INSCOM GRILL FLAME PROGRAM SESSION REPORT

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: STARGATE
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: S
• Document Page Count: 15
• Document Creation Date: November 4, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 4, 2000
• Sequence Number: 1
• Publication Date: June 11, 1980
• Content Type: REPORT

Approved For Release 2000/08/07:
SEC
-00788R000200440001-2
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
ORCON
INSCOM
GRILL FLAME.
PROGRAM
SESSION REPORT
Approved For Release nocosE
CLASSIFIED BY: BY: MSG, DAMI-ISH
051630Z JUL 78
REVIEW ON:
GRILL FLAME
irP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/ter2MP96-00788R000200440001-2
awn',
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD.--42
1. (S) This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in
compliance with a request for information on a target of interest to USI.
The purpose of this session was to describe an area designated by
geographic coordinates.
2. (S) The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document
GRILL FLAME Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated.
3. (S) At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote viewer
during the session. A complete transcript of the session is available
upon request. At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his
impressions of the target site. At TAB C is target cuing information
provided the remote viewer. At TAB D is Memorandum for the Record.
4. (S) The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by
the remote viewer, and, as such, has not been subjected to any intermediate
analysis, evaluation or collation. Interpretation and use of the informa-
tion provided is the responsibility of the requestor.
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
SG1A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
REPORT #CD-421 10 June 1980
SEMsGiA
SUBJECT: Unconfirmed Activity RE. Activity at
11 June 1980
I. (02?REFERENCE: :Repott-i0,40 :6 June 1980.
2. (S/NOFORN) Source observed several structures which he described as
follows:
a. (S/NOFORN) A building resembling a lot of long peaked-roofed
buildings standing side-by-side and attached to each other. The roof of this
building had a linear structure on its roof which resembled a "fire-stop."
Source referred to this building "multi-gabled" and "multi-roofed." (See
item 1, Inclosure I.)
b. (S/NOFORN) Source observed what appeared to be metal "junk" or parts
of old machines laying around outside the building in an (apparent) disorderly
fashion.
c. (S/NOFORN) Source reported that this building appeared to have
concrete (skirting) around it)and between it and a second building opposite.
(See item 2, Inclosure 1.)
d. (S/NOFORN) Source described this second building as appearing to be
single story, of metal construction, and of a length 3-4 times greater than
its width. (item 2, Inclosure 1.)
e. (S/NOFORN) Source observed that across an undetermined distance to
the (apparent) rear of the multi-gabled building was a fence and a road, on
the other side of which was a multi-dished antenna. (See Inclosure 1.)
f. (S/NOFORN) To the right of the multi-gabled building was an object
which appeared to be a bulk liquid-type storage tank. To the lower right was
a tower. The distance between the tower and the multi-gabled building was
approximately 200 yards. (See Inclosure 1.)
g. (S/NOFORN) A "few hundred yards" in what appeared to be a north-west
direction was the believed location of a similar multi-gabled building which
was reported in report CD-40. (See arrow, Inclosure 1.)
3. (S/NOFORN) Source described interior portions of the two structures
(item 1 and 2, Inclosure 1) as follows:
a. (S/NOFORN) The multi-gabled building consisted essentially of an
"open shell" having "open bays" inside, light emanating from near the roof as
though there were windows in the roof. Source said that rows ef interior steel
posts support the roof, and that the building appeared uninsulated. In one end
CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAMI-ISH
DATED: 051630Z3UL78
REVIEW ON: June 2000
Approved For Release 2000/ DP96-007
Iigi.44NEA.ME
&icy, iejz
Approved For Release 2000/08/4mAttar96-00788R000200440001-2
latbla
of the structure was a "big fire pit" or "forge" of approximately
20-' to 30' by 10' to 15' dimensions which source thought to be coal fired.
At the opposite end of the building was a pool of (apparent) water on the
floor and a truck-type vehicle nearby which appeared to have been recently
washed. Source said it appeared as though vehicles could "drive through"
the building in a direction perpendicular to its long axis. (See Inclo-
sure 2.)
b. (S/NOFORN) Source observed "all kinds of equipMent" within the
multi-gabled building, some of which was alike, but. Most of which was
different. Source observed carts and overhead hoists within the building,
as well as "trucks" and "different vehicles" which appeared to be heavy
equipment.
c. (S/NOFORN) Source repotted the interior of the metal building
(item 2, Inclosure 1) to consist essentially of rooms at one end, and to
have a largesteel container "bigger than .a truck" (see Inclosure 3) inside.
Source observed large doors on the large steel container which appeared to
have "dogs" thereon (as if) the container could be made air-or liquid-tight.
Source reported the container extended (approximately) two/thirds the height
to the interior roof-line of the building, and to be of the dimensions
8' to 10' long, 8' to 10' wide, and 10' to 12' in height.,
4. (S/NOFORN) Source had opportunity to re-observe that area of the
installation which (appeared) to be that area described in RepOrt #CD-40.
Source's description of this area, which (appeared) to be "a few hundred
yards" to the northwest of the area shown at Inc4osure 1, is shown at
Inclosure 4, and was described by Source as follows:
a. (S/NOFORN) Source observed that some of the truck-type vehicles
which (had been) parked outside the "old" building were gone, and that only
three to four remained. Source explained that the "old" building (see
Inclosure 4) was that which he had described earlier as the "saw-toothed
building" in Report CD-40. Source explained that this building is similar
in structure and construction to that described- as. the "multi-gabled"
building in paragraph 2a, above.
b. (S/NOFORN) Source reported that "one or two each of quite a few
things" (equipment) were located in this "old" building, and that the equipment
appeared "brand, spanking new." Source further explained that the equipment
appeared as though it had not been field abused.
c. (S/NOFORN) Source observed the following equipment within the "old"
building: (see Inclosures 5 thru 7)
(1) (S/NOFORN) A vehicle with sloping frontal "bow" and three Or
four wheels on each side which reminded Source of an old US "Duck" type
vehicle. Only a small portion of this vehicle was observable.
Approved For Release 2000/
2
-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/nRity7? ri al-PV96-00788R000200440001-2
(2) (S/NOFORN) A vehicle described., as a- mobile anti-aircraft gun
having a tracked chassis, radar dish, and "small calibers" (guns) on top.
Source did not recall the. exact number of guns, but stated it "may have been
3 or 4."
(3) (S/NOFORN) Source observed a vehicle which appeared to be an
SP gun of unknown type. Source stated the gun tube on this equipment appeared
to be shorter and thicker than that which he would expect to see on a. tank,
that the"-turret" area appeared more vertical and angular than a tank's more
rounded turret, and that he could not observe any "gap" between thehull and
turret which would.indicate the turret was moveable. Source said the turret
appeared "fixed," unlike that of a tank. Source also stated this SP gun was
"dust covered" as-though it had been sitting a long time.
(4) (S/NOFORN) Source observed a "truck that didn't look like a
truck" (see Inclosure 6). Source stated this vehicle appeared very large,
was of approximately 15' height, had a "cab over engine" configuration and
"very big wheels."
(5) (S/NOFORN) Source observed a tracked rocket launcher (Inclosure 7)
having racks on its back, the front of which looked more like a truck than a
"track," (meaning tracked vehicle) and which had racks mounted over/in an
open compartment in its rear.
(6) (S/NOFORN) Sourte also observed several "old" towed artillery
pieces of approximately 122mm bore. These weapons (appeared) to have "older"
chassis components than their tubes, implying the possibility the chassis
served as a "modified test bed" for a gun tube which was different than normal.
(7) (S/NOFORN) Source observed 5 to 8 tanks of various types, sizes,
and configuration in various states of disassembly. Source observed some
(tanks) with turrets off, some (tanks) with tracks off and laying haphazardly
aside, and (at least) one tank without (its) engine. Source described these
tanks as not being very neatly arranged within the building; their arrangement
(lack of orderliness) implying the area of the building to be not concerned
with production -or unit equipment' maintenance, but rather test/evaluation or
research. Source stated the particular flavor of equipment "sitting around"
with components removed-did nlot resemble the: "methodology of a production line"
or the "discipline"' of a trod') unit.
(8) (S/NOFORN) Source stated it appeared as though "new" projects
entering the building would Cause the delay or "putting aside" of ongoing
projects in order to WOrk on Ithe one (project) with the shortest deadline.
d. (S/NOFORN) Source atated the interior of the "new" building (located
to the left of "old" building, inclosure 4) consisted of offices and laboratory-
type shops having (undescribeid) machinery in them.
Approved For Release 21 DrIg96 00788R000200440001-2
Ajqaith,
Approved For Release 2000/08 P96-00788R000200440001-2
SG1A
5. (U) COMMENT:
a. (S/NOFORN) Preliminary eva1u.tion of data indicatesaiolicabiiity to
a section of subject facility located
b. (U) Request informal evaluation and comments be provided NLT
20 June' 1980.
'/A:oz24111:1L'
7 Incl KENNETH V. BELL
as Captain, MI
Analyst
Approved For Release 2000/0 RETDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved F Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Lt.1
44.)
'zQ
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
V.'
For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
t.
14
z
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved Fci r Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
1
Approved For Release 2000/08/07\ 6-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
2C.e.irs
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000200440001-2
Approved For Release 2000/Veti: DP96-00788R000200440001-2
TARGET CUING INFORMATION
REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION CD-42
Project: 8003b
Session CD-42
100900 hrs, 10 June 1980
1. CUING DATA: (Provided to viewer.)
Geographic coordinate
SG1A
2. EEI: (Provided to interviewer)
a. Description of area.
b. What is the function of the target?
c. What is presently the most important aspect of (each) target?
Approved For Release 2000/0
IDP96-00788R000200440001-2
SG1A
SG1A
Approved For Release 2000/08/07:
NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Session CD-42 Cuing Data
I0788R000200440001-2
10 June 1980
SG1A
?B tin 7'c third session against Project 8003b
Previous Project 8003b sessions employing
qp were uuu anUv-4u.
a. (S/NOFORN) Identical coordinates
were provided for both previous sessions. However, it appeared from a review
of session CD-40 that #7 did not return to the location of session CCC-98,
but, rather, had accessed some other target relevant area of the overall
target installation. A GRILL FLAME analyst review indicated that #7 may
have keyed on the location of target relevant equipment rather than the
coordinates which were provided. This was indicated by the fact that target
related equipment was reported by #7, but at another location which appeared
to resemble a second suspected equipment storage area within the overall
installation. Therefore, it was decided to attempt to validate session
CD-40's results by directing this session (CD-42) against a new set of coordi-
nates which corresponded to the suspected CD-40 location.
b. (S/NOFORN)was Drovided only the following coordinates at start
of session:
2. (S/NOFORN) #66 had performed as interviewer in 16 preceding sessions
involving Project 8003; two of which (CCC-98 and CD-40) involved Project
8003b and #7. #66 was aware that session CD-40 had not hit the exact target
area, but was suspected of having accessed the target vicinity at a location
other than that actually intended. #66 was aware that the use of "new"
coordinates was intended to validate the results of session CD-40, and could
extrapolate, therefore, that if the analyst's estimate was correct, imagery
similar to that received during CD-40 should logically be acquired during
session CD-42. Due to #66's previous involvement in all Project 8003 sessions,
most importantly sessions CCC-98 and CD-40, #66 was aware of the general
nature of the target equipment as well as the gestalt natures of the geo-
graphies of the target areas themselves.
Approved For Release 2000/9.8
7k4
RDP96-00788R000200440001-2