FEEDBACK AND TARGET DEPENDENCIES IN REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENTS

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00789R002200360001-8
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 9
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 14, 1998
• Sequence Number: 1
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
r=lnai Report-fvbJect/ve E, Tasks i an~ December 1988
Covering the rlod 1 October 1987 to 30 eptember 1988
FEEDBACK AND TARGET DEPENDENCIES IN
REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENTS (U)
Approved For Release 2000/08/ CIA-RDP96-007 98002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 200
8 : CIA-RDP9 -
I INTRODUCTION t;Ln
(U) One of the intriguing questions about remote viewing (RV) and similar kinds of
experiments is the extent to which feedback influences the results. For example, in FY 1987 SRI
International conducted an experiment which showed that subject performance did not seem to
be dependent on the intensity of the feedback provided.' The feedback intensities in that
experiment, however, were all minimal and did not allow for detailed study of the target.
(U) In FY 1988 we created a new target pool. This pool is contained on video disks and
consists of short movie segments, natural scenes, and other composite target material. Some of
the targets have no sound; some contain music only but no words; and some have complete
conversations. Thus, various targets differ in both visual and audio complexity.
(U) In all of the experiments for which this target pool has been used, the subjects have
been given feedback by viewing the video disk segment selected as the target. For all of the
experiments covered in this report, feedback was vivid in the sense that the subjects could view
the target segment as many times as desired.
(U) The purpose o[ the task covered by this report was to see if the quality of these
remote viewing,s (as measured by rank-order judging) differed based on an amalgam of target
type and feedback complexity. Because the target pool was not constructed specifically with this
task in mind, we were unable to differentiate between the effects of target type and feedback
complexity. f
~`"~r`l We examined the ranks assigned by judges when each video disk Segment was the
intended target., compared with the ranks assigned when that segment was not the intended
target. We found that the targets in the "natural" category, which were mare homogeneous than
the other targets, tended to result in better remote viewings. Further, of the individual targets,
one resulted in a significant sum of ranks. That particular target did not receive higher than
' (U) May, E. C. and Lantz, N. D., "Feedback and Precognition Dependent Remote Viewing
Experiments (U)," Final Report, Objective F. Tasks 1a and lb, Project 1291, SRI
International, Menlo Park, California (December 1987}
t (U) This report constitutes the deliverable for Objective E, Tasks ]and 2. Due to project
priorities, separate experiments were not performed for these Objectives.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898 02200360001-8
chance ranks when it was not the intended target, so the result is not due to bias on the part of
the judge.
The series of remote viewings was not significant overall, but the significant
findings in the previous paragraph allow us to make some tentative conclusions (Section IV). In
addition, many of the subjects in this experiment were novices who- were being tested to see
whether or not they had any special abilities. Therefore, the trends observed in this report may
be enhanced when working with subjects who are able to produce higher quality remote viewings
overall.
Approved For Release 2000/08/q(8 : CIA-RDP96-007 98002200360001-8
 A. (U) Purpose
(U) In FY 1988 SRI conducted a series of experiments to try to find people with rem
viewing ability. Because of the nature of the target pool used for this series, it was possibleGto
,.. .
determine whether the complexity of the target and corresponding feedback had an influence on
the quality of the results.
B. (U) Target Pool
(U) The target pool used for these experiments consisted of 16 segments on video disks,
each one slightly more than a minute long. They were divided into four categories, with four
targets in each category. The categories and short titles for the targets are listed in Tables 1 and
y
2 in Section III. '
(U) The targets in the "projects" category contained no sound; the "natural" targets were
set to music, with few or no words; and the targets in the other two categories each had
soundtracks containing words and sometimes music as well.
(U) The four projects targets are the least dynamic of the pool. Each of these consists of
a series of five-second segments of the project name alone interspersed with five seconds of
photographic material related to the purpose of the project represented by the word. For
example, the Project Ultra target consists of the words "Project Ultra" for half of the feedback
time and various still photographs of equipment, people, and the bombed-out cathedral at
Coventry interspersed for the other half of the time. To accurately describe this target would
have required a high level of cerebral functioning.
(U^/ The natural targets, on the other hand, are the most homogeneous. For example, the
Greek temple target consists of an aerial view oit a Greek temple on the top of a mountain, taken
from a circling helicopter; the skiing target consists of a scene from a James Bond movie of a
skier moving down a mountain and off a cliff. all set to music.
(U) The military and science/industrial targets were almost all segments from movies,
consisting of conversations and several different scenes.
UNCLASSIFIED
proved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 2~~~~~~~9R002200360001-8
C. (U) Experiments
(U) The results of all of the individual trials conducted with this target pool were used for
this~task. The results of the group tests could not be used because they were scored differently.
Mast of the data comes from the second-level screening, which was done with subjects who had
performed well on a qualitative assessment in the group screening. Further details of the
screening are given in the Objective B, Task 1, final report, Mass Screening For Psychoenergetic
Talent Using A Remote Viewing Task.
UNCLASSIFIED
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
 A roved For Release 2000/08/08.:.61A-RDP96-O~R002200360001-8
pp
III .RESULTS (TJ)
(U) The remote viewing trials were scored by assigning ranks to the actual target and the
three other possible targets within the same category. For example, if the intended target was the
Greek temple, then the response would be compared with the four targets in the natural category
and a rank would be assigned to each one. For the analysis in this report, the Greek temple
would be designated as the intended target, and the other three natural targets would be
designated as unintended targets.
~ Table 1 shows the distribution of ranks that were assigned to the intended target
by an RV analyst. For example, the aircraft-carrier-takeoff target in the military category was
randomly chosen as the intended target 5 times. It was ranked first 2 times, and it was ranked
second, third and fourth once each. Table 2 shows similar data, but for the unintended targets.
Suppose that the Greek Temple is the intended target; then for that trial, the ostriches, skiing,
and waterfall targets are unintended. Thus, for each trial in the series there is one entry in Table
1, and there are three entries in Table 2. There are a total of 85 remote viewings represented.
The most interesting result is that the sum of ranks for the trials in the natural
category is independently significant. Out of 16 trials, the sum of ranks is 32, p = 0.046. For the
other three ,categories, the rank sums are nonsignificant. For the projects, ~miiitary and
science/industrial categories the (sum of ranks, number of trials, p-value) are (70, 28, 0.53),
(46, 19, 0.42), and (56, 22, 0.43), respectively. Thus, it appears that the targets that were the
most homogeneous and were set to music with few or no words were the easiest to remote view
and/or to match correctly in judging.
The only individual target for which the sum of ranks was significant is Project
Deep Quest (8 trials, sum of ranks = 12, p = 0.007). This is the only target in the projects
category that has a dynamic segment; the others consist of a series of still photographs. Also, the
main theme of this target is water. We were concerned that the significance might be due to a
bias toward choosing this target on the part of the judge, whether or not it was the intended
target. To check this. we computed the rank sum for Project Deep Quest when it was the
unintended target. The sum was 46, for 20 trials, p = 0.24, so the bias hypothesis can not
explain the significant result.
Approved For Release 2000/08/0~..~GIA-RDP96~9R002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08:'CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
~ In contrast. judges did appear to be biased against Project Ultra. Out of the 28
times it was included in either table, it was ranked last place 16 times. including 5 of the 10 times
it was the intended target and 11 of the 18 times it was the unintended target. This target is quite
different from Project Deep Quest because the theme is unclear even after observing the target,
unless one is already familiar with Project Ultra.
Table 1
(U) RANKINGS FOR INTEI`'DED TARGETS
Category
Rank 1
Rank 2
Rank 3
Rank 4
Projects
Manhattan Project
1
1
1
1
Project Blue Book
2
1
0
3
Project Deep Quest
S
2
1
0
Project Ultra
1
1
3
5
Totals
9
5
5
9
Military
Aircrah Carrier Takeoff
2
1
1
1
Atomic Blasts
2
1
2
1
Control Room
0
0
3
0
Russians in Space
0
3
2
0
Totals
4
5
8
2
I~'atural
Greek Temple
2
1
1
0
Ostriches
2
0
4
0
Skiing
1
0
0
0
Waterfall
2
2
0
1
Totals
7
3
5
1
ScienceOIndustrial
Bottling Factory
0
2 -
- 3
1
Building Construction
4
2
1
0
John Glenn Launch
3
0
0
2
Tacoma Narrows Bridge
0
0
3
1
Totals
7
4
7
4
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CI -RDP -007898002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
Table 2
(U) RAI`'KINGS FOR UNINTENDED TARGETS
Category
Rank 1
Rank 2
Rank 3
Rank 4
Projects
Manhattan Project
7
9
6
2
Project Blue Book
7
5
7
3
Project Deep Quest
5
7
5
3
Project Ultra
0
3
4
] 1
Totals
19
24
22
19
Military
Aircraft Carrier Takeoff
5
5
2
2
Atomic Blasts
3
2
2
6
Control Room
3
3
1
9
Russians in Space
4
4
6
0
Totals
15
14
11
17
I~'atural
Greek Temple
1
1
1
9
Ostriches
1
1
5
3
Skiing
7
4
2
2
Waterfall
0
7
3
1
Totals
9
13
11
15
Science/Industrial
Bottling Factory
3
4
4
5
Building Construction
5
4
2
4
John Glenn Launch
3
5
2
7
Tacoma Narrows Bridge
4
5
7
2
Totals
15
18
15
18
Approved For Release 2000/08 IA-RDP96- 07898002200360001-8
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8
IV CONCLUSIONS (U)
The results of this analysis are intriguing, since they suggest that the complexity of
~~
the target and/or the feedback may affect the quality of the results. The natural targets, the only
group to achieve a significant sum of ranks, differed from the others in a few respects. First, they
tended to be more homogeneous visually than the targets in the other three categories. Second,
they were accompanied by music but few or no words. 'T'hird, they tended to represent more
pleasant situations than the other target categories.
Two of these three features distinguishing the Natural target category also applied
to the Project Deep Quest target. It represented a more pleasing situation than the other targets
in the projects category, and it was also more homogeneous.
In conclusion, while we are not able to identify a single distinguishing factor from
these results, it does appear that certain characteristics may enhance remote viewing quality. The
targets for which significant results were achieved were those that were visually homogeneous.
Further, from subjective reports of the viewers, they were the most appealing targets in the pool.
__ ~
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002200360001-8