INTELLIGENCE EVALUATION SHEET

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 17, 2000
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0.pdf110.96 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 IES Control Number: Date IES Completed: PROJECT SUN STREAK (U) Intelligence Evaluation Sheet SECTION I Does the information satisfy your Intelligence Collection Requirement? YES 11 11 CANNOT BE DETERMINED SECTION II This section deals exclusively with the accuracy of the information provided in this report only. Disregard any previous data or IES forms you may have already received when completing this section of this form. Responses are scaled from 0-4 utilizing the following explanatory criteria: 0 - Little or no correspondence with known or suspected components of the target site. 1 - Evidence that the proper target site is being described, however the information contains a mixture of correct and incorrect elements. 2 - Good site correspondence with several items recognizable or cdnfirmatory in nature but some incorrect or irrelevnt information is reported. 3 - Good correspondence with the target with unambiguous and unique information and relatively little known incorrect information. 4 - Data correctly fulfills tasking in a manner which positively enhances current holdings and operational interest in this site.by reporting on heretofore unknown data. IN PART NO Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 IIa - Geographic locale description, i.e? terrain, bodies of water, mountains, etc. IIb - Large scale manmade objects, i.e., cities, railyards, silos, docks, etc. lic - Small scale manmade structures, i.e., antennae, computers, vehicles, missiles, small buildings, etc. lid - General target functions, i.e., research, production, training, storage, troop billets, etc. Ile - Specific target functions, i.e., nuclear testing, CBR storage/research, missile testing, etc. 2 3 4 CANNOT BE UNKNOWN DETERMINED CANNOT BE UNKNOWN DETERMINED CANNOT BE UNKNOWN DETERMINED CANNOT BE UNKNOWN DETERMINED CANNOT BE 4 UNKNOWN DETERMINED F1 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 Ilr - Personalities at site, i.e., des- 0 tions, activities, responsibilities,- political proclivity, E support for government. lIg - Data of predictive importance, i.e., plans, preparations hostile intentions. 'ECTION III 1 2 3 CANNOT BE 4 UNKNOWN DETERMINED 1 2 11 CANNOT BE UNKNOWN DETERMINED Please check which best describes the reliability of the information provided, based on the known to this target, (understanding that subsequent information could raise or lower this interim assessmentpattaining later date). VERY USEFUL USEFUL ECTION IV MARGINAL VALUE NO VALUE CANNOT BE DETERMINED Has information previously provided to you by this office pertaining to this target which may have initially been labelled erroneous, irrelevent or whose relevence could not be determined, been found to have subsequent importance? If.so, please explain by noting the IES control number (if any) and the specific nature of the information that was previously discounted and the reasons for current reevaluation. Please use a separate sheet of paper for your comments. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0 ~ECTIUU V has information previously provided to you by this office pertaining to this target which may have initially been rated "Of Value" (or better), been subsequently found to be of a lesser rated reliability or erroneous in nature? If so, please explain by noting the IES control number and the specific nature of the information that was previ- ously rated and the reasons for the current reassessment. Please use separate sheet of paper for your comments. NOTE: This organization solicits your frank and informal comment or any aspect of this project which could better aid us in providing high quality intelligence to the consumer. Please feel free to use the space below, (or additional sheets of paper as necessary), in any format you deem adequate to convey your thoughts. Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0