MULTILATERAL ANTI-NARCOTICS STRIKE FORCE

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 5
• Document Creation Date: December 23, 2016
• Document Release Date: April 29, 2014
• Sequence Number: 12
• Publication Date: September 27, 1989
• Content Type: MEMO

Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
MEMORANDUM FOR:
FROM:
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE
riF
Counternarcotics Center
OCA 3388-89
27 September 1989
Legislation Division
Office of Congressional Affairs
SUBJECT: Multilateral Anti-Narcotics Strike Force
On September 20, 1989, the Senate passed an amendment to
the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, which would allow
the President to use, out of the money appropriated to the
State Department for international narcotics control, the
amount necessary to fund the U.S. participation in a
multilateral anti-narcotics strike force. I am attaching for
your information, a copy of the Congressional Record on that
date which has the amendment and the accompanying remarks.
Attachment
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE
STAT
STAT
STAT
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE
SUBJECT: Multilateral Anti-Narcotics Strike Force
OCA/LEGi (27 Sep 1989) STAT
Distribution:
Orig - CNC
1 - D/OCA
1 - OCA Records
1 - OCA/Subject File: Counternarcotics
1 - Signer
1 - OCA Read
STAT
2
ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
S 11532 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE. September 20, 1989
such instability by reducing our eco-
nomic aid at this critical juncture. As
the Commission stated in its report:
Durable peace, genuine democracy and eq-
uitable development are indivisible. None Is
sufficient by Itself; each is necessary for the
attainment of the 'other. Without peace,
there can be no development. But without
equitable development, democracy cannot
be sustained, and without democracy, there
will be no lasting peace.
I urge the adoption of the amend-
ment.
. Mr. KASTEN. Mr. President, we
. have had an opportunity to review
this amendment and urge its adoption.
The PRESIDING OFFICER: The
question is on agreeing to the amend-
ment of the Senator from North Caro-
. Ain&
The amendment (No. 808) was ?
agreed to.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I move
- - -to reconsider the vote by which the
amendment was agreed to.
Mr. KASTEN. I move to jay that
motion on the table. ? '
The motion to lay' on the table was
agreed to. ?
?? ? Annunn?zxr No: 809 ?
(Purpose: To authorize the expenditure of
In 1988, the Senate included lan-
guage at my urging in the Anti-Drug
Abuse Act, which Congress passed and
the President signed into law (P.L.
100-690), expressing the sense of the
Congress that "the President should
call for international negotiations for
the purpose of agreeing on the estab-
lishment of an international drug
force to pursue and apprehend major
international drug traffickers."
On July 20 of this year, Senator
KERRY and I successfully offered an
amendment to the State Department
Authorization bill to expand the con-
cept and mission of the force from a
"drug force" to a "strike force." That
amendment also recognized the role of
network aimed especially at American
consumers:
The United States is fighting this
scourge on numerous fronts. In De-
cember 1988, a New York Review of
Books article reported that the United
States almost has doubled the budget
of the Drug Enforcement Administra-
tion (DEM during the last 5 years.
Other efforts cited were the establish-
ment of a drug interdiction center in
El Paso and installation of detection
devices along our borders. The Reagan
administration deployed sophisticated
AWACS planes over the Caribbean. In
Latin America, special agents have
been assigned to gather intelligence on
cocaine producers. Additionally, the
the strike force in purseing interna-
tional terrorists, in addition to target ate Department is deploying Huey
Ing international drug kingpins as
Congress provided for previously.
The amendment Senator KERRY and
I offer today authorizes the expendi-
ture of funds to further U.S. participa-
tion in such a strike force, if and when
It is established. ?
Mr. President, the urgent need for nation. It is time to look toward a :
establishment of such an international global response.
strike force is clearly apparent. The The case for establishment of an .
most recent statistics compiled by the International Strike Force to combat,.
funds for a multilateral anti!narcoUcs_
state Department in its March 1989 the scourge. of international drug trat---z?
strike force). -
- --- Mr.-KASTEN. Mr.-President, I send report, Patterns Of __Global Terrorism. --ficking and terrorism is rapidly devel-
helicopters, and the Green Berets are
instructing local police in the art of
paramilitary operations.
Yet, despite these effort's, the inter-
national narcotics industry has flour-
ished. The problem is too large and
too widespread to be handled by one
an amendment to the desk on behalf
of Mr. SPECTER and Mr. KERRY.
? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
clerk will report the amendment.
The assistant legislative clerk read
as follows:
. The _Senator from Wisconsin (Mr.
KASTEN] for Mr. SPECTER (for himself and
Mr. KERRY) proposes an amendment num-
bered 809.
Mr. KASTEN. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent that the reading of
the amendment be dispensed with.
The PRESIDING .OFFICER. With-
out objection, it is so ordered.
The amendment is as follows:
On page 41, under the heading entitled
"International Narcotics Control", at line 8,
strike the period and insert in lieu thereof
the following: "Provided. further, That of
the funds made available under this head-
ing, such funds as the President deems nec-
essary may be made available for the fund-
ing of MS. participation in a multilateral
anti-narcotics strike force not including any
communist or Warsaw past troops. Provided
further. That funds for such a force may
only be provided if the Committees on Ap-
propriations of the House of Representa-
tives and of the Senate are notified at least
15 days In advance of the obligation of
funds.". '
Mr. KASTEN. Mr. President, I
simply want to say that this is an
amendment which the Senate has con-
sidered in the past on previous legisla-
tion. It is being added to this legisla-
tion. It has to do with an international
antidrug task force.
Mr.-SPECTER. Mr. President, today
I offer an amendment to the fiscal
year 1990 Foreign Operations Appro-
priations Act, H.R. 2939, regarding the
reflect that transnational terrorists
have set a record in 1988 for the
raunber of attacks and have demon-
strated the potential to continue their
violent activities with impunity. The
report states: "The 856 international
terrorist incidents recorded in 1988 re-
sulted in 658 persons killed and 1,131
wounded, including casualties to ter-
rorists themselves."
According to the State Department
report, last year alone terrorists were
responsible for such tragedies as the
hijacking of a Kuwaiti airliner. in
April, the attack on a day-excursion
ship off the coast of Greece in July,
and the bombing of Pan Am flight 103
over Scotland in December. Moreover,
the United .States suffered a substan-
tial increase . in terrorist attacks
against, and casualties of, Americans
abroad last year.
But terrorism is not only an Ameri-
can problem, it is an international
problem. The State Department re-
oping. Many _governments throughout
the world Currently are under seige by:
powerful international drug kingpins
and violent terrorists. The justice sys-
tems of many countries have been tin-
mobilized due to the tremendous,'
power these criminals wield. A shock-
ing example is Colombia, where drug,_
lords have as-cassinated a presidential _
candidate, a minister of justice, an at-, -
torney general, the head of the anti-
narcotics police. 2 dozen journalists;
more than 50 judges, and hundreds of ? ?
police. Many countries also fear retal-,
iation for their law enforcement el- ? -
forts by terrorists or violent interna-; 1? ?
tional criminals. Nation's internal 'se- ? -
curity forces simply are ill-equipped to,, ." ? I
combat this growing and dangerous ?
criminal element. . ..?1 ' -4
A foreign goverzunent may be con-i
cerned that local residents will rebel
against its decision to extradite a pow- -. ? r?-.C.-1
erful national, albeit an International..
, A?
ports that citizens and property of 79 criminal, by storming the embassy or ? 1 I ? ,,,.. -
nations were attacked by international . foreign interests of the government re- '1:- - 1 P .. i .3 r ,
terrorists in a total of 68 countries and -ceiving the extradited felon. Extradit-'4?'t'') ott :,!flf
the majority of victims were the least ing drug kingpins to the United States:' c? I -11,rrrl
protected?innocent tourists and busi. for example, has sparked nationalistio-.7.;-
nesses. With terrorists traveling under' uprisings against American interests.- fr?ri? , ',.-+ I
many aliases and with the protection An illustration of this violent reaction? '1 ,1 ' ::3 ?
or encouragement of certain states, was seen in Honduras in April 1988, : -: A I 1:
the
the problem is too large and too wide7 when American and Honduran au; :It ! ' 0: -I '
spread to be handled by the forces of thorities jointly seized a major inter- ; In"
one nation. It is time to look toward a national drug trafficker, Juan Ramon . . -4-
global response. Matta Ballesteros, and brought him to .
The international narcotics trade the United States for triaL A riot -- -- --- -????'-
t
also poses a serious threat to world ensued and the United States Embassy., .
safety as drug kingpins make their for- in Honduras was attacked by an angry -
tunes trafficking drugs in the global mob. This deep nationalistic sentiment':' ; ? ?
market. Reports indicate that as many also is reflected in opinion polls which
establishment of an international as 50 countries are involved in the pro- show that approximately two-thirds of
strike force to identify, locate, and ap- ' duction, processing, and transporting all Colombians are opposed to extmdi-
prebend international criminals, of narcotics, forming an international tion, regarding it as a violation of na-
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
c
September 20, 198.9 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE
tional sovereignty and a provocation
for more drug vfolence.
As the extent and level of violence
continue to escalate in certain regions
of the world, more and more govern-
ments are seeking outside help. Most
recently, the Prime Minister of Jamai-
ca, Michael Manley, expressed his
strong interest in the formation of a
regional drug force in the Western
Hemisphere. According to a June 10,
1989, Washington Post report, Prime
Minister Manley predicts that the
drug cartels will expand their oper-
ations into international markets that
were previously ignored. As a result,
? the Prime Minister stated that "the
? only effective solution is international
action?a multilateral force, similar to
the U.N. peacekeeping force that could
be mobilized quickly at the invitation
. of foreign' leaders." Moreover, Prime
Minister Manley recognized "that by
operating under the umbrella of the
United Nations or some other interna-
tional body, such a force would be less
likely to arouse nationalist sentiments
that have confronted some U.S. anti-
drug actions in foreign countries."
. Prime Minister Manley discussed his
proposal for a multinational antidrug
strike force at a recent dinner spon-
sored by TransAfrica, an organization
which focuses on United States policy
? In Africa and the Caribbean. As re-
ported in the Christian Science Moni-
tor on June 19, 1989, the Prime Minis-
ter suggested that the members of the
? strike force "would be selected from
countries that would be politically ac-
ceptable to the host nation and would
be mobilized only at the invitation of
the nation's government." His propos-
al for the multinational antidrug
strike force garnered so much support
from. the guests that he received two
standing ovations. .
Similarly, in a July 1988 Letter to
- the Editor of the New York Times,'
former U.S. Ambassador to Barbados,
. Paul A. Russo, ? strongly endorsed a
multinational force to combat drugs.
Mr. Russo is troubled by the problems
-! the smaller Caribbean nations face in
combating illegal drug operations due
.to their lack of resources. He stated:
"A multinational force destroying the
? source of the supply in South America
? would lessen the pressure on this part
?. of the world and give these small
. island nations time to keep ahead of a
growing narcotics problem."
Endorsements for international
action is not limited to smaller coun-
tries. Many governments recognize
that the problems of drugs and terror-
Lim are global and must be addressed
more effectively through international
cooperation and collective efforts.
Strong precedent supports -the
amendment I offer today. As cited
above, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1988, which the Senate passed over-
? whelmingly, expresses the sense of the
Congress that the President should
call for international negotiations for
the purpose of agreeing on the estab-
lishment of an internatiohal drug
force to pursue and apprehend major
international drug traffickers. The
new law also included a specific provi-
sion for the formulation of a multina-
tional force in the Western Hemi-
sphere to conduct operations against
international illegal drug smuggling
organizations. Congress is aware of the
imminent threat that international
drug smugglers pose to small nations
and this provision demonstrates our
commitment to provide equipment,
training, and financial resources to
support the establishment and oper-
ation of a regional antinarcotics force.
Mr. President, the Congress also has
recognized the pressing need for assist-
ing foreign governments on the inter-
national level in the prosecution of
international criminals. In 1986, the
Senate adopted my amendment on the
Omnibus Diplomatic Security -Act?
Public Law 99-399?which calls on the
President to consider international ne-
gotiations to establish an Internation-
al Court to try terrorists:The scope of
this initiative was expanded by my
amendment to the Anti-Drug Abuse
Act of 1988 to include international
drug traffickers and other internation-
al criminals within the court's jurisdic-
tion. ?
As with the international criminal
court amendments, the amendment
Senator KERRY and I offer today is
merely the next logical step in a
lengthy process of study and negotia-
tions to establish an international
strike force. As my colleagues are
aware, many issues will need to be ad-
dressed, such as the composition of
the force, the participating member
nations, the specific role of the force,
and the primacy of nations' sovereign-
ty. This amendment, however, repre-
sents an important step forward in the
development of this urgently needed
international force.
The establishment of an Interna-
tional Criminal Court will provide a
necessary mechanism for the prosecu-
tion and detention of terrorist and
international drug traffickers. The
_formation of an international strike
force will complement the role of the
International Criminal Court by pro-
viding a mechanism to identify,
pursue, and apprehend these danger-
ous international criminals.
Accordingly, I urge my colleagues to
join in support of this amendment to
strike another blow against terrorist
and international drug traffickers.
Mr. KERRY. Mr. President, Senator
SPECTER and I offer an amendment
which would give the authority to uti-
lize funds from the International Nar-
cotics Control Program to fund an
international antidrug strike force.
Such a force, proposed first by the
Congress in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act
of 1988 and more recently by Prime
Minister Michael Manley of Jamaica,
would be a potent weapon in the ongo-
ing war against the drug cartels.
This is a very simple amendment. It
does not authorize any-new programs
and it does not place any restrictions
S 11533
on the administration. It simply gives
the administration the ability to trans-
fer funds for a multilateral antidrug
strike force. I believe that this pro-
gram is essential, but I recognize that
we should not mandate it at this time.
Mr. President, this is a timely issue,
and it is a critical issue. The Govern-
ment of Colombia is currently engaged
in a hot war against the drug lords in
Colombia, and we are left on the side-
lines. While we can send military aid
to Colombia, we have no way of help-
ing with direct military support. Given
the history and sensitivity about
United States troops in Latin America,
Colombia is very unlikely to ask for
United States forces to assist them in
their efforts. If there were a multilat-
eral strike force in place, the Colombi-
an Government would have the
needed helping hand to which it could
turn.
We have already lost this opportuni-
ty to help a nation struggling for its
very survival against the drug king-
pips. We need to ensure that other
such chances do not go by. As Colom-
bia's courageous struggle continues,
we can get the Colombian Govern-
ment military aid?late perhaps, but
that is better than never.
As I noted earlier in my remarks,
this is an issue we in Congress have
addressed previously. In 1988, the
Senate included language in the Anti-
Drug Abuse Act?Public Law 100-690--
expressing the sense of the Congress ?
that the President should -call- for
international negotiations for the pur;
pose of agreeing on the establishment
of an international drug force to
pursue and apprehend major interna-
tional drug traffickers. Yet, no action
has been 'taken ? by the executive --
branch to follow up on that proposal.
Now that we face a situation for which .
such a force was intended, there is no
force to use. We need to establish such
a force now, and our amendment is in-
tended to ensure that the ,administra-
tion has the funding to support such a
force.
Mr. President, the Senate earlier
considered this amendment in the De-
partment of State authorization bill,
where a much more extensive version
was offered by Senator SPECTER and
myself. That amendment was accepted
by the managers of the bill. It author-
ized the administration to support -
strongly the establishment of a multi-
lateral strike force. This amendment
provides the administration with the
important ability to transfer funds for
such a force.
As this year progresses, we will con-
tinue to face the issue of appropriate
military response to the war on drugs.
In the Terrorism, Narcotics and Inter-
national Operations Subcommittee of
the Foreign Relations Committee, we
will be holding hearings on this very
Issue. I know there will be consider-
able disagreement on the question of
direct U.S. military involvement in the
drug war. I am sure, however, that we
npriassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0
? -
S 11534
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SENATE
all will agree that whether or not the
United States military should be di-
rectly involved, a multilateral strike
force is needed as an additional
weapon in our arsenal.
One final point should be made. Ja-
maican Prime Minister Michael
Manley is to be commended for pursu-
ing a multilateralization of the war on
drugs. He deserves credit for pressing
this concept in a variety of multilater-
al fora. His nation, with limited re-
sources, is attempting to deal with a
drug problem which threatens to over-
whelm that country. I think it is im-
portant for us to heed his call for the
creation of such a force because he un-
derstands all too well the threat to the
national security of this country posed
by the drug cartels. He deserves credit
for demonstrating the courage to deal
with this threat with constructive pro-
posals before it reaches crisis propor-
tions in Jamaica. I urge my colleagues
to support this amendment.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is
there further discussion on the
amendment? Hearing none, the ques-
tion is on agreeing to the amendment.
The amendment (No. 809) was
agreed to.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I move
to reconsider the vote by which the
amendment was agreed to.
Mr. KASTEN. I move to lay that
motionOn the table.
The motion to lay on the table was
agreed to.
th
Mr.
clerk
The
as fob':
The :tor from Vermont
for Mr. 8 N, proposes an
numbered 8
ABIENDPIENT NO- 810
. LEAHY. Mr. President, I send
desk an araendment on behalf
IKON.
PRESIDING OFFICER.
? report the amendment.
t legislative der
Mr. ? " Mr. Presi
unanimous ? t that
the amendme be dispe
The PRES II GO
out objection, it so o
? The amendmen is
On page 47. line 1
after the colon:
the funds anpropria
for countries in
$5.000,000 shall be vaila
AMENDMENT NO. 811
r. LEAHY. Mr. President, I send
an amendment to the desk and ask for
its ediate consideration.
T PRESIDING OFFICER. The
ante ment will be stated.
The istant legislative clerk read
as folio s:
The Sc.-ator from Vermont, Mr. LEAHY,
propose an endment numbered 811.
Mr. LE Y. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous onsent that the reading of
the amendm nt be dispensed with.
The PRES 'DING OFFICER. With-
out objection, is so ordered.
The amendm t is as follows:
On page 142, lin 12, insert "determined
that there is" after
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. 'resident, this lan-
guage clarifies sect an 581 of the bill
relating to job-rela d crimes. This
clarification is nec ary to ensure
that it is the Secre of State's de-
termination of reasonab e cause that a
grievant has committed job-related
crime which is the opera ve fact, not
the reasonable cause itself.
The PRESIDING 0 (AA. Is
there further discussion?
Mr. KASTEN. Mr. Presi? ? nt, we
have had an opportunity to reivew
this amendment and urge its ad, ? tion.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. ? ear-
ing no further discussion, the nu ion
is on agreeing to the amendment.
The amendment (No. 811)
agreed to.
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I mov
to reconsider the vote by which th
amendment was agreed to.
Mr. KASTEN. I move to lay t t
motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the tabl was
agreed to.
SUSTAINABLE USE OP RENEWABLE RES
CES ?
rem -111r-r-HEINZ... Mr. President, let me
start by commending the Senator
from Wisconsin [Mr. KAS and the
Senator from Vermont . LEAHY]
for including comprehe ive provi-
sions in the pending b to support
sustainable use of newable re-
sources. They provide or the imple-
mentation of a pilot ebt for nature
program at the Won Bank. and else-
where and enhance t e participation of
nongovenunental tions in en-
They have raY
ese efforts.
clear on what this
this appears to be a
reviated version of Ian-
KASTEN and I included
epartment authorization
year. I would like to ask
r from Wisconsin if this
'II have the effect of direct-
retary of the Treasury to
e the best location for a debt-
ure clearinghouse, and whether
also instruct the U.S. executive
at the MDB's to support debt
nature swaps and assist in setting
s tamable development guidelines for
ank lending?
w Mr. KASTEN. The Senator is cor-
rect- That is exactly what this Ian-
LEARY]
entlment
ent, I ask
t e reading of
ed with.
Chat. With-
ered.
follows-.
rt the following vironmental poli
d further, That of --fulfauP-Port for t
under this heading I also Want to
lint" Africa language does,
e for Malawi.". very much ab
guage Sena
in the State
earlier
the Se
language
trig the
de
for-n
It s
dir
Mr. . Mr.
have had an o a portunit
amendment d urge its
The PR IDING 0
there furt discussion? T
Is on agre to the amen
The endraent (No.
agreed
Mr. . Mr. President,
to re, ? nsider the vote by whic
am ? , dment was agreed to.
. KASTEN. I move to lay ?
m ? ion on the table.
he motion to lay on the table
greed to.
esident, we
to review the
option.
CER. Is
e question
t.
8 0) was
move
the
at
September 20, 1989
guage will accomplish, and I apprer
ate his making the record clear n
that point.
So that it is perfectly clear, I w uld
like to highlight just four poin that
we expect to be carried Out in t e im-
plementation of these pr' ? isions.
These points parallel the am ndment
we adopted on the State thoriza-
tion.
First, the Treasury will onduct an
analysis of where to best ? ate a debt
for nature clearing hous
Second, those findin will be report-
ed to this committe along with a -
timetable for their i a lementation,
Third, instructio will be given to
the U.S. executi directors to the
MDB's on the inn' emention of those
recommendatio and
Fourth, the 31a 's at each MDB will.
seek guidelines o support the sustain-,
able use of na re ral resources. -
Mr. sato i. I believe these provi-
sions are im ?ortant and would make a
sound poll, even if we did not face
the poten al of global environmental
crisis. B the fact is we face just that.
Man's a vities are eliminating species
from t e planet at a rate unparalleled
since he Mesozoic era, 85 million
yea ago. The rate of species extinc-
tio in rainforest areas-where the
ority of the -Earth's species
^ de-is presently_ 4,000 species per
. That is a level more than 10,000
unes the prehuman global extinction.
rate.
Recently, no less a figure than E.0.
-
Wilson, perhaps the most respected bi- '
ogist in the United States and a fore-
authority on the extincttorir crf?
flo and fauna in the world comment
ed man's continued actions such'
as ? ;forestation will cause the extinct=
tion ? at..least-251iercent
world' existing species within the
next 50 .. The elimination of one
out of e y four species may or may
not excl ?e ours, but It will almost
certainly we species whose exist-,
ence is cri to our ability ot main-?
tain life as know it. ? ? - - -
Debt for na? ? e swaps by themselves
are not the : ?- But coupled with a ?
commitment to sustainable develop-
ment by private ? ? d multilateral lend-
ers-which ? ? 90 percent-of- -
developing world's apital formation--
can be the answer.
Without this co ? talent the in-
creasing pressures of lobal warming,
the ozone hole and y other pre-
dicted strains on the ir will over-
take us.
Sustainable deve1opm.4.t makes
sense on its face.
Both investors and bo era will
get more return on the long erm use
of renewable resources than f these.
same resources are destroyed fu quick
profit.
As I mentioned, the Senate pre ous-
ly adopted language to promote ?ese
Initiatives. This is but a simplified er-
sion. It is important to emphasize a r
strong intention in this body to ours
nar-laccifipri in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/05/01 : CIA-RDP92M00732R001100030012-0