LOCATION OF TARGET MATERIAL IN SPACE AND TIME

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 11, 1998
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8.pdf525.69 KB
Body: 
interim Report- the Period 7 October 199i to 30 September 1986 Covering LOCATION OF TARGET MATERIAL IN SPACE AND TIME (U) UNCLASSIFIED ABSTRACT (U) ne reported psychoenergetic skill, known to the general public as "dowsing," is locate lost or hidden items of interest. In an effort to bring this putative ability search" into the laboratory, we conducted a computer-assisted-search (CAS) Participants scanned a computer graphics display and attempted to locate a r-generated target. We explored two conditions: (1) the target was fixed in o dition, and (2) the target was randomly shifting, locations each condition. Eight of 36 participants showed an above chance ability (p < W mputer-generated targets in our laboratory simulation of dowsing. This fir.. ends the results of work done in FY 1984, and provides a pool of rmal study of search techniques. A (ED 020001-8 Approved For Release 2000/08/1,1 : CIA-RDP96-007872000300020001-8 I INTRODUCTION (U) A continuing 1?ee ( is determining the location of targets of interest, whose positions are not known or are known only approximately. It has been claimed by the parapsychological community that r individuals can search for and locate water, oil, minerals, objects, individuals, sites of archaeological significance, and so forth. If this can be demonstrated to be a. genuine ability, and if it can be applied, then we may have a potential match to the This ability can be contrasted to the related psychoenergetic ability "remote viewing," in the following manner. In remote viewing, the viewer is given location information (e.g., coordinates, a "beacon" agent, or a picture), then asked to provide data on target content A In "search," the viewer is given information on target content, then asked to provide location data (e.g., position on a map). The two functions thus compliment each other. Approved For Release 2000/08/1CIA-RDP96-00787 4 00300020001-8 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : GIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 (U) The ability to locate targets is most often referred to as "dowsing" in the Western literature, and "biophysical effect (BPE)" in the Soviet/East Bloc literature. In this report," we shall refer to such techniques simply as "search." Although much of the literature is anecdotal,tt attempts to quantify the ability and to determine its mechanisms have been pursued. t The goal of the present effort is to research the literature, then perform laboratory experimentation to determine whether, and to what degree, such functioning is a viable candidate for application9 This includes determining (1) the best methods and efficiencies of various search techniques, and (2) the appropriate statistical analyses for evaluating results. (U) In attempting to determine if this putative ability can be brought under laboratory control, we have simulated "field conditions" with a computer-assisted-search (CAS) experiment. (U) Our CAS experiments generally contain the following basic elements: (1) A finite matrix of possible target locations (e.g., a 20 x 20 graphics matrix grid) from which one cell is randomly selected by the computer as the target. (2) An individual whose task is to "scan" the graphics display area, and (3) indicate, by pressing a button, his/her choice as to the target location. A feedback mechanism that displays the response and actual target location. (4) An a priori defined analysis procedure. (U) Using this general procedure, we conducted an experiment during FY 1984 in which two conditions were tested simultaneously: 1? ? Searching for a target that remains fixed in space for the duration of the trial (space condition). ;(U) This report constitutes Objective E, Task 2: Develop methodologies to locate target material in space and/or time. t(U) For the most comprehensive and authoritative survey of the claims for dowsing, see Christopher Bird, The Divining Hand, E. P. Dutton, New York, New York (1979). $(U) See, for example, papers published by Z. V. Harvalik, beginning 1970, in The American Dowser, The Journal of the American Society of Dowsers (Harvalik is the ex-director of the basic research group at the U.S. Army Engineering Laboratories, Fort Belvoir, Virginia). ? (U) References are listed at the end of this document. 2 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : dkA,-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 UNCLASSIFIED . Searching for a target that is rapidly moving in space (time condition) . Seven individuals, who were blind to the space/time condition, were asked to contribute 50 hree trials (25 space, 25 time). Five of them produced independently our earlier resultsistthat no time only and two in space only. The most interesting aspect participant was successful at both space and time conditions. (U) During FY 1986, our effort was to replicate the previous findings and provide additional information on possible personality correlations using the Personality Assessment System (PAS).2 Although locating computer-generated targets is academically interesting, it may not assist in locating objects in the "real world." This premise is of paramount interest and will be addressed during FY 1987. 3 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 t4CLpA iE9[Do020001-8 Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 UNCLASSIFIED II METHOD OF APPROACH (U) A. (U) Selection of Subjects (U) A pilot study was conducted to select participants for a formal test, and to refine the protocol. From the overall subject pool amassed for our FY 1986 experiments, participants were selected on the basis of availability and interest. This pool currently contains both "novice" subjects (persons who have never participated in psychoenergetic experiments) and "experienced" subjects (those who have). B. (U) Procedure (U) A Sun Microsystems work-station computer was used to conduct all aspects of the pilot experiment. This computer system is noted for its high- resolution graphics display and graphics input device. (U) The approach chosen here was a modification of a procedure originally developed by Dr. Dean 1. Radin at Bell Laboratories for evaluating geometric-distance scores in a perceptual task.3 In this approach, we begin by constructing the target area of interest in the form of a square. A grid system is then laid down over the square in the form of an n x n matrix, to yield n2 separate grid cells (e.g., 400 for a 20 x 20 grid). The computer randomly selects one of the grid cells as the target for a particular trial. The subject's task is to "locate" the target cell. After the subject responds, both the choice and the target are displayed A trial is defined as a single response (button press) associated with a single target (U) In our experiment, a bounded area representing the perimeter of a 20 x 20 cell matrix was shown to the participant, who could "search" for the target by moving a graphics pointing device (mouse) which controlled a cursor. By pressing a button on the mouse the participant could indicate his/her response. Each participant was told (1) the target could be any place within the display boundary, (2) move the cursor around the bounded area, and (3) when the moment "seemed right," to register his/her choice by pressing the button on the Approved For Release 2000/08/ NIeLIA9S9tF 00020001-8 proved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 UNCLASSIFIED LU) immaflinYA feedback to the participant several seconds of the feedback display, the compute y mouse. L LL -...r--- and the ollowing each trial by automatically displaying the target cell as a filled square 1 participant's choice as a shaded square with a line connecting the two (see Figure 1) . After r rec cled to the next trial. - UNCLASSIFIED p (d) Probability of d < r FIGURE 1 (U) SEARCH MATRIX (U) To test a participant in the space condition, the target location was fixed the target location was changed once each throughout the trial. To test the time condition, millisecond. During the screening phase of the experiment, the computer sndcted one of the experimenter conditions for each trial by a balanced random protocol. The participant were blind as to which condition was being presented on any given trial. Participant choices versus computer selections were stored for future analysis. Each trials--25 trials completed produce 10 trials per session. In the pilot phase, 36 individuals in each of the two conditions studied. (U) In summary, our experimental design includes: ? Hypothesis-=In the absence of known sensory information, it is possible to determine a "hidden," computer-derived target location to a significant degree. 55cc nn Approved For Release 2000/08/10 A6,SfbtEif A0020001-8 For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000300020001-8 UNCLASSIFIED Independent Variable--Target location is on a 20 x 20 matrix grid. ? Dependent Variable--Geometric distance (d) is between choice and target: d = yt-yc)2+(Xt-Xc)2 (U) Using the grid as an approximation to a continuum, we can calculate exactly the a priori chance distribution that any given search response would lie at any given distance from a particular target location. From this, an evaluation can be made as to the quality of a single response (see Figure 1). (U) To estimate the probability of observing a distance (d), the following calculations are performed: ? For the actual target position used in the trial, a distribution consistin4of all possible (400) distances is constructed. ? The probability (p-value) of observing the distance (d) or less is given by r