PROJECT 8033; SPECIAL ANALYTIC REPORT INFORMATION. REPORT REQUIREMENT (D-55)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00788R000400120002-4
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: November 3, 1998
• Sequence Number: 2
• Publication Date: October 24, 1980
• Content Type: REPORT

? Approved For Release 20011031~'9".'"'CPJ4~'BPP~6-007888000400120002-4
T.~7PS~-H--S 5~ t? r /qRv
SUSJ~;CT: SPECIAL APL?~LYTIC REPORT INF'O:ftMATIOId (U} Date
SPORT R~UIRE~r~NT (D -55)
1. (U} The information provided as enclosure to this report wras obtained in.
res~?anse to a collection requirement provided by your office. The information
is from an unconfirmed. source' therefore caution is warranted in its use.
Tlta.s office has been tasked by the Commanding General, Intelligence grid Security
Command, to evaluate and comment an the operational value of the infarmatiara
pravided~ as well as to ascertain the accuracy of the source.
?. (tl) In. order t;o comply with this directive, request the information provided
as an enclosure be evaluated and comments be provided this office no later than
This should be accomplished by responding to questions pr~-
vided within Section III of this report.
~. (U} Section II contains special instructions far the anax.ysts.
d~. (U) Project Pftunber: ~~.
~. (U) Requester: Q(~ SI
6. (S} ;aurce Plumber: ...
7. (S} Interrogator I~lucnber: ~ 14_ __.
$? (S} :Uate Infartnatian was Clbtained:
~4 sEP ao _.
Times: F'M pbo /TO /a3
9? (U }Specific infarrnation provided by the requester in support of required
sa~.arce targetira~; is:
-- See%~.c~ ~i?~lc~~ _...~c~17`~1.rzc~_~?~1rslo ~ rr~res~~7a7irim
~~f __
1O. (U }Specific infarma~tion provided t.o the interrogator to aid in source
targeting was:
S.~ - 4.~.~1_.~1.r ab?v~ _.~_._
ll. (V ) 5~~ecific information provided to the source far target orientation was:
_~.____.S.Fo ~ on ~,~~'r-c,~. C~, rr-sr~~i7`~d~,C1..~~Qh~~ !!2..~5~?~.~~~C~.~;[Z~I..Q~~__..._.____._....~
Approved For Releas
CLASSIFIED BY: MSG HQI3A (DAMI-ISH;
Dtd.; 0516~OZ JUL 7~
Review On: ~~~~-,?~dffi, .
07888000400120002-4
 Approved For Release 2001/~S7(#?7~?:`~GIA-R8P95-007888000400120002-4
NOT RFIEASABLE TO ~17REIGN NATIONALS
12. ( l~ )7~Specific infa,}rrnation requested by analysty:~
Ca'. .1JCS
CY'i~')f.,~Gl ~.ba~~~ ~1'~~~~E' bsr, n~.),F!.'.~,. ~.~15~~!?.~.~~e~~s.w..- ....................~.,
n
..~~.~ m ~~. ~ `4' h.R,s~r LK~~'r ~~.~~... ~.' ~,S''`' 27~' ~n c/ dr~2~, . s, err ~ chi
13. (U) Date intarmatian forwarded: Z? S'~}'(gC7 --_ . ~' -~~
1L~.. (U) Has addi.tianal data been requested: YES
l~. (U) Priority: URGENT
lb. ( ) Remarks:
x^
1. (U) The ma~tex~.al you have been given to review has been acquired from a new
and potentially valuable source of intelligence. Work. is currently being con-
ducted an how to improve the accuracy arxd reliability of the data. Your atten-
tion to the evaluation sheet and your remarks wi11 be the basis for our assessment
of this new collection t?:chnique. Therefore, the effort you expend will greatly
assist us and will ultimately result in you receiving mare information of increas-
ing accuracy and reliability.
~. (U) While formulating your judgements concerning the information provided, the
following comments cancerr~r~, this new source of intelligence may be helpful.
Foremost, the information is likely to consist of a mixture of correct and in-
carrec-t, elements. Specifically:
a. (S) The descriptive elements are generally of higher reliability than
,judgements or labels as to what is being described (recreational swimming gaol
may be mistaken far water unification pools, an aircraft hull may be mistaken
far a submarine hull, etc.. Therefore, seemingly appropriate descriptive elements
should net be rejected because of mislabeling.
b. (S) The data afters conta~.ns gaps (in a .~-building complex, far example,
perhaps only two of the buildings may be described, and an airfield.may be added
that isn?t there). Such gaps or additions should net be taken to mean that the
rest of the data is necessarily inaccurate.
3. (S) Therefore, a recomrrrended approach is to first examine the entire information
packet to obtain an overall flavor of the response, reserving final judgement even
in the face of certain errors, and then go back through for a more detailed analysis.
~.. (t3) If you have questions regarding the data you have received, or its evaluation
please contact this office (IAOPS-H-S) at any time.
._ ~ .
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 :CIA-RDP96-007888000400120002-4