NET ASSESSMENT PLANS: AN UPDATE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
12
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 20, 2013
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 8, 1988
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6.pdf569.49 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 8 March 1988 MEMORANDUM FOR: See. Distribution THROUGH: Douglas J. MacEachin Director of Soviet Analysis FROM. Chief, Strategic Evaluation Division Strategic Issues Group SUBJECT: Net Assessment Plans: An Update 1. The DCI and Secretaryof Defense will submit to Congress this week their formal response to the "Nunn amendment" (see Attachment A). The legislation requires the Intelligence Community to conduct military net assessments (and required a formal plan by 1 March). The formal response proposes to involve the Intelligence Community in military net assessments that will be conducted primarily by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It proposes five studies. Four are variations on the 1989 Military Net Assessment of the Chairman, JCS. The fifth is a Technical Net Assessment on low observables. We expect that Congress will accept this plan and ask for additional detail. 2. The DCI has chosen Major General Larry Budge, NIO/GPF, as his point-of-contact for Intelligence Community involvement in joint DOD/IC military net assessments. We expect that the NIO/GPF will task DI Offices to support JCS net assessment work, including to serve on working groups. The NIO/GPF probably also will ask DI Offices to provide repres ta ives or points-of-contact for coordination tasks. CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 25X1 25X1 251 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 3. The "Nunn amendment" al so calls for greater effort on the part of the Intelligence Community, "and specifically the CIA," to assess Soviet views of relative military capabilities. In a separate communication to Congress, the DCI will state that the CIA will produce special "red" (Soviet-view) net assessment studies during FY 1989 and beyond (see attachment B). These studies would represent efforts beyond CIA's support to joint DoD/IC net assessments. SOVA and OSWR presumably will be re e for these studies within the FY 198q RpcpArrh Program. Attachments: A. DCl/SecDef Plan for IC Support of Net Assessments B. DCI statement on special net assessment studies beyond CIA's support to joint DoD/IC net assessments. -2- CONFIDENTIAL \\N Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved forRelease2013/06/20 : CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 uuilrIULNIIML Distribution: I - D/OSWR I - D/EURA I - D/NESA I - D/OEA I - D/ALA I - D/COMPT I - D/SOVA I - Ch/RIG I - Ch/RIG/TFD I - Ch/SIG I - Ch/SIG/SPD I ea - SIG BCs I ea RIG/TFD BCs SOVA/SIG/SEC (8 Mar 88) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 z ATTACHMENT A MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OP DEFENSE THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Subject: Intelligence Community Support of Net hssessment The enclosed plan for Intelligence Community'support of DOD net assessments and the letters of transmittal to committee chairman have been prepared in response to a requirement included in the Intelligence Authorizat'ion Act fbr Fiscal Year 1989. The? plan and letters of trensmIttill have the agreement of the members of the DOD Net Assessment Coordinating Committee. Request your approval and signature on t.11 stnclosi4ed letters. ? RICHARD L. ARMITAGE Assistant Secretary of Defense (International Security Affairs) r? ROBERT W. RISCASSI Lieutenant General, USA Director, Joint Staff Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Dear (Chairman, SikcC, S5C1. SAC, ASC, MAC) The Intelligence Authorimation Act for Fiscal Year isaa Conference Report requests that the Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence provide a plan for?the conthIct of net assessments which allow for independent judgegkeelts by the Intelligence Community. The JCS 1987 Military Net Assessment and othcr previous USD net .assessment studies have historically lig!ed 6,xtensive input from the Intelligence Community. On September 6, 1987 Admiral, Crowe and Judge .Webster agreed to formalise ak plan for Intelligence Community support of JCS Net Asseesmau...:. 'Enclosed is our plan for Intelligence Community participation in net asseusments. Admiral Crowe agrees with thil plan. Sincerely yours, - FRANK C. CARLUCCI WILLIM U. WESSTER Secretary of Defense Director of Central Intelligence Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 q FOR INTELLIGENCE CCMHUNITY SUPPORT OF NET ASSESSKENTS e Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central /ntelligenc: cotablian this Plan which provides for the full participation of the ntelli gence Community in DOD net assesieents. The, Intellisellc: i community will: participate in the development of requirements for, - participate in the establishment of parameters for, - provide coordinated intelligence, and -,participato in the conduct of net assessments by the Department of Defense. The 'Intelligence Community will review and comment on net assessments prior to dissemination external to. the Executive Branch, and will have the right to present independent conclusions based on its review ot the results. 2 Community-agreed intelligence data bases and assessments will be used for net asnessments where possible. However, where the intelligence input to net assessments is new or comprises material at variance with enrlier Community views, coordination shall bc conducted by -a working group consisting of representatives ox all intereste6 members of the Intelligence Community. Coordination will normally be conducted in amanner similar to that for National Inteniclence Estimates (NIEs). .3. The Intelligence Community will participate in net asseeemente witb DOD/JCS in areas critical to the overall effectiveness of US national security policy, strategy, tactics, and weaporris wystibma. these net assesaments will include such areas as; a. Total military capabilities. These asseeements will innude an analysis of MTfitary functional capabilities acrc:sa the spectrum of warfare including conventional, stzategic nacleaz, nonstzateqc nuclear and CBW. Other military capabilities will bo analy.ted, including: intelligence, eustainability, mobility, electronic warfare, sPeQial operations forces, reAserve forces, command, control, and communications, and 1**LleYithipe *Orb'lfe, anb training.. b. Regional politico-Military balances. These assessments etll analyze the capability of the US and its al1ies tu auhieve regional objectives versus the capabilities of an adversary, ptincipaily the Soviet Union and its allies. Th03* balances may also take into account significant regional sub-balances e.o., North Korea/South Korea). c. Joint technical net assessments. These assessmente will analyse the standing of US end allied R D efforts relative to those of npnlassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 ? ? 10 I--? y,1;0 Soviet Union in key military and technology areas, such ame low 1,eservable technology, new exploeives, and directed energy veapons. These areas are critical as they are fundamental to current. and future farce planning ana national strategy as set torth in NSD0 238. the National Security Strategy, and the Detense Guidance. 4. The time table for initiati-n ..-^mple*ir,n of net assessments identified for Intelligence Commuaity participation. over the nest two years is as follcws: 1968 JCS Net Assessment (Unclassified Document) Commence: I March 1988 Complete: 30 September 1988 Interim 1989 Military Net Assessment Commence: 1 November 1987 Complete: 30 October 1988 1988 Joint Technical Net Assessment, Low Observable Technology Commence: 1 April 1988 Complete: I December 1988 0 1989 Military Net Assessment Commence: 1 November 1987 Complete: 30 June 1989 1989 JCS Net Assessment (Unclassified Document) - Commence: 1,0ctober 1968 Complete 30 September 1989 S.? Dissemination of these net assessments shall include those senior Officials .involyed in national security policy in both the Executive Branch end to the followin1 committees of the Congresst Senate-Armed Services Committee, Senate Select Comsittte InteLLigance, Senate, Appropriations Committee. House Ared Services Committee, Bougie &also Committee on Intelligence, and tht House Appropriationa Committee.. 6. Implementation of the aboee plan has commenced and will be fully implemented by 1 October 1988. 2 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 WORP.14400010lai. 100TH CONGRESS 1st Session SENATE Calendac .4o. 247 REPORT 100-117 AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL ?YEARS 1988 AND 1989 FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, THE INTELLI- GENCE COMMVNITY STAFF, THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM (CIARDS], AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES JULY 17 (legislative day, JuNE 23), 1987.?Ordered to be printed Mr. Nuilm from the Committee on Armed Services, 'submitted the following REPORT [To accompany S. 1243] The Committee on Armed Services, to which was referred the bill (S. 1243) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1988 and 1989 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the U.S. Government, the Intelligence Community Staff, and the Central In- telligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and recommends that the bill as amended do pass. PURPOSE OF THE BILL S. 1243 would authorize appropriations and other matters for Fiscal Year 1988 and 1989 for intelligence activities of the United States Government, including certain Department of Defense intel- ligence-related activities within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Armed Services. The Select Committee on Intelligence reported out the bill on May 20, 1987 and it was referred to this Committee under the pro- vision of Section 3(b) of Senate Resolution 400, 94th Congress for a period of 30 days. SCOPE OF COMMPITEE REVIEW The Committee conducted a detailed review of the intelligence community budget request for Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989. This was the first year that the Administration and the Congress consid- ered budget for the Department of Defense and the intelligence community is a two-year budget. The purpose of the two-year au- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 TJed U! 2 thorization is to permit longer range planning within the Executive Branch, reduce turmoil caused by the annual budget process, and permit both the Congress and the Executive Branch to concentrate on issues of oversight and management and reduce the amount of time spent in the annual budget process. The Committee has carefully reviewed the report of the Select Committee on Intelligence and has incorporated the relevant budg- etary decisions of that Committee in the Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1988 and 1989 reported by this Committee on May 5. AMENDMENTS AND OTHER MEASURES The committee has considered and adopted one amendment and two additional measures. COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY The Committee supports the recommendation contained in the classified annex prepared by the SSCI that funds should be added to continue to improve communications security for certain domes- tic communications. NET ASSESSMENTS BY THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY Net assessments provide a valuable source of information on the potential effectiveness of U.S. forces and weapons systems in hypo- thetical engagements with adversaries. In order to conduct such as- sessments, one requires detailed and accurate information on both foreign and U.S. weapons systems and tactics. A small office exists in the Department of Defense to conduct and coordinate net assessments. This office, separate from the in- telligence community, relies on data from the intelligence commu- nity relative to foreign weapons systems, as well as data from the military services and other DoD organizations on friendly forces. However, the results of these net assessments have been restricted primarily to the Secretary of Defense. Up until 1981, there was some debate as to the extent to which the intelligence community should conduct or become involved in net assessments. Some have argued that while the intelligence community has expertise in foreign weapons systems and tactics, it lacks the requisite expertise and often the access to necessary data relative to U.S. forces. Further, it was argued that such analyses require a commitment of resources beyond what the community can afford without interfering with the overriding mission of for- eign assessments. Proponents of intelligence community involve- ment have pointed out that the expertise and elaborate tools used by the intelligence community to evaluate and assess effectiveness of foreign weapons systems are equally applicable to U.S. weapons evaluations. Further, the involvement of the Intelligence Commu- nity would lend greater credibility to the results of net assess- ments. For example, in the acquisition of weapon systems, the serv- ice proponent of a particular weapon has the primary if not sole responsibility in assessing how well that weapon will perform against opposing threats. 0 (D 0 3 07) (f) (f) In 1981, the Director of Central Intelligence and the Sect. Defense agreed that they would jointly conduct net assessme, CD selected areas, and that DoD would provide the intelligence 5' munity with data on U.S. forces for use in these analyses. The m -0 notable activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement to (inc. a) has been a joint net assessment of U.S. and Soviet strategic for 'in:, completed in 1983, and updated in 1985. However, these joint c(-0) forts have been very limited in number and scope. These effortsa clearly could and should be expanded. For example, it would be useful to have an independent net :is Ri sessment of such strategic systems as the U.S. air-breathing sys tems against the Soviet Air Defense systems. This is particularly? important given the well-publicized problems with the B-1B anC10 the substantial investment yet to come in air breathing systems. Net assessments of key weapon systems will assist the executive> branch and the Congress in making budgetary and programatic de-13 cisions. Currently, the absence of such assessments means thatE3 very important decisions are often made without a complete or in-< dependent assessment of how these systems would fare in actual combat. -h In June 1986, the Packard Commission recommended that the Department of Defense and the Intelligence Community expand its net assessment work. Specifically, the Packard Commission recom- mended that: At the direction of the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint.Chiefs of Staff, with the assistance of the other members of the JCS and the CINCs, and in consultation with the Director of Central Intelligence, should also prepare a military net assessment that would: Provide comparisons of the capabilities and effectiveness of U.S. military forces with those of potential adversaries for the Chairman's recommended national military strategy and other strategy options; Reflect the military contributions of Allied Forces where ap- propriate; Evaluate the risks of the Chairman's recommended national military strategy and any strategy options that he develops for the Secretary of Defense and the President; and Cover the entire five-year planning period. In the Goldwater-Nichols Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs was given a new responsibility to perform "net assessments to determine the capabilities of the armed forces of the United States and its allies as compared with those of their potential adversaries" (10 U.S.C. 153(a)(2)(C), as amended by section 201 of P.L. 99-443.) This responsibility was added because the Congress believed that the Chairman should also have an enhanced role in net assessments. The Committee believes that more involvement in specific net as- sessments by the Intelligence Community is a prerequisite for meaningful participation in the overall assessment of the national military strategy envisioned by the Packard Commission. The Com- mittee is mindful, however, of the potential impact such involve- ment may have on resources and believes that intelligence commu- 0 (D (T) )) n.) 0 0 0 0 -0 n.) o) n.) co Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 4 nity participation should be structured so as to provide an alterna- tive source of net assessment information for those Department of Defense weapons systems or plans judged critical. Accordingly, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence to develop a plan for the con- duct of net assessments which allow for independent judgments by the intelligence community. the Committee believes that the fol- lowing considerations should be taken into account in the develop- ment of this plan: Intelligence community net assessments for the Department of Defense should be restricted to those areas judged critical to the overall effectiveness of U.S. national security policy, strategy, tac- tics or specific weapon systems. The plan should specifically identi- fy and prioritize those areas selected for intelligence community participation and the reasons why they are judged "critical". Given the resources associated with complex net assessments, the conduct of joint net assessments by DoD and the intelligence com- munity are acceptable. The plan should permit the intelligence community to have an equal role in establishing the parameters of the assessment and to arrive at independent conclusions based on the results. The process used in the preparation of national intelli- gence estimates is a useful model in this regard, including proce- dures for reporting dissenting opinions. The completion of net assessments should be timed so as to pro- vide maximum value in the decisionmaking process. The plan should set forth a timetable for initiation and completion of those net assessments identified for intelligence community participa- tion. Net assessments would be particularly valuable to senior officials involved in national security policy outside the Department of De- fense in both the Executive Branch and Congress. The plan should provide a mechanism for dissemination of information on the re- sults of net assessments to such officials. Further, appropriate senior officials should be consulted in the selection and prioritiza- tion of areas to be the subject of net assessments. Furthermore, the Committee encourages the Intelligence Com- munity, and specifically the CIA, to improve its analysis of how the Soviets view "the correlation of forces," which is the Soviet term analagous to net assessments. The Committee requests that the plan be provided to the Armed Services, Intelligence, and Appropriations Committees of the House and Senate no later than March 1, 1988 with an implementation date as soon thereafter as practical but no later than October 1, 1988. The Committee will assess the plan as a basis for any further action in this area deemed appropriate. UNDISTRIBUTED REDUCTIONS AND THE NATIONAL FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM The Committee is concerned about the impact on the National Foreign Intelligence Program of undistributed reductions in the Department of Defense Authorization which might be required as a result of Congressional action. It is the intent of the committee that undistributed reductions applied in the Fiscal Year 1988 and 5 Fiscal Year 1989 Department. of Defense Auttint propriations accounts of the Department of Defense plied to elements of the National Foreign Intelligence contained in those accounts. COM M ITTEE ACTION On July 14, 1987 the Committee on Armed Services approved the wi bill as amended and ordered it favorably reported. EVALUATION OE REGULATORY IMPACT (D In accordance with paragraph 11(b) of Rule XXVI of the Stand- 0- ing Rules of the Committee, the Committee finds no regulatory impact will be incurred in implementing the provisions of this legA islation. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW In the opinion of the Committee, it is necessary to dispense with the requirements of Rule 12 of Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate in order to expedite the business of the Senate. 0 (7) (D Oh OZ eseelel S.\ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 NOTE TO: DCI Central Intelligence Agency Office of the Deputy Director for Intelligence FROM: Dick Kerr The Nunn ammendment also calls for the Intelligence Community, "and specifically the CIA," to improve its analysis of how the Soviets view relative military capabilities. With this in mind, I think it would be useful to add to the package the attached statement of what we plfin to undertake this year in the way of "red":.net assessments. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/20: CIA-RDP92R01136R000200180007-6 25X1