INFORMATIONAL INTERACTIONOF ISOLATED SYSTEMS WITHOUT ENERGY TRANSFER

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00792R000500230003-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 15
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 5, 2000
• Sequence Number: 3
• Publication Date: March 3, 1992
• Content Type: HW

SGA~~bproved For Release 2?6?~~181~iC~U~~6~96-00792R000500230003~5~3~~ z.._
Informational Interaction of Isolated Systems Without Energy ~`!'ransfer
92ASQ446 Unknown city -USSR Unknown in Russian Unknown (Unknown Pub Date)
Unknown pp 341-357
[Article by R. F. Avramenka, V. I. Nikolayeva, and V. N. Pushkin
[ ~'extl ,
i. Problem of the information component of biofield interactions.
A special feature of biofield interactions is the transfer of informativn from one bivfield
structure tv another. Twv types of relativnship can be articulated for structures of that kind
that effect the process of information transfer. One type of structure is asscxiated with
interactions within a system, such as the brain. An example of such a biofield interaction
could be instantaneous -- in the terminology of psychology, simultaneous -recognition. That
rewgnition of very familiar objects suggests the inter-action of a biofield model of an
impression that comes from without and structures that were previously formed anti are
models of already perceived objects. Resonant contact of that sort produces the effect of
virtually instantaneous drawing on past experience of a needed reference and can be
considered the mechanism underlying simultaneous recognition.
Processes associated with thinking and with problem salving can be placed in that category of
informational interactions between systems that are spatially isolated from each other. In the
course of mental activity, the individual is lmown tv create for himself something new, and
that new semantic system usually enables the individual to salve a camplex problem facing
him. As numerous psychological studies show, the principal language the individual uses in
his thinking is the Language of systems of relationships between objects. If one approaches
that psychological reality from the standpoint of the formation and work of biofield
structures, then two components can be articulated in a system of relationships -certain
biofield equivalents of objects, and the stable field interactions of those equivalents,
interactions that are the eyuivalents of the interactions between the objects.
In analyzing a given problem situation, the individual constructs a madel of that situation that
consists of, once again, the equivalents of the elements that make up the problem, plus the
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
 Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
interactions between those equivalents. A gvod example of how the mcxlel of the situation is
constructed is the process that takes place in the head of a chess player when he is analyzing
his position on the chessboard. When he considers his position, the chess player perceives the
pieces as func,~tional points of sorts that have given properties of movement. In
comprehending those properties of movement, he constructs a system of relationships among
the pieces that become the basis of the functioning of his game srtrdtegy.
It's nut difficult tti see that that process -- just like the process of instantaneous, simultaneous
recognition that we alluded tv -- presumes, of necessity, the existence of biofield interactions:
the relationships constructed in the analysis of the situation absolutely musrt interact with the
relationships that constitute the content of the chess player's experience. Only on the basis of
the realization of pasrt relationships can the semantic system of a new situation develop.
Thus, analysis shows that the resonance between biofield structures ~s also a very important
aspect in an individual's thinking. But in that context, it ~s not a resonance of representations
of a single specific obje~:t that takes place, but a resonance of systems that include certain
field equivalents of objects and of the relativaships among them.
The exchange of information between completely isolated biological objects can be considered _
another of informational biofield mteracrion. An example of that sort of interaction is
-tele dth -~ when information ~ t is not enccxled in known languages Spfx:ially designed for
e fer of information is transmit#ed from one individual tv another.
As a great deal of the literature shows, those sorts of bioinformational interactions can
involve the transfer of the most varied of types of psychological manifestations. With
teley~y it i~ vossible to convey an acti~n.,~he_im~e ~f_~ ~b1~-mod meaningful symbolic
stru____e,, or an emotional state. That means that in that kind of bioinformational contact,
there is an interaction of biofield sysrtems of various levels and modalities of the brains of two
individuals who are separated from each other.
All those types of biofield interactions in which information is transferred from one system
S~v` ?~ ~ to another, are characterized fusrt and foremost by_ the fact_that .the transfer of information
~,.~ ~ > involves no duec-t enema ale. Of course, each of the biofield systems that are asscx:iating
with each other needs some amount of energy fur its very existence. It's also probable that
the features of the information exchange between the systems -- the clarity, the efficiency,
and the sv-called capacity of the exchange -- are associated with the energy characteristics of
those systems. The process itself of informational interaction, unlike known hardware
Systems, dues not reyuire energy.
In that context, the oblem arises of idea ' the h ical lager th~oulcl_enabl~_~ne tv
undertake the analysis of the ' ormadonal interdc~tion between spatially separate 5 srtems that
does not require any expenditure of energy for its existence.. Later, it will be shown that there
alr~exists in ml, frequency modulation, and phase nnanipulation.'~?~`
Wovdward's general uncertainty principle holds true for such signals, saying that the potential
capabilities of measurements are determined by a type of autocorrelation function ~ (T, w)
Approved For Release 2 0 0 010 811 5 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
 Approved For Release 2(~F~I~I?~~1~~~6-007928000500230003-5
[sic] of the "wave packet" of the probing signal s(t)
~`++ ~ '-'
where ~: is the total energy of the signal.
The function ~ (z, t,~) generally has its greatest value (peak) at the origin of the coordinates
r=0, Y,~=O, and the width of the peak is --1/w in terms of the r axis anti ~2~/T in terms of
the t~- axis. Those intervals also determine the potential accuracies of measurements in
sequential statistical theory. But the Woodward uncertainty principle itself asserts that a
volume bounded by (~~ and the plane (z, Z.>) is finite and is equal to a constant, regardless of
the type of wave packet,
Figures la and lb depict the image of a typical autocorrelation function of a wideb?
phase-modulated) signal and, for comparison, the topographic image of that function for an
unmcxiuiated radio pulse of the same duration T.
Signal at the filter output
~~ PHASE-MODULATED PULSE
~'?' FREQUENCY-MODULATED PULSE
t
autocorrelation function of the signal TW>1
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
 Approved For Release 20gR/OFFICIAL su E oDP~96-007928000500230003-5
Signals (wave packets) and uncertainty functions
Figure lb
Thus, we See that if the position of the wave packet in terms of the z axis were determined
only by its envelope curve, then the "relation of durations" would hold true -increasing the
duration of the ~llegibleJ of oscillations would lead tv a worsening of the accuracy of
measurement of that position. (We are, of course, speaking of the statistical approach
generally used both in wave (quantum) mechanics and in mcxiern radar.) That's not so in an
actual case of optimal prcx:essing of a wideband signal. The measuring device (filter or
correlator), using a priori information on the type of interpulse mcxiulation of the wave
packet, makes independent measurements of position with an accuracy of 1/W and of Doppler
frequency with an accuracy of 1 /T; expansion of the signal spectrum W does not worsen the
accuracy of measurement of speed of ~1/T.
The modem statistical theory for the measurement of parameters of wave processes is fully
applicable to wave (quantum) mechanics.
In making that application, we must, of course, move from the primitive understanding of the
essence of measurements in the context of Heisenberg ("relation of durations") to the modern
concept of the limitations on those measurements, which has come about as a result of the
development of the theory of statistical raclio physics.
We cannot fail to note that in the modem literature on quantum mechanics, the use of the
Heisenberg principle and the explanation of it as a fundamenhal relationship (~) is often
somewhat peculiar. In the well-known Berkeley Course, for example, for purposes of
illustration, there are figures of wave packets with intrapulse modulation "for which the
accuracy of measurement of frequency is low," although a figure depicts what is essentially a
Approved For Release ~Oo~~~>~~~v~LGY~i~-96-007928000500230003-5
 ii IA.I~USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2~~~/~~~1~ : GIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
wideband signal for which that assertion dues not hold true.'
Why, in fact, has quantum theory lagged behind modern radio p sics on the concept of
statistical limitationns on the accuracy of joint measurements of a number of parameters?
As we can see, the possibility of achieving the potential accuracy of measurements is
governed by two factors:
? the formation of a wave packet with a given type of mcxlulation
? the use of a measurement device the performs the procedure of optimal processing din the_
statistical theory o radio physics, that is a prcx;edure fur consrtruc~ _an_u posteriori _ _
distribution of the probability of the presence of a target with__g_iven~ardmeters _of _rdn~e and
--
~~
Both those factors have simply been outside the circle of yuestions studied in yuantum theory.
For example, the examination of the property of wave packets (de Broglie waves) is usually
limited tv the scrcalled quas7classical approximation
~.:
~~
where P is the pulse and v is the Hamiltonian operator. In other words, it is limited to cases
in which phase modulation rllegibleJ at a distance commensurate with wavelength ~ =h/mV
illegible] that constraint is essentially eyuivalent tv the exclusion TllegibleJ -went of
wideband ~-waves with a marked freyuency mcxiulation (to say nothing of phase-modulated
signals).
On the other hand, the measuring device is usually spoken of as a primitive device that
rec:vrds the intensity of a wave in a given region of Space, but the obvious ossibili
recording intrapulse phase relationships is completely ignored (and that in spite of the fact
that phase relationships, as already noted above, lie at the basis of many modern macroscopic
yuantum instrumentsf ).
In summing up what has been said, one can assert that no fundamental physical laws are
known that would prompt attaching to the Heisenberg relation the sense of a "relation of
uncertainties" that determines the potential capabilities of measurements. Quantum theory
should use, as dues modern srtatistical radio h sics the eneral uncertainty~rinc~le ~ in
particular, e W war prmci le, which adeyuately reflects the true limitations on the
process of measuring "ac tional" magnitudes.
Achieving accuracy in the measurement of the~osition and pulse of a yuantum~echa~uical
obiec~t in conformity with the Woodward principle requires,_of course, _in.physical
e riment of a competent) deli ed record instrument that musrt respond.npt _tv ~-wave
intensity, but ? so to phase relations in wave packet bein~"receivetl. " An examination of
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
 '.. FOR OFFICIAL USF Oi~'LY
statisb ? evey of radar: Such devices, as far as we ow, have not been developed for
1
quantum processes.
o timal processing of the -wave like the optimal processing or eieca~oma enc ~~~
nrincinla:'1~ such a phase mcxiulation reyuires using measunng devices that
with the energy of System M remaining constant. According to the Woodward uncertainty
c --
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
Specific methods for destigning such instruments, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.
Returning tv the quesrtion of playing back am ~-wave image, we see that there is no
contradiction between the possibility of a stipulated location of that image and any
fundamental, verified physical law.
The analysis. that has been made demonstrates that the use of modern mathematics (for
example, the Woodward uncertainty principle) in quantum mechanics opens the possibility of
recording phase relations between various parts of an isolated system M = A + B + ... Those
parts can be segments of a wave packet with a complex law of phase modulation. Phase
modulation of those separate segments of the packet, in conformity with the Feynman
integral, can be assigned external conditions created by another isolated System -- values of
the components of 4z potential at the location of system M.
We note once again that we are looking at phase mcxiulation of a #-wave in a space only,
At the same time, one can presume that the capacity for such information exchange ~ built
into, and used in bioloQa ? ystems
energy-free transfer of .information and. it_
_ V
is not only the transmitting sysrtem, but also the receiving system that musrt ~~tiye~that_i~,
ens ust be expended for the reception of information).
The transfer of information between biological systems is closely linked to brain function _and
thou relation tiv which the fain mechanical and bolo d hic a vac is developing
Biological obi
If one ac~e~s tha energy-fret ongitu ~vc+av a 4x field~Otential are th~..S~ier of_
information in remote communications between biological obtectss then one begins to
understand many experimental data thus far accumulated in bioenergetics and bioelectronic
that are not contained in the classical thev for the transfer f co ? tions~ua__
modulation ectroma etic wave or article fluxes.
References
1. Putkhof, Targ. "Perceptive long-distance channel fcn transmission and information."
TIIRE, No 3, 1976.
R. F. Avramenko, L. P. Grachev, V. I. Nikolayeva. "Desc-ription of electromagnetic
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5
 Approved For Release 2~$~/g~,~L~t~-~~~6-007928000500230003-5
fields via potentials, and Energy transfer problems." Paper given at the Fourth International
Sympvsium on Information Thevry. Leningrad, 1976.
3. L. D. Landau, Ye. M. Lifshits. "Tevriya pulya" [Field Theory]. 1vlvscvw: IzdateLs-tvv
"Nauka," 1973,.
4. D. K. Maksvell. "Izvrannyye svchineniya po tecnii elektrvmagnitnvgv pvlya" [Selected
Works in Elee~n-omugnetic Field Theory]. Moscow: GI TTL, 1954.
5. R. Feyninan, R. Leyton, M. Sends [sic]. "Feynmanovskiye lektsii Po fizike" [Feynman
Lectures on Physics], Vol 6. Mvscvw: Izdatelstvo "Mir," 196b.
6. R. C. Jahlevic [sic], J. Lambe, A. H. Silver, J. E. Merc:ereau. "Quantum interference
effects in Josephson tunneling." PHYS. REV. LETTERS, Vvl 12, No 7, February 1964.
7. R. C. Jahlevic [sic], J. Lambe, A. H. Silver, J. E. Mercereau. "Quantum interference
frvm a static vector pvteratial in a field-free region." PHYS. REV. LETTERS, Vol 12, No
11, March 1964.
8. R. G. Chambers. "Schiff [sic] of an electron interference pattern by [illegible] magnetic
fluz." PHYS. REV., 5 (1960).
9. K. A. Krug "Osnovy elektrotekhnild" (Foundations of Electronics]. Moscvw:
Gvsenergvizciat, 1960.
10. G. G. Markvv. "Antenny" [Antennas]. Mvscow: Gosenergoizdat, 1960.
11. L. Brillyuen. "Nauka i teoriya informatsii" [Science and Information Theory]. Moscow:
Fizmatgiz, [illegible].
12. R. Tolmen. "Otnositel'nost', termcxiinamika i kosmologii" [Relativity, Thermodynamics,
and Cosmology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo "Nauka," 1974.
13. Yu. V. Vorvbyev, V. A. Zhukov. "Semiconical illumination and effect of volume in an
electron microscope image." Paper given at the Fifth All-Union Conference on Electron
Mic,7vscopy. Tashkent, 1976.
14. M. Troyon, R. Bonhomme, O. Gallion. "Use of autvemission electron gun in a
transmission electrvn microscope for higher resolution and single-beam Fraunhofer
holography." J. MICROSC. ET SPECTROSC. ELECTRON, 1976, Vvl 1, No 3, pp 517,
518.
15. A. Huiser, A. Drenth, H. Ferwerda. "On phase retrieval in electron micxvsc:vpy from
image and diffraction pattern." OPTIK, 1976, 45, pp 303-316.
Approved For Release 20~~~0~%~I v~I~l~s~~~6-007928000500230003-5
 Approved For Release 20(~Q~'~I~~~I~~-007928000500230003-5
16. C. Davison, C. H. Kunsman. PHYS. REV., 1923.
17. J. P. Tompson (sic]. Procceping [sic] of the Royal Soc7ety, of London, Series a, 117, pp
6GI0-C~(?9 {192&}.
18. P. S. Tartakovskiy. "Eksperimental'nyye c~snc~vaniya vohxrvoy tevrii materii"
[Experimental Buses of Wuve Theory of Mutter] . Moscow/Leningrad, 1932.
19. Sushkin N. G: et al. DOKLADY AN SSSR, 1949, Vol 66, p 165.
20. D. Ye. Vakman. "Solzhnyye signaly i printsip nevpredelennc~sti v radiolokats-ii" [Complex
Signals cUUI the Uncertuinry Principle in Rcrdur]. Moscow: Izciatel'stvo "Sov. Radio," 1965.
21. E. Vikhman [sic]. "Quantum Physics." Berkeley Course of Physics. Moscow:
Izdatel'stvo "Nauka," 1974.
22. Dzh. [sic] Trigg. "Reshayushchiye eks-perimenty v sovremennoy fizike" [Decisive
Experiments in Modern Physics]. Moscow: Izciatel'stvo "Mir," 1974.
23. Ya. D. Shuman. "Razresheniye i szhatiye signalov" [Resolution cvid Compression of
Signals]. Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radii," 1974.
24. G. Urknvitts. "Filters for detection of weak radar signals in interference reflections."
VOPROSY RADIOLOKATSIONNOY TEKI-INIKI [Aspex:ts of Radar Technology], 1954,
NU 2.
25. P. A. Bakut, I. A. Bolshakov, B. M. Gerasimov, A. A. Kuriksha, V, G. Repin, G. P.
Tartakovskiy, V. V. Shirokov. "Voprosy statistichesk~y tex~rii rddiolokatsii" [Aspec7s of the
Statistical Theory of Radar]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Sov. Radio," 1963.
26. D. Middlton [sic]. "Vvecieniye v 5-tatisticheskuyu teoriyu svyazi" [Introduction to
Statistical Communications Theory]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo "Sc~v. Radio," 1962.
F. M. 'ads c]. "Teoriya veroyatnostey i teoriya informatsii s primeneniyem k
radiolokatsiobabili Theo In _ 'on TheorY..ps..~ppli~~l.to Ruc~ur]. Izdatel'stva
"Sc~v. Radio, 1955. ~~~~ C~t53
28. V. Zibert. "General laws of target detection with radar." VOPROSY
RADIOLOKATSIONNOY TEKHNIKI, No S (41), 1957.
29. A. S. Davydov. "Kvantovaya mekhanika" [Quantum Mechanics]. Moscow: Izdatel's-tvo
"Nauka," 1973.
[References 30 and 31 not included in reference lisrt]
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Approved For Release 2000/08/15 :CIA-RDP96-007928000500230003-5