)
9) Impact of the presence of US personnel in certain Far
Eastern countries: Thailand. November 28, 1952.
Confidential. (Contribution to S/P. paper)
10) Non-Communist political opposition in Thailand.
April 30, 1953. Secret. (IR-6253)
Approved For Release 2004/06/24 :-1A-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/0C jRII dDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Tab I
Annex C
11) The position of Overseas Chinese communities in the
various countries of Southeast Asia: Thailand.
February 19, 1954. Confidential. (DRF-SP-39)
12) U. S. Problems among Overseas Chinese in
Southeast Asia: Thailand. September 29, 1953.
13) Southeast. Asian receptivity to higher moral and
religious content in the international information
progra t. May 7. 1953.
14) The problem of education of Overseas Chinese.
January 4, 1954. Secret (IR-6506)
B. Communications Media
1) Notes on cultural and political factors relevant to
problems of visual propaganda media in Thailand.
August 21, 1950. (Memorandum)
2) Analysis of the press in Thailand. September 1, . 1950.
Confidential. (bIR-5340)
3) Newspapers which might be quoted by FBIS.
May 18, 1951. Restricted. (Contribution to IP-423)
C.
4) Data on newspapers and periodicals- in Thailand.
July 31, 1952. Confidential. (CPI request)
Foreign Propaganda
1) Government of Thailand not enforcing restrictions on
Communist propaganda. (IB-1135)
2) Thai Government continues to tolerate local Communist-
front activity. September 23, 1952. Confidential. (IB-1232)
3) Communist propaganda activities in Thailand. October
14, 1952. Secret. (Memorandum to IIA)
1) Communists charge US assistance to Chinese Nationalist
troops in Southeast Asia. January 11, 1952. Secret. (IB-1086)
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: C3IA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Tab I
Annex C
2) Thai Communists move to identify Party with major
popular issues. October 24, 1952. Confidential.
(IB-1000. 500)
3) Reaction papers: Thailand. 1952, 1953, 1954.
4) Communist and Anti-Communist propaganda in Southeast
Asia: Thailand during 1953. May 11, 1954. (CPI-SP33)
5) Political Complexion of Chinese Language Newspapers
in Southeast Asia. November 28, 1952.
6) Chinese. Communist propaganda concerning Thailand.
May 20, 1953. Confidential. (IR-6308)
D. Public Opinion
1) See particularly items under Current Intelligence below--
II.C.I.a.
Developments significant for propaganda: Thailand.
Weekly, 1952, 1953, 1954. (IR-5550.xx)
3) CPI weekly briefings: Thailand. 1953.
4) Preliminary assessment of Asian attitudes toward the
Indochinese Conflict. December 7, 1953. (CPI-SP 24)
E. Descriptive Details
(This type of information is frequently furnished to USIA
through telephonic contacts rather in formal reports. )
1) Official holidays. 1950: Thailand. January 1951.
(Memorandum)
2) . Major holidays celebrated in Southeast Asia: Thailand.
May 30, 1951. (CS5.-23)
F. World Communism
1) Developments in world Communism: Thailand.
1952, 1953, 1954. Secret. (Contributions to IR-5650)
2) Southeast Asian Communists at Social Welfare Con-
feerences::tThb Thailand. October 13. 1952. Confidential.
(~ F
Approved Fora easeCo20f~ /D C A RDP67-D009A000100030001-6
-53-
SECRET
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A00010003TG1 x6
Annex C
F. World Communism (continued)
3) Indications of Communist activity in Thailand.
December 9, 195Z. Secret (IB-1297)
Communism in the Free World: Capabilities of the
Communist Party, Thailand. February 1953. Secret.
(IR-6165.6)
Assessment of Communist strength in Southeast Asia.
January 29, 1954.
II. Intelligence for More General Purposes
A. Estimates
1) Communist capabilities and intentions in Asia.
April 1, 1952. Secret. (DRY contribution and NIE 47)
Consequences of a Korean truce: Thailand. April 1953.
Secret. (DRF contribution and IE-52)
3) Thailand's ability to withstand. communist pressures
or attacks. May 24, 1953. Secret. (DRF contribution
and SE-45.)
4) Communist courses of action in Asia through mid-1955:
Thailand. September 24, 1953. Secret. (DRF contri-
bution and NIE-9B)
5) Present and prospective capabilities of non-communist
Asia: Thailand. October 1, 1953. Secret. (DRF-SP-21)
6) Thai reaction to Viet Minh victory in Indochina.
November 30, 1953. Secret (DRF-SP-30)
7) Probable Thai policy following loss of Indochina to
communist control. April 15, 1954. Secret. (DRF-SP-43)
The foreign economic impact of a US business decline.
May 10, 1954. For Official Use Only. (DRF contribu-
tion and IE-65)
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24 MA-RUP67-00059A0001000300g I
Annex C
B.
Basic Intelligence
1)
National Intelligence Survey: Thailand
a)
Political
Section 50
Introduction
51 52
The Constitutional System
Structure of the Government
53
Political Dynamics
54
Public Order and Safety
55
National Policies
57
Subversive
58
Propaganda
59
Biographies of Key Personalities
b) Economic
Section 60
Introduction
64
-= Manufacturing and Construction
65
Trade and Finance
61
Agriculture and Food (nearly complete)
62
-m Fuels and Power (nearly complete)
63
Minerals and Metals (nearly complete)
c)
Sociological
Section 40
Introduction
41
Population
42
Characteristics of the People
43
Religion, Education, and Public
Information
44
46
-- Manpower
Public Welfare
2) Reports
a) Political
(1) The Viet Minh Invasion of Laos and the Threat
to Thailand: a background report. May 15, 1953.
Secret. (IR-6311)
(2) The Thai Autonomous Region in Yunnan (Sibsong
Parma). July 3, 1953. Secret (IR,-6315)
Approved For Release 2004/06 2 .dff P67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/, : CIIA P67-00059A000100030001-6
Tab I
Annex C
b) Economic
.(1) Institutional Impediments to Private US Investments
in Southeast Asia: Thailand. March 6, 1952.
Restricted. (IR-5819)
(2) Factors affecting climate for US investment in
mineral development abroad: Thailand. May 14, 1952,
Confidential. (Contribution to IR-5905.3)
(3) Asian rice ,prospects for 1961: Thailand. August 1952.
Restricted. (IR-5940)
(4) Government expenditures on economic and social
services in Burma, Indonesia, the Philippines,
and Thailand. April 15, 1953. Restricted. (IR-6152)
(5) Economic conditions and short-term economic
prospects in Japan and Southeast Asia: Thailand,
July 16, 1953. Confidential. (IR-6345)
(6) Contemplated expenditures by the Thai Government
on economic developments projects. August 12,, 1953.
Restricted. (Memorandum)
(7) Foreign Trade Developments in South and Southeast
Asia, 1950-52. August 25, 1953. Unclassified.
(Contribution to IR-6349)
(8) Bilateral agreements in international trade.
April 22, 1954. Unclassified. (Contribution to
IR-6110R1)
G. Current Intelligence
1) Reports
a) Political
(1) The new constitution and political prospects in
Thailand. March 13, 1952. Secret. (IB-1121)
(2) Mounting political tension in Thailand. September 4,
1952. Secret. (IR-6006)
-56-
SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
Tab i
Annex C
(3) The government of Thailand may be moving toward
neutralism. September 4, 1952. Confidential (IB-1000.487)
(4) Thai government arrests opposition elements.
November 20, 1952. Confidential. (IB-1279)
(5)
Prospects of Thai -Cambodian-Laotian alliance.
January 19, 1954. Confidential. (IB-1548)
(6) Chinese irregular forces in Burma. February 15, 1954.
Secret. (IR-6507)
(1) Possible effects of lower sterling rates in Thailand.
April 10, 1952. Confidential. (IR-58.61)
(2) British-Thai rice negotiations. October 29, 1952.
Confidential. (IR-6050)
(3)
Deterioration in Thailand's trade and.balance of
payments position in 1952 and 1953 prospects.
July 14, 1953. Confidential. (IR-6241)
(4) Thailand's trade prospects for 1953 continue to
deteriorate. October 9, 1953. Confidential, (IR-6445)
-57-
SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
Case Study on India
1. Because of the presence in Washington of the
Deputy PAO from New Delhi, Mr. William Handley , the
Survey Team sought to obtain as much insight as possible
into the field needs in India and capabilities and points of
view with regard to intelligence.
Z. On.the basis of discussions with Mr. Handley, other
USIA personnel, and intelligence officers, the following con-
clusions were reached:
a. That a bibliographical statement of the existing
intelligence production relevant to the types of intelli-
gence needed by 'USIA should be sent to the field for the
selection of those items which would be of greatest
likely use.
b. In the development of an operational plan.for
India, an intelligence annex should be developed,
based upon the findings in the Thailand case study
and adapted to meet the peculiar needs of India. The
terms of reference for such an annex are attached at
Annex A hereto.
c. That there were possibilities for PAO reporting
but that requirements for such reporting should be
carefully drawn, levied in moderation, and fulfilled
in full cooperation with the Embassy.
COI~FIADF NTIAL
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: I DP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004106/ rOR 67-00059A000100030001-6
TAB: J
Annex A
INTELLIGENCE ANNEX FOR A PSYCHOLOGICAL
PROGRAM FOR INDIA
Intelligence questions which should be considered and answered
selectively to assist the formulation and execution of a psychological
program.
(The four "Stages" represent a time-sequence; the questions thus
frequently overlap, but need to be answered with increasing detail as
the operation progresses from the problem of deciding upon the country
target--Stage I - to the problem of deciding upon the group or in=
dividual target--Stage 3 Q and the selection of themes and actions--
Stage 4.)
STAGE I m STRATEGY
SELECTION
Why pick this country.?
A. Is India in danger of communist attack by force?
B. Are the communists attempting or likely to attempt to subvert
India?
C. Does India have will and capacity to resist attack by force or
subversion?
D. Can India will and capacity be increased?
E. What attitudes does India display towards the Cold War?
F. In what direction are these attitudes likely to develop?
G. Are there means whereby these attitudes can be changed favorably
to the West?
H. Does India provide an example and leadership to other peoples and
governments ? _59-
Approved For Release 2004/06/ 'rGIR ETP67-00059A000100030001-6
 SECRET Tab J
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A00010003QQa1 x A
Y. How does India compare h,-, above respects with major alternative
targets ?
SECTION II - PLANNING
OBJECTIVES
What do we wish to accomplish?
A. What are the attitudes of the government and people of India
towards the East-West conflict?
1. How do they view present global East-West Tension?
a. Do they see it resulting from a conflict.of principle, a
desire for power, aggressive tendencies, fear of aggres-
sion, or from other forces?
b. What possible developments of the situation do they fear
and what do they think the actual course of developments
is likely to be?.
c. Where do they think their own interests lie in the sit-
uation?
2. Do Indians understand the threat of communism?
a. Do Indians think the communists intend to take over their
country?
b. What confidence have the Indians that they can resist coM-
m uni s m ?
c. Do Indians think that communism threatens their ideals,
aspirations and way of life?
d. To what extent do Indians see through communist profes-
sions, such as being 11.for the people, 10 and coa munist
misrepresentations of the West?
-60-
Approved For Release 2004/06/24'Y fp1 T _7-00059A000100030001-6
 F~+, ~ Tab J
Approved For Release 2004/0 ~4CCIA IA-00059AO00100ADD6' 6A
that it might be potentially beneficial to them, as o -3 -
ing speedy solutions for social and economic problems and.
enabling India to develop into a. strong and powerful nation?
Do they think, or tend to think, of communism as the wave
of the future, or invincible?
e. Is the Indian view of communism distorted by expectations
What knowledge and understanding have Indians of communist
history, with special regard to the treatment of satellites?
. What do.the Indians:...think of."theWest?
What do Indians think of collective security measures
involving association with the West?
a. How do Indians assess Western objectives, intentions
and capabilities towards the Communist bloc countries?
co Does concern over political and economic imperialism color
Indians' attitudes toward the West?
4. What do they think of the US?
a. What identities and differences of interest do they see
between themselves and the US?
What. view do they have of US leadership in the Free
World?
c. How do they react to US foreign policy generally?
a. Do they admire or condemn particular aspects of US
culture as they see it? e.g.,, liberty, "materialism."
e. What other factors contribute to the. present state of. Indo-
US relations?
5. What other attitudes condition their view of the East-West-
tension?
a. Da differences and disputes with other "tiations of the
area affect the Indian attitude toward the US and the
West? (e. g. , the Kashmir and canal waters disputes
with Pakistan.)
Approved For Release 2004/06/246 f r7-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/ og*L"P67-00059A00010003%%l g
Annex A
b. What influence do ideological, moral or religious
concepts have on the. Indian attitude toward the East-
West conflict?
$. What factors contribute to shape, strengthen, or weaken these
attitudes ?
1. What is the content of the nationalist idea and sentiment in
India?
a. ltow strong is the Indian sense of national unity? What
factors tend to promote or hinder the growth of Indian
national consciousness?
b. Have Indians a pride in their nation, its history and
achievements? To which features of these do they
point with pride?
Cc How do Indians look upon. themselves and their culture
in comparison with the people and cultures of other
countries2
d. How do Indians regard other countries and their nationals,
especially the USSR and China, Europe and the US?
e. Do Indians cherish deeply certain elements of their
national life?
(1) Would these include. democracy, independence,
religion, property and way of life?
(2) Others?
f. Are the Indians working towards goals of economic and
social development?
(1) How much have they done, and planned on their own?
(2) Do cultural factors affect Indian attitudes towards
development?
(3) How strongly do the masses desire improvement of
material conditions?
-62-
Approved For Release 2004/06/2#'-'gi&R?P67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/O c ?DP6?-00059A000100Q ,$QL,O -6
Annex A
g. Have the Indians a vigorous traditon of political conscious-
ness and activity?
(1) Is the government apparatus now or potentially capable
of controlling communist pressure?
(2) What circumstances do or might arouse in the Indian
people intense feeling on political questions?
h. Are there minority problems?
(1) Do the minorities suffer from insecurities and un-
satisfied aspirations?
(2) How does the majority look upon the minorities?
(3) What are official policies towards minorities ?
(4) Is the government capable of applying these policies
or of obtaining satisfactory solutions.?
i. Are there other aspects of Indian culture and society
which influence Indian attitudes towards the East-West
conflict?
C. Do Significant segments of Indian society hold views and attitudes
which differ from those discussed above?
D. Do any particular factors affect Indian attitudes towards using of
force to resist aggression?
1. How do they regard the army and military service?
2. Have they experience or tradition of military action?
a. Practise in use of weapons?
b. Guerrilla warfare?
3. Are there cultural, ideological, or religious factors which
condition Indian combativeness or martial spirit?
STAGES III, IV
as for Thailand
(Add fgVk4P6r Rele # ( Rp -G OS OO OO030001-6
6.3
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
Tab
Annex B
List of Intelligence Products Relating to India
January 1952 through May 1954,
with selected items 1950-1951
(These products were prepared by OIR/State and the Office
of the Coordinator for Psychological Intelligence)
NOTE: Each project is listed only once under its primary description,
though it may, in addition, meet specific requirements under
other categories.
A. Se ments of Societ
1) Data on Ethnic Groups: India. September 14, 1951.
Restricted. (Contribution to CS-5. 12).
2) Major Religions of India. December 11, 1951. Restricted.
(IR 5668).
3) Some Aspects of Religion in India. October 31, 1951.
Confidential. (IR.5684).
4) Labor' Organizations in India. January 3, 1952. Confi-
dential. (IR 5525).
5) Organization and Influence of Buddhist Institutions in the
World Today: India. January 23, 1952. Secret. Con-
tribution to IR 5625. 3).
6) Developments in the Asian Socialist Movement. September
10, 1952, Confidential. (Contribution to IR 5731).
7) Minority Problems in the Near East and South Asia.
October 21, 1952. Confidential (SP 243).
8) Data on Organized Labor in India. October 24, 1952.
Unclassified, (SP 245).
-64-
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
SECRET
 Siatci1
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
Tab J"
Annex B
9) Distribution of Occupation of India's Gainfully Employed
December 9, 1952. Unclassified. (SP 257)
10) Nehru's Attitudes Toward Communism, the Soviet Union,
and Communist China. July 24, 1953. Secret. (IR 6269).
11) Background Information on Panchatantra 12/53.
12) Material Supporting USIA Activities in India in Dealing with
Issue of U.S. Military Aid To India 1/54.
13) Analysis of Nehru Statements On Communism 12/53.
14) U. S. Doctors In India 12/53,
15) Activities '-of U5 Missionaries in India, 2/,54.
16) Indian Attitudes Towards, the. .US 11 /.53
17) Background Information on French Enclaves In India 4/54.
18) Forthcoming Election In Trvancore-Cochin 11/53.
19) Background Data On South Asia 11/53.
20) Estimates of the Reactions Of Indiana, To the Failure of the
U. S. to Ratify the Geneva Convention and of U. S. Leaders to
Condemn the Use of BW.. 1/52.
21) - Estimated Reactions to Increased UN Bombing Activity in Korea
8/52.
22) Extent of Resentment In India Toward Living Standards of
Americans in India 4/52.
23) Linguistic Self Determination I ndia 12/52.
24) Recently Constituted State Governments In India 4/52.
25) Comparison of Indian and U. S. Voting Behavior 1/52.
26) Bibliography of Basic PW materials docuciien ``Z/''5 :
27) Anti-westernism In India 5/51.
Approved For Release 2004/06,(2 CHAR P67-00059A0001 00030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/2? CrA '67-00059A000100030DJl ,-6J
Annex B
28) Indian Attitudes Toward India's Current International Role
9/53.
29) Moral and Religious Content In the IIA Program-. India 5/53.
30) Indian Misconceptions of the U. S. 5/53.
31) Survey of Foreign Including Indian Attitudes Toward U. S.
Economic Policies 8/51.
B. Communications Media
1) Channels of Public Information in India. March 17, 1952.
Confidential. (IR5551).
2) Circulation of Indian Newspapers 2/54.
3) Chinese Radio Broadcasts to South Asia 2/54.
4) Background Information On Times of India. 12/53.
5) Possible Improvement of U. S. Collection Efforts On the Communist
"Book Program!' in South Asia 2/54.
6) Background Information On theAll India Radio 1/54.
7) List of Publications Sponsored By Communist Press in New
Delhi 1/53.
8) Information On the Bombay Free Press Journal 4/52.
C'. Foreign Propaganda
1. Program Content and Plans
1) Soviet and Chinese Economic and Cultural Moves in India,
January 1947-July 1.952. July 26, 1 952. Confidential.
(Contribution to IR 5972).
2) The Nature of Communist Social Welfare Propaganda in
India. November 1952. Restricted. (Memorandum).
3) Communist Make Large-Scale Effort to Involve India Intel-
lectuals and Culture in "Peace Campaign. 11 March 17, 1952.
Restricted. (IB 1123).
Approved For Release 2004/06/~ 67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24RCIA RDP67-00059AO001003 00016
nnex
Communist Books in India and Pakistan. January 22, 1952.
Restricted. (SP 180).
5) Quotations Indicating the Importance Communist Attached
to India. February 21, 1952. Unclassified (SP 193).
6) Quotation from the "Program of the Communist Inter-
nationa. " June 27, 1952. Unclassified. (SP 222).
7). Communist Penetration of Indian Motion Pictures Industry
and Indian Music. October 7, 1952. Confidential. (SP 238).
8) Extent to Which Communist-Line Press in India Plays Up
the Issue of Racial Discrimination in the US. March 15,
1954. Secret. (Memorandum).
9) Information On Western Commercial Advertising and
Communist Controlled or Communist Front.Newspapers
3/53.
10) Effects of the BW Campaign In India 11 / 52.
11) Soviet Cultural Activities In and Exchange of Visitors
With India 8/51.
12) Communist Propaganda In India.6/51.
D. Public Opinion
1) See items under Current Intelligence below-II. C. 1. a
2) Developments Significant for Propaganda: India. Weekly,
1951, 1952, 1953, 1954. (IR 555,0.xx).
Reports on reactions to bacteriological warfare campaign,
Eisenhower election, President's atomic energy proposal,
Geneva Conference, etc.
4) South Asian Attitudes Toward the West. June 27, 1951.
Restricted. (OIR 5372).
5) Indian Newspaper Comments on Treatment of Negroes in the
US. November 24, 1952. Unclassified. (SP 253).
6) Indian Press Comments on Secretary Dulles, May 13, 1953.
U cl s ified Memorandum .
Approved or Release 200 /Oss/ 'PIRD 67-00059AO00100030001-6
61-
 SECRET
ii
'Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A0001n300016
Indian Reactions to Dulles-Eisenhower Foreign Policy State-
ment 12/53.
8) Intelligence To Support Advertising Campaign In India. 12/53.
9) Indian Comment on Forthcoming Berlin Conference 1/54.
10) Analysis of Christian Science Monitor Article on Communism
in India 1 / 54.
11) Analysis of IBS Memo on Communism in India 1/54.
12) Pro-US Statements. made by Indian and Pakistani Leaders
12/53.
13) Indian Reactions to Secretary Dulles? Speech of March 29, 1954.
14) Indian Reactions to H-Bomb Tests and Related Developments
4/54.
15) Conference of South Asian Prime Ministers in Ceylon 4/54.
16) Indian Opinion on the Geneva Conference 4/54.
17) Indian Reaction to Nehru?s Statement Refusing to Permit
Overflight of India 4/54.
18) Indian Reactions to US Atrocity Charges in the UN 11 /53.
19) Indian Reactions to Developments in Iran 11 / 53 .
20) Foreign Opinion Concerning American Comics 5/54.
21) Reactions to the Moscow Economic Conference and of the
Returning Delegates 4/52.
22) Reactions to the Japanese Peace Treaty 4/52.
23) Indian Reactions to Ambassador Dean?s Efforts at Panrnunjon .
10/53.
24) Foreign Opinion on the Geneva Conference (Serial) 4/54.
25) Indian Opinion on the Soviet Peace Tactic and on President
Eisenhower's April 16 Speech 4/53.
Approved For Release 2004/094: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24RCA RDP67-00059A000100f 0b e0,p1
26) World Opinion on Soviet Possession of the H-Bomb 9/53.
27) World Press Reactions to the Seventh G.A. : India 10/52.
28) Miscellaneous other reactions reports to Stalin Death,
Eisenhower Victory, Korean Armistice Negotiations, etc.
29) Foreign Reaction to the Question of Grain Shipments from
the US to India.
E. Descriptive Details
(This type of information is usually furnished to USIA. by
telephone, rather than in formal reports.)
1) Holidays Celebrated in Countries of the Near East, South
Asia, and Africa. January 24, 1951. Unclassified (DRN-IP 258)
2) American Support for Indian Independence. November 17, 1952.
Unclassified. (SP 251).
1) The Extent of Communist Penetration in India. March 8, 1951
Secret. (OIR 5373)
2) Developments in World Communism: India. 1951, 1952, 1953,
1954. Secret (Contributions to 5650). 1
3) Analysis of Communist Propaganda: India. May 30, 1952.
Secret. (IR5714. 1).
The World Strength of the Communist Party Organizations.
1953, 1954. Unclassified. (Contribution to IR 4489).
Communism. in the Free World: Capabilities of the Communist
Party, India. January 1953. Secret (IR 6165.11).
6) Indian Communist Activities Since the Elections. In progress.
Secret. (IR 6399).
7) Material on Soviet Intentions in India 2/54.
8) Communist Effort in India in 1953.
-69-
Approved For Release 2004/0 P67-00059A000100030001-6
C
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A00010~ j% 1B6
9) Recent Communist Propaganda in India 11 / 52.
10) Information on Calcutta Communist Conference 2/52.
11) Evaluation and Analysis of New Delhi Document "Communist
Party: Facts and Fiction" 4/53.
12) Information on Communist Activity in India 10/52.
II. Intelligence For More General Purposes.
1) Trade With the Soviet Bloc--South Asia. March 31, 1952.
Secret. (Contribution to NIE 59).
Consequences of Communist Control Over the Indian
subcontinent. April 30, 1952. Secret. (Contribution to
NIE 61).
3) Probable Developments in South Asia. March 6, 1953.
Secret. (NIE 79). .
4) Foreign Economic Conditions and Trends. September
24, 1953. Restricted. (Contribution to IE-53).
Communist Courses of Action in Asia Through Mid-1955.
October 14,. 1953. Secret. (Contribtuion to NIE-95).
6) Soviet Bloc Capabilities for Economic Warfare.
October 1, 1953. . Secret (Contribution to NIE-100)
The Vulnerability of Non-Communist East Asian Countries
to Communist Pressure, 1953-55. November 16, 1953.
Secret (Contribution to IR 6465).
B. Basic Intelligence
1) National Intelligence Survey: India
a) Political
Section 50 -- Introduction (almost competed)
51 -- The Constitutional System
Approved For Release 2004/06/34 m CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
SECRET
 Approved For Release 2004/06, pP67-00059A0001000 pa0S01J6
Annex B
Section 52 -- Structure of the Government
53 -- Political Dynamics
54 -- Public Order and Safety
55 -- National Policies
57 -- Subversive
58 Propaganda
59 -- Biographies of Key Personalities.
b) Economic
Section 60 Introduction
61 -- Agriculture and Food
62 -- Fuels and Power
63 -- Minerals and Metals
64 -- Manufacturing and Construction
65 -- Trade and Finance
c) Sociological
Section 40 -- Introduction
41. -- Population
42 -- Characteristics of the People
43 Religion, Education and Public Information
44 Manpower
46 Public Welfare
Reports
a) Political
(1)
India's Position in the East- Weet Conflict.
May 24, 1951. Secret (OIR 5526).
(2) India's First General Elections and Their Results.
June 19, 1952. Confidential. (IR 5852).
(3)
Problems of Refugee Rehabilitation and Plebiscite
in the States of Jammu and Kashmir. December
23, 1952. Restricted. (IR 5780).
(4) The Indo-Pakistan Canal Water Rights Dispute.
June 30, 1953. Secret. (IR 5649).
Approved For Release 2004/06 IgYnk- DP67-00059A000100030001-6
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO0010003JUI6 B
(5) Factors Affecting Political Stability in India.
Secret. In progress. (IR 5782.4).
(6) The Linguistic States Problem in India. In progress.
Confidential.. (IR 6596).
.b. Economic
(1) The Food Problem of India. September 25, 1950.
Confidential. (OIR 5262).
(2) Major Development Projects in South Asia: India. October
12, 1950. Confidential. OIR 5350.
(3) The Agrarian Problem of India. February 19, 1951.
Restricted. (OIR 5354).
(4) India: Geographic, Social, Political and Economic Conditions.
October 31, 1950. Restricted. (OIR 5371).
(5) Land Reform in India. November 10, 1950. Confidential.
(OIR 5390).
(6) South Asian Trade Relations with the Soviet Bloc and China.
June 11, 1951. Secret. (OIR 5458).
(7)
Availability of Strategic and Essential Commodities in South
Asia. August 7, 1951. Secret. (OIR 5527).
(8) Political and Economic Factors in Foreign Countries Affecting
the Development of Their Raw Materials for Export. June 12,
1951. Confidential. (Contribution to OIR 5553).
(9) Economic Conditions in Kashmir. November 9, 1951.
Restricted. (IR 5622).
(10) Current Status of India's Food Supply. December 14, 1951.
Restricted. (IR 5669).
(], 1) South Asia Data Book. 1952 (IR 5623), 1953 (IR 6310).
(12) Opportunities for Private Investment in TCA Countries as
Indicated by IBRD and Ex-dm Bank Mission Reports. November
1952. (Contribution to IR 6087).
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
 SECRET
Tab3
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100A4PM-%
(13) Partition Debt of Pakistan to India. March 12, 1932.
Unclassified. (SP 198).
(14) Grant and Loan Assistance Given to India by US and
International Agencies, July 1947-June .1952.
July 24, 1952. Unclassified. (SP 225).
c) Sociological
(1) Cows and Monkeys in India. March 26, 1952.
Restricted. (SP 200).
(2) Birth Control in India: Prospects for Alleviating the
Problem of Over-Population. January 20, 1954.
Confidential. (IR 6268).
C.
Current Intelligence
1)
Rep
orts
a)
Political
(1)
Deviationism in the Communist Party of India.
January 17, 1950. Secret (OIR 5143).
(2)
Suggestions of Bad Feeling Between the Chinese
Communist and Indian Communist Parties.
March
31, 1950. Secret (OIR 5221).
(3)
Soviet Intervention in Kashmir Dispu::e.
January 31, 1952. Secret. (IR 5781).
(4)
Results of the Indian Elections. March 24, 1952.
Unclassified. (IR 5853).
(5)
Congress Party Government Ousted in One Indian
State, Possibly Threatened in Two Others. April
29, 1952. Restricted. (IB 1152).
(6)
Indo-Pakistan Relations Worsened by Political Upset
in Kashmir. August 13, 1953. Secret. (IB 1473).
(7)
Nehru-Ali Communique on Kashmir Indicates Little
Progress. August 25, 1953. Secret. (IB 1480)
Approved For Release 2004/0617231 -CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
SECRET
 SECRET
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100''b('1-6
Annex B
`r"' (8) Communist Fail to Win Control of Andhra, India?s Newest
State. October 6, 1953. Confidential. (IB 1498).
(9) The Forthcoming General Election in Travancore-Cochin.
November 23, 1953. Secret (SP 308).
(10) Analysis of Christian Science Monitor Article, by Gordon
Graham on Communism in India. January 20, 1954.
Confidential. (SP 312)%
(11) Indian Communists Face Test of Strength in Travancore-
Cochin Elections. February 19, 1954. Secret (IB 1559)
(12) Kashmir Constituent Assembly Ratifies the States Accession
to India. February 26, 1954. Secret. (IB 1564). (13) Nehru Presses for Control of French Enclaves in India.
April 14, 1954. Secret. .(IB 1596).
(14) Colombo Conference: Five Asian Nations Offer Advice to
Powers at Geneva. May 12, 1954. 'Secret. (IB 1616).
b. Economic
(1) Possible Utilization of Certain Indian Resources for Far
Eastern Development. February 6, 1952. Confidential.
(IR 5725).
(2) New Indian-Pakistani Trade Agreement May Restore, Normal
Trade. April 8, 1953. Confidential (IB 1383).
(3) The Problem of Land Reform in India. January 1952.
Confidential. (SP 172).
(4) Foreign Economic Conditions and Trends in Africa. Near
East, and South Asia. July 1, 1953. Restricted.
(Contribution to SP 290).
Approved For Release 2004/Wfil4lRDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/0? IQ1'Ffgfk1 7-00059A0001 (k01-6
Annex C
(These Projects were conducted under the guidance of the
former Evaluation unit in USIA)
1. Selected Segments of Societies
a. Size, Composition, Ideologies & Attitudes toward US, USSR, etc.
IF V. IND. 2 6
IEV.IND. 28
IE V. IND. 31
IF V. IND. 36
TV V. IND. 47r 1
Questions Raised by Indians about American Wome4
12/17/52
Some Clarification of the word, "Americana",
12/19/52
Survey of USIS Local Staff Opinion, 12/23/52
Results of Bombay Press Survey Conducted by
Asian Press Service, 8/30/51
Qualitative Analysis of Usage of USIS Material
by English-Language Press - July 1951, 9/29/51
Opinion Poll Among USIS Local Staff in India 9/53
Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part I -
Channels of Communications, 5/54
Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part II,
Public Opinion in Lucknow, 5/54
Communication of Ideas in India A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part III,
Communications and the Background of Opinion
in the Village, 5/54
USIS Indian Staff Opinion Study - A Quarterly
Mail Survey
b. Patterns of Influence among Groups
IEV.IND. 9 USIS Output and the Industrial Worker Audience,
5/5/53
IEV.IND. 47,1 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part I -
Channels of Communications, 5/54
Not yet received.
Approved For Release 2004/0@1?kpWtM)??7-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/Oel3b~ Ip 67-00059A0001 0bOl-6
Annex C
IEV.IND. 47-2 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part II,
Public Opinion in Lucknow, 5/54
IEV.IND. 47-3 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part III,
Communications and the Background of Opinion
in the Village, 5/54
........... Study of Operation of USIA Outpost Hyderabad
2. Media Research and Analysis
a. Types of Media in the Country
IEV.IND. 3 Pilot Study (Prepared for Guidance in Formulating
a Content Analysis of Certain Foreign
Newspapers with a View to Assessing the
Efficacy of the USIS Program) 5/16/52
IF V. IND,.29 Theme Analysis of the Anti-American Line
Demonstrated in Two Books in India, 1/12/53
IEV.IND.45 The Image of America and Americans as Presented
in the Communist-Line Press in India: An
Analysis of Crossroads and Blitz, 1/20/54
IEV.IND.47-1 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part I -
Channels of Communications, 5/54
IE V. IND. 47-2 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part II,
Public Opinion in Lucknow, 5/54
IEV.IND.47-3 Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part III,
Communications and the Background of Opinion
in the Village, 5/54
IEV.IND. 48 The Imagery of America: A Content Analysis of
the Indian Press, 2/9/54
b. Organizational Aspects of Each Medium
1EV.IND. 5 Evaluation of Some Operating Problems in the
Placement of Expendable Libraries, 3/16/53
IF V. IND. 7 An Administrative Study of the U. S. Educational
Foundation in New Delhi, 4/27/53
** Not yet received.
-7:6-
Approved For Release 2004/O&24F&Ac67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06gQt~ClI P7-00059A000T0 30001-6
Annex C
IEV.IND. 38 Study of VOA Reception of the Hindi Program in
India as Relayed from Ceylon Radio, 7/53
IEV.IND. 48 The Imagery of America: A Content Analysis
of the Indian Press, 2/9/54
IF V. IND. 49 Evaluation Study: Miniature Library Study,
2/12/54
d. Content of the Communications Output the Media
IEV.IND. 3 Pilot Study (Prepared for Guidance in Formulating
a Content Analysis of Certain Foreign News-
papers with a View to Assessing the Efficacy
of the USIS Program), 5/16/52
IEV.IND. S Report cn the Administration of Pictures for the
Film Attitude Survey, 5/21/53
IF V. IND. 10 Public Attitudes Toward the Community Projects
Program: Kothipur, Naglapathak Village
Study, 10/7/52
IF V. IND. 11 The Image of America and Other Foreign Countries
as Presented in Tektbooks, 7/53
IE V. IND. 22 Fulbright Students in India 1951-1952, 10/8/52
IFV.IND, 30 Qualitative Analysis of Osage of USIS Material
by English-Language Press, June 1951, 8/9/51
IF V. IND. 33 Qualitative Analysis of Usage of USIS Material by
English-Language Press, July 1951, 9/29/51
IEV.IND. 42 Report on the Evaluation of the Ouality and
Effectiveness of the Translations of the
USIS India, 12/53
IEV.IND. 44 Information Analysis for New Delhi - An Analysis
of Content: Middle East Bulletin Input...
New Delhi Post Output, 5/15/53
IF V. IND. 45 The Image of America and Americans as Presented
in the Communist-Line Press in India: An
Analysis of Crossroads and Blitz, 1/20/54
IEV.IND. 48 The Imagery of America: A Content Analysis of
the Indian Press, 2/9/54
IEV. P.11 Analysis of Wireless Bulletin Input and Post
Output for New Delhi, Athens, Mexico, Hong
Kong, 5/1/53
-7-7-
Approved For Release 2004/0 )~F@ Ij, 7-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/061c i)(Q M 00059A00QA100 3001-6
e. Location and Type of Audience Receiving Media Output
IEV. IND. 13
IEV V. IND. 14
IEV. IND. 15
IEV V. IND. 16
IEV. IND. 17
IF V. IND. 18
IF V. IND. 21
IEV. IND. 24
IFV.IND. 38
IEV. IND. 39
IEV. IND. 47- 1
IEV. IND. 47-2
A Readership Study of the English Language
Edition of the American Reporter, 9/10/52
A Reader ship Study of the Hindi Edition of the
American Reporter, 9/18/52
A' Readership Study of the Tamil Edition of the
American Reporter, 10/ 15/52
A Readership Study of the Malayalam Edition of
the American Reporter, 10/28/52
A Readership Study of the American Reporter
Telugu Edition, 11/3/52
A Readership Study of the Bengali, Gujerati and
Marathi Edition of the American Reporter,
10/24/52
Library Study, 1/13/53
Effectiveness of the USIS Auditorium, Calcutta,
2/4/53
The Voice of America Audience in India as
Measured by those Who Received the VOA
Newsletter, 8/53
Study of VOA Reception of the Hindi Program
in India as Relayed from Ceylon Radio, 7/53
Study of the Placements of Miniature Libraries
Throughout India, 1/13/53
Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part I,
Channels of Communications, 4/54
Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part II,
Public Opinion in Lucknow, 4/54
Communication of Ideas in India - A Survey of
Lucknow and Three Indian Villages - Part III,
Communications and the Background of Opinion
in the Village, 4/54
Analysis & Elimination of Duplication in USIA
Distribution List
f. Audience Reactions to Media and Why
IEV.IND. 1 Some Preferences of Indian Radio Listeners, 2/53
IF V.IND. 2 Fan Mail Received by the American Reporter
in India, 1/52
**Not yet received.
Approved For Release 2004/06/s ) T-00059A000100030001-6
-78-
 Tab J
Approved For Release 2004/06/2~P&i'N60059A0001000300,q"ex C
IEV V. IND. 5
IEV. IND. 7
IF V. IND. 10
IEV .IND . 12
IF V. IND. 13
IEV V. IND. 14
IF V. IND. 15
IEV V. IND. 16
IEV. IND. 17
IEV. IND. 18
IEV. IND. 20
IF V. IND. 21
IF V. IND. 22
IEV. IND. 23
IEV. IND. 24
IF V. IND. 25
IF V. IND. 28
IEV. IND. 31
IEV. IND. 35
IEV V. IND. 3 8
IEV. IND. 40
IEV. IND. 41
IEV V. IND. 42
Evaluation of Some Operating Pro blems in the
Placement of Expendable Libraries, 3/16/53
An Administrative Study of the U. S. Educational
Foundation in New Delhi, 4/27/53
Public Attitudes Towards the Community Projects
Program: Kothipur, Naglapathak Village
Studies, 10/7/52
The American Reporter - Staff Paper, 3/27/52
A Readership Study of the English Language
Edition of the American Reporter, 9/10/52
A Readership Study of the Hindi Edition of the
American Reporter, 9/18/52
A Readership Study of the Tamil Edition of the
American Reporter, 10/15/52
A Readership Study of the Malayalam Edition of
the American Reporter, 10/28/52
A Readership Study of the American Reporter
Telugu Edition, 11/3/52
A Readership Study of the Bengali, Gujerati and
Marathi Editions of the American Reporter,
11/24/52
American Reporters Survey of Mail from Readers
12/28/51
Evaluation of Exhibits in India, 11/7/52
Library Study, 1/13/53
Fulbright Students in India 1951-1952, 10/8/52
Film Evaluation Report, 1/30/53
Effectiveness of the USIS Auditorium, Calcutta,
2/4/53
Delhi Public Opinion Study, 10/22/52
Survey of USIS Local Staff Opinion, 12/23/52
Results of Bombay Press Survey Conducted by
Asian Press Service, 8/30/51
Qualitative Analysis of Usage of USIS Material by
English-Language Press, July 1951, 9/29/51
New Delhi Film Evaluation Study, 8/4/53
Study of VOA Reception of the Hindi Program in
India as Relayed from Ceylon Radio, 7/53
USIA New Delhi, Incoming Mail Analysis Chart,
8/18/53
Opinion Poll Among USIS Local Staff in India,
9/24/53
Report on the Evaluation of the Quality and
Effectiveness of the Translations of the USIS
in India, 12/53
Approved For Release 2004/06/24k Tr 2059A000100030001-6
 Tab J
Approved For Release 2004/06/i kki bfiOL00059A00010003QQ jt C
IE V. IND. 43
IE V. IND. 44
IE V. IND. 46
IE V. IND. 49
IEV.P.11
A Study of Exchange of Persons, 12/53
Information Analysis for New Delhi - An Analysis
of Content: Middle East Bulletin input... New
Delhi post output, 4/ 15/53
An Analysis of the Incoming Mail Received at the
Delhi Post Addressed to the "Question and
Answer" Column of American Reporter, 2/5/54
Evaluation Study: Miniature Library Study, 2/12/54
Analysis of Wireless Bulletin Input and Post
Output, 4/1/53
Survey of School and University Preference for
Maps
Mail Survey of Labor Audience Reading Taste of
a Sample of Readers of "The American Labor
Review"
VOA Audience Taste Study with Program Analyzer
**Not yet received.
Approved For Release 2004/06/2?Wr 4p0059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
SECUR TyINF'ORMATION
IAC-D-39/1
11 December 1951
.NATIONAL .INTNLLIGENCE ESTIMATES
SU RT FOR
ATO STANDING GROUP
6K
1. The attached :paper is submitted for consideration by the IAC
in response to the needs of the NATO Standing Group Intelligence Committee,
and SHAPE for strategic intelligence support as expressed by the U. S.
Member, NATO Standing Group Intelligence Committee, and by G-2, which serves
as the executive agent to provide intelligence support-for SHAPE
= 2. It is the view of the representatives of the IAC agencies that.
the handling of specific requests for U. S. national strategic intelligence
assistance to NATO will be greatly facilitated if there can be a common
understanding of the nature of this problem and a procedural framework
agreed upon as set forth in the recommendations.
3. There is also placed on the agenda a current-request for a National
Intelligence Estimate to go to the Standing Group Intelligence Committee,
the recommendation for which is based on this paper (see IAC-D-39/2).
JAMES Q,. REBEE
Secretary
Intelligence Advisory Committee
C~ S-E-C-R-E-T
I C-D-39 1
11 December gg5511
9 ~~j Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A0001000 0001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
SECURITY INFORMATION
IA.C-D-39/1
11 December 1951
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATES
SUPPORT-FOR N STANDING GROUP
25X1
25X1
1. To determine a practicable ,means for providing U. S. support to
meet the needs of the NATO Standing Group and its major commands for
national strategic intelligence estimates. (This excludes strictly military
intelligence estimates.)
RECOMMENDATION
2. It is recommended that National Strategic Intelligence support
shall be provided for NATO as follows:
a. For the Standing Group (it being understood that the
initiative rests with the U. S. Member, Standing Group Intelligence
Committee).
(1) Specific NIE or SE on authorization of the DCI with the
concurrence of the IAC for the U. S. Member to ow to the other
members of the.Intelligenceittee, with
U. S. Member retaining custody of the document.
(2) Specific NIE or SE on authorization of the DCI with con-
currence of the IAC for 0. S. Member to t in the Intelligence
Committee ("table" means to use in Commit ee as background in the
production of NATO strategic estimates);
(3) Preparation of estimates to meet explicit NATO needs for
tabling in Intelligence Committee, it being understood that it
is Standing Group practice to disseminate for comment to the U. S.,
national staffs those national contributions
which have been prepared in response to a specific request;
b. For the major command concerned (it being understood that the
initiative rests with the major commands through JIC to IAC):
(1) Preparation of specific estimates to meet the explicit
needs of the major command concerned, such estimates to be tabled-
in the major command for use of international officers only.
S-E-C-R-E-T
IAA . -3. 1
11 December 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
SECUR TY INFORMATION
IAC-D-39/1
11 December 1951
DISCUSSION
3. It should be noted that in no case would a National Intelligence
Estimate or Special Estimate be permitted to go to a foreign national staff.
The document produced by the Intelligence Committee even though it were
identic with the U. S. National Estimate would be transmitted to the major
commands or to the foreign national staffs without any formal identification
of origin or connection with the United States Government other than U. S.
concurrence in any NATO estimate,
4+. Under present arrangements SHAPE.is authorized to request contri-
butions on area intelli ence from the National Staffs. Insofar as such
requests dea strict Wi military intelligence, the support is provided
by the JIC or by the competent Service agency. In other cases the support
required may take on the character of a National Intelligence Estimate. It
is understood that upon transmittal of the latter category of intelligence
by JIC to SHAPE, SHAPE would presumably, with its own staff, produce its
on intelligence estimate out of the national contributions.
S-E-C-R-E-T
IAC-D-39
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059.0Gt}OQ191
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000
Security Information
IAC-D-39/1
11 December 1951
TAB A
1. The StAtAik% it CUp It 6, a 18E A -39 hi
level representatives of the Ohief% of It ff or ' itet A taee,
Great Britain, and Prftce.. Bubordiaaate to tbl Oro> is am Intel,.l.i ace
Committee whose functions e"
To provide 13t UdiC i tet1i C6 e+ 'b tB ter eta iasg
Cro f* r its use ftA reterenee, de miect e*ry, to the ZCegion*l
conmaraa d, NATO in pursuit of the NATO mission.
2. V. So participation In the Into ignce Committee is t1r0u ,
the U. S. Member who has close x'elatio a with 310, JIG and the Service
intelligence agencies and VUO relies iaa ediately On them fe ealiaeiw
ante. JIC is er cutive went of the Defense Department a acts fob
the U. S. Qovera nt in Providing the military intelligence and Is the
channel for 1roviding national strategic intelligence support required
for NATO Standing Group for military purposes i
3. The V. S. Government has supported the de'+relopmei t and
t b-
lishment of NATO because of its estimate that in the face of Soviet
policy it is only by combining their resources tkat the Westc
nations can frustrate Soviet designs and at the *ame ti maintain a
free society. Action by the 12 members of NATO in gearing theme el+es
economically, militarily, and :morally to the tasks at hand is dependent
upon a common appreciation of the facts co4ceaning the Soviet ezd Its
preparations for war, its capabilities, and its intentions.
4. The U. S. Government,. while geographically most remote from
the Soviet orbit, has been most concerned about the Soviet problem.
As the single nation with the material and moral resources necessary,
the U. S. has found it necessary to take the leadership in virtually
all fields of the common effort. This leadership can be strengthened
and made more. effective if it is fully extended to the intelligence
sphere as well. One of the main problems the U. S. has had with
respect to NATO has been to convince them that the Soviet menace is not
so vast as to make Western resistance pointless, Joint strategic intel-
ligence and guidance can be of immeasurable value in the resolution of
these problems,
S-E-C-R-E-T
IAC D39-39/
11 December 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000 ` - ` a
Security Information
IAC-D-39/1
11 December 1951
5. Furthermore the U. Si. is the only country with sufficiently
comprehensive and reliable intelligence resources to provide a reason-
ably accurate appraisal of Soviet strength, capabilities and intentions.
DISCUSSION
6. The U. S. must support NATO with strategic intelligence for
two reasons:
a. To discharge our obligation to provide to the Standing
Group the best strategic. intelligence and guidance available
to support and direct the combined military strategic planning
and secondarily to make ;known to the major NATO commands the
strategic intelligence upon which strategic planning is based;
and
b. To assist the NATO nations to properly and accurately
assess the Soviet menace.
(. The United States Government is currently making available
to the U. S. Member, Standing Group, Intelligence Committee, through
JIG appropriate intelligence of all the agencies and of the IAC. It
is also making available to SHAPE for tabling:
a, sanitized summaries of Watch Committee reports;.
b. military intelligence;
c, a political-economic summary prepared by the Depart-
ment of State's intelligence area;
do certain portions of the National Intelligence Surveys..
Specifically with respect to national strategic intelligence estimates,
support for NATO has been confined to the following:
a. making NIE's and SE's available to the U. S. Member for
his background in dealing with the other members of the Intelli-
gence Committee;
b* assisting in the preparation of an initial overall estimate
for the Standing Group;
c. the preparationiof SE-16 in response to a specific request
of the U. S. Member, Standing Group,. Intelligence Committee.
S-E-C-R-E-T
IA 39 1
11 December 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06124: CIA-RDP67-00059A000$9De oie 0
Security Information
IAC-D-39/1
11 December 1951
8. Underlying our decision regarding the substance of our
strategic intelligence support of NATO and the method to be used for
providing it are these major considerations:
a. Need for cooperation: It is clear that NATO cannot meet
the crisis which it faces if its members are mutually suspicious
that each is holding back from the other his true purposes or his
true estimate of the situation. A genuinely cooperative attitude
is an essential if the personal relationships of members of the
Standing Group, the Intelligence Committee, and the major NATO
commands are to generate harmony which is required for joint action.
This problem has been faced in practically all our participation
in international organizations,
b. Need for U, S, leadership: Because of the limited resources
of most of the NATO governments tto produce intelligence information
and high quality national estimates, U. S. intelligence has the
large share of producing strategic intelligence. As the chief con-
tributor to NATO intelligence, the U. S. must be scrupulous in its
effort to contribute to the common cause the maximum which other
considerations will permit, Because it has greater resources for
collection, collation, and estimating than any other of the NATO
powers its obligation to assume leadership in this respect is
undeniable.
c. Appropriateness of U. S. strategic intelligence to NATO
.needs: National Intelligence Estimates as currently prepared by
the IAC are designed to meet the needs of the President and U. S.
,policy officials, Frequently the way these estimates are written
is stimulated by, and therefore directed toward, the requirements
of U. S. policy. This may be to respond to an existing situation,
to take the initiative with respect to a developing situation, or
to create a situation to our advantage in our relations with the
enemy, our allies, or the neutrals. Such intelligence estimates
might well be inappropriate, from the U. S. point of view, for
meeting NATO needs (although they might influence the other nations
to our advantage) unless they were carefully selected and their
use was surrounded with adequate restrictions. Strategic intel-
ligence for NATO should be pointed toward the strategic questions
facing NATO although in some cases these may coincide with the
immediate questions facing the United States Government. To
obtain maximum U. S. strategic intelligence support for NATO
with the least expenditure of our limited personnel and resources
requires us to use if at all possible what we have already
-3_
S-E-C-R-E-T
IAC-D-39 1
11 December 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AOOO
Security Information
IAC-D-391
11 December 1951
produced, taking into account: (e.) the danger of divulging
prematurely a U. S. policy move; (b) the security consideration.
d. Security: In any dissemination of U. S.. intelligence to
foreign governments in addition to the obvious hazard of tipping
the U. S. policy hand prematurely to our allies there is the more
serious danger of malicious or unintentional leak to the USSR.
The foreign national members of the Standing Group, the Intelligence
Committee and the major NATO commands have an international character
and are either morally bound or sworn not to divulge to their nationa:.
staffs intelligence or other information having to do strictly with
the international or collective business of NATO. On the other hand
it is understandable and entirely probable that in retaining their
relationships to their national staffs (highly necessary to main-
tain and develop vitality and viability of the international groups)
there will be some unauthorized revelation of information. It is
difficult to provide assurances comparable to that effected within
this Government that no such leaks either malicious or unintentional
will occur because: (1) these foreign nationals with international
responsibility have not been subjected to security investigation
equal to our own, and (2) they possess a dual. role as international
and national officials. Any arrangement, therefore, for the trans-
mission of U. S. national strategic intelligence must either be
based on faith that no disclosure will occur or upon recognition
that some d-ieclosure is inevitable and that, special estimates will
have to be prepared for NATO or existing ones will have to be
expurgated. It is noteworthy that this problem is more acute for
the United States than for other countries because of its larger
potential contribution to the common fund of intelligence and
because, on account of the U. S. power position, the USSR would
consider a U. S. intelligence estimate of much more value to them
than one representing the views of any other country.
S-E-C-R-E-T
AC-D-39 1
11 December 1951
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
Security Information
IAC-D-40/1
4 February 1952
INTELLIGENCE 'ADVISORY C014-1ITTTEE
DISSEMINATION OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
TO FOREIGN GOVERNi,I1;NTS
Attached is the redraft of IAC-D-40 pursuant to the action
of the IAC at its raeetinG of 31 January 1952 and includink; an
additional proposal of the FBI (last phrase of Faracraah 3).
It would be appreciated if a written concurrence to this pro-
posed NSC letter would be sent to my office by 'nv rsday,
7 February 1952.
JAI 0.. RIBBER
Secretary
Intelligence Advisory Cotrmjttee
S-E-C-R -13-
Li Ac - U-767 11 -'
I+ February 1952
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
REDRAFT S-E-C-R-E-T
Security Information
IAC- -1O/l
February 1952
DAFT MEMO'ANDUM FOP : Executive Secretary
National Security Council
SUBJECT: Dissemination of National Intelligence
to Fore iGn Governments
1. In keepin; with the present policy of the United States which
associates this country with other Governments in political and military
cooperation, it is essential to provide these -overnrnents with U. S.
national intelligence where such action will contribute to the security
of the United States.
2. Heretofore national intelligence has been Given some forei&n
disse.iination, on a highly selective basis,
to a fear other foreign overnments and NATO bodies.
This has been done under the authority of the Director of Central
Intelligence as inferred from the National Security Act of l"'.47 and
the National Security Council Intelligence Directives. The volume of
intelligence that can and should be released to certain foreign Govern-
rients has become so considerable, however, that the National Sec-Lrity
Council is requested to grant sortie specific authorization and clearly
fig: the responsibility for the disseriination of national intelligence
to f ore. novernr,lents .
3. It is therefore proposed that paragraph 5 of NSCID-1 be
desiGnated 5(a) and that the followinG be inserted:
Paragraph 5(b) - Unless otherwise provided by law or NSC
Directive, the Director of Central Intelligence is authorized to
25X6
S-E-C-R-1 -T
IAC-D- 0 1
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-OQQ5i Q GjW1-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
Security Information
IAC-D-40/l
4 February 1952
disseminate National Intelligence on a strictly controlled basis
to foreign governments and international bodies upon determination
by the Director of Central Intelligence, concurred in by the
Ixtelligence Advisory Ccrsmittee, that such action would substan-
tially promote the security of the United States provided that any
disclosure of classified military information included in such
national intelligence is in accordance with the policies laid down
in the U. S. National Disclosure Policy (MIC 206/29), such deter-
zination to be made by the Army, Navy and Air Force; and provided
fuxther that any disclosure of FBI intelligence infor iation will
be cleared with that Agency prior to dissemination.
4. In connection with the general subject of dissemination of
intelligence to foreign governments, it is noted for the information
of the National Security Council that the Central Intelligence Agency
has been in the past and is currently disseminating intelligence infor-
mation collected by it and finished intelligence ( other than national
intelligence) produced by it to certain foreign governments on a reci-
procal basis. This is being done in keeping with national-security
interests and, where military information is involved, under the
'resident's policy with respect to dissemination of military infor-
mation to foreign governments (MIC 206/29). This has been necessary
and extremely useful in securing the prod: of the intelligence
S-E,-C-R-E-T
f
I AC-D-407-1
k February 1952
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
S-E-C-R-E-T
Security Information
IAC-D-l O/l
4 February 1952
agencies of the foreign governments to add to cur ami intelligence
resources.
5. This proposal has been approved by the Intelligence Advisory
C or,n;ditty e.
UTAVIM B. SMITH
Director
S-T
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-000 931-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
TAB
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
 Approved For Release 20g R4ETlA-RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
DISSEMINATION OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
.TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
IAQ-D-45 /2
(Revised)
2 3 June 1953
Procedure for release of national intelligence documents to
foreign governments in pursuance of NSCID 1, revised, will be
as follows:
National Intelligence Estimates
1. In forwarding the draft of an estimate to the T AC, 414E will
propose its release or non-release to foreign governments, giving
reasons therefor, and indicating in cases where release is proposed
what governments should receive the estimate.
2. An agency nonconcurring in this proposal will specify, at
the IAC meeting next after the meeting at which the estimate is
discussed, its reasons for nonconcurrence. When there is objection
to proposed release, specific reference will be made, to any para-
graphs considered non-releasable. The IAC will then agree either
to release, not to release, or to release a sanitized version.
Other Types of National Intelligence
3. Proposals for the dissemination to foreign governments of
other types of national intelligence will be submitted to the Secretary
of the IAC, who will bring it to the attention of the IAC.
Notification of Dissemination
4. The agency serving as executive agent for the dissemination
of a particular category of national intelligence will notify the
Secretary of the IAC when the authorized dissemination has been made
and this will be reported in the IAC minutes for the information of all
concerned.
lAC-D-.45/2
(Revised)
23 June 1953
Approved For Release 2004/0%14CfIqCDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
SECRET
SECURITY INFORMATION
IAC-D-45/2
(Revised)
23 June 1953
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
DISSEMINATION OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
1. Attached is a revision of paragraphs 1. 2, and 3
of the former procedure for securing IAC concurrence on
dissemination of national intelligence to foreign governments.
2. This revision was adopted at the IAC meeting on
23 June 1953.
25X1
Secretary
IAC-D-45/2
(Revised)
23 June 1953
Approved For Release 2004/@'8`/ !RDP67-00059A000100030001-6
 X.
Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
IAC-D-77/1
28 December 1953
INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
BUDGETARY ANALYSIS OF INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
Attached (TAB A) for the information of the IAC is a copy
of the DCI? s' letter to the Bureau of the Budget on this subject.
The letter incorporated suggestions made at the IAG meeting of
15 December (IAC-M-133, paragraph 3) and transmitted suggested
categories (TAB B) as they were amended at that meeting and
subsequently discussed with Mr. Macy.
Secretary
25X1
IAC-D- 77 / 1
28 December 1953
Approved For Release 200470FT Ti?,TA-l lF&'-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059AO00100030001-6
CONFIDENTIAL
TAB A to
IAC-D-77/1
28 December 1953
23 December 1953
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Robert M. Macy
Bureau of the Budget
SUBJECT: Budgetary Analysis of Intelligence Programs
1. In response to your 17 November 1953 request for advice
and assistance from the Intelligence Advisory Committee in the
development of a more adequate budgetary analysis of U. S. intelli-
gence programs and more specifically in the formulation of a
categorized approach to budgetary analysis, there is attached a
suggested initial listing of categories to accomplish these purposes.
2. In keeping with the understanding reached at the IAC
meeting at which you were present, internal security programs
are excluded from the categories as they will be excluded from
the analysis.
3. Based on informal consultation, it is my understanding
that you believe these categories will be suitable to assist you,
at least in the initial stages, to achieve the objectives outlined
by you on 17 November to the IAC.
4. As the survey proceeds, the Bureau should feel free to
call upon the IAC for additional assistance, as appropriate. It
would be appreciated if the Bureau's findings would be made
available to the IAC.
/s/ Robert Amory, Jr.
for
ALLEN W. DULLES
Director
TAB A to
IAC-D-77/ 1
28 December 1953
Approved For Release 200/ U6/'Z 1,W- 67-00059A000100030001-6
 Approved For Release 2004/06/24: CIA-RDP67-00059A000100036B to
CONFIDENTIAL IAC- D- 77/ 1
'Suggested Categories for the Survey of Intelligence Budgets
1. The major categories should be restricted to the classical
classification of intelligence, namely: collection, production and
dissemination.
2. The category "collection" should be divided as overt and
covert.
3. Intelligence activities under the category "production"
should be further classified as follows:
a. Political, cultural and sociological
b. Ground Forces
c. Naval Forces
d. Air Forces
e. Economic
f. Scientific and Technical
4. No attempt has been made to classify "production" or the
subdivisions of "production" as basic, current and national intelligence.
Such a division, if made, would be unrealistic, inasmuch as in some
agencies the employment of personnel on these respective categories
of intelligence will vary with the intensity of international relations
and crises. There is no formula thus far discovered or used among
the agencies which could indicate the actual allocation of total resources
to those categories of intelligence.
5. The category "dissemination, " for the sake of uniformity
in the survey, should include screening, reproduction, translation,
distribution and libraries, although the relationship of those functions
to both production and collection is recognized.
6. In connection with these activities, whether by intelligence
or by operations, which serve purposes other than intelligence, the
approximate intelligence cost should be broken out and listed. This
is particularly applicable to certain problems in collection, but is
not necessarily restricted to. collection.
TAB B to
IAC-D-77/1
28 December 1953
Approved For Release 2004/0N( W 059A000100030001-6