ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT. NICKNAME: OTHER A . SESSION NUMBER: 01, 02, 03. SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 101

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 23, 2002
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: June 2, 1986
• Content Type: REQ

Approved For Release 2002/11/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900250002-3
4
/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
ERV SESSION PROCEDURE REPORT
WARNING NOTICE:
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
CONTROL NUMBER:
NICKNAME: Other "A"
DATE OF SESSION:
REFERENCES: None
2-6 Jun 86 TARGET COUNTRY: Unknown
g
SESSION NUMBER: O1, 02,
GS
03
DATE OF REPORT:
31 Jul 86 MISSION STATUS: Initial/complete
TECHNIQUE UTILIZED: ERV SOURCE IDENTIFIER: 101
1. ( ) TASKING: Initially the interviewer was provided a 3x5 card
on which the following tasking was typed: ures and
purpose of the structures at (coordinate) In the
two Subsequent sessions the interviewer was provided further verbal tasking
and directions~,`i.e., " site is accurate but focus attention on tunnel and
rocket device, additional emphasis on purpose of rocket device and relation to
site." Throughout sessions the interviewer was never told the exact nature
of the site, its key facilities nor its mission. In the initial session, the
Source was simply given the coordinates of the site, (encrypted to preclude
inadvertent geographic cueing as per Eytended Remote Viewing(ERV) protocols).
In subsequent sessions, Source was again provided the coordinates and a general
synopsis of previously reported data. No additional specific tasking emphasis or
intentional cueing was provided to Source.
2. ( ) SESSION: During the initial session, Source took a "joyride"
to an unspecified site whose descriptive. data did not coincide with the known
data on the site. Source was retargeted, (coordinates repeated) and
successfully acquired the site. In subsequent sessions Source was encourage
to initially take a "joy ride" to a'site of his choosing, (later to be designated
!'Sanctuary") and from that site, at the direction of the interviewer, he was
to move to the target. This technique appeared to eliminate inadvertent
reporting on non-related targets and was enjoyable to the Source, therefore,
he use of "Sanctuary" targetting will continue on a trial basis to A ermine
Lts affect on the Source's success rate.
I p
( ) SUMMARY: The following is compilation of the raw and unevaluated
data provided by Source during the total of three sessions conducted on this
target.
a. ( ) A fenced complex of buildings and facilities with a feeling
of military involvement. There are numerous scientists and technicians working
at the site. Some areas of the site are above ground, (buili jngs and related
facilities), while other areas are undera ournd or at least partially under-
ground. Mnay of the buildings appear to be abandoned completely including one
building (next to a railroad track) which may have once been a depot. This
building oriedtR )Re9 a d()Og 1/gei?MFA*Dpg 9FtWlg6M50U 8t of