I'D SOONER RESIGN THAN FOOL CONGRESS, SAYS CIA NOMINEE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP99-01448R000301270082-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 9, 2012
Sequence Number: 
82
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 18, 1987
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP99-01448R000301270082-6.pdf72.82 KB
Body: 
STAT C Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/10: CIA-RDP99-01448R000301270082-6 ARTICLE APPEAl_se _ ON PAGE CHICAGO TRIBUNE 18 February 1987 I'd sooner resign than fool 'Congress, says CIA nominee WASHINGTON [AP]?Rob- ert M. Gates, President Reagan's nominee to run the CIA, said Tuesday he would consider resigning if he ever were asked to hide a covert ac- lion from Congress for more- ithan a few days. In close questioning during his confirmation hearing about the administration's Iran arms .sales, Gates acknowledged for ,the first time that the Central 'Intelligence Agency had violat- ed its understanding with Con- gress by waiting more than 10 ,months to disclose the Iran ini- tiative. A 1980 agreement made it clear that key members of Con- gress expected to be notified ;within "a few days" of covert iintelligence actions, but the Reagan administration never conceded that interpretation, Gates said. In the case of the Iran deal, "I believe the long period of withholding went beyond the bounds of the compromise of 1980," Gates said. "I believe it stretched the comity between the two branches to the breaking point." He promised to the Senate Intelligence Committee that in the future he would not con- sider such a long delay in con- gressional notification. "The President could decide otherwise, and the committee needs to know that I would not be disloyal or insubordinate to the President," he said. But if such a presidential directive would hurt CIA rela- tions with Congress, "I would contemplate resignation under those circumstances." Gates also acknowledged that the agency had shown "shortcomings" during the en- tire Iran-Contra affair. "Our officers violated our own internal regulations in facilitating a flight in Novem- ber, 1985" that carried weapons to Iran, he said. "We did not communicate well enough in- ternally about what was going on. We should have protested more vigorously our involve- ment in an operation where there were significant elements unknown to us and where we mistrusted key figures. "We tolerated ground rules suggested by others that ex- cluded our own experts. ... I also believe the CIA made an error in not pressing to reverse the directive to withhold prior notification once the operation began to string out in February, 1986. The entire undertaking was a unique activity that we are all determined not to re- peat." In response to questions, Gates told the panel that re- visions made in then-director William J. Casey's prepared tes- timony for the panel late last year were made not because there had been an attempt to mislead Congress but because the agency itself was having dif- ficulty in determining the facts. A reference in an early draft of the testimony stated that no one in the agency had been aware that there were weapons on a plane which the CIA had arranged to fly to Tehran in November, 1985. "In fact, some of our overseas officers had known or suspected what was on that plane," Gates said. He said his own lack of knowledge about details of the Iran initiative was due in part to an "informal division of labor" in which Casey took the lead on Iran and Central Amer- ican matters. Gates also told the panel that he had heard only "flimsy speculation" about the diver- sion of Iranian arms sales pro- fits to Nicaraguan guerrillas be- fore the matter became public in November. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/10: CIA-RDP99-01448R000301270082-6