EXPLANATION OF THE COMOR WORKING GROUP'S VIEWS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF TARGETS FOR THE (SANITIZED) MISSION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92B01090R002700030142-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
December 6, 2002
Sequence Number: 
142
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 30, 1963
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92B01090R002700030142-8.pdf83.24 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/03/03: CIA-RDP92BO1090R002700030142-8 TOP SECRET vqw NRO REVIEW COMPLETED 30 October 1963 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director (Science and Technology) Explanation of the COMOR Working Group's Views on the Importance of Targets for the Mission On Monday morning, 28 October, I talked with of OSA and was advised that in addition to coverage of the NEFA area of the Sino-Indian border another mission was planned to cover some transportation routes between the NEFA area and the Ladakh area. In my own mind, I doubted that this intermediate area warranted a special mission. I accordingly dispatched the following telecon to the COMOR and Working Group members: In case of Sino-Indian border, COMOR at last meeting (COMOR-M-208, para 3a) indicated that except for the NEFA area further coverage not necessary at this time. However, Chairman advised by Operations that it wishes a confirmation this statement takes account of fact that there are transportation targets in area between NEFA and Ladakh for which a mission is planned. Chairman requested Working Group to consider this at meeting 29 October, to advise Chairman immediately as well as principals on COMOR so that by cob on that date Chairman will have views to transmit to Operations. Copy// of 11 TOP SECR~ Approved For Release 2008/03/03: CIA-RDP92BO1090R002700030142-8 25X1 Approved For Release 2008/03/03: CIA-RDP92BO1090R002700030142-8 TOP SLCRLI 2.. f OSA also advised of the conclusion of the COMOR -ring Group on Tuesday, 29 October, that they did not consider :.L se targets by themselves to be of important significance so .:~.~ to!warrant a special mission. 3. My concern in this regard was that COMOR must remain as alert as possible with regard to the coverage of COMOR = to have failed, the first immediate question would likely have been "Why did it go? " We need to be able to answer that question. taken needlessly. Were that mission targets, particularly in high risk areas, in order that risk is not 4. On the other hand, needless to say, if the Secretary of Defense wants this area and the Director is willing to instruct it to be obtained, the matter is out of our hands. me . e e 1 Chairman Committee n Overhead Reconnaissance Copy 1 DDS&T. 2 DDS&T 3 CIA Member COMOR 4 Ch/ ?WG 5 AD/OSA 6 ID/OSA 7 FA/OSA 8 RB/OSA 9 SA/DDS&T 10 SA/DDS&T 11 SA/DDS&T Approved For Release 2008/03/03: CIA-RDP92BO1090R002700030142-8