PROJECT EVALUATION FORM
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date:
April 10, 2000
Sequence Number:
6
Case Number:
Content Type:
FORM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5.pdf | 76.1 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 Dow PT
1., SPONSOR'S OFFICE:
2. INFORMATION REQUEST DATE:
3. TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION:
4. PROJECT NUMBER:
5. SOURCE NUMBER:
6. NUMBER OF REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT:
7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND DATES:
8. REFERENCES:
a. Requirements (Cite)
(ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9)
b. Initiative Report
9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one)
a. ICR Response
b. Collectors Request
co Selected by Analyst
10. VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one)
a. Major Significant Value (narrative comment required; include report
numbers, specific information in the report which was valueable, and
why it was of value)
b. Valueable (narrative comment required; include report numbers,
specific information in the report which was valueable, and why
it was of value)
wA , sU4
oaM,Ta.r erawranaN
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
/ c. No Value (see Item 12p below)
11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION (select one or
more and describe how the products will benefit)
a. Basic Intelligence
b. Current Intelligence
c. Estimative Intelligence
d. S&T Intelligence
12. REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE (select one only)
a. Too Fragmentary
b. Duplicative
c. Untimely
d. Not gespons~ive to Tasking Cited
13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only)
a. Completely Satisfied
b. Partially Satisfied
co Not Satisfied At All
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
14. REMARKS (comments should include but not be limited to recommendations for
application of this unique intelligence methodology)
15. DISCLOSURE DATA (select one only)
a. Releasable Evaluation Not Requested
b. Evaluation Is Not Releasable
c. Evaluation Is Releasable on a Need-To-Know Basis
16. EVALUATOR'S NAME:
17. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL:
18. DATE EVALUATED:
19. ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION:
20. (Signature of evaluator)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5