INTELLIGENCE EVALUATION SHEET
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date:
May 17, 2000
Sequence Number:
4
Case Number:
Content Type:
REPORT
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0.pdf | 110.96 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
IES Control Number:
Date IES Completed:
PROJECT SUN STREAK (U)
Intelligence Evaluation Sheet
SECTION I
Does the information
satisfy your Intelligence
Collection Requirement?
YES
11
11
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
SECTION II
This section deals exclusively with the accuracy of the information provided in this report only. Disregard any
previous data or IES forms you may have already received when completing this section of this form. Responses
are scaled from 0-4 utilizing the following explanatory criteria:
0 - Little or no correspondence with known or suspected components
of the target site.
1 - Evidence that the proper target site is being described, however
the information contains a mixture of correct and incorrect elements.
2 - Good site correspondence with several items recognizable or cdnfirmatory
in nature but some incorrect or irrelevnt information is reported.
3 - Good correspondence with the target with unambiguous and unique
information and relatively little known incorrect information.
4 - Data correctly fulfills tasking in a manner which positively enhances
current holdings and operational interest in this site.by reporting on
heretofore unknown data.
IN PART NO
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
IIa - Geographic locale
description, i.e?
terrain, bodies of
water, mountains, etc.
IIb - Large scale manmade
objects, i.e., cities,
railyards, silos,
docks, etc.
lic - Small scale manmade
structures, i.e.,
antennae, computers,
vehicles, missiles,
small buildings, etc.
lid - General target
functions, i.e.,
research, production,
training, storage,
troop billets, etc.
Ile - Specific target
functions, i.e.,
nuclear testing, CBR
storage/research,
missile testing, etc.
2 3 4
CANNOT BE
UNKNOWN DETERMINED
CANNOT BE
UNKNOWN DETERMINED
CANNOT BE
UNKNOWN DETERMINED
CANNOT BE
UNKNOWN DETERMINED
CANNOT BE
4 UNKNOWN DETERMINED
F1
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Ilr - Personalities at
site, i.e., des- 0
tions, activities,
responsibilities,-
political proclivity, E
support for government.
lIg - Data of predictive
importance, i.e.,
plans, preparations
hostile intentions.
'ECTION III
1 2 3 CANNOT BE 4 UNKNOWN DETERMINED
1 2
11
CANNOT BE
UNKNOWN DETERMINED
Please check which best describes the reliability of the information provided, based on the known
to this target, (understanding that subsequent information could raise or lower this interim assessmentpattaining
later date).
VERY USEFUL USEFUL
ECTION IV
MARGINAL VALUE
NO VALUE
CANNOT BE
DETERMINED
Has information previously provided to you by this office pertaining to this target which may have initially
been labelled erroneous, irrelevent or whose relevence could not be determined, been found to have subsequent
importance? If.so, please explain by noting the IES control number (if any) and the specific nature of the
information that was previously discounted and the reasons for current reevaluation. Please use a separate
sheet of paper for your comments.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0
~ECTIUU V
has information previously provided to you by this office pertaining to this target which may have initially been
rated "Of Value" (or better), been subsequently found to be of a lesser rated reliability or erroneous in nature?
If so, please explain by noting the IES control number and the specific nature of the information that was previ-
ously rated and the reasons for the current reassessment. Please use separate sheet of paper for your comments.
NOTE: This organization solicits your frank and informal comment or any aspect of this project which could
better aid us in providing high quality intelligence to the consumer. Please feel free to use the space
below, (or additional sheets of paper as necessary), in any format you deem adequate to convey your
thoughts.
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R000100430004-0