PROJECT EVALUATION FORM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 10, 2000
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
FORM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5.pdf76.1 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 Dow PT 1., SPONSOR'S OFFICE: 2. INFORMATION REQUEST DATE: 3. TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION: 4. PROJECT NUMBER: 5. SOURCE NUMBER: 6. NUMBER OF REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT: 7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND DATES: 8. REFERENCES: a. Requirements (Cite) (ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9) b. Initiative Report 9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one) a. ICR Response b. Collectors Request co Selected by Analyst 10. VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one) a. Major Significant Value (narrative comment required; include report numbers, specific information in the report which was valueable, and why it was of value) b. Valueable (narrative comment required; include report numbers, specific information in the report which was valueable, and why it was of value) wA , sU4 oaM,Ta.r erawranaN Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 / c. No Value (see Item 12p below) 11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION (select one or more and describe how the products will benefit) a. Basic Intelligence b. Current Intelligence c. Estimative Intelligence d. S&T Intelligence 12. REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE (select one only) a. Too Fragmentary b. Duplicative c. Untimely d. Not gespons~ive to Tasking Cited 13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only) a. Completely Satisfied b. Partially Satisfied co Not Satisfied At All Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 14. REMARKS (comments should include but not be limited to recommendations for application of this unique intelligence methodology) 15. DISCLOSURE DATA (select one only) a. Releasable Evaluation Not Requested b. Evaluation Is Not Releasable c. Evaluation Is Releasable on a Need-To-Know Basis 16. EVALUATOR'S NAME: 17. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL: 18. DATE EVALUATED: 19. ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION: 20. (Signature of evaluator) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5