AN OVERMODEST CIA -- EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON JOHN E. MOSS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000500350005-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 5, 2004
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 12, 1966
Content Type: 
OPEN
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000500350005-7.pdf61.13 KB
Body: 
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD 12 July 1966 Approved For Release 2004/02/10 : CIA-RDP75-00149R000500350005-7 An Overmodest CIA r-i -r- EXTENSION OC I CMARKS or or CA1,11-01m A iN TIIE HOUSE OIs ILIiPI1ESr..NTATIVES Tuesday, July 12, 1966 I Mr. MOSS. Mr. Speaker, the. follow Ing article from the St. Louis Post-Drs-l patch, which also appeared in the Sacra-~ mento Bee under date of July '1, 1D66, is one. which deserves the thoughtful con sidcratlon and reflection of every respn'I- sible member of the Federal Govcrn went: i Pronr the Sacramento Dec. July' 1, 19661 AN OvrnmoOEST CIA Only In the most nnrcow sell trchhicai wino can It be considered nccurnlo to any that the CIA has never main porn cy uml h-vcr tried to Influence a preslrirI.;lal dent-: Sinn. Those were the Inrulcsi, Ur,v'ten which the agency's new dlrectm, a,l hl Mein, gave sal aters when the A=- -'I :;rrv- Sce Committee recommended app, oI 'sin nomination. They can ncarcnly l.. y u, n, vlth the record of CIA oporntioos r:,11, in Cuntemnul, in the Day of Plgs Ins. ,m, mnl In South Viet Neal. Perlmpn It In technically precise try nv ti,nC the CIA does not hake policy, 1111, crw,t r:; ei tuntiorm. Tile was certainly JI", rr:,, In the Day of Pigs Invnt;lon, which Roan start to finish was n CIA enterprise, orlgii atcrl. rn Arthur M. Schlesinger reports In "A Thousand Days", by CIA Director Allen Duller and LLie nsslstnnt Richard M. Dlsseli Jr. fly present-- hog a newly Installed President with the of t i- Allon of no exile force ready to Invade Gun a with American training and supple L. the CIA created ,the ctrruvnstannee under own tile policy decision It wanted-the President np- proval--was virtually assured. Thla may not he making poll, y III the strict scnsc, but it in so close to It Wont the dlgmronce is not important. t lrnllarty ht South Viet Nam It wall the CIA thnt undertook to Install Ngo Dlnh Dien no bend of n military anti-Communist govern mene offering a mtfltnry lodgment to the United Ataten on the Asian trebrilmid still thus undermining the neutralist bade of the 1054 Ocneva settlement. Out of that situn- tlon grew on policy decision after another adding up to deep American involorrnent In at, Aaiun hand win, It I. true tint At every stags of these end other CIA operations the agency obtldned nominal approval from the National .Seen city Council and the President, So the responsi- 'allity of Its ventures has been widely shared. Yet it 1s a fnmlllar fast of bur...... n tic life that the agency which orlgi nntee prof core controls the information shoat tr,om nnC directs the day-to-day operntinus line sr, fverwneirning infrueneo upon the in it grAlcy unnerrying them. - It is for Into Pennon thni, the CIA tgll to be kept under strict and severe cool. Th.nt means flint of nli, control by tae -i'r,. eldan c. We do not see how such control nor. 110 axef- clsed tntcss very rigid restricttona err npPhCC to the Initiation of any cinndestiw? opern- tlon (no dlatiuct from the gatheri;,r nI in. formftttnnl at the very begsminag. 1( in not the American mission to go around (l,o world setting up governments and knockl,'g then, down, and bo governmental agency should enjoy carte blanche to engage In this hull- nesn without strict supervision by the very highest responsible officials. Tltat kind of supervision. applied with a heavy dose of ekeptlolem,as to the long-run pge tl acrloea of clonk-and-dagger work, should cut the CIA's "dirty tricks" division toe minimum. Ercctlvo control ales mennn congrcnlotiat knowledge of whet to going on. We tee no' lined reason why members of the Brenta For. elect Relations Committee Should not be added to the "watchdog" group now noml- nally responsible for keeping the CIA under review. That the ngency'a work vitally at., forte foreign policy III obvious, and the Ben-' store who are responsible for reviewing our International relations should know whet the CIA le,doing all the time, early as well as