PROJECT SUN STREAK TARGET: 0175. INBOUND TEAM: 079.

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 14
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: December 9, 2002
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: September 9, 1986
• Content Type: REQ

Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
CONFIDENTIAL/NOFORN SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
PROJECT SUN STEAK (U)
BEACON TRAINING SESSION
WARNING NOTICE: INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
DATE: rl` SFZP 5
TARGET :
OUTBOUND TEAM : 1) MR
INBOUND TEAM:
SG1J
2) ----
1) 09L9
MISSION EVALUATION:
-71,00 Fi_ Muft1Ac`5;1
1. (C/NF/SK) PROTOCOLS:
a. The Remote Viewer was introduced to the Outbound Team (OBT) at 6S'00
hours, `j h- &, . Following this "warm-up meeting both the OBT and
the Inbbund Team (IBT) were restricted to the area of the unit operational facility
with orders not to discuss the particulars of the upcoming mission. During
this "restricted" period neither the OBT nor the IBT were permitted to make or
receive outside telephone calls or to meet with other members of the unit. The
OBT was reindoctrinated on the need to maintain the integrity of this mission
by not varying the purpose of the trip to the site to tend to personal needs,
e.g., errands, refreshments, etc.
b. At F)Q,3rj hours, the actual target, (sealed within an envelope)
was provided to the OBT at which time they were permitted to depart the area
enroute to the target. Their verbal tasking was as follows:
(1) Do not unseal the envelope until you have moved out.of the
immediate viewing area of .the unit.
(2) Go directly to the target area and remain in the general area
(by driving around the block if necessary) until exactly 1d O o hours.
(3) At (boO hours, position yourself at the target area and
perform any actions normally associated with the functions of the target, e.g.,-
bowl at a bowling alley, purchase refreshments at a snack bar, etc.
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
(4) Remain on site for a minimum of fifteen minutes or longer but only
if a longer period of time is required to finish a function of the building
such as finishing a cup of coffee or similar purchase, etc.
(5) Following this fifteen minute mandatory visit to the site, return
immediately to the unit area.
(6) After arriving in the unit area, the OBT is not to discuss the
target or events that occurred at the site with anyone in the unit. When the
IBT has finished the post-session phase of the mission (sketch s:-, summaries, etc.)
the OBT and the IBT will proceed back to the target area, still without comments
pertaining to the actual mission.
(7) At the target site, the OBT will retrace their movements at the
target w1 . being followed by the IBT. When the target (or specific items at the
target) are recognized by the Remote Viewer, he/she will so state with a brief
explanation or reference to the data collection phase, if necessary.
(8) Following this second visit, both the IBT and the OBT will return
to the unit area at which time the OBT will be released and a general feedback
session will be provided to the Remote Viewer.
c. The Interviewer will be responsible= for collating the data obtained
from the entire session, (session information, post-session interview and on site
visit), and from the data an overall evaluation will be given pertaining to
the success of this mission based upon the relevence of the material provided
and later substantiated. The guidelines for this evaluation will be on a 0-7
point scale of target/data correspondence. This scale is as follow:
7 = Excellent correspondence, including good analytical detail (e.
naming the-site by name).
6 = Good correspondence with good analytical information (e.g., naming
the function), and with essentially no incorrect information.
5 = Good correspondence with unambiguous unique matchable elements and
little incorrect information.
4 = Good correspondence with several machable elements, but some incorrect
information.
3 = Mixture of correct and incorrect elements, but enough of the former
to indicate viewer has made contact with the site.
2 = Some correct elements, but not sufficient to suggest results beyond
chance expectation.
1 = Little correspondence.
0 = No correspondence.
In addition to the numeric scale of evaluation, the Interviewer may opt to
provided other comments on the target/session correspondence as necessary in
narrative form. All of this material is then provided to the Remote Viewer for
future references and/or discussions with the Interviewer since the material in
these reports will be used as the basis for additional skills training, if required.
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
& ccio cksscon9 S&p i" (A D)
10 Mf N&TaS
rM(M
r (g5- SEC)
SG1J
6. cw SIoic NO/S# O C,95-/ - 0955
RR an ' c& o
SG1J
/t coe -" (Zc&rJ c'?S 2
t1A
r)c-sc r ike
--4 rv0t
' 141 rv Dy
C'onj vF'
(zo 5'-Cc)
cure itat o f
0 97- Ndtg
(0 V~E
tNct, e ej C4 j
2 . F\1 G Y c n1c.~.
4'o UNDFe Ce>urSsaas
'Saw-le- i C o -1e-r nd;ses
Lr.~ca.'L~ar~ rv'
` W t (a! yl c aIcsS, yR c? 4 wf,, Cecrev -F &k? curuo a
lEc`Irr 4-e a/ fc
c: onolf/w i~ > jrc rr
4 &J
rt c (~! j 7 / U/C
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
SG1J
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
z
&41-01 l7 Cadf f cUn efc~~ e
~ raid
`a` f t 7h.e Qfe a.~
--4
~ua,c ~~~ , Y , l~rc cam- tf ~a r~lC~
604 A4
------ + Am 7kicly ~ffv
o c
qO C4
A k(
wa CY
1, )
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
0 ViOLM
SG1J
SG1J
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
3
Ae f Moe I u, CL
C^ L4~
-517 P"41 -beeQ4
t0t
j c~ cum:
Dix,ct 6;tt 44 A&4-
P,& j ~ C C
2: 'v
pno
)NA dA6411 Ca'P~
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
SG1J
SG1J
SG1J
SG1J
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
L(
01411
Aye 4evn. -
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
SG1J
AlF
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
!a-,'-c0
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
li'd
~ft~'cfrv~ ce,
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
 ;Appri ved For Release 2003/04/1 : CIA-RDP96 QO789ROO16020600D'1_-6 ~
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R0Q,1602060001-6
 See ADC's
UNTY, MD STREET MAP"
:)r Continuation
AI Saints,.
ANNA OLIS
JUNC ION
JESSUP
~Il~Va
F- p S
..0 Q A y Rl
aa~p~ DIVI 0 Fa rH
0 FN ORNF
0Y dT Pp 6r
'0, 'IML
N ~9~i s~ m WpR ~.
Oy;~ P ~ t'QN Ng~_ST
~ ~'~~ TERRY
ooe ~EA hapel I'i
DENNIS fib`' \S~\Pd EFRA Ype~
NIP RD~a
DOP
Y RD (BAKER 0
p6~~ 13
ational pn70LAIV, T
N
Security
Agency
ISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
s~yo 2O8H3 4/1 %OR8N CI NRpP96-0
'COLONY
FAIRFIELD
of olony 7
quet Club West
qp Meade
ES
ARGONNE P LCE ER I Qry CAR R
HILLS
NE,s
N
r --.JF nr IL._--~
1DRI, GE R
GMEADE
RSKINE RO
Joins Map 11 '76'47-30- MD GRID 860,000 FT COPYRIGHT MCMLXXXIV-ADC
%J MARKET PLACE
~II
701
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
Des r~OD `wst/; )(1 rr, b NdUS to-
09 )-Ile, 410 e ley 1 4 . (See- MZo)
YV S/ Y tA- L- t( 4 a ~,lG~~ dv d cc ?vK 2 a ~y
14 rr, t/.C- O.;& t x e. 012 / /rlj1 er c / 4, e.
a r t. Z ~i desS r/ 74ao/
YO
J
//st /3 ~r/?/u cis,
C-0 (1 ! /Z ST~r2~
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
 CPYRGHT
Joins Map 6 880.000
F
Ta 011?,
GEORGE
se 2003/04/
lAv Bf9~~~~ MEADEDALE
 0?9
. Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
2. ( ) SESSION RESULTS:
a. ( ) Source was able to enter an altered state without any apparent
difficulty. There were no known inclemencies or environmental factors which may
have affected Source's performance in this tasking. It should be noted, however,
that this session represented the culmination of an extensive eight week training
program in which the undersigned personally trained the Source to Remote View
utilizing the extended Remote Viewing (ERV) techniques. Therefore this session
was the first actual formal session utilizing the ERV technique in which Source
and the undersigned were teamed together. Perhaps, for this reason, Source's
characteristic trait of perfection and striving to succeed manifested itself
in a readily apparent aura of tenseness and anxiety. During the actual session
Source took a full ten minutes to reach an altered state, (not an unusual amount
of time) and when "cued" took almost a full two minutes to make an initial reply.
This early response delay continued for approximately five minutes but as Source's
anxiety dissolved in proportion to the depth of her altered state (evidenced by
the change in tonal quality of her voice), the responses became normal. Source
utilized very few "analytical" phrases, e.g., "looks like...,", reminds me of..."
"I think it's....," etc. This is a commendable statement since "analytical staements"
are the curse of even the most experienced Remote Viewer. Neither Source nor the
Interviewer (the undrsigned) were aware of the target
b. ( ) During the session, Source provided essentially the following
information of probable relevance to the site:
(1) A thin building with a predominant color fo gold/yellow. The
area is quiet with no activity. (note: the target was the Kimbrough Army Hospital.
The OBT entered the hospital through a side door and walked through a passageway
into a small waiting room near the pharmacy. The predominant color in this area
is yellow. Within the hospital, although people can be seen walking around the
overall emotion is quiet as people await their turn at appointments.
(2) Source made repeated reference to the building in terms::-of a "small
pyramid with an old flag on top". At first this reference eluded confirmation,
however, a "follow-up" visit to the site revealed two structures on top of the
hospital roof approximately three meters square and three meters high. The
purpose of those structures is unknown (and in fact.immaterial). What is relevant,
however, is that both of those structures (readily visible as you enter the hospital),
are shaped similar to the Aztec type pyramid (broad base, slanting up to a flat top).
The reference to the "old flag" may have been a typical disjointed RV response in
which two separate items are reported as overlapping on or actually attached to
each other. The US flag, located on a pole in front of the hospital is, ironically,
old an somewhat worn.
(3) Source reported that the OBT member was observed standing in front
of the site, with his back to the facility. This did occur but curiously, it
occurred approxiamtely 10 minutes before the actual cueing. The.accuracy of this
perception (mixed with accurate descriptions of what Source was viewing at that
time--an open field with trees in the distance, a tower "(like the Eifel tower)"
while smoking a cigarette), tends to indicate another possible symptom of Source's
desire to succeed. It would appear that Source did not wait for cueing from
the Interviewer but "went to the OBT" prior to the designated time thus
"erroneously" reporting on the activity of the OBT and the area he was viewing at
that time.
(4) In the final phase of the session Source continued to report on the
open, green f ie p F7& le t 2( / c
. 0lAWkVP9 8 2(9 4e on
 Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6
cue and describe the various items whe did so with great reluctance and difficulty. This
odd behavior may have been a manifestation of the fact that Source was aware, at
least subconsciously, that whe was viewing the "wrong" area which was located ~I
directly across the street from the actual target. The reluctance could have been
a mixture of confusion and "guilt" (if guilt is possible in an altered state) as
to where "12:00, 2:00 o'clock, etc" actually lied referentially.
(5) Source accurately described walkways and parking areas associated
with this site.
cc ( ) A review of the data provided by the Source during the
actual Interview and the comparison of that data coupled with Source's "on-site"
comments would seem to indicate that:
(1) Source successfully acquire the target
(2) Source reported on several of the gestalts at the target
(3) Source, perhaps due to anxiety, confused the actual target with
areas adjacent to the target.
SG1J
Approved For Release 2003/04/18 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001602060001-6