POLICY TOWARDS CHILE
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
Release Decision:
RIFLIM
Original Classification:
T
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date:
January 5, 2010
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Publication Date:
November 9, 1970
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9.pdf | 190.94 KB |
Body:
' No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05: LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05: LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
af 7C717?l Security Deci ioll 1Vieino'1 1.~1tE:z1'tl ~~~
TO: Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense
'Director, Office of Emergency Preparedness
Director of Central Intelligence
ON-FILE NSC RELEASE
INSTRUCTIONS APPLY
;X :W:s A :x:.f ve at, a w~- Rd' .; xt s ? . ai rrtws.:xaa,,.
to establish and maintain close relations with friers y
- 1
on Noveh"iber b, 9 tTie'Ilifex-
policy* toward Chile wwrill be the concept underlying Option C of
agency paper submitted November 3, 1970 by the Department of State for
the consideration of the National Security Council as outlined in the guide--
lines set forth below.
The President has decided that (1) the public posture of the United States
will. be correct but cool, to avoid giving the Allende government a basis
on which to rally domestic and international support for consolidation of
the regime; but that (2) the United States will seek to maximize pressures
on the Allende government to prevent its consolidation and limit its ability
to implement policies contrary to U. S. and hemisphere interests.
Specifically, the President has directed that within the context of a publicly
cpol and correct posture toward Chile:
.. vigorous efforts be undertaken to assure that other govexnrezlts
in Latin America understand fully that the U. S. opposes consolida-
tion of a communist state in. Chile hostile to the interests of the
United States and other hemisphere nations-, and to the extent
possible encourage them to adopt a similar posture.
close consultation be established with key governments in Latin
America, particularly Brazil and Argentina, to coordinate efforts
to oppose Chilean moves which may be contrary to our mutual
interests; in pursuit of this objective, efforts should be increased
dl military
at the meeting of the National Security Council
7a'vllov.ting the discussion
70 the President has decided that the basis for our
leaders in the hemisphere.
TOP SECll_TISENSITIVE- I1~YES ON1''y
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05: LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
necessary act.,,"..._
fr assistllcc
Zcin,
'exclude, to tii~' ::t t i11V 4' S tjllt i1i. tt14
a. rivate
r U.S.xarxl ax
P
1?xo
f
,
a
lees
.w,_y`,., litee
nr ~~^7-rl
those 1 G r ~_..~ rt_YIXSP ~ 7~Litl:i
.
fisting guar ~t,:~.ce
;.~ Lch ex
detexzil,.ztc ii?t a~:tc tit.
t,C~ termitte4i saz reciuc;c ;
a:rxangenav:x,-
in international
bear
to,.~5S1tc`~11Ce
c. bring xxld iYl~u1~1 feasible ex fi.nal`de t
to limii mt cruenGe de to coordinate
t ons e dit or atl.
i be made
A,f fair s , and chair e Y
the establishrnent a
w~~tic,na~l :Crc~,t:7 Y
5ccr c=tarics of State anc
r~ pr4:sentativcs of the , and the Pre; iclctat'ssslstant for
Grntral' laYt.clli.t;crxcc b of the SecxeiarY of State, to
the representative
G
Government of Clnle w if the U. S.
character will be Garlsidexecl illeod on a but case way
ter hated
air et1G}
itntelzts will be be reduced, educed, delay s ed in or wi-ach
existing Gomm they Gould b
desires to do so,
Should be esamined? er cney
" that the Director of the office of _on s of possible
ent has directea
S ~r. e aTA e a study which sets forth the implicati
The Presid stor.k,.,.;file disposal actions
i c,ur
1CSs l .a r cc, PIt 1: x:ct
clevclapix7cntS in of E;i=zlr:.t.. f
may affect the rx~arlcc Ling
other factors as they
relationships with Chile. eview Groin? sheet ynonthly
ific policy issues `v t
ic President also has directed that the Senior enior spec ~Ve been
The to consider
or more frequently as ne eral xy to report actions which 1<
posture, stions vrhich lmay tecl
the #rarnnd to of this genera ecific policy quest!
present to hinn. further sp Process the Preside nohjssing
take- , and to To facilitate this p pxa
Working Group,
require leis decision. re ctor of
1]i ,
g
# an Ad Iloc Inter, ency 1 nP f ~,nsc , the
l0f''i ?.A.;. e p
friendly "at ns g unilateral U S p
objective of le .- S zrlvustlxlents
y t U S. priVate business interests athex concgerr with
ssure th l e and
f C_tii
a
opexati.ans in Chile are made aware o~exnxe~
or cut
Gavernment vie :vs the Go h the U S G
which the U: S o111 s v.h
the restrictive nature of the p
intends to f611LOV*.
nts be undertaken '~~ith the
namic aid comnzitt~te riwate social
no ne~~r l~ii~lter:~.l eco t-,clrnat~it~.rian or P
-154. 't]ssis
no - vot'iV111ZS of
c
finat1rial instltu ectionefforts shoes olio #rQrn other
to Chile (in this conn, this p y
- ---~;,M?tim suPl~bit for n,~,a?ricc"1. with. the
Tan srCRr _. WSITIV r'Y Es ONLY
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05 : LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
roue .es of notion and related action plans for
the consideration of the Senior Review Group and to coordinate inip=lcz'n_'nta-
tion of :approved courses of action.
CC: Secretary of the Treasury
Administrator, A. I. D.
~irec tvr,7ff`i?c,,bf 1'at and Setx.M.:::
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05: LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9
)I'S ONLY
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
TOP SEC1tl T/SENSITNF./EYES ONLY
No Objection to Declassification in Full 2010/01/05: LOC-HAK-460-5-6-9