MORSE CALLS REFUGEES 'REAL ENEMIES' TO U.S.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP75-00149R000300200011-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 11, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 21, 1998
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 27, 1963
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP75-00149R000300200011-8.pdf309.59 KB
Body: 
HUMAN EVENTS APR 2 7 1963 Morsea s s o d For Release: `Real Enemies' to U.S. Castro and anti- Communist refugees. Already it is aft the Communists w to are cur enemies. but the anti- S ator Wayne 1iorse tells theta off in a brisk speech urging them to re- in tuber that it is not for them to make A erikan foreign policy and that they re not In the t'n;te(j States with any ri ht_s, legally or ,aurally, to use the to ritory of the (Jutted States for ac- ti itits atimed at implicating A ncrica., ft reign policy in siuationy t,'at might w 11 lead to war"-or, more plausibly, t a Soviet retreat from this hemis p ere, which we are supposed to wan Bpsi i,?~ the refugee nuisance, 'there fa the Goldwater-Keating nuisance w ich, according to 1984 logic, is t sing away the- great "victory" o missile withdrawal. It takes a bi CPYRGHT 0 ci, ing to figure this one, them publisher of Lie 171~d1;]i " 4_s ,...* tit r, se to the W&. It seem at "by refusing to bring Castr d )wn by the brute force of Yanke a s, Mr. Kennedy has restored fat s i,0 with South America now infusin n L.;, policy." 'T'his victory, accordi t Mr. Graham, is "being recklessi s uandered by the partisan brawliti over Cuba. In building his argument, M raham comes out with the most r .arkable 1984-ism I have encou t red yet. Castro, it appears, "occuple t ie place of Syngnian Rhec or Diem r. unpopular leader propped by ma . ve support of a major power . . he responsibilit for the final do y f 11 of Castro lies with the people Cuba." They, with tactics "imitati- f Mao Tse-rung and Ho Chi Minh' re poised to fight the only kind f var of liberation' that the free wort an countenance." It sound, like a war of libera- tion that i~ un- likely to lib, rate anybody- rspe- t lalty since we are determined t:) clap into jail any Cubans ,,=ho might like enlist it, it! The trouble is W.'ing in the Orwellian Age, men I kV CPYRGHT ::tL1 tpt to suggest that there is some- thi::i screwy . ,)out it run the risk of bt ie;t; brushed aside as nuts. In the Kingdom of the Blind, the man with 2()!`0 vision is under a serious handi- can. bus I confess I haven't observed any erious dissent from the view that it is "irresponsible" to take the Soviet occultation seriously. Few -complain of the effort to ass'.)ciatethem wit:i some mythical war mongers who demand immediate invasion of Cuba. inaction on Cuba ,"Oiled 'Understanding' ^t r ,r h ;m insists ? that the real Cuban revolution must not be given "tltc sort of support that would make them American satellites," because the reve??.'ion is one "which will never be unfit - ,.)od' i r;1,,pfficers who ask for } raises a ton: Lie fulurg rate of the Xi:if; Ranch :xr other US invest- ments-,(: Cuba."` A- pre- 1984 mind would en.ertain the possibility that the restc rat`,,! of freedom to Cuba might not be, in. .;istent with a responsible attitude tt..,.rd US property there, una in a:., .t,e that such matters can be settled i.t:t-:, when the Communist base at our Jo.,rstep has been phaabd out.. But, I suppose that is negative thinking. 1111 in a14 A rnjoyed .1984 more when it uWas fctivn! Sanitized - Approved For Release,: CIA-RDP75-00149R000300200011-8 ,1_. ponenta of near appeasement. The United States speedily gathered around Miami an array of armed power that could have bounced Castro all the way to the South Pole. While this "big stick" was be- ing created, the President practiced the sort of intensively skilled diplomacy that alone can find an option different from nuclear warfare or surrender. A single instance showed the value of in- structed and informed reflex action. That was the President's peremptory refusal to consider . any trade involving our Turkish bases-and this despite a widespread afflic- tion of weak-kneed jitters on the part of many in and out of Government. A THROWBACK TO KIPLING One who visits the Caribbean area, even brieflly, cannot help being appalled by the cacophony of abuse and jingoism that has come out of the United States on the heels of the President's success. First came a caterwauling over the rela- tively ineffective Soviet bomber contingent, that remained briefly In Cuba. Next came a blather of criticisms of the U.S. intelligence system-either naively amateur in nature or viciously reckless of U.S. security if the sources happened to hold any responsible positions in our security organization. Finally, there have come the trumpeting swivel-chair warriors, stirred by blurred recollections of Kipling's days, who demand such belligerent acts as blockades. It is sur- prising that Mr. Nixon could so quickly parole himself from his self-announced sen- tence of long-term silence. It is appropri- ate, however, that he selected the setting of Mr. Jack Paar's program for the announce- ment of what in other circumstances would have constituted a grave. demand for acts of war. Seen from the Caribbean area, Mr. Ken- nedy's victory over the Cuban missiles is not diluted by these strangely _ motivated do- mestic attacks. The Kennedy policy has established, for the last Latin doubter, Cas- tro's suppliant role as a Communist satellite. And by refusing to bring Castro down by the brute force of Yankee arms, Mr. Kennedy has restored faith in the maturity and sense of partnership with South America now in- fusing U.S. policy. RESCUE IS NOT THE ANSWER The Cuban exiles in the Caribbean area have fairly easy and constant communica- tions with Cuba. They know that dissatis- faction with Castro is constantly growing. But they also know that within Cuba there is little desire to be rescued from. Castro by Yankee arms, only to be returned to the chaos of corruption existing before Castro's tyranny. throw of Castro, but the creation of a new governmental system that will permit Cu- bans, by themselves, to find a democratic destiny. Cubans of this school of thought are hor- rified by the bellicosity of a Nixon. They are depressed by the partisan speeches in the United States which indicate that we should reassume a benevolent guardianship over Cuba. Those Cubans who engaged in the early planning of the Bay of Pigs fiasco still re- member the callous ideas of superiority held by CIA officials. "The first thing I was asked by the CIA officer in charge," says a leading Cuban exile, -'was to state ' my attitude toward restoration of the King Ranch properties." These exiles-predominantly young pro- fessional men of moderately liberal and 'democratic leanings-are determined that Castro will be overthrown from within Cuba. They- have no interest in a Guatemala type coup d'etat directed by the CIA-or any other outside organization. They are seeking financial support with- out strings. And support is just beginning to come, in trickles, from among the exiles themselves and from other Caribbean dem- ocratic forces. This is aid without. any strings, without any commitments aside from the moral assurance of these men that of corruption. TOPSY-TURVY SETTING From the United States, these exiles and their working colleagues now in Cuba will welcome only a form of support for which we have little governmental experience. They do not want the large-scale, massively supervised support that has been America's method in South Korea and South Vietnam. For in Cuba the tables are turned about topsy-turvy. from the usual cold war setting. Here Castro occupies the place of Syngman Rhee or Diem-an unpopular leader propped by massive support of a major power. And in Cuba it is the Communist bloc, for once, .that is trying to prop an unpopular govern- ment with an expensive supply line running across thousands of oceanic miles. The anti-Castro resistance that is already a-building takes heart from the lessons of other areas. These Cubans know that 500,- 000 French soldle,.s, including the ruthless professionals of the Foreign Legion, could not conquer the relatively weak bands of native Algerian rebels. They know how large a threat to massive U.S. efforts a few thousand well-trained and dedicated Viet-_ Cong Communists have become. They know that ours is an age when force can impose an unpopular dictatorship only when it is as totally overwhelming as the So- viet divisions in East Germany. The greatest U.S. aid to the free Cuban movement will not come from military ac- tion against Castro. The sort of action rec- ommended by Mr. Nixon smacks so much of Yankee imperialism that in the final analysis it could only help Castro. The major things needed from U.S. policy are already coming forth under President Kennedy. His firm and courageous elimi- nation of the Soviet missiles, and his subse- quent actions, have prevented the Commu- nists from turning Cuba into a satellite firmly held by Soviet might. The responsibility for the final downfall of Castro lies with the people of Cuba. They are now just beginning the gathering of their forces, inside Cuba and among the exiles in the Caribbean area and on the U.S. mainland. The young men who today are forming these revoluntary forces of freedom are not prominent on our TV screens or in our press photographs. And they are revolutionaries- in the classic sense-not merely opponents of Castro but opponents of his betrayal of the revolution which Cuba under Batista and his predecessors had so long needed. They are gathering now, and have been for 15 months since their morale began re- covering from the almost fatal defeat of the Bay of Pigs. They are resolute in their determination to see Cuba liberated by Cubans. They are, not merely wary of. but in fact openly hostile toward, the sort of U.S. support that would make them Ameri- can satellites. This is the dominant characteristic of the new Cuban democratic revolutionary move- ment. It is a characteristic which will never be understood by CIA officers who ask for promises about the future fate of the King Ranch or other U.S. Investments in Cuba. In the final analysis, these Cuban freedom forces are poised to fight the only kind of war of liberation that the free world can countenance. Their guerrilla tactics will be ? frankly imitative of Mao Tse-tung and Ho Chi Minh. But their political strategy will be drawn from the experience of Wash- ington and Franklin and Jefferson. For their war will not be aimed to establish a U.S. hegemony but rather to create a new free land. SUCCOR THAT FAILED The extent of the determination of the Cuban liberation movement can be shown by a recent poignant example. Sanitized - Approved. For Release : CIA-RDP75-00149R000300200011-8 1963 MAR 2 1 1963 FOIAb3b Sanitized - Ag~~FII~R~IA-~ some guile, is required to sort out the truth from the facts. But certainly the celebra- tion of St. Patrick's Day 1s centuries old in America. It began before the Revolution; it has never ceased; may it never do so. It has taken root among us because it is an occasion dedicated to freedom; to national freedom and religious freedom, and to the great St. Patrick. There was never a better cause. We stand In the mighty succession of those who first proclaimed it, and those who brought it .to fulfillment in our land. It 1s our cause to defend and ours to advance. In that con- JOHN P. KENNEDY. Partisan Brawling Squanders Fruits 'o Cuba Triumph EXTENSION OF REMARKS OP HON. GEORGE P. MILLER . OF CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, March 21,1963 Mr. MILLER of California. Mr. Speaker, all Americans should deplore the 'unfortunate political charges that have been made recently concerning Cuba. The petty bickering which has been taking place can only give aid and com- fort to the enemy. In last Sunday's Washington Post, I feel that a penetrating analysis of the foibles of such. a discussion at this time is made in an editorial by Philip L. Graham. This editorial entitled "Parti- san Brawling Squanders Fruits of Cuba Triumph," is certainly an excellent ac- count of where we stand now on the Cuban matter. Under leave to extend my remarks, I am pleased to incorporate this editorial in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: CUBA TRIUMPH -"have done more fundamental political 'thinking in the past 4 years than in the pre- (By Phili .GrahU S "ERTO Rico c`o.,:-Th~~- SAN JUAN, PUERTO e fruits of America's greatest cold war triump4 are be- ing recklessly squandered by the -partisan brawling over Cuba. The triumph came on Sunday morning, last October 28, when Chairman Khrushchev announced the surrender of the Soviet mis- sile systems in Cuba. Considering Khru- shchev's usual prose style, the announce- -ment was an-epic of unambiguous brevity. The missile systems would be taken down' and this would be certified by the U.N. This came less than 6 days after the Presi- dent's tough TV speech. Thus Mr. Kennedy forced the Soviet Union- to agree to "dis- armament with inspection," a reversal of years and years of obstinate Soviet rhetoric. The ensuing reaction is enough' to drive toward near despair any observer of our two- party system. Here was an indisputable ex- ample of the U.S. Government working soundly, sensibly, sagely under. crisis condi- tions. The President turned his back-alike on proponents of armed invasion and pro-