HUSH, HUSH

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP99-00498R000100150144-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 20, 2007
Sequence Number: 
144
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 3, 1978
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP99-00498R000100150144-9.pdf38.62 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/06/22 : CIA-RDP99-00498R000100150144-9 h-~'.i IC.U.7a -D~EA T 114E 3 July 1978 Hush, Hush The spy who came in and told A issue in an Alexandria. Va., court- room last week was whether top CIA officials could hold an ex-spy to his writ- ten agreement to let them censor anything that he wrote about his undercover expe- riences. Testified CIA Director Stansfield Turner. "If he is able to get away with this, it will prove to other people that we have no control." In other words, the agency wanted to chill into silence other potential telltale spooks. The case involved Frank Snepp, who spent eight years with the CIA, 4% of them in Viet Nam. Last November he pub- lished a minutely detailed, 580-page book. Decent Interval, in which he charged the CIA with "a failure of judgment at the highest levels" for not trying to evacuate all of its Vietnamese agents before Saigon fell to the Communists. Snepp disclosed no secrets in his book. But by not letting it be reviewed before publication, the CIA claimed, he broke the contract he had signed when he was hired by the agency. During the two-day trial, crusty Fed- eral Judge Oren Lewis sided with the CIA. He denied a defense motion for a jury tri- al. saying there were no facts to settle. He lectured Snepp about his having no right to reveal classified material. When re- minded that the case involved no classi- fied material, the judge accused the de- fense of "dealing in semantics." Lewis' judgment. which Snepp intends to appeal: "I think it was a willful. deliberate and surreptitious breach of contract and the highest public trust. He never said he was i doing it, a la the Pentagon papers, to save the country. He did it for the money." Lewis suggested that the proper penalty. which he will announce as part of his writ- ten verdict this week. "might be to relieve him of all his ill-gotten gains." e STAT Approved For Release 2007/06/22 : CIA-RDP99-00498R000100150144-9