ORGANIZATIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF FDD

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 22, 2001
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 8, 1951
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9.pdf197.99 KB
Body: 
SECRET Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9 ., l :,a *OGC Has Reviewed* TIAg F3t1 to Ott May have A1,414-FUT rector or pe atioms yus3.+rs: maw dated 2 October 53. to AP/0 from Chief, FD,, Approved For Release 2001/09/03 : CIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9 M5/H'- "' SECRET 000036 is OCT 1951 3ai. Assiataaat and Scuior Comm? tart to the Director of Central Iat ]J4gwwe Or aisatlsaal Asalpae at of FDD Ezecutivo Peg stry__I SECRET Assistant Director for Operations Chief, Foreign Documents Division Organizational Assignment of FDD 1. The question has been raised whether FDD might not be assigned better organizationally to the Office of Collection. and Dissemination than to the Office of Operations. 2. To answer this question requires an analysis of the broad intelligence functions, their respective community of aspects, and the relationship of FDD to each. 3. It is premised that the most efficient performance of intelligence functions is achieved by grouping allied operations under interlocking direction within the intelligence organization. 4. There are four major categories of functions (a) the collection and reporting of intelligence information; (b) the analysis and production of intelligence; (c) special covert activities; and (d) ancillary or supporting services. 5. The functions of the Office of Operations logically form a part of category (a) above, as it is concerned with the collec- tion and reporting of information through exploitation of the three major overt sources, i.e., interrogation of people, monitor- ing of broadcasts, and examination of documents. 6. The functions of the Office of Collection and Dissemina- tion logically form a part of category (d) above, as it is con- cerned with the coordination and transmission of requirements, the physical dissemination of reports, the maintenance of machine record facilities and registers of information for reference pur- poses, and the servicing of requests for the procurement or loan of reference materials. 7. There is no community of aspect in the functions and operations of these two offices. The one is concerned with the actual exploitation or processing of sources with the objective of continuous production of information required for intelligence; whereas the other is concerned with servicing on the one hand the various offices and intelligence agencies in a liaison capacity receiving and transmitting requirements and reports, and on the other hand servicing primarily the intelligence producing offices with reference materials and machine record facilities. SECIEl SECRET Approved For Release 2001/09/OrCIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9 8. !DD's primary and major functions are concerned with the exploitation or processing of foreign publications in order to provide continuous production of information needed by the intelligence producing offices. It therefore logically belongs to category (a) of paragraph 4 above, i.e., the collection and reporting of intelligence information. Within this category it could be, on the basis of theoretical logic, assigned to any office whose functions also fit into this category, i.e., the Office of Special Operations or the Office of Operations, as both of these offices are concerned with the collection and pro- duction of information. That these two offices have split this major function into covert collection and overt collection has as a matter of practical logic assigned FDD to the Office of Operations, since FM is basically concerned with the processing and collection of information from overt foreign documents. 9. The validity of this assignment is further proven by the need for close coordination and cooperation between the three overt collecting activities. Much overlapping and duplication is possible especially between the Foreign Broadcast Information Division and Foreign Documents Division. To avoid needless waste of time and effort the personnel of these two divisions should work closely together. Unified direction of these two activities is a concomitant. 10. The secondary or minor function of FDD is the provision of a translation service. Technically this is purely a service function. On the basis of theoretical logic, this service function could logically come under any office with similar service functions. As a matter of practical logic, it was determined that it could be best supervised and operated by an activity already using foreign languages as a tool on a mass basis, plus allowing for double use of scarce linguistic personnel, where applicable. This has proven correct in practice permitting in some cases slightly greater exploitation of foreign publications, maintenance of the translation service and all-around efficient use of personnel. The translation service, however, has been and remains an appendage to FDD's normal functions of processing the foreign literature for intelligence purposes. 11. FAA's relationship with OCD is akin to that of other offices but probably to a much lesser extent. FDD calls on OCD for procurement of foreign language materials through its liaison with the State Department in much the same way as any other office asks OCD to procure reference materials. FDD's reports are dis- seminated by OCD in the some way as the reports of other offices. MD receives its requirements from OCD as do the other collecting offices. However, FDD does not have as great a need for the services of OCA as do the intelligence producing offices. On the translation service side of the register, FM does service OCD, but this service does not amount to one per cent of the total. Thus the relationship between OCD and FDD is relatively small and Approved ForREgbasee2M/08/oasttAlR.(dF tatD6>s 06-9 SECRET SECRET Approved For Release 2001/09/03TCIA-RDP84-00022R000300070006-9 12. In summary we ray then draw the following conclusions: a. FAD is basically an office collecting and producing intelligence information. b. As such, it must logically be assigned to an office with similar functions. c. OCD is basically an ancillary or supporting service office. d. With the split between overt and covert collection FM is logically assigned to the Office of Operations. e. The translation service function of FDD is an appendage for the sake of economy and efficiency. f. The relationship between FDD and FBID is great and requires close coordination, g. The relationship between FDD and OCD is relatively small and normal to the intelligence process. h. Overall FDD is assigned best organizationally in the Office of Operations. SEdBE i