SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COMMITTEE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP80-00832A000200080018-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 24, 2000
Sequence Number: 
18
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 2, 1958
Content Type: 
SUMMARY
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP80-00832A000200080018-8.pdf373.71 KB
Body: 
Apprctitied For Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A200080018-8 SLWMY AM REC DATIOl FOR WE CO s E 2 June 1,958 S I0N NOP L797: dated ' February 1957 25X1A 03, At:a Officer eation A. Summa 2 Aug Suggester proposed that a brief of references be typed under the text of a cable to further identify cables whose text is not self-explanatory. B. Sg4?F.Il?.M~ al ationS On 19 February 1957, Deputy Cable Secretary, 25X1A atate4 : "The Cable Secretariat doubts that the mere identification of subject matter would obviate pulling the reference. If specific benefits to recipient officers can be determined by.survey or study, the Cable Seeretsxiat will be glad to reconsider the feasibility of applying the suggested treat- ment to Incoming Cables. However, such a service vou obviously require additional personnel within the Cable Secretariat. Until those bodies were furnished and the T/0 a juoted, the Cable Secretariat could not perform the service, however beneficial." 6 March 1957, Chief, O&M (OD/P ), stated: 25X1 A It is our opinion that typing of a brief defeats the purpose of the referencing theory. `or example, references: a. Reduce the transmission time; b. Reduce preparation time; c. Are often made. to familiar working re a. tIons A d. Usually involve a. problem of a desk who is aware of the history; e. Supplement the text; and f, Decrease the possibility of violating "need to know.." "This office concurs with the Cable Secretariat in his statement that a "brief" of the referance(s) would not e1ix inate Pull ins the references. ? e sa, ester recosmen a prccedure.L change which is not w-rr ted on the basis of the inforation furnished. In view of the above c xat8, this suggestion cannot be favor-- ably considered," Approved For Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A000200080018-8 a-g-0?R-E-T Nqw~ Approv For elease 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A00 0080018-8 /t E Sugg. No* 2797 Contd. 25X1A In Norch 1957, Committee Members concurred in these. di: approvals on a Round Robin concurrence sheet. on 15 November 1957, the suggeater vent the Executive Secretary a copy of a Memorandum, for All Cable Recipients from Cable Secretary, (see TAB A) which had not only incorporated his suggestion but caused him to re-open his case. On 7 January 1958, Chief, O&M (DD/P) stated: "Observation and interview has verified that the proposal set forth in Suggestion No. 2797 is the same as a pro- cedure currently in effect in the Cable Secretariat." On 28 January 1958, Deputy Cable Secretary stated: "The Cable Secretariat reccsm ends an award appropriate for an estimated annual savings of $45,000 be presented to the orig- inator of Employee Suggestion No. 2797 which suggested that originators summarize references in outgoing cables to properly identify subject matter, and that the same also be done on incoming cables for the benefit of all recipients. "This .recommendation .I s based on the followsing a. ES no. 2797 was disapproved by the Cable Secretariat 19 February. 1957 (1) because of insufficient information concerning the possible benefits to cable recipients, and (2) :strong doubt that the increased workload in summarizing references for incoming cables could be absorbed by the Cable Secretariat without additional personnel. b. In September 1957, the Cable Secretariat began to summarize references for both incoming and outgoing cables on a trial basis. auestio es returned from 115 offices indicated great enthusiasm for the service and attested to an aggregate savings of 10.5 wan days per day. Cost to the Cable Secretariat in providing the service was estimated at 1.5 man days per day. let savings to the Agency was thus determined to be 9 personnel at an ectiate L average salary of $5,000 per amnum for a total of $45,000 per year. The Cable Secretary's decision to initiate essentis11y the same service described in ES No. 2797 for all cable recipients as an extension of a service furnished the Director vas influenced by two factors unrelated to the suggestion. Approved For Release 2000/08/15: C1RDP80-00832A000200080018-8 S-E-C-R-E-'Z S-E-C-R -E-T Approved; Fdl'F elease 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP8 sum o 3300080018-8 (c l =y if AneJ Y ts>seweresrec required tooeuas c eve ti a~~` gee 'ereacee , ther t?3=,+,u review th t, and, (2) Belief that the theoretical iasaprove . accuracy cowl be achieved and the eddi.tional workload ahseeryrbed because ,of full on uty strength of 75 persons for 6eptawber in evont t to 70 persons during arch 1957, loth Of these beliefs have proven to be true ..A. our on.duty strength b re fined high, the additional workload been aheor?bed, and dissemination accwwy h is roved (average error percentage records:? d as for September., October and Y saber declined to 0 for December,. it would be appreciated if the person vaabmitting this aug- gestion could be told that the decision by the Cable Sec- retary to supply a short syuopeiss of the amt recent cable w under rt4ken with no intent or desire to deprive him of his just award. Nit is reccx ended that thin ou stion be referred to DD/P since a part of the suggestion has to a with the 2riaatos Preparing the synopses. This is being done only ia' end by only a few uuits, pr i. sari FE, T and occas sional.lf Mi. and. M." 17,1he sate''s estta ate was slightly higher t "Reflecting a , require cent that appro tely forty offices are required to independently look up pertinent references-- considering the receipt of fifty cables daily based on a five.. clay v ark week, s sst l.ng three minutes (minim=) to Look up each reference; total 150 minutes daily tiaee ot0 ruutea or loo hours daily spent in looking up references equals 500 man. hours per - ek, equalli. 1/2 days per day to 4M~e with the probl . At $5AOOO equal e $62,500 annual savings. (Above is strictly an estimate since eau er of copies effected by degree of eensssitivity, s t saseas, etc., and the actual number of copies received and disseminated unknown. "Outgoing?.?COnsle' r originator's typing of a brief resume on outgoing cables (when required for clarity) requires a adioiss a want of the typist time which wou be reduced to nibil by virtue of the fact that ultimate recipients of 'dcomeback?' copies (offices coordinated with, or copies altaatributed to, by o/s) vould not be required to look up c farefoess. Another thought is that this procedure should reduce filing arequirest nta of all "informtion'1 offices." wow Approved For Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A000200080018-8 I%W Approv,Qel Fo Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP8 00832AO 00080018-8 S-E-C-R-E Su W. No. 2797 Con td. The Suggestion Awards Stiff then attempted to equate the advantages and disadvantages to the customers. In response the DC/EE, C/ +'E, C/Ia, C/ , DC/WE, C/wt, C/SR, and C/BE, pointed . up the value of the synopses - on incoming cables iculorl,y - but rested their case on the intangible benefits. Line of Duty Status in line-of-duty (A& ixa Officer ' Deputy Chief fi.B . In . Division there is a cable officer in the Executive Secre- tariat's office who handles a.ll cables. -111, 4_1 ~ ~,I 25X1A I. Recognize adoption of suggestion. 2. $450.00 arr?m based on Intangible Benefits (High-Extended) Decision of Counittee k" l dopted Not Adopted VxL_ N ~)_ 25X1A JL d 4 .`. :1.L "T. of support) Letter of Appreciation 7f k AR9 vec F jR,,.easp 2O00/~$/45 : CIf RDP80 40MAO0A2b908001~= Cam., `..CUL(1 . Q ,_ ,~ /Support'e relation thereto is that Of a customer who receives support cables for action. FE/ Support does not have any re- sponsibility for the handling or fort of cables. D. Executive S+ec 's Rccondation Approves For Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP8-00832A008000080018-8 S-E-CSR.&.T TAR A 4 November 1957 M MEMORANDUM FORS All Cable Recipients SUEJECF t Cable Reference Resumes 1. Your response to my memorandum of 30 September 1957 solic. iting your comments concerning the value to your office of the Cable Secretariat resumes of referenced cables was very gratifying. 2. You may be interested to know that based on the estimates furnished by all offices, it appears that these resumes have reduced the Agency workload by approximately 9 man days per day, or approxi- mately $45,000 per year if we estimate the average salary at $59000. In addition to the estimated saving in terms of dollars, the comments show that almost without exception cables are easier to handle when resumes are furnished. This is a 'service which we are happy to pro- vide in our role of making your job easier. 3. I have observed that some units are preparing their own resumes at the time on outgoing cable. is prepared. To the extent that this is done, it makes our job in the Cable Secretariat easier. able Secretary 25X1A S-E-C--R-S"T Approved For Release 2000/08/15: CIA-RDP80-00832A000200080018-8