RECENT SOVIET NAVAL ACTIVITY IN CUBA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
July 12, 2010
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 18, 1970
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3.pdf196.74 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 TOP SECRE ISENSITIV IEYES ONLY September 18, 1970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROMs Henry A. Kissinger SUBJECTs Recent Soviet Naval Activity in Cuba State Dept. review completed Analysis of reconsaaissaaace flight photography over Cuba has jconfirmed the construction of a probable submarine deployment base in Cien Wuegos Bay. Specificallys -- A Soviet submarine tender is anchored next to four bouys which the Soviets have placed in the Bay. submarine nets have been emplaced acmes the appraaac a to we eep water basin in which the mooring bout's and the tender are located- -- A Soviet LST is anchored at a fuel pier and the Soviet tanker is anchored in the northern bay. -- Two special purpose barges are also located in the ar+aea. -_ Special construction an Alcatras island, an island in the Bay, appears to have boon completed. This includes an administrative area, two single- story barracks, a soccer field, basketball court and pro- bably handball, volleyball or tennis courts.. AA offshore wharf nand swimming area are on the east side of the island and a platform tower has been constructed just south of the administrative area. The foregoing situation acquires special significance in the light of the conversations I had with Charge Vorontsov on August 4 in the White House Map Room. You will recall that I saw Vorontsov at his request an that occasion. He Called me in San Clemente to say ha wanted to have an appointment as soon as I got back When I saw him he was extremely cordial and read ta -we a co munication which he handed to me. TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE/EYES ONLY NGA Review Completed No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12 : LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 w w TOP SECRET/SXNSITIYELEYk$ ONLY The teat of the note which is at Tab As . Expres.ed Soviet anxiety over alleged attempts by Cuban revolutionary groups in the United States to resume sabotage and subversive activity against Cuba from the U. S. soil. _.. Complained about provocative articles in the American lase s.s ambivalent statements on the part of the U. S. officials concerning -- Stressed that the Soviets were proceeding on the Cuban question from the understanding with regard to Cuba that existed in the past and confirmed thattthe Soviets expected no to adhere to this understanding. Not.a The so called understanding to which Vorrontsov, was apparently was arrived at during the Cuban- nisi crisis. In essence, during the exchanges between the U. S. and the Soviets in 1962 at the time of the Cuban missile crisis we were given assurances that the Soviets would not locate nuclear weapons on Cuban territory in return for assur- ances from the U. S. government that we would not undertake military action to change the government of Cuba. On August 7 I stated to Voroutsov that at your request I had been instructed to give him the following reply: -- The U. S. notes with satisfaction the assurance of the Soviet government that the ity1eretandings of 1962 are still in force, adding ''We take this to mean chat the Soviet Union will not emplace any offensive weapons of any kind or any nuclear weapons on $uban mail. ei -- I stated further that you wish to point out that although we have heard repeated reports of increased Soviet activity in Cuba that you were eaxeesrcisf*a the utmost restraint 25X1 -~ You were maintaining the understandings of 1962 which I was hereby authorized to reaffirm. y the U. S. would not use military force to bring about a change in the governmental structure of Cuba. ?- I then added that it had come to our attention that Soviet TOP SECRET SENSTTIVE/EY.ES ONLY No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 w TOP SEICRE's'/SENSITIVE/ EYES ONLY long range airplanes of the type suitable for nuclear bombing missions were flying with increasing regularity to Cuba. While we believe these planes were on reconnaissance missions we thought nevertheless that this might constitute a basis for approach g the limit of our under- standing. It would certainly be noticed it the Soviet Union kept such operations to a z inlmum. The saaa"rxr ap d to Soviet naval a in the Caribbean. -- I called Voroatsov'as attention to the fact that we had taken protective measures in recent days with respect to a Soviet ship which reportedly was in danger of attack from Cuban exile groups. -- Vorontsav indicated he appreciated the good spirit in which the observations were made and was certain that the Kremlin would be very happy to receive them. -- I co cluded by telling Vorontsov that the major problem now was to see what concrete progress could be made in the area of *ogo- tiations. despite the exchange between Voron sea,~r mfrs a Soviets have- ve,d precipitously to establish an installation in Cien Fu_egos Say which is pre harbly eiesigned taae serve TOP S RET SE isITI"V"E EYES ONLY . No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3 w V The increase lately in the United States of activity, hostile towards Cuba could not but attract attention in Moscow. Certain anxiety has been caused, in particular, by attempts to units various groups and organizations of Cuban counterrevolutionary emigration in the United States and by resuming of sabotage and subversive activity of these organizations against Cuba, directed from American territory among other places. There has been an increase in number of provocative app sals in the American press and of ambiguous statements on the part of certain officials of the United State*. We would like to stress that in the Cuban question we proceed as before from the understanding on this question reached in the past, and we expect that the American side will also strictly adhere to this understanding. No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/07/12: LOC-HAK-512-1-8-3