TARGET; CHURCH AND RECTORY
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
8
Document Creation Date:
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date:
April 24, 2000
Sequence Number:
10
Case Number:
Publication Date:
October 26, 1973
Content Type:
HW
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7.pdf | 490.74 KB |
Body:
A ' &40M Fob R e l A a k dA91OW: GFA=RDP9 0787R0 ,pA'~g~)
rpt- SG1I
OCTOBER 26, 1973. THIS IS A REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT WITH RUSS
TARG, PAT PRICE AND OBSERVER IN A SIIELDED ROOM ON THE SECOND FLOOR
OF SRI. HAL PUTHOFF AND DICK HONEY OF SRI ARE TRAVELLING TO A
REMOTE LOCATION WITH THE OTHER OBSERVER.
RIGHT NOW IT'S 3:55, FRIDAY, OCT. 26. THE TRAVELLERS HAVE BEEN
ON THEIR WAY SINCE 3:45. WE EXPECT THEM TO ARRIVE AT THEIR TARGET
LOCATION AT 4:15.
IT'S 4:14. PRELIMINARY LOOK AROUND.
11,
The first perception that I'm feeling right now is that they've
separated as a group. That's just a perception. I haven't looked
at them or located them, but I get the perception that they've
separated as a group.
I'm going to do a quadrant scan first and put some organization
into it.
I'll start with 12-3. In that I got a flash and it looked like a
stalk of wheat. I didn't feel any perception of them in the area
but I caught the flash of that so I'll be sure to come back to that
after I've done a 360? scan.
as far as the Bay Bridge, so I'm out there a good realistic limit.
said that it was a kind of mechanics like better look a little
more thorough, so I'm going to override that and go on to 9-12.
I get nothing in that quadrant (9-12) at all.
s
' h t 1 -
t
I'll take from 3-6. Incidentally, I've extended the boundaries
out to infinity - I haven't put an artificial boundary, just the
two legs of the 3-6. I get nothing in that quadrant.
1:11 take from 6-9. I get nothing in that quadrant. Yet, when I
e wo eg
Going back 12-3. The leg on that that I m using -
is El Camino as one leg and Ravenswood is the other leg. I'm scanning
0?1 riht then on Dick Honey first.
~ (to
SG11
((60
,1 Hal took his camera along.
~`ah
Right at this instance I'm not getting =with this particular
0y-
I actually pick them up in that quadrant. I just started to flash
group - feels like there's somebody else there instead. I'll
explore that a little further. I'll try and locate the surroundings.
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
I just got a flash of something I can't put a name to. I'll put
,}ie...looks like a V...so I'll have to dink around with that awhile
and see exactly what that is.
IS IT A STRUCTURE SHAPED LIKE A V OR A LETTER?
The first flash that I got would be an architectural form that
curved over, v's down, comes up and then curves over so that you
of ?_ ? ' lu'.
are IoQr1jF1 J %.c:~ at at the ?
V but in a structure, so I've got to determine precisely what that
is.
Looks like the intersection of a building that curves down with a
curved campy, and the canopy looks like rather than being plexi-
glass or anything, looks like stucco or plastered canopy.
SG1I
The texture that they're walking on looks distinctly as a sidewalk,
cement sidewalk. I still don't get iI right there with them, and
49'I get a third party there with them, and I keep picking up a fer e
there. p o
SG11
Very interesting. See, analytically,
Hal and
Dick
should be
there, but I'm getting Dick and Hal there and the
third
party
per seems to be a girl, and it seems that
i is remote
from there.
SG1I
I'll try and bring it in more definit
ion.
Got a look at a tree and it wasn't a eucalyptus this time.
Looked more like a poplar, no that's too straight - this is an
overhanging tree - a sycamore.
YOU GOT THEM IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT?
1go'O"'fRight. Distance wise, looks like 1-3/4 miles.
DO YOU HAVE THEM ON THIS SIDE OF THE BAY?
Yes. This side of the bay. I'm trying to bound the area by possibly
011' some reference point that I might know of. First of all, I'm trying
y
s
oo
ng a
c.
AL PIME "A Do
to determine the area that they're in specifically.
I'm getting the impression there are quite a few people rather than
just that particular group. Seems like they're intermingling with
numbers of people, and I get the impression that there's quite a
bit of street traffic right adjacent to them. Looks like they're
' actuall
treet traffi
l
ki
t
2
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
0
Ge=tting the impression of quite a few shops, doors, places of that
character.
There's an awful lot of activity.
RATHER THAN ONE PRIMARY STRUCTURE WHERE THEY ARE?
Ott Seems there's a whole series of structures where they are.
Trying to pick out something predominant rather than just generalizing
in that specific....
I'm getting two images so I'll discuss them both and then I'll
sort!-.it out.
One is an area that has like two large office buildings with quite
a clear area between grassy, sidewalks, and the sidewalks look like
they're cement with inlaid pebbles on the top.
Well manicured grounds - trying to think of the special term cause
there's this particular significance there.
It appears that they're walking along the walkways between these
two major buildings, like two big office buildings, and there's
(a I quite a distance between the two I'd say, oh, 200 feet.
Now, to the left of that and that kinda would look like, that would
be on the northwest side, I get the distinct impression of a shop
~+~~?~'alt area. Marketing shops, bookstores, things of that nature. Street
t@ traffic seems to be quite prevalent.
IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS?
It looks like a very large fountain type area with an archway or
a curved geometric design spanning, it's raised up it looks like
about two feet above sidewalk level, direct angular, and has
intersecting archways going over the top - looks like it could
be a planting area plus a fountain.
The buildings look like tilt-up concrete, and the window structure
in them is very unique, inasmuch as they're not flush. Looks
like they're curved in,'looks like they've been laid into a mold
and are curved in and the glass is set back. In the specific
SG11 area that I'm looking at the glass in it looks dark tinted.
0
Now I can get
4:25.
with the group. You might give the time notation.
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
I definitely feel that now they're together as a group.
DO YOU STILL HAVE THE GIRL WITH THEM?
i was looking at that situation. Yah, it seems like there's fob_
people in the group rather than just three.`
CAN YOU TELL ME ANYTHING ABOUT THE GIRL? WHAT COLOR IS SHE WEARING?
: i,c UkS i i-}~G a light cress and a Knit sweater, grayish, w nl to or Mn
off-white sweater. She has long hair. Looks like its tied in
the back. She's wearing glasses. Shoes - she has a heel height
on that of about 1". That's what I'm getting on the girl.
Just took~,4 look at the sky up above, and it looks very clear.
Some comment about something up above.
Something else flashed in there - it's right in the same context.
Something they just looked at. Had rather artistic shape rather
than geometric, it would be more baroque - lot of curve lines and
0 return curls in it, things of that nature. Haven't just sighted
N6~ what the hell that is.
GVIicos,
IS THIS PLACE WITH THE TWO BUILDINGS AND THE PLAZA IN THE SAME
NEIGHBORHOOD AS THE SIDEWALK WHERE THEY WERE WALKING ORIGINALLY?
No, it seems that they left a plain cement sidewalk, and I would
put the distance from those buildings to the big tall buildings
#Pp - they look like 6 or 7 story, maybe 8 - I put the distance from
those buildings to the other place at about 120 yards.
They both can be seen from the same place, but they're non-contiguous.
The two large buildings seem to be put into a plot of ground much
more spacious, and the other, the street around it and everything
looks cluttered. The buildings got an awful lot of clutter in
that area. It's kinda set in....
SG1I
in nice and clear.
I just pulled
Hal's got a camera taking pictures.
IS THERE ANY ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLACE WHERE THEY ARE?
They look like what I'd classify as a very high-class office building.
More of a commercial office type building. Like maybe there's
airline offices in it and insurance of~ices, brokerage offices,
things of that particular variety.
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CfA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Seems like they're in and out of numbers of other people. For a
while they were kinda..... and then they seemed to separate out of
0 them for a while.
6y SOWI saw some, I want to say hexagonal shape, that seems to be fairly
JK41 accurate.
I seem to be getting an awful lot of back pressure on the line.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN.
The whole scene keeps blocking out on me, and I can feel an inflowing
pressure on tle thing, and I'll just blow it off and take a look.
I'd say that the area that I'm looking at is probably the dominant
features in the thing are these two office buildings...if one takes
a little distant-view of it, and it seems to surrounded by.spacious
CIAO 04 9, 'e C-1 0 (Z Y
plazas and fairly uncluttered and very geometri al.
IS THERE ANY GRASS TO BE SEEN?
d-
Yup, you bet. There's lots of grass, and there's also very geometrical
sidewalk patterns, and it seems to be a pebbled surface - they've e2
taken the cement and laid it in and then overlaid it with pebbles
about the size of fingernail in diameter, and then rolled it so
that you're walking on a smooth surface, but it's pebbled.
It seems like I should be getting a hell of a lot more data acquisition
than I'm getting.
DO YOU THINK IT'S WORTH TALKING ABOUT THE THING YOU SAW EARLIER
WITH THE TWO ARCH SHAPED ROOFS?
Yah, right at the first when I said I say V shaped?
YES. IS THAT ANOTHER PLACE?
Very close. Not another place like distance in miles, it would be
more like that would be the first thing after they got out of the
car they saw - with the front of the building came down and then
it dropped and it looked like the canopy is a curve shape.
It's quite an architectural structure - nothing insignificant
about it. Very substantial structure.
That seemed to be a part of the buildings that looked across the
plaza from them. It appears to me that they walked out into the
center of this plaza and are in the process of returning.
5
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
I was just trying to pick up pieces of the conversation right at
that time, but the minute I focused on it I just kinda blew out
of the area.
11ather interesting phenomena. I seem to be talking about it in
the context of being in this direction, while actually I'm viewing
it on 1800 line behind me, which would put them in the quadrant
of southwest. I just begin to observe the fact.
I've been shifting around and now that I relocate my body, it
actually puts them on a line southwest of me so now I have to
reexamine and find out whether that's so or not.
I've got to decide whether that's analytical or it's what I'm looking
at precisely, which always forms a paradox.
WHY DON'T YOU LET THE DIRECTION GO FOR THE MOMENT AND TRY TO RAISE
UP ABOVE THE PLAZA AND LOOK DOWN AND SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING
MORE AROUND THE EDGE OF THE PLAZA THAT'S WORTH NOTING.
OK. I'll pop up to about 5,000 feet - that seems to be a good
altitude - and look down on this...ok.
I can see that totally surrounding the buildings, they are separated
by about 200 feet, and totally surrounding is well tended, open`
spacious area, manicured lawns- there is an archway - double
arch-that cross over this way - not double this way - they cross
over intersect...
Out in the center of a very geometric pattern of sidewalks and
lawn affairs. It's between the two buildings.
Now, it looks like in the direction of the sun, the hills, the place
that I'm looking at is flat - looks like maybe a quarter of a block
off a major intersection.
The distinctive architecture of the building - I just happened to
look at the airconditioners on the roof, but that's not of too much
interest - take a look at the window structure because that did
fascinate` me.
They seem to be deeply inset, I'd say there's an 18" inset, so
rather than the windows being on the surface, they're inset at
~1b about 18". They seem to have a dark grayish tint like a gun-metal
tint.
6
Approved For Release 2003/09/08.: CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
IF YOU LOOKED AT THIS BUILDING THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT, IS THERE
ANY DOMINATE THEME TO THE ARCHITECTURE?
It's what I call classic contemporary. Straight lines, but the
curve lines came mainly in the view of the windows, and it looks
like when they precast the concrete, it would be like precasting
over a bathtub, inverted bathtub, and then-lifting the mold off
and setting the glass in.
VERY DESCRIPTIVE. WHAT COLOR IS EVERYTHING?
60.1 The building seems to be a kind of an olive tan description.
The glass seems to be dark tinted, seems like a gun-metal gray -
that's how I would describe it.
Seem to be commercial type building - office commercial type building.
Doesn't feel like there's - may be - owned by one company, but it
seems like there's commercial type offices to me.
ARE THE TWO BUILDINGS EXACTLY ALIKE?
0
Very similar. I would say that they were probably built together.
The pattern of the windows seems to be the same.
They might be part of an industrial complex - could well be.
4:40. DO YOU WANT TO TRY TO SEE WHERE YOU ENCOUNTERED THE WHEAT
GROWING?
When I looked at it looked more like a decoration rather than,..
because initially I saw just a single stalk rather than a field
of wheat. It looks like its part of a cluster like it would be
a display that somebody might do for Halloween - with cornstalks
and shafts of wheat and pumpkins and things like that, rather than
being a wheat field.
That was probably a window display in an office on the ground
floor. That was one of the very first things I picked up. Then.
I picked up on...
Trying to locate Hal's car and couldn't locate it because the
attention seems to be going out of the area, more toward the car.
Right now I'm a damned sight more interested in what's going on
in my head than in what they're doing, so I'll try to look at both.
WHAT'S GOING ON IN YOUR HEAD?
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : C3A-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7
I don't know - like I say I've got the effects of a headache. I'm
trying to sort that out and look at them at the same time.
Going to leave a hell of a gap in the tape, but I'm not too much
worried about that.
Right now I get them leaving the area.
ARE THEY IN THEIR CAR YET?
I don't seem to get them in Halls car. I keep trying to put them
in Halls car, but I'm not getting them in Hal's car.
DON'T FORCE THEM INTO A CAR IF YOU DON'T SEE THEM.
No, I'm not. It's just that I don't see them in Hal's car..
I get them. out of the area now. I. don't know how in the hell we
set time-wise, but it feels like they've left.
FINE. IT'S 4:43. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU WANT TO MAKE?
0
Approved For Release 2003/09/08 : Ch-RDP96-00787R000200130010-7