IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION OF PERSONNEL (U)
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP96-00792R000100140038-1
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
2
Document Creation Date:
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date:
October 28, 1998
Sequence Number:
38
Case Number:
Publication Date:
May 27, 1983
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 77.27 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2003109/10 C!A-RDP96-00792R000100140038-1
SECRET
27 May 198.3
SUBJECT: Identification and Selection of Personnel (U)
Dr. Harold E. Puthof f
SRI International
;333 Ravenswood Avenue
A:enlo Park, California 94025
Dear-Dr. Puthoff:
(U) References:
t' letter, ted _ 27 'April 1983, subject same as
a. Your memo, .dted? 7 June 1982, subject: Screening
c. Your memo, dated 11 . May 1983, subject:
"Sele*ction/Training Task.
(U) I have reviewed y(aur June 19$2 and May 1983 memos with
the INSCOM Staff Psycholog = t- who i4 m;/ principal advisor on
this project. Based upon this initial review, I would welcome
an official proposal.
(U) Information not reflected in your memo which needs to
be addressed in your proposal include:
a. (S/CL-1/NOFORN) Phase I: Who are4."calibrated"
remote viewers? How many are we talking about?' What is an
"extended Wechsler" test?. Where will the testing take place?
How long will the testing take? Who will perform the data
analysis?
b. (U) Phase 2: Why were the Wechsler, Meyers-
Briggs and 16 PF chosen as the instruments? What is the outcome
expectation? Where will the "second group of individuals" be
drawn from?
-CLASSIFIED BY: CG, INSCOI
DECL: ; OADR
CENTER LANE SECRET
? 1u ruttIGrt ~~~~rrnn
Approved For Release 2003/09/10: CIA-RDP96-0tl~i'9 tI 6 00140038-1
Approved For Release 2003/0(19
. . a00792R000100140038-1
c. (U) How long to completion of the project? How
long will oac~ phase last? What percentage of contract funding
will betassigned to each phase?
(U) Another question is the apparent lack of relationshlip
of the screening approach described in the memo of June 1982'and
,;your,.new approach as stated in the memo of May 1983?
(U) To allow shfficient time for a review of your proposal
and to meet administrative requirements for funding in FY 83, an
expeditious response is requested.
ROBERT J. JACH IM
LTC, MI
Project Manager
UCLA"
Approved For Release 2003/09/10 :CIA-Ib6-007928000100140038-1