SENATOR BARRY GOLDWATER

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP91-00901R000500260001-7
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 30
• Document Creation Date: December 15, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 24, 2003
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: March 28, 1982
• Content Type: TRANS

Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R0005099-7
RADIO TV REPORTS, IN~
4701 WILLARD AVENUE, CHEW CHASE, MARYLAND 20015 656-4068
PUBLIC AFFAIRS STAFF
STATINTL
PROGRAM Face the Nation STATION WDVM-TV
CBS Network
DATE March 28, 1982 11:30 A.M.
SUBJECT Senator Barry Goldwater
Washington, P.C.
GEORGE HERMAN: Senator Goldwater, the people of El
Salvador are voting today, with the possibility of a victory-b}
the extreme right. What do you feel should be the United Statfs
policy towards whoever wins the election in El Salvador?
SENATOR BARRY GOLDWATER: I think we ought to try to
get along with them. I think we should do whatever we can in a
noncombatant way to help the country. Central America is as im-
portant to us, I think, as any part of the world, probably. And
I wouldn't want to see us go down there with armed forces if
there's a chance of getting the whole thing to work. And I think
maybe we can do it.
ANNOUNCER: From CBS News, Washington, a spontaneous
and unrehearsed news interview on Face the Nation with Senator
Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence
Committee. ,
Senator Goldwater will be questioned by CBS News con-
gressional correspondent Phil Jones; by Jack Germond, syndicated
columnist for the Baltimore Evening Sun; and by the moderator,
CBS News correspondent George Herman.
HERMAN: Senator Goldwater, it was your opinion in your
first answer that we should get along with whoever wins the elec-
tion in El Salvador. But supposing it should turn out to be the
extreme right wing, Major D'Aubuisson, who says his first action
would be to hang President Duarte, a man who's been -- D'Aubuisson
has been called a psychopathic butcher. Should we get along with
him, or should we put him in some kind-of quarantine?
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000500260001-7
OFFICES IN: WASHINGTON D.C. ? NEW YORK ? LOS ANGELES ? CHICAGO ? DETROIT ? AND OTHER PRINCIPAL CITIES
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00050026 001-7
SALT UK E CITY TRIBUCTE (UT)
31 MARCH 1932
Once more Adm_ Bobby R.-'Inman, deputy director of the
Iligence . Agency,. has. thrown the
gauntlet, to the ground; threatening
the American- scientific- community,
in effect; that if it'doesn'i voluntarily
,reduce-4he~flowof technical informa--
tion with. possible military and indus-
trial application to the Soviet Union
the government will:
The: admiral has professed sur-
prise 'that `a similar statement made
in January., was taken as a threat by
.scientists and academicians. when he
raised- the' possibility of government
intervention to stem the-'flow of ideas
during a talk - before:. the American
Association for- the Advancement of
Science::
At that time he said he was
aghast that his remarks were taken.
as a threat by his agency rather than
the private views of a "knowledgable
citizen."
Monday, however, there was no
uouoc -tnat tie. was. expressing the
opinions of the deputydirector of CIA.
Inman reiterate. his position before a
joint meetir/g of:two ;subcommittees
of the House, Science and Technology
Committee. , 4'It is . time for the
scientific;community`-to 'acc'ept that
there is an outflow, and that outflow is-
potentiallydamaging, he told the
Congressmen. Scientists, particular-_
ly t oli`se -afflfat ed -.'w---educational
institutionshe said should not: wait.
for government regulation (as if it is'
an inevitablity) but should' "set: up
their own'-',mechanism to~ limit ,.the
asS~Y _..3r i. Aye
ou p ?r.?6RR3FA~.~7+".?"w ~'ia_. * 7fti+"C:,..:?,. ~F-"
"'In `gthe`r ;words;"his telling the:
academcs'cbmmunity.to:`either shut
- up or the government. will shut- them
A
Besides being what amounts to .1
contradiction of terms (if somethin" I
is non-secret it shouldn't be sensitive)
the proposal is a threat to the viability
.of American scientific processes. The
free flow of ideas and- -the ready
exchange of data- are the bedrock o ,
this- n_ ation's scientific prowess .
If the government demands, - or
enforces, a stifling of that free flow of
ideas and information the risk :is high
that.' America will - soon find itself
sitting in the. back_ seat-=with the
scientists of some less restrictive
nation in the driver's seat..
Although the admiral denied- it
vigorously, 'his proposals -.are pre-
cisely what -Rep. Albert Gore Jr.,
D.-Tenn., called "the first step along ffe
the road that has made Soviet science I
so pitiful."
ine tears- of Dr. Frank Press,
president of-the-National Academy of
Sciences, deserve paramount consid-
eration. He worries, he .:'told the
subcommittees, that government ef-
% to muzzle scientistsmight force
basic research -with indirect military.
applications, out, of universities, "thus
denying,. this important resource to it
the Defense-Department.. We should
consider how much our -security is I
harmed by denying government ac-
cess -to many .of the nation's most -1
brilliant scientists."
in other words, i's a penny worth
of additional security worth the pound
of lost and unfettered research? In all
Then ntel1igehce offfeeVL~vas`tes
tifying .m connection '?J fh
govern-
trlent propposals etc Vk4 +~-'f cress to:
ce""main non-secret ~-utaensit ve seien=
-If
tificnformation x
;L':~7~', .~..
Approved For Releasd 2003/12/03: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00050026
RTICLE APIV.EAR ;D
ON PAGE
31 March 1982
The free flow of information and"ideas is.
vital to'th2 advancement of scielice and tech-
nology: No . nation hail provided better proof
than the'Unite&Statgs . Tn Yrzairitain Amen=
:sc1 ntif
harm the progress?of scieiice_" Here is som
thing to build on - the more effectively soif
the discussion expands to include independent
voices`concerned about the commercial im-
fields: the freedom, of inquiry and. research agreements Under the economic gun sR ry -
must be protected against neiv pressures; for -This week governmental pressures for se-
seccecy coming frouz,"bokh?the priviate an crecy of unclassified information came to the
c
o
t
un
am
nt
te
unateq;Apr
lly the systerii that produced the
goyetalsector ~or
fore again when Adm Bobby I inan deputy
tive~ efforts are uncle wa wills at7east some ] director of the CIA appeared aLa congres- ? scientific and technological-lead that the gov-
?toprotect an d leave`as
cooperation from-Ahese sectors tTieinselves,sionar ieaiing. He renewed his January ca1C ~
with no thin to roteet. in the,,-very-
-Sucti efforts must be .igarousty pursued nat! -for the'cientific community--con -? place - g near fu-
only in the name of constitutional rights but in , voluntaryrestnictions on itself or risk.govern tune The wax t protect hat lead is to make
the~name of the4=irery~`commercial'ancLrna mental%restraints, `-~i#z r? > x d _:i sure the county sbest taleniisencouraged to-
the new secrecyz?J v --to? tesistiWashington efforts to change-their a w Il,around past;discovc ries.~s
n
?"
'
k
i
` Mote. that officialiy-tlassified `:sec' et
formation is not the issue~iere Thescientists- cla practices on foreign scholars access: to ssifTeduzformation $tazzfordforexample
le.i
and-- universities ' trying to protect-their free tivas asked to restrict certain kinds of tech
dour are-not trying to escape. the.i esponsibii 'nical data from Chinese'sEudentsand aSoviet l
sty for protecting classified secrets-They.are4
-robotics specialist one whose work ,, inci-1
trying to. prevent restraints on the-fruitful ex j i i - a -
a
4 dentatty,'is said to have significantly aided
te companies's'eeking to. keep results
by priv
' of research to themselves:=:or under1nitia ,
tives by government agencies seeking to keep
ever' unclassified-'inforrnation-away from -po-
tentialadversaries = iF*:;, ,:A c:. s ;,.~
Last week a conference of university press
dents and genetic 'engineering- company ex
ecutives took a-step toward clarifying; respon
sibilities - in comirrercial . arrangements-
betwe'en private,/eompaniea and?edi1cational`
`institutions. -Te5n came up with: guidelines for
fashioning agreements that among=, other
things, ` do~noti proiiiote- a secrecythat wilt-
'Ame'rican progress in the-field.. Stanford ref
fused noting, that no secret or.classified re-
search is_perm itted on the canapes
Two panels of public'and privateofficials
liavebeen setup to con'side- the matter of sci
entific-freedom-and -national security needs
.They properly want to avoid a collision course,
between government Sand the researchers it,
IsGoveTy
Their work is important; because freedom
of ideas and s.e urity;are not opposed but'in-
separable. A group of ; u:liversity.presidents
,put it well some time age when protesting an
effort to imposeexport restrictions-on univer-
sityresearch achvzties:'
'Restricting: the free fiow~of information
among. scientists andengineers would alter
f
d
a
e
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 AT TICLE PPEk D ~TATII
ON FAG= Approved For Release 2003/12/03 CIA-RDP91-00901R0
Tr C`IIZISTIr?'? )CIEPNCc; i-I0'JIT03
30 :arc 1982
Curb on US scientific fiow\
to Soviet Union is urged
x.? ; ,.. Washington
The US government may be forced
to impose tough restrictions on the
flow of scientific information to the So-
viet Union, Bobby Ray Inman; deputy;;?
director of central intelligence, said.
"I think in six months, a year, or 18
months as the government begins to
see the full magnitude of what the So-
viet Union gets from the West, there
will be a decision,". he told a House
Science and Technology,;
subcommittee.
He said it is vital for scientists to be-
gin voluntarily consulting the govern-
ment and in some cases submitting
research for prepublication review in
an effort to forestall legal restrictions
on the flow of information.
But Rep. Albert Gore (D) of Ten-
nessee said legal restrictions would
be harmful to US science and aca-
STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000500
ON PAC
By David Roberts
W N{NGTON TIMES 5TA
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
(Limited Edition)
30 March 1982
Ctrs ucjJu.y ..~.... -- ~
,describing a"hemorrhagel:of sensitive.U.S.
technical1in~or;nhtion being pirated.by they
alled for academic researchers.io
;
c
Soviets
establish a voluntary Peer review program::,
:4: .. nl,Siraf?ifRR_ _'`ic
10 51Li ecu yvaaa
Inman told a joint rongresstdrialpanel that
such a plan will`be necessary because the.
Reagaaadmini$tration's efforts at tightening
`security in other areas will forceSoviet spies
omunitY for.%
to'turn to ; the academi~4c m
'information:
";' .'T-he voluntary review Program, Inman said,;:
'would be similar ,to a system currently being
used to. help -.prevent irelease, of scientific,
research }nvolving.sectPt:cadin methods.1
'.Scientists and'mathematicians v*rking ins
this area voluntarily forward a ca demic papers
,to the National Security. Agency for review.
`prior to:{publication" In, this, however; the;
taiithors,arenot obligated.to.w ithhold publiFl
cations even if NSAclaims they should.';;~.
:.Inman warned that'if:the academic coin;,
munity did not undertake voluntary restraints;
the federal government might impose roan ,~
tdatory'measuressix months; otse year; 1$
1 ,fir e' 'W f,~1
J!?`Nt
i
'
e9
Hrgh Stal
.::
;-Other witnesses' at?the_ conference agreed
twith Intrian's? contention;that greater;secu
;xity was needed,although many,expressedl
,'reserVatibns about how-suchrestrictionsi
might be:app]ied.=,ii
~Frarik 'ess;''.tiresiden o ithe; National.
{ cadeiny~bf'Scierice',said that- Vipanel of
nJt.:
"Security Agency,has taken alea d ip denounc1r, 9
stake&in resolving the controyersy;.: Press.::
experts is studying the problem; and expects ,,
to have preliminary recominerdations by Sep-,
'`tember.on steps. the. academic community,:
*indus ry and government cQuld take to soly t"
t
'. r _"ITotb parties arid, the country have a hig t ;
(with the Soviets ; F,
Outflow of Information :, f,?
,,We should no Ionger;accept'as t given.
that the United States benefits from such in -`exchange,".he told two subcommittees of the
House Science and Technology Committee.
They met to understands number of admix-
r'Istration?proposals to control the flow of s "i ''_.i
sitive information toEastern bloc couatri s.
-!!j,.'6 time foi*scientists to come to accept
.that there is anoutfioiv of information, ' Inman
said. - `This is aner.ormous outflow, not to a
friend, but an. adversary...greatly reduciag
;.,the time' necessary+-td get major [Sovi"t]
weapon4 systems into production:'-
:: Via;` :?. ~ r? -. -?+,
b
. According'to ~nnan; researchers apcept i
;the restrictions on publishing information
r resulting from research done under industry
contracts without losing their academic'fr 'e-
'.dory,sotheyshouldbeabletoacceptnatio sal
security restrictions as w 11 ,~ ? ;; : r , , ,
~'. ; "VI need to assess the 'proper balance
between legitimate national security con4id-
'.'. erations and possible damage to our tri:di-
~i.tion of.freedam.in academic and scientific
institutions," said Rep. Albert Gore, Jr., one
of th,e two subcorpmittee chairmen.. ` ' . .
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 it
z~R z' T C r.'-~4p t?pved Fir Release 20031,ij10$ 1 391-0090180005
?z; FAC 30 fnAfCH 1932
inrnan -Bids Academics Monitor Own
By ROBERT REINHOLD
sped] toYbe H.e York rLmn
WASHINGTON, March 29 -- Adm.
Eiobby R. Inman, deputy director of the
Central Intelligence Agency, urged the
scientif C commum:ty today to come for-
ward with proposals *-o reduce the flow
of technical information with military
and industrial app'il odors to the Soviet
Union or face the Yrcpect of Goverr]-
rnent-imposed c o rats.
Ft is time for t e scientific com-
munity to accept that there is an out-
flow, and that outflow is potentially
Congressional i wring. Academic , when Admiral Inman raised the possi-
scientists, he Rent on, should not 4.-:Lit I M fry of Government intervention to
stem the disclosing of ideas. At the time
he was speaking before the American
Association for the Advancement of Sci-
ence and today he complained bitterly
tratnews accounts had exaggerated his
remarks. He professed surprise that his
cc uments had been taken as a threat
by his agency rather than as the private
ti i ews of a "knowledgeable citizen."
Admiral Inman said today that he
was trying to serve as a "goad" to the
academic world, to get it to act before
more onerous proposals came from the
Departments of Defense. Commerce
and State, and the National Security
Agency. not the. Central Intelligence
Age'rlcy
Representative Albert Gore Jr., the
Ten see Democrat who heads the In-
vestigations and Oversight Subcommit-
tee, suggested that Admiral Inman was
taking the "first step along the road
that has made Soviet science so piti-
ful." Admiral Inman heatedly retorted
that he was not proposing censorship.
Rise in University Leaks
While he said that only a "small per-
centage" of technical leakage came
from college campuses, Admiral Inman
predicted it would rise soon if counter
es ioaage efforts succeeded in closing
off industrial and other sources to
Soviet agents. He said universities ai-
ready.restrictecl access to research to-`
protect their commercial interests..
Lawrence J. Brady, a sistant Secre
STATINTL
strong belief in the academic com-
munity that they have an inherent right
to teach, conducr research and develop
exchange programs free of Governn-
ment review or oversight."
"Clearly we cannot allow cur vital
technolovical lead to be whittled
away," he said, "simply because We,
refuse to take the time and trouble to
try and strike a balance between the d0.,
wands of academic freedom and the;
reeds of national security."
At the hearing, Dr. Frank press,
president of the National Academy of
Sciences, said he feared that Govern-'
ment efforts might force some basic re-
search search with indirect military applica-
tions out of universities, "thus denying
this important resource to the Defense
Department.
"We-should consider how much our;
security is harmed by denying Govern-
ment access to many of the nation's
most brilliant scientists," he said.
STAtINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
for Government regulation but should uary orcorhrr..erce for trade administra
"set up their own mechanisms now to tion, said the department, which en-
deteimineideas to limit the outflow." I forces export controls, was concerned
He spoke at a joint hearing of two sub- abort academic research because col_
committees of the House Science and Ic es had become more involved in
Technology Committee into Govern- raor~k with industrial applications. He
ment proposals to restrict access to cer- called it a "sensitive and complex prob.
taro ronsecret but sensitive scientific ' l.'m" to restrict sensitive technology
information. These efforts have without "unduly burdening scientific
arrxned intense unease among aca- searcher later scientists, many of whom say ater today, he spoke differ-
they fear clumsy bureaucratic intro- e'ntlYtotheAssociaticnofFormerlntel-
sion that. might undermine American. iigence Officers. He complained that
scie_ntific prowess. the' Administration confronted "a
 Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R0005
01,
THE WASH I ?JGTON POST
30 March 1982
a
By Philip J. Hilts-
WashfngWnW.s:~~. Writer
Adm. Bobby, Ray Inman. deputy
CIA director, acknowledged yester-
day that scientific papers are only a
"very small part of the problem" of
the "hemorrhage of this- country's
technology" to the Soviets. -
But at the same tiu-ne,. in speaking
to two House subcommittees on sci-
ence and technology, he again
warned that there is a "massive So.
viet effort" to acquire U.S. technol-
ogy, and if scientists do not volun-
tarily censor some of their papers on
sensitive technology, "I think in six
months, a year, or 18 months, as the
government begins to see the - full
reagnitude of what the Soviet Union
gets from the West; there may be a
decision to impose restrictions.
At a January meeting here of sci- I
entists, Inman warned that if they
did not voluntarily let the govern-
ment review some of..their sensitive_
pap; ru,- tough restrictions might ire.
Yestexclay; `Inman said he re
gretted using the phrase "tidal wave,
of public outrage,"but added that,
then and now 'he, was. trying to
"goad" scientists into: acting before
the government does
Also testifying for the: administra-1,
tion yesterday was Lavrence,..J.;
Brady, assistant secretary : of., com-,
coerce, whose remarks ,were: re-
strained compared, with what be said
later at a luncheon with the Associ-
ation of Former Intelligence Officers.
There, Brady said the Reagan ad-
ministration, has "aggressively +
stepped up our enforcement efforts"
under the export, administration act
in the past year. He cited criminal
prosecutions in two California cases .
One case involved a shipment of
copper water-cooled mirrors used in ~
high-power lasers. The shipment to
the Soviet>,Union was made, through
? . s, Warni
nobs
an intermediary in West`.Germany-,
The California company's. presidenti
drew a 10-year prison sentence, all!
but six months of it suspended. ' I
Brady-said the Soviet KGB hasp
built -an' industrial-espionage ?net
work of frightening proportions;' one;
that he said has `bla:nketed the de-~
veloped ' capitalist countries -
sucking up formulas. patents, blue
prints and know-how with frighten
ing precision"
11 He said the administration is still
trying to develop a critical-technol-
ogies list that it hopes to make "the
kingpin of the whole system" of pre-!
venting seepage of sensitive data and
equipment. But at least a few in the
audience of some 400 seemed cha-
grined by Brady's suggestion that
the role of the multinational firms in
the transfer. process is "going to be a
public policy issue in the next de-
cade:'
"How long can we wait.- one
questioner demanded "This hasl
been going on since 1906"
? At the House hearing, Inman said
that he believes that 70 percent of,
the problem-of the "outflow of tech-'
nology" comes from Soviet espionage!
activities, and that only a small per-1
-centage of the-other. 30 percent can
be attributed to the failure of scien-'
tists to keep sensitive work secret.
But he said he expects the Soviets
to concentrate on the other' 30 per-
cent much more in the future as the
administration succeeds iri'halting
more of the Soviet espionage.
Rep. Albert Gore Jr. (D-Tenn.)
'questioned Inman 's arguments and
said the United States should "not l
take even ? the first step down that
road [of a closed society] that makes
Soviet research so pitiful." - '
Robert Rosenzweig, a vice pres-
ident of Stanford University, said
the premise of the administration-
that-there is a threat to,national se-
TATINTL
curity from open - scientific., :x-
change-"is wrong. We should re--ct.
it .... It has always seemed risk% to
run an open society;.perhaps tha is !
shy there are so few of them.'
in a related development, ofic als
at Commerce said yesterday they ,ire,
'investigating conflicting accounts of
a shipment. of 3960,000 in water 6u-
rification equipment to Libya `i:at.
the Customs Service -eized in
Brooklyn on Friday.
Customs spokesman Louis Geri,
sad his agency determined that the .
shipment had not-reached the 'iVa-
tertnwn, ;Mass., loading docks of the i
exporting firm, Ionics Inc.,' ?+':ntit:
after the administration's emhsgo
on high-technology exports. to Libya
took effect March 12. A Comm-erce'
spokesman said "we were giver as-
surances by the firm that the- ?tutf
had gone to the clocks on March 11.
Staff writer George Lardae+- Jr.
contributed to this report.-
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901
ADivi BOBBY RAY il'Y;?1Au~t
;,
.r,,. cnnb'r"u to ~bnorP~ ariantiata - art
 Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R0005002
ARTICLE PHILADELPHIA IHQUIHER
30 !.!A~R 1982
By Tim Ahern
Assa..ia1 4 Prera
WASHINGTON - Top intelligence
officials; concerned about a "massive
Soviet effort" to accuire U.S. techtiol-
-ogy, told Congress yesterday that
American scientists and universities
-should reduce the `ow of sensitive
STATINTL
sucf as weapons systems or missile ceptable damage" to basic freedoms.
guidance information. But there needs to be an attempt to
But U.S. agencies are stepping up impede the flow, he added. -%
their counterintelligence efforts and George Millburn, acting deputy
"if we are successful, we will cut off undersecretary..of defense-. for re-
many of their avenues," Inman said, search and engineering, said the
That, he predicted, will lead to exchange of -information between
Soviet efforts to gather information the United States and the Soviet
information to the Soviet Union. about basic research, much of which Union is "one-sided." He said there is
is done at universities. only'"very, very minimal" benefit to
Unless the transfer of information the United States.
is halted voluntarily, there may be Attempts to restrict the flow of
pfrom the fgovern. basic information do not have to The administration is considering
me pressure s
to block it, he federal
Bobby Inman, infringe on academic, freedom, he' a draft executive order on secrecy
said, that would permit the government to
deputy director of the CLtold tw
o
House subcommittees. . As more and more universities are
Soviet efforts to gain access to b} Moving into areas that have commer-
sic rest efforts only applications, such as genetic
y a small part of engineering, they have restricted the
the problem" of the "outflow of tech- availability of information about
nology," Inman said, their research, he said, suggesting
There has been "a massive Soviet'
that such restrictions could he ap-
effort" by a "wide range of means" to plied to national-security matters.
learn about U.S- research, particular- "I have not put a proposal on the
ly applied technology, he paid. , table to control anything," Inman
About 70 percent of the Soviet ef- said, explaining that he was trying to
forts to learn about U.S. technology be a "gadfly" and simply wanted' to
come through intelligence or legal j, raise the warning flag.
and illegal attempts to purchase that
information, he said; adding that
most of the efforts are aimed at find-'
In an open society such as the Unit-
ed States, "you'll never control the
i
f i
f
i
h
fl
ormat
on w
n
t
out unac-
ow o
ing out about applied technology, a
more easily claim national. security In keeping information secret.
That proposal and Inman's warn
log have raised concerni in the aca-'
demic community that the adminis
tration wants to restrict the flow of
information.
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03: CIA-RDP91-00901R000$00260001-7
29 March 1982
'n s 44
i iz28=+it+i: e{ZaTflIiiivi?Tte1
yet. -- : GOVERNMENT 1
, M .=;vr^~?i 293 i'.EU !.,rER THE ?=a SMAY BE
FORCED Tr.ti.? IMPOSE TOUGH ON THE FLOW OF SCIENTIFIC
r e. .?.~. i.: ! RESTRICTIONS .I!e_ R'a UNION! DEPUTY r' TRRL --.
t dN:ThyLe 3 S..;`?'-Y
!"fT.i?H TO THE SOVIET IOE!!;
? r ? - _ to ' DIRECTOR BaBay - N M A N = A 1 ! F D i?'! :
RRY a ^ THINK IN SIX MONTHS! R YEARS OR ...`r" MONTHS 1Al THE
GOVERNMENT MAGNITUDE OF WHAT THE - - ~i V^
BEGINS TO SEE THE FULL
Y.
:.!Y '+r IrI r.:
UNION GET FROM THE s9ESYT; THERE }} WILL BE A ELSON! i e HE TOLD A
MMITTEE!
HOUSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE.
HE SAID IT 1_ TS 5 :%sTflr.a p='Y.r. SCIENTISTS TTO BEGIN VOLUNTARILY
p~ AND
CONSULTING WITH THE d GOVERNMENT AND iN S p'?E CASES SUBMITTING
r
O FORE.krL
REsE~lstiYPS'! FOR PRE-tf'BL F T1r~.''!!TT1 EFFORT TO FORESTALL
~4t:, st..r..tt) REVIEW in AN `! EFFORT
RESTRICTIONS ~i ON THE ! Tt?r FLOW OF rr INFORMATION-
LEGAL
MR i ' :tar.iu p~ n r. c: ;'si~ ~f y n Y ADM_R-iiL3 SAID A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF T'~? A THE
?
r. +:.s. ;d
:t+ET UNION'S GRINS IN MILITARY TECHNOLOGY Tsr.r.AR: tt TEr-? tNOsLOr! ? HAVE -^ RESULTED >'? FROM
t.Ei at !~A? p.. Tr.:~ 1 it4- >3' ^ r S.{:r FROM FRTHE.. ;.~N I E^F { '-i:!'!TES R!`:t.{
.?e..!'; ITS
ALLIES.
r, r r. TENNESSEE c r
tom" zP ESENTR _ VE !:LEER. ! 60REI 6 L EN CRR4{ SAID
RESTRICTIONS WOULD ??i itl ?i LEGAL BE HARMFUL TO U -S- SCIENCE.
t
r
r
r ~ Cr
:P: 4.ii.4r ~.
r SAID _
?{. !'~ r r R i. Y44 ACADEMIC Frr'~~i
1 ? T r~'?ii r 3!'': ?i`'. ts.~ Y ~ FREEDOM! :=.
RE' T ICTIONS COULD THWART SCIENTIFIC rit.{ AND SIMILAR
.. _ ;, rV~~t=r eE n!a T~Ar;pT ? SOVIET T UNION "ARE WHAT r. _ SCIENCE
r.T !`t4 r.? ?E SOVIET ~ Rr. ?`F~ ~,.T
i~_, ! ;;F4~f+E !T_ Ti`! THE ~ ~ {~a
SO P1T1FUtL. 3 ?!
MORE 1241 :?'1
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 X13 ? CL. , 1., W7vBd For Release
6 3 W-RDP91-00901 R00050
4 T Oil PAGE'
Monday
Tough Question: Should there be in-
creased secrecy and control of science
and technological information? Adm.
Bobby Inman, deputy director of Cen-
tral Intelligence, and Frank press,
winpby Perico Pastor
president of the National Academy of
Science, will offer answers when they
appear before a joint hearing of the
House Subcommittee on Science, Re-
search and Technology and the Sub-
committee on Investigations and
Oversight. 9 A.M. Room 2318, Ray.
burnOffice Building. -.1
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
alendarl
 Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R00050026
WIT.,, 1 ,r,rpoO SUNDAY II 'r';~ JOuD'II I (~i )
25 i;.r,!Sii 1.952
0
By JOE TRENTO
Staff repcrter
WASHINGTON - NASA has title
to a technological prize that may
ignite a bureaucratic war hotter
than anything the 100-ton space
shuttle will encour,_er in its searing
re-entries.
As NASA issues public relations
pronouncements about how the
shuttle can be used to launch busi-
ness satellites, study production in
space, and improve our lot on earth
- planners at the CIA and Penta-
gon envision a far different future
for the world's first operational
space transportation system. War.
Interviews with NASA, Defense
Department and intelligence offi-
cials, congressmen, and a variety of
secret documents from those same
agencies show:
e- The Air Force and CIA are
heading for a battle over the multi-
billion dollar spy satellite program.
Early flight tests show the shuttle a
potentially cheaper and more reli-
able platform for spying from
space than the elaborate CIA satel-
lites that have cost billions to
develop.
6 If space treaties now in effect
were scrapped the shuttle could
deploy large nuclear warheads in
earth orbit saving billions of dollars
over the proposed MX program
now before Congress.
0 Shuttles could be equipped
with automated devices that could
disrupt Soviet computer and micro-
wave communications.
0 A Defense Department study
.shows computer controlled lasers
aboard the shuttle could be used to
destroy Soviet nuclear warheads.
0 The shuttle could be 'used ' to
orbit biological and chemical weap-
ons stockpiles that could be brought
to their targets on command back
from space.
The CIA, in an assessment of
Soviet reaction to the reusable
spaceship, said in the view of the
Kremlin's experts the shuttle
"negates" the Soviet's ability to
launch more and heavier nuclear
S, , " -t'- S- %_ . / I
to be joined by 1985 by Discovery
and Atlantis.
A private company, Space Trans-
portation Co. Inc., has proposed
buying a fifth orbiter for the fleet in
exchange for worldwide commer-
cial marketing rights of the shuttle.
No decision has been made on.that
offer by NASA.
Technicians are now rewiring the
Lyndon B. Johnson Spacecenterin
Houston to protect the communica-
tions for future shuttle missions
from prying Soviet ears.
Air Force officials require all.
NASA and contractor employees to
have security clearences to work on
the shuttle operations.
The fourth launch of Columbia,
set for late June, will orbit the first
spy sensor
Force.
1 he laser sensor package is
designed to help define targets for
nuclear tipped rockets.
With that launch, the American
space program - always a wide-
open affair - will begin to shut out
the glare of publicity in the name of
national security, something the
Soviet Union has done for more
than 25 years.
The television pictures, the open
communications, the good news
and bad Americans are so used to
getting will be a thing of the past.
In the late 1930s, the program
will become even more secretive as
the shuttle is sent into polar orbit
from a new launch site being built
at-the Western Test Range at Van-
denberg Air Force Base, Calif.
That launch is being designed to
hide the shuttle from observation
while it is being loaded with cargo.
"In 1971 NASA had to make a
pact with the devil to get its space
shuttle through Richard Nixon and
Congress and now the devil wants
his part of the action" an angry
member of the Senate Intelligence
Cbmmitttee said. That senator
asked not to be named.
The pact the senator refers to is a
bizarre partnership NASA, made
with the Air Force to sell the expen-
sive program to Congress. Though
the military has not invested one
dime in the $10 billion develo ment
'Charle
role: `, ~. 1.1431 ail,? att a OcttJOr
result of 'h e need toffsqueeze moreelectronics into missile vvar.
.
nncc the ..'early 10705, hovuevers the genie has escaped the bottle:
Dra rnatlc advances in inicr oeIectronics have come from private indus
;nottheYmtlrtary Tq a large; egree, the rapid progress of teehnol
has been clue to freettechmcal rnterchangeearid the emergence of
many open technical anti engineering "co nmunihes' suc "as Silieoft:=a
Now-trieyouttxiui 1311 open cotnpetitivehess bf.th s industry
"maybe brought to a screechirng halt
IV`W exportrestrictionson mnicroelectron c technology and ;on corn
puter.software wrll serve to isolate the U'.S.froFn world markets, which: a
Most 'sr C8E1tI 114t/e17eT`r reStnction an open par[rng bf
r e search and..-deveToptn nt we > ktivill. lav rogressandput-an end toa
Y,t 5 techholo r~Ieads more a ectzvel than any leaked secret possibly".
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 Approved For Release 20D3ffM,:DClA-RDP91-00901 R0005
15 March 1982
The Reagan Adrninist. ationhas put the nation's scientific and tech-
nical coinmunity on notice that it intends to clamp new restraints
both on the,export of U.S. advanced teehiiololy and on, traditional aca-
demic freedorns
Speakin recently before an American Academy foi-the Advance-',
ment of. Science symposium on "striking a Balance: Scientific F7ee-
.dom and National Security,"Admiral Bobby Inman, deputy director of'
the Central Intelligence.A ency and past director of the National S ecu
rity.-'agency, warned scientists, "I think the tides are moving and mov-
ing fast toward`Iegislativesolutions There will be. pressure for
le islationto stop the hemorrhage of the nation`s technologies
=The lock-it-up " thrust of the Reagan Administration is sure to have
a chilling :effect. both on our nations campuses and on high
technologrndustries; including the personal-computer industry.
~'Ize full`sc,ope'of the3,dministration's plans, including adraft exec
utivr order resriz tine Congressional' legislation and a Pentagon at-
:tempt to-.broaden the definition of classified information to include
poteztiallyanything.ofa technical nature, will become evident in the
coming months as attempts are made tc whip'iip public support for
Inman.told the' scieritzfific community drat the cloak of secrecy is go
ing to extend far. beyond the boundaries of'the-military research-and=.
developmenit comnunity
In terms of harm tothe national interest, itmal es little difference
otegr.xpt~sinbolsterAd--' cetoleft3stinsnrgedes--- ,
rninistra tGataatiuas-tbat_CCUbatba , Ni~~ protested
United States
and ether Caztr ist Countries were' Ce flights over its tern '
using Nicaragua as a c=dTdt to super tory as ..$ flagrant violation of inter-
.,port- -Salvadaraa national law" and-said r'a destabili..
agency said. the mph ,Proved zaiion plan of the C.I A> against Nica?
Nicaragua was assembling.the?larg_ rai sa is xader "exclusively . The military:'
esk mil{tare,' farce in the regiian'It is is exclusively.y. defensive,'
`vastly beyc~cd any defe siv! e need," insisted Sergio Ramirez . Mer ado, a
said Adm. Bobby Inman. tS L. DepLty memo of - ?thev.rSa inist junta:
Directarof C trai Intelligelme. - Asked about C-I.A_ estimates of 2 ,WD -Cuban Photographs showed Cubew military- Soviet admilitary, , Mr. Ra m andlio to assse t
bases: "built along ng Cuba. design," ed,..There is not a single foreign sol--
tanks and armored persor4nel carri - dierinNicaraaua,
ems identified as Soviet ypes, -
o 1-.airfields had been e on vended bye
;cur airffelds being Men United States officials and bvg' dur- a
aircraft .Also cei ve vheavy axl tart lag the Somoza regime, he said. And
r~:re former
: Misidta Indian he villages Lin northeast challenged Washington to produce
ng of Nicaraguan weap
Nicarassna, which the C.~. . cha ged W
had been leveled *i r presparation for and other to El Salvadcre. Mr. Ramirez'
irrtrnemilitaryt2rrrs;s ItoneigFcbor_'far from spurring Nicaragua= argued that,:;
ingH ras:.' .: ; . _ ".:::.~ : ~? rom the guer. Mites on, J
were
eraed about re
Other- United States
er
=,
iB
p
cus
o
cials saida
sios i f the u- the CI:L was P 3c, millions of e~fllas succee in. -el doilara in covert ffnandlal aid to irdi- ,~ disrupting the : "would be a political Salvadoran ced failure for'l
vrduals and orgat Nrca*a- -the United States, and we're afraid i
gua that it.ccnsiders politically pro
gressive but not :M yst- sr. '~ the bill for it,- Mr. the'Pass addition, they . 10 said irezsaid.~
U led States
was discussing Pf wfth A oleztiIIa, r
Vene Lela, Colo ~rHondvras and
other South' A.mian, couatr:ea for
-Paramilitary c;t~rat:ions:.-'Trey added
that Washings= Is 4Jppesingany.role
? ...for' Nicaraguan, exiles==associated :
with the formersoIfaoza dictatorship..
'fl e. United' Stares) would not supply
opessonnel for the Ioperatioa4;,:whiciu '
STATINTL
Approved For Release 2003/12/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500260001-7
 STATINTL.._
r r''ri'~iTi !:.ni_
tjfs nY _ii
r.
i iii i?i i iE iti i i Fi E i H i-i a_ r E?i 1 iii _i i i F: i E i i s F?i ^ ie i ?- ig i-F i i i i i E: Fi i-i i f :i i i_? iii
r . --
Approved For Release //0V: 6I#ff P'I~-QITY00050
13 March 1982 ~ll~~
~~.t ih. -, ?i i_r i?f14 TF__F-_
i_ n i;^ ?i i?,i T? i `i i _ ! si Tin
.i. ?i i r F ?i T ~?_ -.^..i. i_ r: t
?i n 1= L h. i n N :-# - F F _ r i i t r r{ r~ ~i : Fi i?r: i~ i F i- f Fc i ^ f i_
+i it iti 'r iY - s-' i 'r F^ i i_ i ?i i h i_ i _ i fi i~ F i rt: i-i fi! R (_ h {
iy E = r ? rt :- + F t . rl ice. f?t ' r ^ _ Fir _ _ i:. -'t i - T_ F:' r ^F { ?. f - ~' a - : ' 1 i r . - _. i ^ h. i . i i- h , - ..- i i
?F n r i i< rr. _i ~i L . _ ? _ y ri F i:i iti _ r _ i 3='r.
t, it t 9- t-i b .TJ? '.w'i. i_ iti G.P.. ,r.. t?. ?~[ i": Y i?T R- 3 I"F Y. i~ i .Y.. ~.l T :?J ?! _ .. .. i ti M i~ i F r' .
. -?~!?Vi ... r r-! ri t F ^c:" .wi j.}F: ^F ii'" _.:_ r:?i:iF_ _.