(Sanitized) WARNING PAPER (ATTACHED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80M01082A000900060012-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 6, 2004
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 24, 1974
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80M01082A000900060012-8.pdf361.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80MO1082A000900060012-8 IC 74-2099 24 Octt,ber 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: arning Paper (attached 1. This paper, except for the paragraph on the Alert Memorand ,I, .is an excellent summary of the mechanisms being developed to lmpro' z communication within the community during acrisis. I think it inaccurate, however, to call these mechanisms "A National arning System" and to imply that their use will enable the community to provide better warning of impending crises. 2. The national warning system consists of the Alert Memo, and procedures, the -Watch (or Strategic ,yarning) mechanism, the procedures being developed under NSDM 242 t-, cope with unclear warning, and ultimately (but not a responsibility of the inteiligen?.e community) tactical warning systems, such as BMEW S. N I .!, 0 ., CONTEXT, etc. can in one way or another support these warnini- systems but are not in themselves such a system. Acting Chief, PR D Attachment: As stated Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - IC Registry PRD Subj ect 1 - PRD Chrono w/o att) Approved For Release 2004/05/05:: ClA 25X11 25XI 25X DRAFT 22 October 19/4 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80MO1082A000900060012-8 A NATIONAL WARNING SYSTEM Introduction Beginning with Pearl Harbor our ability to obtain and act on warning information has been conspicuous for its failures rather than successes. With the exception of the Cuba Missile Crisis, there have been an almost continuous succession of failures down through the Yom Kippur war and Cyprus. In almost. every case there was adequate information existing within the structure of our government but the information failed to converge to time to allow warning. Part of the 'probl em derives from the proliferation-of organizations who are contributers to the warning process. In the area of intelligence alone, for example, at the time of Pearl Harbor there were only three. intelligence agencies (Army..6-2, Office of Naval Intelligence, and the FBI) and now there are over two dozen. The intent here is not to criticize- these various activities--they all do useful work--but rather to point out that the problem of converging critical and relevent information is growing exponentially more difficult. From time to time there have been major organizational efforts to consolidate--the creation of CIA and NSA being notable examples--or repeated efforts to reorganize, such as the current discussions on the role of the Watch Committee/National Indications. Center. A different approach is to take organizations as they exist but give them a new dimension of communication by means of interagency remote confer- encing techniques. Some efforts are made in the direction of interagency 5X1 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80MO1082A000900060012-8 Approved For Release 2004/05/05 : CIA-RDP80M01082A000900060012-8 communication by the exchange of liaison officers, or, during a crisis, the creation of interagency task forces, but their efforts are hampered oy being away from their parent organizations, among other problems. Current Conferencing Networks In May, 1973, the then DCI (and later the current DCI) accepted the proposal to explore the use of remote conferencing networks. In April 1974 the USIB agreed to make the National Operations and Intelligence Watch Officers Net (NOIWON) operational. The NOIWON consists of the Watch officers of CIA, DIA, NSA, State, State/INR, J-3 and the White House Situation Room. The NOIWON proved particularly useful in the Cyprus crisis, being used as. much as four times within one hour. If any two Wt