VOTERS HELPED REMOVE CIA LIMITS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00901R000600210006-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 31, 2007
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 5, 1982
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00901R000600210006-6.pdf945.94 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 NEWPORT NEWS DAILY PRESS (VA) 5 NOVEMBER 1982 oters laelped Re move McMahon talked. about CIA's By BOB EVANS Staff writer WILLIAMSBURG - The Central Intelligence Agency, with the'help of the American electorate, has gotten Congress . "off its back"' during the e deputy past v ars, John N. w director of the CIA, asa d Thursday. Many of the restrictions placed on 1 intelligence gathering during the 1970s have been removed, McMahon told a group of College and William and Mary alumni and students attend. ing a banquet for the Order of the White Jacket. The order is composed of people who worked their way. through college. in food service jobs. McMahon did not provide any spe cific changes, but said, "I think the people of the United States were the first to recognize" that some Congress- men had gone overboard in restricting limits the agency's activities. They made wise e said, their feelings known at the ballot box, conomic decisions he he added. The spread of technology Some of the changes in con res- friendly nations has also become more sional oversight of the"CIA during the important. ? in recent .1970s were good and should remain, The -Soviet U Years, he said, however, McMahon ,said. pion "knew the details f of our _C- "airplane before it fle "I take a great deal " t whil e o heChinese':`have a copy of otir in--knowing that yaur sati(elected)sreprefaction- sidewinder missile," he said, sentatives know and abnrove. what 'A'-- world, ne become ?t wnictj the CIA has said =F a more involved xecentl 1;4- .1ilonitoririg the spread of.intr afive or more years f o r mnowt' rroris M atianal , i.m;cMahon said., won't be just me or William Casey (CIA director) answeri ? t Ten he ng years qu ,tions ... we'll be in goodes- ago, onlyS n ations had said. company.". be to worry about terrorists;" he said. This even-handed a to SI ince nations a then, the ndnumber has grown IIgence- ath g ering could't h nave come people have bee more than 12;000 too soon, McMahon said. McMahon said, n killed by terrorists, The CIA's job since th e early 1950 s has - grown from "Intelligence is i , "a d eed a """uman d dt is -e- .usry11 fense against the spread of: Commu-: M growing cMahon . the growth in- said.. all time, nism iE y Al urope t the p ooint whereit is concerned not justith w military or political knowledge,': It now handles seemingly unrelated inform ti a on such as "the problem with narcotics - where it comes from and who the key players are," he said. The agency is also -responsible for gathering information on friendly -na- ?'tions such as Japan and those in west- ern Europe that are "emerging as eco- nomie competitors" in the sale of tech. nology, he said.- j For each 1 Percent' increas in' unemploy e ment, the'U.S. loses $25 mil he lion a said, in gross national. product, , America can no longer .count on; unique technological it advances-.to keep' s people employed,. he said-' The impact. of those high tech- nology competitors overseas must be watched closely so the U.S. can make MORI/CDF pp5,8 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 /I Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 WILLIAMSBURG VIRGINIA GAZETTE 27 OCTOBER 1982 CIA Official To Speak WILLIAMSBURG - CIA positions in the CIA's four direc- Deputy Director . John. N. torates. McMahon will speak to members In 1965, he' was appointed of the Order of the White Jacket deputy director of the Office of at 7 p.m. Thursday in the Cam- Special Projects,". which is re- pus Center ballroom at the Col- sponsible for reconnaissance and lege of William and Mary. technical operations. He was The Order of the White named director of the Office of Jacket is a group of W&M Electronic Intelligence in 1971. alumni who earned all or part of .he was appointed college expenses .by work- In. 1973; direc- ing in the college cafeteria or in for of the, Office of Technical restaurants. Services. The banquet is scheduled as In 1982, McMahon. was ap- part of W&M's homecoming ac- pointed the agency's executive tivities this weekend. director::and-was responsible for McMahon,. a graduate of Holy day-to-day "management .of the "Cross College, joined the CIA in. CIA..He was.. -appointed deputy . 1951 and has ,served in senior director in June Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 FFJFXD ON pnG: 1-- T H V!IJ.S'r-ii` s `0 dPO:ST 20 SE: RJR 1982 U.S. -Coris.ide'rs Return Of Marines to Lebanon By John M. Goshko t.'ashIngton Post Stat Writer The Reagan administration, holding firm to its de- mand that Israel withdraw immediately from West Bei- rut, was considering last night whether to send U.S. troops back to the Lebanese capital as part of a new, temporary peace-keeping force involving France, Italy and possibly other countries. Administration sources, while stressing that no deci- sions had been made, said the idea was under active con- sideration because of the need for some force capable of preventing further tragedies such as the massacre Friday of Palestinian civilians and maintaining stability'in Bei- rut until the Lebanese army can assert its authority. Sources said that was the main topic of a 75-minute, Cabinet-level meeting presided over by President Reagan yesterday morning. [The United States joined in unanimous approval by .the U.N. Security Council early yesterday of a resolution condemning the "criminal massacre of Palestinian civil- ians in Beirut." Details on Page A19,1 A working-level group of State Department and De- fense Department officials was directed to study the op- tions further and report to the White House last night, with the expectation that a decision on what course to follow and the timing of an announcement will be made today. France and Italy" which participated with the United States in the multinational force supervising evacuation of the Palestine Liberation Organization from Beirut ear- lier this month, have announced willingness to send troops back in the wake of the killings. However, the sources said, President Reagan was not,ready, as of last night, to acquiesce in reconstituting the force un- less-he is satisfied that the need cannot be met through other means. These in- clude stationing United Nations observ- ers in Beirut or redeploying there the U.N. International Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) from southern Lebanon. In addition, the sources continued, the president insists that any U.S. participa- tion be tied to conditions such as guaran tees of cooperation from Israel and the Lebanese government and willingness of other countries to join the force. In that connection, the sources said, the administration is exploring whether additional countries .can be persuaded to send troops. Reagan's caution about returning all or part of the 800-member U.S. Marine Corps contingent to Lebanon is under- stood to be rooted in concern about ha- tred between feuding Moslem and Chris- tian communities there. It could engulf the force in fighting that would result in U.S. casualties or shooting at Lebanese or Israelis. The administration fears that such an outcome would stir a hostile reaction from the public and Congress. The pos- sibility of U.S. Marines fighting Israeli forces or any of the Lebanese. factions battling each other could create great difficulties for Reagan's hopes of getting Arab-Israeli cooperation on with his new Mideast peace initiative. However, some sources, acknowledging obvious risks in returning Marines to Beirut, said they G'ca1 _INU D Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 VOLUME 6 O NUMBER 8 - August 1982 News Supplement to IEEE Spectrum Industry, Federal leaders discuss information controls Washington, D.C.-Government defense and Intelligence representatives told Industry leaders that technology transfer should be viewed as a counterintelligence problem ratherthan as a trade problem. Speaking at a June2 roundtable sppoonsored by Spectrum In Washington, D.C., are Jan Herr- Ing, chief of the TechnologyTransferAssessment Center(left), and Central Intelligence Agency Executive DirectorJohn McMahan (right). Mr. McMahon recommended that computer manufacturers not worry as much about restrictions on exporting outdated technology as about Soviet thefts of cur- rent developments, such as plated-disk memories. Erich Bloch, vice president of IBM, suggested that Government should place more reliance on Industry's own desire to protect Its secrets, rather than on regulation of sa ios.This view was supported by Edward David, presi- dent of Exxon Research and Engineering, and by Henry Bachman, vice presi- dent of Hazeltine Corp., who suggested that Industry could do a better job of safeguarding Information if intelligence representatives would explain what it was the Soviets were trying to stea I and how to thwart them. Both Industry and Government represents lives agreed that the current system of export controls on technical Information free the special reports on technology transfer in Spectrum, May, p.641 Is both Inadequate to protect information that needs protecting and hopelessly complex when itcomes to allowing nonsensifive Information to be exported. By the end of the meeting, a consensus was reached that the Government needs Industry toset priorities for different kinds of information to be pro- tected and to see to It that the mechanisms of protection do not strangle in- novation and economic growth. It was also agreed that Industry could use the Government's help In learning how to protect proprietary Information from Intelligence efforts. - Among those from Industry participating In the roundtable were: Grant Dove, senior vice president, Texas Instruments Inc.; Fred Garry, vice presi- dent, General Electric Co.; William Howard, vice president, Motorola Inc.; Gordon Moore, chairman, Intel Corp.; and Robert Schmidt, vice chairman, Control Data Corp. Representing Government in addition to the two CIA officials were:. George A.Keywarth, presidential science advisor,who assisted Spectrum in planning the meeting; Gus Weiss, National Security Council Staff; Stephen ryen,deputy assistant secretary of defense for international trade and security policy; Michael Lorenzo, deputy assistant secretary of defense for defense research and engineering; Steven Garfinkel, directorofthe informa- tion security oversight office, GSA; Ernest Johnston, senior deputy assis- tant director for economic and business affairs at the State Department; Bohdan Denysyk, deputy under secretary of commerce for export ad- ministration; Joseph Smaldone, chief of the arms-licensing division in the munitions control office of the State Department; and Donald Langenberg, deputy director, National Science Foundation. A data lied report of the meeting will appear in the September Issue of Spectrum. Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 . I PI I IIN I L ARTICLE A.PYEARr _ON PAGE Z NEW YORK TI2 Z'S 2I JULY 1982 Analysis/Lesfia H. Gelb Political `hif't Illustrated by Moderates~' SpedalwTheNew-lark Timem ! ,p ~+ ~* WASHINGTON, July 23 - In recent De a tu_;L~ e, weeks, the three officials generally re- s , 7 . ON t 9, Mmfflam - - . ;.: with the United States's European left Government, each a man with im- pressive military credentials. allies on that subject. Like the offs. of just how -far the political center of. a> "' ^ r participated in the discussions, the Administration. It is also a reminder not agree to the deployment of new Y American medium-range just how steady and deep institu- range missiles is tional roots run in Washington, be. Europe unless arms control talks with neath shifting political fashions. Moscow were under way. It was a The three officials, Secretary of matter of European .:, politics that the State Alexander M. Haig Jr., Gen amencan military understood, even David C. Jones, the Chairman of the MMthough the point had not quite sunk in Central Intellgence Agency, were Alexander M. Haig Jr. also joined forces with Mr. Haig and- classified as conservatives in the Car- the State Department in arguing that ter Administration. In the Reagan Ad- - the terms of the . arms limitation ministration they were classified as It was not unusual in the last year treaty should , be observed, even moderates, a shift that eventually be- and a half to hear White House offs- though Mr. Reagan and those close to came an element in the departures of cials or political appointees in the De- him had pronounced the treaty sorely Mr. Haig and Admiral Inman. . fense Department express a certain deficient. mistrust of them, They were often In all of these cases, General Jones ? Associated n~ren Adm. Bobby Ray Inman What actually changed was not the three men's views, but the political climate in Washington. in the inner councils of the Reagan Administration, the three men were the main advocates of arms control talks with the Soviet Union, of a less devilish theory of Soviet behavior, of more tolerance in dealing with the world as it is. As a result, they and the institutions they represented were often out of step with the hard-line ap- preach of the White House. viewed as having divided loyalties, to and Secretary Haig had greater com- their institutions rather than to the mand of the facts and the diplomatic President. The political men of the histories. They carried the day each Administration were never quite com- time with President Reagan. fortable with them despite their mill. They were less successful. in. other tary backgrounds. traditionally .a matters. For example, while. both good conservative credential. ? men and their institutions worried There was trouble from the outset. Defense Secretary Caspar W. Wein- berger wanted to cut short General { Jones's second two-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff because the general had recom. mended Senate approval of the second strategic arms limitation treaty. The general had also' supported the Panama Canal treaty, much to the dismay of the Republican right wing. Mr. Weinberger, however, was per. suaded to keep General Jones on the job because bf the uproar caused by rumors of his impending di miss l; the Secretary and White House offi. cials reportedly did not want to put themselves in a position of being ac- cused of politicizing the military. In any event, General Jones stayed on for a full second term and for regu- lar,retirement, and he became an ad- vocate of beginning talks with the, Soviet Union on medium-range mis- siles in Europe at a time when the political appointees in the Pentagon were against such negotiations. about the growth of :Soviet ,military power, neither was prepared to argue that the United States was in a posi. tion of military inferiority. Soviet military superiority was an article of faith with the Reagan team. General Jones and Mr. Haig essen. tially restricted themselves to ar- guing that in some respects the Sovi- et had the advantage but that in other respects the United States and the Western powers were still better off. They emphasized "adverse trends" in the military balance rather than cur- rent inferiority. They were often joined in this view by Admiral Inman and the professionals of the Central Intelligence Agency. Admiral Inman also proved a thorn in the side of the Reagan Administra. tion with his repeated opposition to ef- forts by Reagan political appointees to expand the role of the C.I.A. to in- clude certain kinds of domestic spying. Like most senior C.I.A. offi- cials over the years, he had respect for covert operations only under care- fully controlled conditions, and he had a sense of their limitations. Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 THE NORWALK HOUR (CT) 16 July 1982. Z br_{nm. '11151vaRnSe Ponta, Defends Record Washington, D.C. To the Editors . . - Your 30 .June 'editorial stating that I must have been involved in illegalities during my 31 year career with the Central Intelligence Agency represents a grave injustice not only to me, personally, but to the many dedicated CIA employees who honorably serve their country, often with great personal sacrifice. The Senate Select Committee un , Intelligence conducted a scrupulous investigation of me to ensure my 'worthiness for the position of Deputy Director of Central. Intelligence. If you check the public record of that investigation and my subsequent confirmation hearing, you . will find it replete with references to my "honesty, integrity and forthrightness." I believe the Committee's unanimous endorsement of my nomination represented a strong vote of confidence both in my integrity and 'that of the institution I have served for 31 years. Your readers deserve to know that we in CIA take pride in living up to the confidence President Reagan expressed in us during his recent visit to the agency when he said, "I have full confidence that you will do your job vigorously and imaginatively while making sure that your activity is lawful, constitutional, and in keeping with the traditions of our way of life." John N. McMahon Deputy Director, Central Intelligence Agency Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R0006 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL `._ --- 13 JULY 1982 The Soviet Forgery War It sounds like a John Le Carre spy thriller. Soviet agents forge some offi- cial-looking U.S. documents and try to use them to stir up anti-American sen. timent in Europe. There are letters from President Reagan, former Sec- officials who cooperate with the U.S.; to obfuscate the true nature of Soviet actions and intentions, and to create a favorable. environment for the execu- tion of Soviet foreign and military pol- icies. John McMahon who re , p sented the ranking officials. There are sugges- CIA's report to Congress in 1980 and tions about a military coup in Greece recently replaced Admiral Bobby In. to overthrow Socialist Premier Papan- man as deputy director of the agency, dreou, a secret agreement for a U.S. told Congress: "There Is a tendency intelligence base in Sweden, a letter to sometimes in the West to play down King Juan Carlos of Spain about ways the significance of foreign propaganda of countering opposition to joining and to cast doubt on the efficacy of co-' NATO and efforts to neutralize the vert action as instruments of foreign anti-nuclear movement In Europe. policy. Soviet leaders, however, do not Although it may sound like spy fie- share such beliefs. They regard pro- tion, It's all too real. These are actual paganda and covert action as auxil forgeries by the, Soviet Uniori , whfd:: iary - lnsants' In the conduct of were uncovered by'U.S. and allied in- their foreign policy by -conventional telligence and released to the press diplomatic, militaryand economic last week by the administration. The means." forgeries are only the latest in a long The latest disclosure of the Soviet line of Soviet propaganda and covert forgery campaign is another reminder action measures against the U.S. that the Kremlin leadership Is con- The Central Intelligence Agency ducting an orchestrated war of Ideas presented a lengthy, detailed report to against the West. Americans have' j Congress in 1980 about the Soviet tTn-?generally been reluctant to recognize ion's es in 98 . bo this, quickly. dismissing suggestions Way public , opinion_:..; that Soviet cultivation. may play a cru- against the U.S. in Europe and else- where. The report cited some 150 anti--, vial though of course not total role terror- American forgeries, many on official- In the growth of international terror- looking stationery and su Ism and domestic discord in Western pposedly societies..., This reluctance 'Is under signed by top U.S. officials, which standable, since conspiracy is alien to '' were uncovered by the CIA. It "con-: servatively" estimated that the-Soviet' the American experience while red- Union spends $3 billion a year on such baiting demagogy is not. propaganda and covert action. Yet no American interest-least of all the avoidance of demagogy-will The Soviet Union's propaganda be served If serious Americans fail to war has manifold aims: to influence recognize the nature of the challenge world public opinion against U.S. poli- we face. When we are reminded that cies; to portray the U.S. as an aggres- the Soviets use forgery as a routine sive and "imperialist" power; to dis- .. propaganda tool, we have to ponder to credit those foreign governments and what other lengths they may go. retary of State Haig and other high- Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 STA ,Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 I... T I?.:I.; LP?EAtM ON P"G THE NEWSDAY MAGAZINE (N.Y.) 11 July 1982 uletlyin Coi . By David Wise - Photo by Ken Spencer Some -weeks ago, an interesting piece of information began circulat- ing in the intelligence community the closed, spooky world of the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Secu- rity Agency, Federal Bureau of In- vestigation and the other spy agencies in and around Washington. The word went out that William J. 'Casey, the director of central intelli- gence, had bought an expensive house in the exclusive Foxhall Road section of Washington. To men and women accustomed to working with fragments, piecing to- gether minute bits of intelligence to form a larger mosaic, the report was immediately seen for its true signifi- cance. Better than any official- an- nouncement, it meant that Bill Casey, a Long Islander who has a home in Roslyn Harbor, was plan- ning to stick around as CIA director. There have been times in the past stormy year and a half when it was not at all clear that Casey would sur- vive as the DCI, as the spies refer to their chief. There was a series of di- sasters. First, Casey named his for- mer political aide, Max C. Hugel, as head of the CIA's cloak-and-dagger directorate. Hugel was soon forced to resign as the result of disclo-. sures in the Washington Post about his questionable business' dealings. Then the Senate Intelli- gence Committee, responding to a barrage of publicity, began probing Casey's own financial past. And .Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.), chairman of the intelligence com- point-blank for Casey to resign. All of that took place last year, Casey's first year on the-job. The storm subsided. The Senate panel, in a backhanded way, found Casey `not "unfit" to serve. And through it all, the CIA director - Ronald gar's campaign manager in 1980 --= managed to preserve his close per- sonal relationship with the Presi- dent. ("I still call him Ronnie," Casey has said.) Among those who must surely have heard the report - about' the house off FoxhallRoad was Casey's deputy, Adm. Bobby Ray Inman, ..who Sen. Goldwater and a lot of oth- ~er members of Congress had openly hoped would be R.eagan's original choice for CIA director. Blocked from the top job, wooed by private industry with job offers in six fig. tires, Inman in April announced that he was quitting. In Moscow, the KGB has no doubt already heard about Casey's nem house. Very likely, Vitali V. Fedor. chuk, the recently appointed chair. man of the Committee for Stat( Security, better known as the KGB, career who has managed to stay one has already informed President Leo- jump ahead of trouble, barely avoid- ing -entanglement with the likes of 1 And the report is true. J. William Robert Vesco during Watergate. Doswell, director of the CIA's Of- For example, ? Sen. Joe Biden of flee of External Affairs, a smooth, Delaware, a Democrat on the Senate. Richmond, Va., lobbyist and former Inet~ vocal c c e Casey's newsman whom Casey brought in as his top public relations man, con the panel's findings on the CIA di- firms it. Doswell said that Casey . rector, declaring. "Mr. Casey has and his wife, Sophia, moved last displayed a consistent pattern of month from their apartment some- omissions, misstatements, and con- where in Washington to their new tradictions." And Casey's critics also home off Foxhall Road. charge he is not really qualified to run the CIA, since his intelligence experience dates from World War TT mhan 'nP worked for the Office 'of mittee, once a Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6 ices (the OSS was the - Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R00060021 PHILADELPHIA NEWS 10 JULY 1982 'LI-.1fa Vase!! `The Reaga administration is apparently growing in-- ,creasingly -concerned. that its top officials might appear to have conflicts of interest between their private. holdings pied theirpublioduties. . ...Well it might. Since a fair number of them are people of considerable wealth and personal power, the matter should ,indeed be of concern, particularly since many of them would not notice a conflict of interest if it leaped out of their break- fast oatmeal wearinga derby hat i ': ` When Attorney General William French Smith, for example, used questionable tax shelters to avoid paying a large share of his taxes, there was a proper public outcry and ,he quickly, if reluctantly, whipped out his checkbooks to make matters right.''-- The conflict-there, of course, was that it could well-fairto Smith to rule on the legality of the those same shelters. . Men and women who go into-publicoffice often Out their. financial holdings into -what -are known as "blind trusts." Theoretically, at least, they relinquish-control: of .their in- vestments to a third: party. If you believe that that system always works you'll believe that, at least where blind trusts are involved, it-isn't always true that the-rich inevitably get .richer.' But despite its potential for mischief, the blind trust sys. tem seems to have worked fairly well. At least one Reagan appointee has refused to have any. thing to do with it CIA Director William J. Casey has insist- t-ed on keeping-his a"' 'where he can see. it. By doing so lase year, Casey. was able to sell hundreds of, thousands of dollars in.oil stocks just before they plummeted : in value because of the world oil glut. _ As-director of the CIA, Casey is privy to top secret reports on, among other things, potential oil supplies throughout the world - one of the factors that determines the value of .oil stocks. Interesting-coincidence, what? . A Casey spokesman has denied that the CIA director ever used his insider's knowledge that an oil bust was in the off- ing when he decided to sell off his holdings. Nevertheless, the CIA has come up with a unique system to try to insure that there won't be any hanky-panky going on. ' _ From now on, it says, DeputyCIA Director John McMa'. hon will head a team of CIA subordinates who will keep tabs of their boss's finances, warning him of any potential con- flicts of interest. Thus, the public will foot the bill to make sure that Casey treads the straight and narrow. For his part, we're sure, Casey will be duly grateful and will sell off each and every stock that might pose a conflict of interest. When his term in office ends, he will be a wiser but poorer man - and hundreds of CIA agents will have been commended for their service to the boss. The only problem with the arrangement - and one admitted by the CIA - is that no one has decided, just what would or wouldn't be a conflict of interest situation. We can-think of one for starters: The fact that Casey has adamantly' refused to put his financial holdings into a blind trust in the first place. ..+~ 0006-6 Approved For Release 2007/08/04: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000600210006-6