UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
BRI"CC,
UNITED STATES
V.
B-90-090(TFGD)
B-86-59 (TGFD)
ARIF DURRANI
September 9, 1991
GOVERNMENT'S OBJECTION TO ARIF DURRANI'S SECOND REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
The government objects to each of the seven requests for
production contained in the defendant's Second Request for
Production of Documents, received on July 25 and 26, 1991.
No useful purpose could be served by requesting additional
A # ' f iY ~.f
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CntJRTt S. I`:
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES
V.
ARIF DURRANI
B-90-090(TFGD)
B-86-59 (TGFD)
June 4, 1990
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ISSUED PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255
The defendant has filed a Motion for a New Trial under 28
U.S.C. Section 2255, claiming that newly-discovered or revealed
evidence proves both that his testimony at trial was truthful and
4 aY~
4xttt ' it ! z tztri Cdr tx
__ _ w~Yl.ltr
DISTRICT OF.
UNITED STATES OF Ail R-CA
Ala F D U KI':h I
^ CIVIL
n CRIMINAL
TO:
George Cave
14112 Burling Bush =a.
SUBPOENA
CASE NUMBER: CRIN. e`a6-59 ('TFCD)
t PERSON ^ DOCUMENT(S) or OBJECT(S)
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear in the United States District Court at the place, date, and time
specified below to testify in the above case.
PLACE
"Ops." 110 Each project received a code name in the
sequence. TH-1, TH-2, and North told the
Committees that the projects ' had -not -progressed
beyond the planning stage and, therefore;-he did not
seek -a :Presidential . Finding authorizing any ofy these
o erations'1S1J
North testified that he 'discussed- the Enterprise's
role in these projects with:Poindexter, but Poindexter
said he did not recall such a conversation.112_The
only :evidence that-the President knew of these sensi-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CIVIL B-90-090 (TFGD)
CRIM. B-86-59 (TFGD)
VS.
ARIF DURRANI AUGUST 6, 1991
AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE
SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION
1. This is a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ? 2255, to vacate
and set aside the sentence and judgment of conviction in United
States v. Arif Durrani, Crim. No. B-86-59 (TFGD).
2. Movant was convicted of three counts of violation of the
JUN 25 91 15:02 FROM US ATTORNEYS OFF BFT
IA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VS.
CIVIL B-90-090
CRIM.' B-86-59
(TFGD)
(TFGD)
ARIF DURRANI
JUNE 12 , 19 91
NOVANT'S FIRST RtQUEST
Fop. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Pursuant to Rule 6(a), Rules Governing ? 2255 Proceedings in
the United States District Courts, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 et
seq., movant Arif Durrani hereby requests that the United States
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, ) B 9 0 am
V. ) CASE NO.
ARIF DURRANI,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF
THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT
THE SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C.S2255
ARIF DURRANI
P.O. Box 5000
Sheridan, Oregon 97378
#09027-014
Pro se
APPROVED FOR RELEASE
DATE: NOV 2007
( i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RETURN OF SERVICE(1>
DATE
RECcIVED
PLACE -!
5/1
BY SERVER
DATE
PLACE_ _. / _.._
SERVED
t. : 17"
SERVED ON (NAME)
[
''
e
t
V~
FEES-AND ILEAGE NDERED TO WITNESS (2)
a
.
?
,r. .~1j
-
J
,
-~
E YES NO AMOUNT $
SERVED BY
FOIA
