SALE OF CANADIAN NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 2010
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 19, 1974
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4.pdf191.72 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/03/09: LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4 TOP SECT ZCZCWHE143 00 WTE1`) DE WTE 7344 3231637 0 19160OZ NOV ?74 FM COL KENNEDY /'/TU1{AK23// TO GENERAL SCOWCROFT ZEri T 0 P 5 E C R E T CONTAINS CODEWORD DELIVER AT OPENING OF BUSINESS W H4 33 32 TOMAK23 NOVEMBER 15, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL SCOWCROF'T FROM: DAVID ELLIOTT SUPJECTi SALE OF CANADIAN NUCLEAR REACTOR TO SOUTH KOREAN THE U.S. (WESTINGHOUSE) HAS ONE REACTOR UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN KOREA AND ANOTHER ONE BEING NEGOTIATED. ALTHOUGH NOT AN NPT PARTY, KOREA HAS ACCEPTED IAEA SAFEGUARDS ON U.S. SUPPLIED NUCLEAR FACILITIES, AND HAS INDICATED WILLINGNESS TO DO THE SAME FOR THE CANDU. OUR AGREEMENT WITH KOREA ON COOPERATION IN THE PEACEFUL USES OF ATOMIC ENERGY (AN AGREEMENT WHICH WE REQUIRE AS A PRECONDITION FOR NUCLEAR TRADE) UNFORTUNATELY HAS THE "P-NE LOOPHOLE" WHEREBY DIVERSION ON PLUTONIUM IS FORESWORN FOR NUCLEAR f4EAPONS BUT NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR PNE USE. WHILE WE ARE CONSIDERING HOW TO CLOSE THIS LOOPHOLE IN ALL OUR AGREEMENTS, THIS MATTE? IS NOT A PRESSING CONCERN VIS-A-VIS KOREA BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO CHEMICAL REPROCESSING PLANT FOR EXTRACTING PLUTONIUM FRCM SPENT FUEL, AND THEY ARE VERY UNLIKELY TO HAVE SUCH TECHNOLO(=Y FOR SOME TIME. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/03/09: LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/03/09: LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4 TOPSECRET. WILL KOREANS RA ISE THE QUESTION OF NUCLEAR REACTORS? IT SEEMS UNLIKELY THAT THE KOREANS WILL.?ROACH THE REACTOR SUBJECT(U) SINCE CANADA HAS MADE NO FINAL DECISION AND v`OREA MAY YET GET THE CANDU THEY ARE SEEYING, AND (2) SINCE w L ARE BUILDING ONE REACTOR AND NEGOTIATING A SECOND IN KOREA, THERE WOULD BE NC .REASONS FOR THE KOREANS TO THINK IT NECESSARY. TO QUESTION IN HIGH LEVEL DISCUSSIONS THE AVAILABILITY OF MORE* HOW TO RESPOND IF THEY DO RAISE REACTOR SALES... WE MAY WANT TO USE FURTHER SALES AS A LEVER TO CLOSE THE PNE LOOPHOLE. THEREFORE, IT WOULD RE RFASONALEE TO: -- ACKNOWELDGE THE NUCLEAR COOPERATION THAT HAS BBEEPN CARRIED OUT BETWEEN US AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE KOREANS HAVE SELECTED A U.S. REACTOR TO HELP MEET THEIR ELECTRICAL POWER NEEDS, EXPRESS CONFIDENCE THAT FUTURE REQUESTS FOR REACTORS CAN PE WORKED OUT, AND INDICATE, AS WE HAVE OFTEN SAID, THAT THE BENEFITS OF ATOMIC ENERGY SHOULD BE AVAI.LA,BLE TO ALL WHO ENFORCE THE CONDITIONS THAT PRECLUDE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVES. DENIS CLIFT AND JACK FROEBE CONCUR. TAB A CANADA - SOUTH KOREA THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT IS TRYING 'TO DECIDE WHETHER TO ALLOW THE SALE OF NUCLEAR POWER AND RESEARCH REACTORS TO SOUTH KOREA AND A-NUMSFR CF OTHER POTENTIAL PURCHAS ERS A DECISION TO SELL TO SOUTH KOREA IS NOW VERY MUCH IN DOUBT BECAUSE OF GROWING CONCERN IN CANADA THAT PLt!TO- NIUM PRODUCED BY THE RESEARCH REACTORS MIGHT BE. DIVERTED TO MILITARY USE. COVERN MENT IS GENERALLY CONVINCED OF SEOUL'S HOPE CF DEVELOP- ING A NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITY. THIS CONFIRMS AN EARLIER CANADIAN PRESS REPORT WHICH STATED THAT GOVERN- MENT SOURCES HAD SUGGESTED CANADA MIGHT DECIDE NOT TO SELL A REACTOR TO SOUTH } OREA EVEN! IF ADEQUATE NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS WERE OBTAINED. SEOUL :HAS AGREED TO SIGN A SAFEGUARDS PROTOCOL TO THE REACTOR SALES AGREEMENT END OF PAGE 02 TOP SECRET 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/03/09: LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4 TOP SECRET COVERING NOT ONLY THE CANDU.! REACTOR ITSELF, SLIT PLSO THE PRODUCTS EMANATING FROM IT. ACCORDING TO THE PRESS REPORT, OTTAWA RECENTLY COM- PLETED AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SEOUL REGI'ME'S POLITICAL STABILITY AND MILITARY ASPIRATIONS AND WHETHER THESE MIGHT LEAD TO A NUCLEAR ARMS PROGRAM IN-SOUTH KOREA. THE ARTICLE DID NOT CONTAIN THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE STUDY, BUT INDICATED THAT THEY HAD, 13EE N GIVEN. TO THE CABINET. THERE HAS SEEN HEAVY COMMERICAL PRESSURE OF OTTAWA TO AGREE TO FOREIGN SALES OF ? THE CANDLI REACTOR BECAUSE CANADA WCULD GAIN ENORMOUSLY. OTTAWA HAS PEEN BESET BY .DOUBTS ABOUT ITS REACTOR SALES PROGRAM. RE, ,CENTLY, THERE HAS BEEN INCREASING DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN PRESSURE CN OTTAWA TO TAK MORE CAUTIOUS APPROACH IN APPROVING REACTOR. SALES. Z 7344 NNNN No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/03/09: LOC-HAK-550-3-30-4 25X1 25X1 25X1