SUPPORT TO STATE DEPARTMENT - POSSIBLE CHEMICAL ATTACKS ON IRAN OR IRAQ CAPITAL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91B00776R000400080012-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 24, 2013
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 17, 1988
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91B00776R000400080012-7.pdf195.16 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 The Director of Central Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20505 National Intelligence Council MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence THROUGH: Chairman, National Intelligence Council FROM: Charles E. Allen National Intelligence Officer for Warning NIC-01823-88 17 May 1988 SUBJECT: Support to State Department - Possible Chemical Attacks on Iran or Iraq Capital 1. Attached is a warning paper forwarded to the Department of State in response to a request from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security for a written assessment of the likelihood that either Iran or Iraq will resort to chemical attacks on the other's capital. There is Community consensus that the likelihood of such an attack is small, but that the potential exists and may be increasing. 2. The Department asked for a statement in writing because of internal discus- sions following a 28 April briefing at State by a member of my staff. Initially, there were differences between Diplomatic Security and the Bureau for Near East/South Asian Affairs over whether US dependents should be withdrawn or whether other steps should be taken to protect US personnel there. 3. The issue now appears to be resolved, however. The Department is planning to send a joint State/Defense technical team to Baghdad to survey the US Embassy for possible installation of a chemical alarm system and suitability of other countermea- sures (e.g., portable shelter, masks, suits, awareness briefings, etc.). We will keep you informed of further developments. Charles E. Allen Attachment: Warning Issue 25X1' 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 NOFORN- Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals NOCONTRACT- Not Releasable to Contractors or Contractor/Consultants PROPIN- Caution- Proprietary Information Involved ORCON- Dissemination and Extraction of Information Controlled by Originator REL. . .- This Information has been Authorized for Release to ... Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 - National Intelligence Council National Intelligence Officer for Warning 13 May 1988 WARNING ISSUE IRAN/IRAQ: Chemical Attacks on Cities? The NIO for Warning is concerned over the possibility that either Iran or Iraq will initiate chemical attacks on the other's capital and that the victimized country will retaliate in kind. While the likelihood of either side resorting to chemical attacks on principal cities is assessed by the Intellience Community to be small--the retaliatory capability of each providing a significant deterrent--the potential for this low probability, but high impact, event exists. We are unlikely to have warning of imminent attack. Several factors and recent events prevent us from ruling out the possibility of chemical attacks in which Western diplomats and other civilians could be at risk, including: o Extensive recent battlefield use of chemical munitions; o Muted world response to the deaths of perhaps several thousand Kurdish non-combatants in March, which has left the impression of low international political cost arising from such attacks; o The "war of the cities" using ballistic missiles--now in ceasefire after more than 200 total strikes; o Evidence that Iran is preparing its people for chemical attacks; and o Unknowns about what is driving the decisionmaking of the two sides: Iraq has behaved in an uncharacteristically decisive and aggressive way of late; and we know that there is a heated debate in Tehran over how to respond to recent military setbacks. Should radicals prevail, they might opt for escalation by retaliating with chemical attacks against Iraqi cities. Both governments have chemical capable delivery systems. Iran has 125 and 250 kilogram bombs containing mustard and cyanide that can be delivered by F-4 and F-5 aircraft. Iraqi aircraft last bombed Tehran with conventional weapons in late February, an action that led directly to the missile war of the Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 ? cities. They also have bombs up to 500 kilograms for delivering mustard and nerve agents from Soviet or French-built aircraft. Iran might realize that in such an exchange it would suffer disproportionally, while Iraq would have more difficulty denying chemical attacks of Iranian cities than it has had in deflecting allegations of chemical use on the battlefield. Nevertheless, as more nations acquire a chemical capability, the threat of either intentional or unintentional exposure of large civilian population centers to chemical attack increases, especially in areas such as Iran and Iraq, where a demonstrated willingness to use both chemicals and long-range delivery systems are present. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET Warning Issue FRAM! Charles E. Allen NIO/Warning 7B 42 Headquarters T icer esigno ion, room number, and building) VC/NIC 3. C/NIC DDI Registry Executive Registry FORM 61 O USE PREVIOUS I-79 EDITIONS OFFICER'S INITIALS 17 May 1988 COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.) iY 0/OD! REG 1 8 M AY 1988 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7 Iq Next 1 Page(s) In Document Denied Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/06/24: CIA-RDP91 B00776R000400080012-7