END OF STAGE CRITIQUE FOR AGENCY 025'S STAGE 5 & 6 TRAINING.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00789R001400220001-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 2, 1998
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 25, 1988
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00789R001400220001-2.pdf270.84 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 QA-RD-00789R00141SATES GOVERNMENT memorandum DATE: 25 October, 1988 REPLY TO ATTNOF: DT,"-.S (0113) SUBJECT: End of Stage critique for Agent 025'ss Stage 5 &. 6 training SG 1 J TO: DT ??"S (ATTN: 1. (S-??;iaS) PERIOD OF TRAINING : 025 an Stage 5 lectures by 003 on September (:3, 1 '8# w i-iant:is-on training began September 12, 1988, under my tutelage, and finished October 21, 1988, along with Stage 6 training, which was introduced during the on-going hands-on training period. 2? (S"???SS) PROGRESS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During 025's St age 5 & 6 training, the foll.owi,ng accomplishments were made: as STAGE 5: 025 progressed through Stage 5 training very rapidly. After the initial Stage 6 training, 025 began to show a slight bit of confusion between the techniques for Stage 5 regarding AOL perceptions and Stage 5 for valid signals. A quick refresher brought performance back in line and no other problems have been noted in this area since. b. STAGE, 6: The many elements of Stage 6 training were introduced ?t:.ta t?;;", cai"ie= at- ra 't i tile, along with selected target sites which would give immediate practice in the technique just introduced. The class was held at the designated work time, lasted approximately 10-15 minutes, and ended with a session which would utilize the material just learned. After all the techniques except two (see below) had been learned and practiced, sites were selected which could use mixtures of these techniques. 1) PROBING FOR PERCEPTIONS: 025 learned through repeated practice that all Stage 6 techniques utilize "probing". This principle was re-introduced with each technique, and 025 was not allowed at any time to work Stage 6 using any other method. By the end of training, 025 was fully proficient in self- correcting the normal tendency to "slide" over the time-line, scale "line, map, etc:. 2) MODELIi\.8: 025 produced excellent results with modeling (see photographs of models in individual session summary reports). The material used was Pl ay--Doha 025 appears to have a keen sense of 3-dimensional awareness about site characteristics, and very little trouble expressing them in this medium. i~lrTTI.IOFORN CLASSIFIED BY: DI:A (DT) DECLASSIFY: OADR OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 (REV. 1-80) GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 5010-114 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789 R001400220001-2 tit GP0 : 1965 0 - 461-275 (364) Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789 R001400220001-2 3) TiMlI'?...L...;I;ICIIICII,aa 025 quickly grasped the concept of time-lines, and had nc; apparent. trouble with them, either in the beginning or later. 4) MAF'f':I:NL : During the mapping exercises, 02i5 really became aware of the clangers of "sliding" versus the accuracy of "probing" for perceptions. ;) SCALE-LINING: Scale-lining presented somewhat more difficulty AT-6161-TV to a tendency he/she had to associate the line with time progression. Scale-lines are purely allegorical, in that the RVer is not allowed to know even the slightest hint about what the line stands for unt.i 1 after the perceptions are received and recorded. This tendency was worked on, bt..tt training may need to be refreshed an this point from time to time. 025's scale-lines, once divorced from the concept of time, provided astoundingly accurate information about the individual sites. t's) DOWSING: 025 was introduced to Stage 6 dowsing during the last se 'ssion off' training. Instruction stressed not only the techniques of Stage 6 dowsing, but also the differences between it and "normal" ciowsi ng. 025 immediately understood the principles involved and produced a session with extraordinarily accurate results. In this session, 025 was introduced to and given practice in both "a.l.legor?ical.s" Stage 6 dowsing (where the RVer uses a blank sheet of paper and doesn't know what he/she is looking for) and "actual" Stage 6 dowsing (where the RVer uses a standard map and is told what to look for on :1t.) c? AOL/AOL SIGNAL: 025 has made tremendous strides in being able Fa-recognize-10L. Only one session found 025 completely trapped in AOL drive, and wound up in failure, but this is not :i.nconsi stent with the performance of other viewers. Constant attention was given throughout all sessi. ons to stress the importance of recognizing and objectifying AOL. d. REPORTING: 025's only short-fall i,nct during Stage 6 training was the continued tendency to not stop viewing long enough to write perceptions i rite the Stage 6 matrix. 025 reaches a strong contact with the site, and must be constantly prompted to write perceptions down. I do not feel that this wi.l.l change with anything besides lots of experience, and constant pressure from monitors. It will hinder solo work however, until it is learned as an automatic reflex. e. I::AI1_..L.RE. As mentioned above, 025 had only one session where he/shre w