CONVERSATION WITH SECRETARY VANCE, 23 APRIL 1967

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 15, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 10, 2004
Sequence Number: 
50
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 21, 1967
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5.pdf232.5 KB
Body: 
ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2004/05/12: CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 21 April L-)67 MEMOft.ANDUM ICR THE RECORD SUBJECTS CoAveruation with Secretary Vance. 21 Aril 1 67 It seemed to me that he has the pararxount re:e1Don4t'btli.ty for Tote 11i-ence activities.- ctivit to s. - latter latter responsibility was obviously not exclusive. On ue o,., ter e;.errciae. One is the statutory responsibility for the ~ rote tie , sources and n eethods. Th ?osier is his re&ponsib.lity for Cater.-, the objectives of the national intelligence effort. I raid than. this uti er the authority of the secretary of I}ofense. I pa ix::tee that the IaCI has two basic artd noa.dale aable respornsibilit procedural and jurisdictional lines of authority. hi:, an e.:. lyr to cow be riasenblest haa4 to corns from r arcs vrhic'i are :ror ,a is three separate Presentat ong, The develu-:>iv.oct of a scrllua preseeieta tioi inevitably involves cuttixig t sro, , ' em tr bti c of the display of D*ftnae Department resources. Cbvio-40A? thin t:.~- Department had to take the initiative iA the constrxrction cf? saic that he agreed with it. I Said that we roco ,nine that the Lit. which is ight occur to hirrr. 2.ar. Vance read the letter gore . letter personally to :'fir. Vance so that I could ans? ;er .:ay- tkxess tarot oriented display and (or this reason askee. r:~e to cLcchver Mr. 1Ieln: s wantee to be corr plettly clear about his attitaC~lt tom oriented display of intelligence resources. I told ":r. Vao .:e t _ disposition of the "20 Questions" and the Constructio t of a. tar 1. 1 caUec; on dir. Vance in his office at 1?T) Tai... 2. ,t..' t t.lti3 that he was in coma plate aka*roerrecat .e ;. these views. 1I* cid not seem to me overentbusta.stic about thib exercise or particularly optimistic that It would serve a pawtfcc iL. Approved For Release 2004/05/12.: CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 Approved For Release 2?004f05/12 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 useful purpose. At least he thought it would be a long time b ::for : anything significant came out of it. I told him that we would deal with Solis Horwitz on matters of policy and that I would assign son person or persons to deal directly with Herb Benington on matters relating to the construction of the display. (I have subsequen"dfy ac- ,:riled Horwitz, Benington and Bill Fischer of the BoB that Gerry P*wttib0:::-.o:! and Nathan Fitts would represent the DCI in this capacity.) 3. II said that I shared Mr. Vance's skepticism and t}at, while I believe that we should push for the target oriented die Slay vigorously as circumstances permit, we should sirr ultaneoumiy _u .. ;r. take ,an -evaluation of particular areas which, because of their experuje and/or importance, appear to warrant special examination. 1 po x ~r:. out that the purpose of a display is to reveal imbalances in the tot:.. grogram e o or areas of over~a , etc. A good many of these a~ pretty obvious already and, LA my opinion, should be the ubj ct c immediate examination, It was for this reason, I said, that eve k-;.-- put forward the "20 Questions." I also said that I had had several conversations with General Carroll about the necessity for stdi-e: of discrete areas of intelligence activity, such as the effort a-ainl,. the Soviet ICBM program, etc. Mr. Vance agreed that we shoulc ahead with this kind of thing. 4. Mr V l ip .:4A, that he had just received the Dav : Re -) , : t from Al Flax and wondered whether I had read it. I said that I ha ":t and that I was concerned about the 1:BM.problem as a test of the ` P. of the intelligence community to launch a concerted and effici -nt ei against a really important target. I said I hoped that this prbbler;i might indeed serve as a catalyst to help improve the orgganization::r. arrangements in the community to plan and program the activity a. this kind of target. The Davis Report, I said, was concerned wit: only one element of the problem, although a very important O ie, that was the overhead coverage. Mr. Vance said'that he had instr...y-. Flax and Larsen to brief him on the totality of the effort and the it= tive effectiveness of land based, as well as space, coverage. I s -id t : 5 I hoped he would include us in any discussions of this character. real problem seemed to me to be to identify the specific targi is . were ac a -to"varrO-Ua 1~ es o collection act ty and lcientif means of coverage most liken to afford covera eof a par cular As an em Te; . r riientioned the problem of the enga;err~ent" r , dar x;; gar, the precise value of which as an indication of ABM activity still see 1-_a to be in some doubt.' Approved For Release 2004/05/12 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 Approved For Release 2004/05/1-2' CrA7-iiD 86M00612R000100040050-5 5. I said that I thought the program review procedures rs?cw in effect, at least as regards CIA, the CCP and the CIP, *-ere whether any substantial improvement in the procedures re~ati:* to these reviews was possible. I expressed some reservatioh abc! ; NRP however, and pointed out that theJP is not given any,thie ,.,,. the searching scrutiny to which other large intelligence progra rr:,-j subjected. I Said that it was obviously important to rna.inta;n to degree the informality with which reconnaissance programs; are :t.:. cussed and approved. On the other hand, I thought that the pro; :,-t? , would benefit from review through somewhat more formal proce. t,raz. 6. Finally. Mr. Vance reverted to his converEatiot, with cgi,, D irector and Admiral Taylor about the need for a very searchir- critical rLItiew of our round based intelligence fac if i ias. 'l`hq tar v Defense ilvri ree Y n a p e s meeting and personally erne. !Ae. his interest in the problem. His basic concern continues to be u =: th fa t th t c a our relations with such nations as Turkey, Pakistan arc,, ,,htopia can be distorted by considerations relating to the presence of ir:t: J gence facilities on their territory. 1L.4r. Vance indicated that they wool sae pre ared to a additi l p y ona money in ordqV,jc avo the ne.cessit maintain nn? tell n`ce fac l n f g ;e i ities i oreign countries. We disc.,; e pro em poadd by-the lived of`Over~eas command, for tactic- early warning intelligence facilities. I assured Mr. Vance- that t,, d already undertaken a review of the take and objectives of oversee: r collection facilities and would develop some conclusions about ti: purposes and importance of these activities and the cost ant::. rela. iva effectiveness of alternatives. JOHN A. t: ROl"F . D/DCI/NIPS Distribution: DDCI - ExDir-Comptroller Mr. Sheldon DDS&T PPS Approved For Release 2004/05/12 : Cl -RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 ILLEGIB Approved For Release 2004/05/12 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5 Next 3 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/05/12 : CIA-RDP86M00612R000100040050-5