REPORTERS SAY THEY'LL USE DATA FROM BRIEFING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96M01138R001200020010-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 17, 2005
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 16, 1982
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96M01138R001200020010-4.pdf84.54 KB
Body: 
Approved Fo ARric ,on PAGE lease 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP96 M 011 0001200020010-4 NEW YORK TINS 16 DECE1f.BER 1982 Reporters Say They'll Use Data From Briefing By JONATHAN FRIENDLY Reporters who attended a Defense Department briefing Tuesday at which thiey were asked to sign a secrecy oath said yesterday that they would use in- for-mation from that session in future reports. 1 none of the 13 reporters actually signed the oath, but they did agree or illy to restrictions on how they could pu blish the information about Soviet mi.litary capacity. They also were ba rred from taking notes at the two- bo ur presentation at the Pentagon. In interviews yesterday, the report- ers provided differing explanations of min C. Bradlee, called the affair '-a-, what those rules were. The consensus clumsy effort" by military officials, was that they could not write an im- adding, "I don't see much point in going ' t use the information. " mediate report relying solely on the if you can briefing but could use the material to Defense Secretary Caspar W. Wein- fill out future articles. berger arranged Tuesday's briefing by They said they -would conceal the the Defense Intelligence Agency to re- source of the information with such spend to reporters' challenges to him to phrases as "the Administration be- document his assertions that Soviet lieves" or "intelligence officials think. weapons imperiled American security. Some Had Expected Document The document the reporters were d m . 'd n Sat amo l si th th . . . asked to sign a formal secrecy agree- is based. Should an attempt be made by l meat but attended the meeting with any person to solicit from me this de- plans to leave if they could not persuade fense information, I agree to report the Pentagon to drop the requirement. I without delay any such incident to the Richard Gross, a reporter for United Assistant Secretary of Defense for pub- press? International, left the meeting licaffairs." rather than agree even to the oral i Such a pledge would have prohibited pledge that the information would be, : reporters even from telling their editors' given "off the record," which usually what was said at the session. means that a reporter may not publish'( All of the reporters balked at signing the information ever in any form. ?t 1 ibe document. After negotiations, the "What's the point of giving us classi-'1 Pentagon officials agreed to give the tied information you can't use?" be briefing under what most of the report- said, adding that "you become a party" ers said were rules that permitted them to the Administration and observing, to make some use of the information "If I wanted classified information for The Defense Department officials myself, I could join the Government." who supervised the session did not re- The New York Times was notified in spend yesterday to telephone calls seek- 1 advance of the meeting that reporters tag their explanation of the session or 'would be asked to sign a formal secrecy their view on the rules of disclosure. agreement. Seymour Topping, the man- .' aging editor, said The Times decided not to send a reporter because it did not accept such preconditions, which "tend to confuse the issues and consequently the public." Assailed as 'Clumsy Effort' The Washington Post's Pentagon re- porter did not attend because he was working on another assignment. The newspaper's executive editor, Benja- Some of the reporters who attended the briefing said they knew in advance they would be asked to sign something but had thought the document would be a routine statement 01 rules-. under which briefings are frequently held. Others said they knew they would be Approved For Release 2005/12/14: CIA-RDP96M0l138R001200020010-4 , te e as g ng a r tngs "I agree that, unless specifically au- thorized in writing by the Secretary of Defense, I will neither divulge or reveal in writing, broadcast, or any verbal dis- course the actual information pre- sented at this briefing nor the generic source upon which this D briefing I A