PROJECT EVALUATION FORM
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date:
April 10, 2000
Sequence Number:
5
Case Number:
Content Type:
FORM
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6.pdf | 66.13 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
1 . SPONSOR'S OFFICE:
2. INFORMATION REQUEST DATE:
3. TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION:
4. PROJECT NUMBER:
5. SOURCE NUMBER:
6. NUMBER OF REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT:
7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND DATES:
/ / a. Requirements (cite)
(ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9)
/ / b. Initiative Report
9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one):
/ / a. ICR Response
/ / b. Collectors Request
/ / c. Selected By Analyst
10 . VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one) :
/ / a. Major Significant Value (Narrative comment required;
include report numbers, specific information in the report
which was valuable, and why it was of value.)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
/ / b. Valuable (Narrative comment required; include report
numbers, specific information in the report which was
valuable, and why it was of value.)
/ / c. No Value (See Item 12, below.)
11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION
(select one or more and describe how the products will benefit):
/ /
a.
Basic Intelligence
/ /
b.
Current Intelligence
/ /
c.
Estimative Intelligence
/ /
d.
S&T Intelligence
12. REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE (select one only) :
/ /
a.
Too Fragmentary
/ /
b.
Duplicative
/ /
c.
Untimely
/ /
d.
Not Responsive to Tasking Cited
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only) :
/ /
a.
Completely Satisfied
/ /
b.
Partially Satisfied
/ /
c.
Not Satisfied At All
4. REMARKS (comments should include, but not be limited to recommenda-
tions for application of this unique intelligence methodology):
15. DISCLOSURE DATA (select one only):
/ /
a.
Releasable Evaluation Not Requested
/ /
b.
Evaluation Is Not Releasable
/ /
c.
Evaluation Is Releasable On a Need-To-Know Basis
16. EVALUATOR'S NAME:
17. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL:
18. DATE EVALUATED:
19. ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION:
20. (Signature of evaluator)
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6