KGB STATUS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00901R000500060003-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
42
Document Creation Date: 
January 4, 2017
Document Release Date: 
April 28, 2008
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 25, 1985
Content Type: 
TRANS
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00901R000500060003-7.pdf3.29 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 RADIO TV REPORTS, IN~ 4701 WILLARD AVENUE, CHEVY CHASE, MARYLAND 20815 (301) 656-4QAP~ NBC Nightly News STATION WRC-TV NBC Network September 25, 1985 7:00 P.M. CITY Washington, D.C. TOM BROKAW: Intelligence sources in Washington now have confirmed reports that a very high KGB official defected to the West in Rome this summer. Vitaly Sherchenko (?) is said to have had detailed knowledge of Soviet operations in the United States, Western Europe, and Latin America. And as John Dancy reports, this is only one of several major KGB setbacks recently. JOHN DANCY: The explusion of 31 Soviets for spying has devastated the KGB's operations in Britain. American intelligence sources confirm that the Soviet KGB chief in England, Oleg Gordievsky, has already revealed the names of more than 100 Britons working for the Soviets. GEORGE CARVER: Gordievsky was a gold mine, a platinum mine and a diamond mine all rolled into one. He knows everything that there is to know about Soviet intelligence activities in his country of assignment; in this case, the United Kingdom. DANCY: The man on the left, Stanislav Levchenko, is a former KGB agent, who declines to be photographed because of death threats against: him. What effect must this have on the KGB's operations in STANISLAV LEVCHENKO: The Soviets, of course, lost all of their agent network in Great Britain, which will take them at least five years to rebuild. They're trying to assess the damage which was done to the KGB operations, not only in England, but in Europe. OFFICES IN: WASHINGTON D.C. ? NEW YORK ? LOS ANGELES ? CHICAGO ? DETROIT ? AND OTHER PRINCIPAL CITIES Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 IOfexh'b"b?_ Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTICLE APPEARED. ON PAGE Q- -A Suit takes aim at U.S. weapon test By FRANK JACKMAN News Washington Bureau WASHINGTON-Four Democratic congressmen and the Union of Concerned Scientists filed suit In U.S. District Court yesterday to block the upcoming Air Force test of an antisatellite, or ASAT, weapon against a target in space. The ASAT weapon, which will be carried aloft by an F-15 jet fighter, is scheduled to track down and destroy an old, drifting U.S. scientific satellite over the Pacific, re- portedly on Friday. The group of scientists were joined by Reps. George Brown (D-Calif.), Matthew McHugh (D-N.Y.), Joe Moak- ley (D-Mass.) and John Seiberling (D-Ohio) in seek- ing a delaying injunction. They argued that such a test at this time would be illegal because the Reagan adminis- tration is not "endeavoring in good faith to negotiate with the Soviet Union a mutual and verifiable agreement" to limit such weapons as re- quired by current law. In his certification to Con. gress last month, President Reagan said that the U.S. was trying "in good faith" to negotiate an agreement with Moscow and that pending such an agreement, testing was needed "to avert clear and irrevocable harm to the national security." "The USSR has the world's only operational ASAT system with an effec- tive capability to seek and destroy critical U.S. space systems in near-Earth orbit," Reagan said. He said tests were needed to "restore the necessary Military balance in this area." But in an affidavit accom- panying Yesterday's lawsuit, former CIA Director William o y c that even wi o test, the U.S. ASAT system "is alrea far more advanced than be em." He said that of the 20 Sov tests to date, half have failed. Brown, a leading critic of the controversial $4 billion U.S. antisatellite program, said the ASAT test was really a preliminary test of the President's proposed Star Wars space defense system. 'Transparent' "The miniature homing device that is a key compo- nent' of the ASAT weapon "actually is ... an essential element of one tier of a space-based ballistic missile program," Brown said. He charged that Reagan's cer- tification was "a transparent effort to circumvent the law." White House spokesman Larry Speakes denied the charge. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 NC1.1 V(1DV TTMF74,' Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 .....;_ ... ...t ARTICLE APP RE hat !M PAG ever the reasons for paring , if staff, analysts assert that co m_ The J parries are their shortsighted by /y tdmIping back k their analytical cape~- Ris Business biltiee.? "There is a secular trend of ice*," the globalization of goods and serv- Mr. Nye-side tnfo eaviron- ent, it is self-defeating for a com- papy to pull in its horns and concern Small Firms Face Squeeze By KENNETHcN. GILPIN it elf solely with. the domestic mar- "'We sat down a few weeks ago and ? ket..You need someone in the corpo- edunted up the number of contacts we ration with a sense of world events so had that could get us to heads of state yoq won't get blindsided. Companies .around the world, and the number that don't see. this are in for some came to about 35," Mr. Colby said in shocks and loss. of market share. an.interview. Political risk analysis is a field that Although the private consulting has come of age only in the last deg- firms charge more than individual, ado, as foreign affairs have rocked sources say that Mr. Kissinger's ? other foregin affair South Africa's problems may be an annual fee of about $250,000. Mr. creating difficulties for a host of corn.. -singer's firm declined to comment parries doing business with that coun?? `0~'its fee structure, but Arco and the try. But for one business, political 1uor Corporation have said in the risk assessment, it could prove some., 'past that they are clients. Mr. Colby 's thing of a boon, serving as a reminder ? has much lower up-trout fees, of the relevance of political inteffi. the industry sources said. genre, particularly t mpanies op- '-Corporate risk analysts typically erating abroad. earn $60,000 to $75,000 a year, acwrd- The profession could use some bol-? ing to a survey by the Association of stering. The South African problems Political Risk Analysts last year. come at a time when companies such Some firms headed by well-known as Atlantic Richfield and Gulf 011 individuals have managed to make have been phasing out their political money, but the brunt of the downturn risk departments, or decreasing their in the business is being borne by importance. small consulting firms. Last year, '136 percent of those responding to a Nye, director of international evalua- tion, said his unit was being dis- banded as part of a restructuring. From now on, someone with a part- time job will be looking at interna- tional affairs," said Mr. Nye, who founded the department 11 years ago, after receiving his doctorate in politi- cal science at Washington University in St. Louis. He will begin evaluating foreign . government credits for Moody's Investors Service in New t onth m k Y -survey compiled by the Association of Pblitical- Risk Analysts, a profes- sional group, classified themselves as consultants offering political risk services, about half as many as the 'previous year. ? ? ?sAnyone can put out their shingle," said. William P. Kelly, deputy direc- tor of international governmental af- fairs at the Ford Motor Company. "And a lot of the consulantancies ere one-man operations." R$asons for Shake-Out x or ne Foreign affairs experts point to the The reduction in in-house staff at Po corporations, however, has aided a Secession of the early 1980's, corpo- number of small consulting firms rdte retrenchment and dissatisfac- headed by such foreign policy super tion with the kind of analysis that stars as Henry A. Kissinger, former > nagement was getting to explain' Secretary of State, and W i . Why the political risk business is goWg through something of a shake- _ "to Colbv Director of Cent oence from 1973 to 1876. These firms out. The strong dollar has also cut offer the government experience of into overseas earnings at many com- their key people as well as often panes and lessened their emphasis providing contacts with government .oa.,foreign operations, they say. officials here and abroad. "After the fall of the Shah of Iran in Mr. Colby left another Washington -199, everybody said let's do some- about political risk," said Gor- consultitig firm, International Busi? Rayneld, a political risk analyst Hess Government Counselors, to start ? in;ihe international economics group his own firm, Colby, Bailey, Werner at the General Motors Corporation. &, Associates, early this year, and `But the recession here caused com- formed anetwork of outside consult- panies to cut staff in manufacturing ants, including William B. Dale, a for- ln?ustries, in the oil industry and in nier deputy managing director of the the banking industry. And some of the International Monetary Fund. Access ;IR people to go were political risk to a wide range of powerful people is y-ts, 'flit' important selling point. rt who could .inending problems and ideally save a company money - was an at- tractive one to many concerns. Businesses turned to 'academia and government to recruit experts who could sift through complex economic ,and political data about Iran br Mex- iccL or other potential trouble spots .Around the world, and weigh their Im- plications for their companies. Gulf Oil-Angola Case Cited political judgment can pay off is the .decision taken in the mid-1970's by Gulf Oil to remain in Angola in spite of a widening revolution. In that situation, sources said that the feeling among Gulf's management was to pull out of the country. The compa- ny's international affairs group argued against such a step, and Gulf stayed. Cuban troops are guarding its oil rigs, but Gulf is still there, making money. But if the idea of political risk as- sessment seemed compelling, the profession has encountered some rough going. There is little question that predicting riots and coups and other generally unpredictable events is a tough occupation. But that is the kind of service that political risk ana- lysts purport to offer. The South African financial crisis, which some analysts confess they did not see coming, offers some insights into the difficulties of analyzing polit- ical risks. In that case, the growing political unrest led to a loss of confi- dence among some of the country's creditors. The decision by the Chase Manhattan Bank in July not to roll over some debt reverberated through the financial markets, leading even- tually to a financial crisis for the countrythat took some by surprise. "I felt that things would get bad quickly and saw that there had been some capital flight," Mr. Rayfield of G.M. said. "But I had no idea that things would unravel so fast, and I didn't make the short-term call. I talk to a lot of people at other companies on the phone, and no one was making that prediction." Continued Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Even when political analysts can foresee troubles ahead in a particular country, moreover, a company may still encounter problems. For one thing, the analysts may not succeed in convincing management that their- outlook is right. Perhaps more diffi- cult is the case when analysts and management agree, but there is no easy way to react. William Looney, an associate edi- tor at Business International, a weekly newsletter that tracks the im- pact of international events on multi- national companiess, said that a re- cent survey of companies with invest- ments in South Africa, for example, showed that foreign companies felt there was little, if anything, that could have been done, "A number of the savvier compa- nies, like Ford, have slowly been reducing their exposure there for sometime," Mr. Looney said. Earlier this year, Ford, which has been in the country for more than 60 years, merged part of its holdings with a division of the Anglo American Cor- poration. "We made our decision based on our long-term reading of the situation down there," Mr. Kelly of Ford said. Now that the risks in South Africa have become more apparent, many. J companies feel locked in. "A year ago, we weren't sure when the pro- cess of real polarization would turn into street violence and cause disrup- tions in the economy and the country in general," Mr. Rayfield said. "Now we know, but aside from lowering our long-term market forecasts, all we can really do is wait it out. Doing something drastic, like pulling out or selling out, will be much more diffi- cult now." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Y STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTICLE APPEARED 6 September 1985 ON PAGE '/d High-Stakes Lobbying' on Behalf of her a ions Grows in Washington Around Aid, Trade Issues By MONICA LANGLEY Staff Reporter of THE WALL STRIET JOURNAL WASHINGTON - Even though House and Senate conferees were deliberating on a foreign-aid authorization bill in a session closed to lobbyists, Denis Neill and Leslie Janka were lobbying hard for their clients. Egypt, Jordan and Morocco. Outside the conference room, Mr. Neill, formerly with the Agency for International Development, was meeting with law- makers and their staff as they emerged, suggesting changes in the bill to help his foreign clients. At the other end of Penn- sylvania Avenue, Mr. Janka, a former Reagan administration official, shuttled between the State and Defense depart- ments, urging officials there to weigh in on the congressional debate. By the time the conferees wrapped up the $12.8 billion foreign-aid bill at 1:30 a.m., just a week before Congress began its summer recess, Messrs. Neill and Janka were delighted that the legislators had watered down a provision to prohibit arms sales to Jordan until it negotiates a peace treaty with Israel. They also were pleased that the conferees didn't reduce aid to Morocco because of its ties to Libya, but did provide for $2.6 billion of funds to Egypt next year. Lobbying for Countries Grows Such high-stakes and finely orches- trated lobbying on behalf of countries is growing on a wide range of issues includ. ing economic aid, military assistance and international trade. Nations that used to rely on their ambassadors making the rounds on the dinner circuit increasingly are rushing to sign up this town's top lob- byists, including many former high-rank- ing government officials, and paying re- tainers of as much as $600,000 a year. Yet some worry that the growing ranks of lobbyists representing foreign govern- ments are harmful. "By hiring the elite lobbyists, foreign governments can manip- ulate the administration and Congress to act against our own national interests," charges Joel Lisker, former chief of the Justice Department's foreign-agents unit. "If not against our national security," he says, "against our economic health, with era[ to investigate some lobbyists' actions on behalf of foreign interests. Lobbying and law firms predictably are taking advantage of this swelling eager- ness by foreign governments and corpora- tions to retain Washington representation. Gray & Co., for example, a big lobbying and public-relations firm here, set up a separate lobbying unit catering to foreign- government clients. About 850 lobbying firms are registered now with the Justice Department, repre- senting "thousands" of individual lobby. ists, according to Mr. Lisker. This number has risen steadily in the past four years, he adds. And more often, high-ranking offi- cials are leaving government and lobbying for foreign interests. William Colb came out of the Central Intelli ence A enc an start re resent- 1g Sineanore at an an raz ea- gan campaign operatives Charles Black, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone have signed up Saudi Arabia, Peru, Portugal, the Bahamas, St. Lucia and the Dominican Republic. Stanton Anderson was a deputy assistant secretary of state until he left to start his own firm, now representing Japa- nese and Brazilian interests. Richard Stone, former U.S. senator from Florida, now lobbies for Taiwan. And William Ful- bright, former chairman of the Senate For- eign Relations Committee, has advised Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emir- ates. And the pay is typically higher from these foreign governments than from do- mestic clients, lobbyists acknowledge. Neill & Co. receives $360,000 from Egypt, $300,000 from Morocco and $260,000 from Jordan as annual retainers. South Africa pays $500,000 a.year to John P. Sears, for- mer Reagan campaign director, and $300,- 000 to the law firm headed by former Sen. George Smathers. Gray & Co. just renego- tiated its contract with Turkey, doubling the fee it receives, to $600,000 a year. "Foreign countries tend to pay bigger fees to lobbyists, because they are more susceptible to big names and past titles," says Thomas Quinn, a Washington lobby- ist. Congress Bewilders Them often frustrating to them because one con- gressman can stop everything," says Jo- seph Blatchford, former director of the Peace Corps and Commerce Department official, now with the O'Connor & Hannon law firm here. As foreign-country business heats up, lobbying firms are establishing areas of the world in which they claim to be expert. Neill & Co., for instance, is establishing it- self as expert in the Middle East. Edward van Kloberg of Van Kloberg & Associates says his firm "specializes in developing countries and Eastern European coun- tries." His group represents Romania, Iraq and Cameroon. Yet, some lobbyists refuse to represent countries they fear would hurt their credi- bility. "We have turned down Libya sev- eral times," says Niels Holch, a Gray & Co. vice president. "And we also refused to represent the Nicaraguan freedom fighters." Gray & Co. does represent South Korea, the Cayman Islands, Haiti, Mo- rocco, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. A group of 14 congressmen recently called on Attorney General Edwin Meese to investigate the foreign-agent disclosures made by the Washington law firm repre- senting Nicaragua. In a letter, the law- makers asserted that the firm, Reichler & Appelbaum, "may have falsified their re- cent activities report" by failing to dis- close that they "initiated, facilitated and assisted in the production and dissemina- tion" of two reports alleging human-rights violations by Nicaragua's anti-government resistance forces. Paul Reichler says his firm isn't re- quired to report that it initiated and helped carry out the reports; disclosure is re- quired only if he disseminated the reports, and he didn't, he says. The letter to the at- torney general "is obviously a political statement for 14 apologists for the Con- tras," he asserts. While representing foreign governments is generally very profitable, there can be surprises, as Mr. Blatchford, the former Commerce Department official, found. Hired by then-President Nimeiri of the Su- dan, he lost the lobbying contract abruptly when a military coup occurred early this summer. "My clients don't drop me; they get overthrown," quips Mr. Blatchford. "The next foreign country that retains me, I'm going to ask for the fee upfront." the current trade imbalance as the best ex- Lobbyists say foreign governments gen- ample." erally hire them for help before Congress, With the rapid rise in the numbers of because they find it bewildering to accom- foreign-nation lobbyists, some members of modate so many members with so varied Congress want greater disclosure to the interests to protect. "Foreign countries government on their activities. Other law- think they can handle the State Depart- makers have asked the U.S. attorney gen- ment, but Congress, on the other hand, is Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTICLE APPE~t,r Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ?1 PAGE I September 1985 DRAGONS HAVE ~0 BE IMI JD William Colby, the Colorless CIA Director, Was Tired of Battling James v Angleton, the Agency's Mysterious Counterspy. Does a Bureaucrat Get Rid of a Legend? One weekend this May, strug- gling to maintain some poise but betraying the discomfi- ture of an assistant headmas- ter whose chair had been slipped out from under him one time too many, the vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelli- gence, Senator Patrick Leahy, whistled in the media to announce his intention to launch an immediate inquiry. Despite the law's requirement and the Reagan administration's statements that at least the chairmen and vice chairmen of both the Senate and House intelligence com- mittees must be adequately informed of all covert activities, the Vermont Demo- crat was clearly worked up at the extent to which "things have fallen between the cracks. " The detonation the previous week of a car bomb in Beirut that killed more than 80 people was the direct consequence, according to the Washington Post, of a late-1984 administration directive to the Burton Hersh has been working on a book about the CIA for two years. He has written for The Washingtonian about diplomat-lawyer Sol Linow- itz and Senator Edward Kennedy; his previous books include The Mellon Family and The Educa- tion of Edward Kennedy. By Burton Hersh Central Intelligence Agency to put to- gether native teams for "pre-emptive strikes" against suspected local terror- ists. Of this initiative-promptly denied by the administration itself-virtually nothing had reached the ears of Leahy and his fellow Democrats because none of them had enough of an inkling of the administration's covert intentions to frame the right questions during intelli- gence-committee hearings. As for that car bombing? Under attack from report- ers, the magisterial Leahy had pressed for answers and "found out about it on my own. " To preclude subsequent bush- whacking, Leahy announced, "We're going to review six or seven operations. I do not want my side to get caught on a Nicaraguan-mining type problem. " It's been a decade since cataclysm came close to obliterating the Central Intelli- gence Agency; Senator Leahy's public desperation was itself a measure of how far Agency leadership had vitiated the oversight-and-disclosure process and re- turned the clandestine establishment to business as usual. Ten years ago, responding to the pub- lic's outrage at reports of broad-scale domestic mail-opening programs, drug travesties, and decades of bungled assas- sination plots, the post-Watergate Con- gress set up its first sweeping investiga- tion of the CIA since authorizing the Agency in 1947. Down bureaucratic rat holes, like so many fire-hose nozzles, the Pike and Church Committees sec- onded by the Rockefeller Commission let loose a torrent of investigators and depositions and conscience-stricken case officers and subpoenas and discovery documents and unfriendly witnesses un- til month by month the deepest cata- combs of the intelligence community were swamped to the rafters. Out into the publicity of the hour there streamed an incredible proliferation of espionage mavens and subversion impresarios, species rarely identified before, many bobtailed and indignant at such a historic interruption. Least unhappy-looking, friends of the intelligence community kept noticing, was the Agency's tidy little director. It was William Colby, after all, whose slips to newsmen had all but sounded the alarms; now he seemed blithe enough, and forthcoming at all times before the swarming investigative bodies. "Bill, do you really have to present all this material to us?" a heavv- Cnntlnued Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTICLE APPEARS ON PAGE BALTIMORE SUN 11 August 1985 Number of Soviets in U.S. called threat to security By Vernon A. Guidry Jr. Washington bureau of The Sun WASHINGTON - Operating from an imposing embassy on 16th Street here that predates the Com- munist revolution. Soviet spies gath- er Information almost openly In the halls of the federal government and more circumspectly on suburban back roads. Across the continent, in an afflu- ent San Francisco neighborhood called Cow Hollow. a seven story brick building houses the Soviet con- sulate. The American counterintelli- gence community regards It as the West Coast headquarters for the re- lentless Soviet pursuit of U.S. high technology, military and otherwise. . These are the most prominent outposts of the hundreds of Soviet and other Eastern bloc agents be- lieved to be operating In the United States. They have become increas- ingly controversial since the charges that the alleged Walker "spy ring" sold Navy secrets to Moscow for nearly two decades and the first- time ever conviction of an FBI agent for passing bureau information to the Soviet Union. The Soviets' American outposts are a source of frustration to coun- terintelligence experts and govern- ment officials who believe Washing- ton Is needlessly giving Soviet espionage a helping hand by permit- ting too many official Russians in the United States. A recent report by the Senate In- telligence Committee put it this way: The danger to U.S. national se- curity entailed by larger-than-neces- sary numbers of Soviet diplomatic and consular officials in the U.S. and Soviet personnel at our embassy and consulates in the Soviet Union re- quires immediate action." The mention of Soviet personnel in U.S. facilities was a reference to the fact that while the Soviet Union provides all Its own personnel in this country, from janitors to ambassa- dors, the United States hires Rus- sians for many jobs at U.S. facilities in the Soviet Union. The report went on to say that while administration officials say they are committed to fbdng the problem, little effort has actually been seen. In fact. President Reagan used his Saturday radio broadcast on June 29 to say the United States should 'reduce the size of the hostile intelligence threat we're up against In this country." In the same broad- cast, the president said that "we need a balance between the size of the Soviet diplomatic presence in the United States and the U.S. presence in the Soviet Union...." At the State Department, howev- er. an official involved with the issue says there's no plan to reduce the Am of the Soviet contingent in this country. As far as the balance dis- cussed by the president goes. con- sideration is b being workers U.S fadlg ties with Americans when we can afford It and it will contribute to em- bassy security." ? This has been the department's longstanding approach to the ques- tion. The Soviet Union has about 320 persons officially associated with its embassy here and consulate in San Francisco, about evenly divided be- tween diplomats and support per- spnnel such as chauffeurs and jani- tors. The U.S. counterintelligence community estimates that perhaps aP much as 40 percent of the total is composed of professional spies. " The United States has 185 Amer- icans off cially working at its embas- sy and consulate in the Soviet Union. nearly all diplomats. Moscow has not put a limit on the number of Americans It will allow, but the Cited States capped the Soviet presence here at 320 in 1980 as a response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. These figures do not count the number of Soviets assigned to the United Nations in New York or such c an- numbers as trade delega- tMns the like that allegedly have been used as covers for spies. In total, according to the FBI, there are approximately 4.300 offi- cials f!om the Soviet Union, Soviet bloc countries. Cuba and the Peo- ple's Republic of China in the United States. It Is estimated that 30 to 40 percent of them are intelligence pro- fessionals. . The arrest on spy charges of for- mar Navy warrant officer John A. Walker Jr., two relatives and a for- mer Navy colleague sent shock waves through both the military and the counterintelligence communi- ties. Mr. Walker was arrested May 21 in Montgomery County after the FBI said he left a plastic bag with classified documents for a Russian contact. That contact was apparent- ly a Soviet diplomat seen in the area of the drop, the FBI says. John Walker's brother, Arthur, was convicted Friday of seven char- ges involving espionage. The Walker case reinforces our longstanding concern about the ex- tent and scope of Soviet espionage activities in this country." said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy. D-Vt.. vice chair- man of the Senate Intelligence Com- mittee. Mr. Leahy and Sen. William S. Cohen, R-Maine, have written an amendment to the State Department authorization bill to limit the num- ber of Soviet diplomats and embassy personnel in this country to the number of Americans in similar po- sitions in the Soviet Union. , In introducing the measure to the Senate, Mr. Leahy said It would speed the reduction of the approxi- mately 200 Russians employed by the U.S. embassy in Moscow and consulate in Leningrad. It would, as well. he said. require "action to be taken to draw down the numbers of Soviet diplomatic and consular representatives in the Unit- ed States." The State Department opposed the amendment. saying the limits on its flexibility in carrying out its own staffing process "could be harmful to U.S. interests." Last week. the amendment sur- vived in the final version of the State Department authorization bill. The administration has six months to come up with a plan for evening out the numbers. it doesn't mean you're going to stop spying here," Senator Leahy told a TV interviewer. "There's no way you could pass a law to outlaw the Soviets spying here, but you could certainly cut down the number of those who have diplomatic immu- nity and give the FBI a fighting chance. Right now, they don't have that." Accordinil to William Colby, for- mer director of the Central Intelli- gence Agency, "A ood way to han- dle the Soviets is strict reCIDrOCIty. In other words, if we have 10 people. Continued Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ON PAGE - C _ WASHINGTON TIMES 5 August 1985 Monday's People Spoken word, and then some William Colby Words, words, words. Speaking is the agenda and the main order of business at the 154th annual convention of the International Platform Association today through Friday at the Mayflower Hotel. Former CIA direc- tor William Colby, former ambassador to France Evan Galbraith and magician-illusionist Harry Blackstone Jr. are among first-day speakers. By the time the IPA con- vention winds up, among those joining them at the microphone will be Joan Mondale, wife of the former vice president, Walter Mondale; Sen. Robert Dole, R-Kan.; Rep. Claude Pep- per, D-Fla.; J. Peter Grace, former CIA director Stan-4 field 1Lrner Malcolm S. Forbes Jr., Jeane Dixon, David Hartman, Dick Cavett, Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and singer-songwriter lbddy Pendergrass. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT / AR Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-009018000500060003-7 ARTr WASHINGTON POST ,~A(1.~C;L7t 4 August 1985 ff7iatDo You Do -N-MeiiYou. Get B Y I ~4 A N' B R 1` rT n v William Colby, CIA director 1973. 1976. In 1975. President Gerald Ford fired William Colby as chief of the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency. Colby stepped down in 1976. When Colby took over the CIA. he acted against such practices as open- ing citizens' mail. The agency had been looking at U.S. citizens' mail to the Soviet Union lince 1952. when. Colby says. "we were worried about atomic spies." He explains: "1 told Congress_ in a secret report ... what had gone on... I was trying to show that the CIA was not (hiding) under every bed in the country But my secret report leaked... The Nei' York Times published an article that launched a full Congressional in- vestigation. I was fired. Afterward. I wrote Honorable Men, in which I show the CIA is basically a good outfit. I'm writing a book about Vietnam. where I worked for the agency for years." He also runs an international investment consulting firm. "Sure." Colby says. "it's a shock to be tired, but it's the end of a job. not the end of your life." William Colby. Fired as director of the CIA. ire d~ STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 i DN PAGE_ July, August, Intelligence for Business Leadership By William E. Colby, General Partner, Colby, Bailey, Werner and Associates The intelligence process is traditionally con- sidered to be a system of collection of information, especially in the more exotic form of es ip onage. Since espionage is by definition illegal, one won- dgrs how intelligence can then be reconciled with business. In fact, intelligence has grown far bond its earlier identification with espionage. Today, masses of information flow to intel- ligence centers and are exchanged among them. The triumphs of modern communication and other forms of high technology have now created the information age with its ability to report instantaneously the most obscure details concern- ing most of the world. Technology has also produced new techniques for assembling and accessing information, from electronic communication to satellite photog- raphy to computer data banks. In government intelligence circles some of the techniques re- main secret, but at the same time much of the substantive information acquired is released to provide the information necessary to public debate. An example of this is current Soviet nuclear weaponry, weapons the Soviets consider secret but which we learn about through secret means and about which our Department of Defense reports to the public on a regular basis. The intelligence process also comprises a third stet), which is probably least well-developed in government, but which is easily achieved in the private sector. This is the application of infor- mation collection and analysis to the particular problem faced by the decision maker. In business, if the analysis is not relevant to the decision maker, he will not purchase the service. T the incentive for private enterprise is to focus intel- ligence support on the business leader's ques- tions. These may include specific bureaucratic, regulatory or cultural problems a business may face, as well as broader political or economic trends. The business leader is also as much inter- ested in opportunity as danger, so the business intelligence process must identify the positive as well as negative implications. The usual business situation requiring an intel- hhence assessment is an investment or acquisition abroad, reflecting a company's desire to expand September 1985 or diversify its operations into a new and promis- ing market. But before acting on the basis of a market survey alone, the prudent executive should insist on a look ahead at the political and economic environment of the market nation. The result may be more subtle than a simple go-no-go decision, as the investment may be structured to limit the investor's exposure. Or the assessment may reassure that an apparent threat, such as the election of a Socialist govern- ment, will not in fact result in nationalization. Thus the business leader has access to a vast col- lection of facts about the modern world, assisted by remarkable advances in communications, information storage, and energetic reporting ser- vices. As many business leaders can attest, how- ever, the results can be less than satisfactory as the flood of data can be difficult to order and absorb. A new industry of intelligence analysis for business purposes now exists in the United States. In all cases the process is essentially judgmental, depending upon a broad background of exper- ience not only with the area and subject but with the techniques of analysis. The process also includes the second opinion familiar to the med- ical profession, an independent assessment, ac- quired from a separate source, to check the reliability of the first judgment. When uncertain- ties exist they must be identified, even high- lighted in alternate projections of contradictory scenarios, to warn the business leader of the degree of risk he is assuming by relying on one or another judgment about a future development. For the business leader the important thing is to recognize the need for the full intelligence process as he faces a decision. He must not be satisfied with a simple assurance from his regional manager that there is a bright and happy future in a given country and that all of his friends in the Western-oriented business class feel that things are in good shape despite some problems in the countryside. Either as a function of the business operation itself or through outside consultants the decision maker must insist upon a meticulous examin- ation through the full intelligence process, i.e., collection of the information analysis of the implications, and application to the particular decision. In this way the business leader can take advantage of the enormous growth of the intel- ligence process in America in these last few decades. He can at least identify the degree of risk he faces even when he is not truly certain C" Wed Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 of a result, so that he can measure the gain he must anticipate as justification for assum- ing the risk involved. In this way he can not only demonstrate due diligence in his responsibilities, but true wisdom in his decisions. ? Jt. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTICLE AfF? Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ON FAGE~._...-~ TIME 8 July 1985 The Problems with Retaliation Fear ex-CIA chiefs weigh the options for countering terrorism he TWA hijacking have fed he desire to find some way to o to terrorists what they are oing to American citizens. threaten and perhaps take the lives of hi- jackers? Might swift retribution deter ter- rorists, or at least punish them? What about covert counterterror, the capacity to identify and eliminate terrorists, pre-emp- Navy strike team trains In California " If there are casual ties, so be i t. " tively or in retaliation? TIME Washington Bureau Chief Strobe Talbott put these questions to four former directors of the Central Intelligence Agency. All agreed that the U.S. should move vigorously and effectively to oppose terrorism but not adopt assassination as an instrument of policy. Each of the former CIA chiefs has had other experiences that bear on the current challenge. Richard Helms (Director of Central Intelligence from 1966 to 1973) spent many years in the CIA's clandestine services and was Ambassador to Iran from 1973 to 1976, so he knows about Shiite fundamentalism firsthand. James Schle- singer (DCI from January through June 1973) was Secretary of Defense from 1973 to 1975. William Colby (DCI, 1973 to 1976) ran the highly controversial Phoenix counterinsurgency program in Viet Nam from 1968 to 1971. And at the request of Annapolis Classmate Jimmy Carter, Stansfield Turner (DCI, 1977 to 1981) came to the CIA from a career in the Navy. Their interviews with Talbott follow. RICHARD HELMS It is very important to keep these inci- dents in perspective and not get so incred- ibly worked up over them. Terrorism, of course, is a serious challenge, and we must do our best to deal with it. But to declare a "war on terrorism" is just to hype the problem, not solve it. The quiet, steady approach is better than bombast. As for assassination, it's just not on. The people of the U.S. won't stand for it. In fact, there are problems with all levels of violent action. Let's say the Delta Force puts on masks and goes in and blows up an installation around Beirut. We've vio- lated the sovereignty of Lebanon and killed a lot of people in cold blood. Are they terrorists? You'll have a lot of argu- ment about that, just on our side alone. What if you send in a coup-de-main group of civilians [a hit team]? If it comes out that they were Americans-and it takes no time at all for that kind of thing to unravel in public-you're facing all sorts of allegations. If, instead, the blow-and-burn stuff is done by surrogates whom you've trained in the black arts and given a suitable cov- er, there is a whole other set of problems. If you've recruited them from dissidents who have an ideological motivation, they may be very hard to control. You may think you've called the operation off and wake up one morning and find out they've gone and done it anyway. Let's say we have reason to believe that Khomeini or Gaddafi is behind some ter- rorist act, so you decide to strike by attack- ing the Iranian oil fields or a Libyan air force base. In the latter case, you've now got all the Arabs against you. Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the moderates will feel immense pres- sure to line up with their Arab brethren. We've got to get used to the disagreeable fact that there really is no quick fix for terrorism. What we do need is improved intelligence work against terrorist groups. Penetration can help derail the nasty stuff. When I was in the agency, the CIA penetrated the P L.O., and we helped head off several terrorist acts, including an assassination attempt against Golda Meir. We also need improved cooperation among free-world intelligence services. As long as we have a leaky Congress and a leaky oversight process, friendly services Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ARTI CLE ON PAGE Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 WASHINGTON POST 24 June 1985 Controversy at Cosmos Oath Opposing Women Members Required By Sandra G. Boodman Washington Post Staff Writer The officers of Washington's posh Cosmos Club thought they had finally found a way to defuse the embarrassing controversy over ad- mission policies that has simmered for more than a dozen years. Their solution: to require prospective members to sign an oath stating they will not seek to change the bylaws that exclude women. Rather than squelching a debate its officers characterize as "un- seemly," however, the policy seems likely to revive the furor over let- ting women join the elite social club that was founded 107 years ago for "men of accomplishment." Amon _ its 3100 members are supreme Court Justice Harr A. Blackmun an William Colby, former direc- tor of---the Central me igence Aency_. TheCosmos Club is not tax ex- empt. and thus is under no legal obligation to admit women. Last year the club, located in an ornate Embassy Row mansion valued at $5.1 million at 2121 Massachusetts Ave. NW, paid nearly $104,000 in real estate taxes, city records show. Within days after the policy was announced earlier this month by the club's board of management in its eagerness to "restore a tranquil and sociable atmosphere," the Commit- tee of Concerned Members of the Cosmos Club, a group favoring the admission of women, hinted it might challenge the policy in court. A law- suit, Samuel P. Hayes, leader of the Committee of Concerned Members, warned in a recent letter to the board, "could hardly take place without undesirable publicity." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ASSOCIATED PRESS 9 June 1985 WHAT ARE AMERICA'S MOST COVETED SECRETS By HENRY GOTTLIB WASHINGTON An American Army officer once joked that a way to stymie Soviet spies woulo be to feed them all 19.6 million classified U.S. documents, requiring them to spend years sifting the entire pile _ much of it useless. While no one in the Pentagon has taken the sL!ggestion seriously, many intelligence experts agree that the key to espionage is quality, not quantity; that some top-secret leaKage harms U. S. security but much of does no damage at all What intrigues some analysts about the alleged spying by former Navy communications specialist John Walker Jr. and a band of associates is that the secrets Walker could have passed to the Soviets appear to range from very valuable to highly "perishable" information that wasn't very important. On the issue of intelligence in general, "there's no laundry list of what's the most important, but it is possible to distinguish between what is highly valuable and what is marginally dangerous if lost," said James J. Townsend, a Soviet affairs expert at the Georgetown Center for Strategic and ntP nnfiLnal Studies. Highest in value, according to Townsend, would be information that would reveal to the Soviets U.S. sources of information on what the Soviet military machine is doing. For example, the most damaging loss to U.S. intelligence would be exposure of a y'well-laced U.S. spies, in the Kremlin ..or the revelation of U.S. techni ues of direct intelligence gathering on Soviet opera ions. "The highest priority of any intelligence operation is to find out where the ;.F,aks are," Townsend said. It is for this reason that when spies are discovered, an effort is often made to turn them into double agents or dupe them into passing useless or inaccurate information to their masters. There are also electronic means of monitoring a potential enemy, and the seriousness of the Walker case stems from his possible access to codes, jamming techniques and other surveillance measures that might have helped the Soviets know how America tracks their ships, Navy officials have said. beyond the category of spy vs. spy and the question of how the United States gathers intelligence electronically, the most vital secrets are those that could inform an enemy o a U.S. mill arv vulnerability. Former CIA Director William E. Colby, in a telephone interview, referred to such information as "chinks in the armor}ter a any country woo be desperate to hide. Pentagon and Capitol Hill sources revealed on Thursday that the CIA is studying whether the Soviet Union can detect and track America's nuclear missile-firing submarines. STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 al. TI~.~~Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 P~4% NEW YORK TIMES 6 June 1985 Money Said to Have Replaced Ideology as Main Spy Motive By IRVIN MOLOTSKY Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, June 5 - "Money is the dominant reason" Americans now choose to spy for the Soviet Union, ac- cording to Stansfield Turner, a former Director of Central Intelligence. ,Admiral Turner, who served in the callgl: Adminitratsut: and o er or- 1her officials concerned with n-aTional ecurity agreed in separate interviews today that ideology was no e - - es P167 'n reason Americans commir a e as r was to S 19JQ s. They suggested it was muc more difficult to capture a spy acting for financial gain than those who do it for reasons of ideology. The current spy case involving three members of the Walker family was broken only after the former wife of one took her story to the authorities. Ideology in Rosenberg. Case Perhaps the most famous case in- volving ideology in the United States was the one that led to the execution of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, a case that still stirs sharp argument over their guilt today, 32 years after their execution. They were the only Amer- icans ever `executed in the United States after a civilian trial for espio- nage, having been convicted of trans- mitting nuclear weapons secrets to the Soviet Union. Another was the perjury conviction of Alger Hiss, a former State Depart- The arcane language of espionage: Washington Talk, page B14. merit official imprisoned when he denied charges brought against him by I Whittaker Chambers. Mr. Hiss has I long denied guilt. William E. Colbcr. who headed the Central intelligence rtkencv from ' o 1 9 7 6 , , said a is. c Philbv- uraess- ac - Uwe Arl Britain in vvoo ved-acZ.iv!. a - .curred "when a ovl u sented antifascism aria t e .were R -W off with the Hitler-Stalin nonaggression pact and later with the information provided by Nikita Khrushchev when he denounced the horrors of Stalin's re- gime, Mr. Colby said. More Potential Recruits The current investigation, involving John A. Walker and others, presents pieblems typical of those that the United States must deal with these days, the intelligence experts said. "John Walker is a money case," Ad- miral Turner said. Gene R. LaRocque, a retired admiral who is director of the Center for De- fense Information, a group often criti- cal of the Reagan Administration, said the development of spying-for-money was dangerous because the field of potential recruits is so much larger. "The ideologues are few in number," he said. "The people who want a little more cash are legion." Griffin B. Bell, the Attorney General in the Carter Administration, said changing values were also having an effect in a number of recent spy cases. "With the breakdown in values, partly because of Vietnam and partly Watergate, and a looseness in general discipline, both social and organiza- tional, secrets are held in much more contempt," Mr. Bell said. "The `me' generation and `I'll make it onmy own' have lea to recent circumstances that have beer. financially based." Asked to review the spy cases he knew about as the nation's chief prose- cutor, Mr. Bell said, "I don't know of any ideological recruits." Few Leads With Money Cases A knowledgeable intelligence source, who would not rmit use o his name, .had this appraisa : "In counterespionage, if you can identity 'geological groups, that's won-. derful. B ut when it's pure cash for sale, you :lull : have any leads. It makes searching for the agents much more opt ncult, if not impossible." Morton Halperin, a Pentagon and National Security Council official from 1966 to 1969, agreed that ideology was no longer the main motive for espio- nage and said this undercut the notion that the Government should investi- gate the ideological past of Americans. "The people convicted in the past seemed to have acted out of political reasons," Mr. Halperin said. Now, he said, it would seem to matter less that a person was once a member of the Communist or Socialist Party, or the Anericar'.r for Democratic Action. Presceution Policy Change Mr. Halperin is now director of the Center for National Security Affairs, which deals with security and civil liberties matters and has been critical of Reagan Administration policies. Another change noted by Mr. Halp- erin was that the Government was now prosecuting people who spy for money. "In the cast," he said, "the Govern- ment would make them double agents or feed tnem false information. That would cast doubt on the information they had sent previously. Also, if you prosecute, you blow your double agent." Mr. Halperin noted that it was Mr. Bell who, as Attorney General, had changed that policy. Mr. Bell said he had decided to prose- cute such cases because "I always thought we were going to have to have more sentences to do something about it." "We do need to have more trials, more examples, more long prison terms," he said, "if we are going to bring it under control." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT AUME 09 PW WASHINGTON TIMES 4 June 1985 Vernon ;Walters Debunking the image of mysterious lone wolf By Deborah Papier THE WASHINGTON TIMES he lone wolf. Furtive, mysterious; A 'creature. of the shadows, moving stealthily through those nether regions of the diplomatic world where the light of publicity never shines. % f This was the reputation Vernon Walters developed some would say cultivated - in four decades of service to the United States as a military intelligence officer, deputy director of the CIA and special State Department envoy. But Vernon ]Dick) Walters, who two weeks ago became Jeane Kirkpatrick's replacement as ambassa- dor to the United Nations, doesn't have much patience these days with that cloak-and-dagger image. "It's bunk," he says. "The lone wolf creeping around; that's an overdone legend. I've been highly visible for a long time. I could show you a box as large as this coffee table filled with cassettes of public speeches I have made in various parts of the United States. "I have not been publicity-seeking;' he continues. "I don't seek the limelight, because I find I can work more effectively if I don't. But I don't shun it either. This idea of my fleeing and hiding ... as I said at the press conference the day I was nominated, I have never trav- eled under a false name, I have never used a passport that was not made out in my name; and unlike many of the people in this room I could say that I'd never reg- istered in a hotel under any name but my own" The point that Mr. Walters wishes to make is that he is not some mole suddenly forced, at the age of 68, to adjust to a life above ground.. He does not see his new -post as representing a radical change in direction for him, but rather as a natural culmination of a long career in foreign affairs that involved him in most of the important events of our time, from the implementa- tion of the Marshall Plan in Europe after World War 11 and the founding of the Organization of American States, to the Paris peace talks with the North Vietnam- ese and the normalization of relations with the People's Republic of China. "The reason why I do not feel awestruck by this jo " says Mr. Walters, "is that everything I've been doing for many years has been in direct preparation for it. Fur 44 years I've been serving the United States all over the world. I've translated for six presidents. 1 would ven- ture to say I've probably been involved in world affairs longer than any of my predecessors in this job" "I think Walters comes to the job running full-speed," says former Secretary of State Alexander Haig, for whom Mr. Walters worked as a special envoy. "He'll have no learning process. He's fully abreast of all the international issues, has been involved in the evolution of those issues. He will garner a level of respect that may be unprecedented in the history of that post. I would anticipate he will be the most effective U.N. 'ambassador we've had in recent years" Former President Richard Nixon goes even further. saying that Mr. Walters is a "world-class strategic 'thinker," and that this skill, 'com- bined with his linguistic talents (he speaks eight languages), makes him "the best-qualified American ambassador to the United Nations since the organization was founded" Despite Mr. Walters' qualifications for the post, the course from his nomination to his confirmation was not a smooth one. He was nominated by President Reagan in early February. Six weeks later, it was reported that he was pre- pared to turn down the assignment unless he could be guaranteed the same access to National Security Council meetings that Jeane Kirk- patrick had, access that Secretary of State George Shultz evidently wished to deny him. "It was not a matter of personal pique," says Mr. Walters. "I felt that if the position were diminished my voice would be muted; and it was not in the interest of the United States to have a U.N. delegate with a muted voice. I also thought that coming on the withdrawal from UNESCO, it could be interpreted as the United States' giving up on the United Nations, turning its back on it." It is still not clear exactly how -much access to the National Secu- rity Council Mr. Walters will have, but he professes himself content with the disposition of that particu- lar issue. "I've been told that the terms of reference of my job are exactly the same as Ithose ofI my predecessor, which is perfectly satisfactory to me. A great many newspapers indi- cated that I had accepted a down- graded job, a lessened job, and that's just not true. Lu Lris>~t STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 3 .... Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ST AT Alin CLB Ap W-11R Of PAGE__7j2A.- U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT 20 May 1985 "Information Boutiques"- Intelligence a Price Former government agents, academics are striking gold by selling guidance about foreign developments to business. NEW YORK A few years ago, an ex-CIA agent walked into the headquarters of Secu- rity Pacific Bank in Los Angeles and said his new company could provide useful information. He knew, for exam- ple, that Spanish officials were lying about their country's inflation rate. "I was amazed," recalls Richard Kjeldsen, the bank's international economist. "I thought he would be talking about peo- ple running around with Molotov cock- tails-not economic affairs." Now, such visits are commonplace as former State Department officials, aca- demics and espionage agents, plus business executives with international connections, sell their expensive in- ances of international affairs to corpo- rate chieftains. His firm cloaks itself in mystery-the door to its Manhattan of- fices says merely "Suite 1100." In Washington, a multitude of one- time Central Intelligence Agency direc- tors and operatives have formed similar companies. Former CIA Director Wil- liam Colby spends part of his time work- ing for International Business-Govern- merit Counsellors, Inc. Richard Helms, another ex-director, advises clients such as the Bechtel Group on Mideast securi- ty matters. Andrew Falkiewicz, once assistant director of the CIA under George Bush, runs a company called Dunedin Corporation with five former CIA analysts. Algxander Haig, former Secretary of State, likewise trades his knowledge of foreign leaders for a fee, as do many lesser ex-State Department officials. Cox, Lloyd Associates, a New York research house, estimates that busi- nesses in 1984 spent 3 billion dollars on news and information-a figure that increases about 10 percent each year. Though the bulk of that money goes for conventional news and financial-in- formation services, Connie Cox, presi- dent, notes that scores of "information boutiques" with revenues of less than 2 million dollars now offer what could be described as private intelligence. Ob- serves Cox: "It's enough to keep a number of people living comfortably." What information is worth that kind of money? A Long Beach, Calif., orga- .nization called Business Environment Risk Information predicted in Decem- ber of 1980 that President Anwar Sa- dat of Egypt would be assassinated within a year or two. Ten months later, the prediction came true. BERI also forecast an Iraqi invasion of Iran nine months before it occurred. Yet it said India's Prime Minister Indira Gandhi stood only a 10 percent chance of assassination-adding that if she were killed, a military takeover would ensue. Gandhi was later murdered, and there was no military coup. BERI charges $144 a year for a newsletter and $400 per country for specific reports. Humble pie. Dunedin Corporation correctly forecast the results of local West German elections that led to the victory of Chancellor Helmut Kohl in sights into the' twists and turns of for- eign economic and political events: For companies needing guidance about foreign lands, there is no lack of sources- ^ A dozen large corporations- pay $2,000 a month for Oxford Analytica, an Oxford, England, service that issues electronically a daily news analysis. a InterMatrix Group of Westport, Conn., 'charges $400,000 a year for a data-base service giving in-depth assess- ments of specific issues and countries. ^ For something over $100,000 a year, Henry Kissinger will explain nu- 1982. Bank clients of Dunedin were interested in local elections because of business dealings at those levels. But Dunedin did not expect Mikhail Gor- bachev to take over the Kremlin lead- ership. "Despite the fact that we spend a lot of time dealing with the U.S.S.R., I am humble in our ability to predict things that come out of the Politburo," says Falkiewicz, who served in the For- eign Service in Moscow. Kissinger gave Merck & Company advice that France under Francois Mit- terrand would be tough on foreign businesses. At that time, the Rahway, N.J., drug firm was considering a sub- stantial investment there. Despite Kis- singer's warning, says William Van Buren, vice president and secretary of Merck, "we decided it warranted additional private investment." Sometimes, these information ser- vices wield too broad a brush for their clients. James Bisch, a senior vice president of Chase Manhattan Bank, says he would like Oxford Analytica to focus more on the business ramifi- cations of its reports. But, in general, "we're quite satisfied," he adds. Though former CIA and State De- partment people abound in these or- ganizations, they disclaim use of clandestine methods to gather infor- mation, or reliance upon contacts at, Langley or Foggy Bottom. "If asked," says Thomas Bolle of Dun- .. edin, "we tell clients we are not a conduit for confidential informa- tion." He says that Dunedin relies on the experience of senior associates who have spent a lot of time in their specific areas of responsibility." Kissinger obtains insights from his continual global travels and friend- ships with influential figures. Others such as InterMatrix have local con- tacts they query for analyses. Timing a key. Corporations pay well for information though it may be avail- able for 50 cents-the cost of a business newspaper. Timing is one reason. Many services claim to have contacts inside governments. They say they can alert clients to events before they become public. "Since day one," says Walter Wriston, former Citicorp chairman, "people have wanted to know some- thing first, whether it's a crop failure in Argentina or the amount of money the Treasury is going to raise." Citicorp is often solicited by private intelligence experts but relies on its own staff abroad. Yet many businesses do need guid- ance on unfamiliar topics or nations. Daniel Sharp, director of international relations at Xerox, says the appeal of information-consulting services is that they help his company follow the busi- ness environment abroad. A good set- Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 aR1i - ap~EQ ED WtSSHINGTON TIMES 13 May 19 85 I U Events of note Here is a selection of the many Washington events which may be making news in the week =~?1 ahead: ? Wednesday: The Andrei Sakha- rovlnstitute and The Jefferson Educational, Foundation will honor Mr. Skaharov with a con-. ference, dinner and concert (Capitol Hill). Former CIA director William Colby wili deliver a lecture at the National ~.rchives on "The-Con- stitution and the CIA." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT ~~0SS ^S_f C;' . 6. t'YLY~r WASHINGTON TIMES 6 May 1985 SOCIETY / Betty Beale Former CIA director Bill Colbv and is bride of five months, for- mer ambassador to Barbados Sally Shelton, being toasted by Esther and Jack Coopersmith. Said Bill, recently divorced from wife Bar- bara, he met Sally two years ago and tumbled. She's v.p. of Banker's Trust for Latin American business. He's now business consultant. They have an apartment in New York and house here. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 a- -~" Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Women Speak out in a Nuclear world The Majority That's No Longer Sileh By BEVERLY BEYETTE, Times Staff Writer "We sit here," the speaker said, " 30 menu 15; r o m some mis- % m the miq e o ioeria-tar- ted on os An e es. m sur t was not a frame rom "Dr. Strap clove Part I. t was the first Los An eles omens on er- ence on National ecurity, n t e s ea er, i tam . 0 y, or of the entra me i ence Qency from 1 to . was aooressin tree question: an ust e ,ussians . boosting Participation were men and that only one person, a questioner in the audience, men- tioned that none of the U.S. negoti- ators at the table in Geneva are women.) When the last speech had been presented, Lynn Greenberg of the Thursday Night Group, a Santa Monica-based nuclear education most rees f , e organization, told con of them women, "This is your chance to stop listening to experts and to become one yourself." Her appeal for ideas for constructive . . ranging informed public debate, public par- ticipation in policy-making, creates more coherence. it tends to blunt the extremes." Warnke emphasized that he was not suggesting that the public take part in the day-to-day, nuts-and- bolts decisions, explaining, "1 don't think (for example) that most Americans really feel that they have the information to determine whether or not we ought to stay in UNESCO. I think most Americans couldn't tell UNESCO from UNICEF or Uniroyal or Unisex" Issues of Survival -Inc -wiu'.-'...... e issues Warnke urday at UCLA was a 12-hour, $40 from a women, said, h course in Soviet-American to talk with Russian women, to that should engage public attention crash relations, arms control strategies, formation of study groups e and theeau sse of U.S. the pros and cons of "Star Wars," sian history, culture and politics. ' are Chary forcissues of u tion of milit the economics of defense and the I Scared. . . or believed', strategic arms policy. These are [y the issues that specter of nuclear proliferation. I The stated objective of the spore- But, bombarded of ieen? omen, wiitth peace, with survival. have to do song Committee for National Se- information, many what Ruth- W arnke added: "The sorry histo- curity, a Washington-based pri- seemed to be thinking vote nonpartisan, nonprofit group, Mead of Brentwood, a Ann book ry of the NIX (missile) certainly " expert was "to educate a broad spectrum 1 keeper company, for a lateretelevis ss pdrodudon't rely 1 on the confidence judgment of on what: those who from time to time are in issues women and to about encourage national them security to issues know who to believe participate knowledgeably~in ... I subject. .1 don't know whether thTposi,s ors' e(Strategic De- decision-making be more scared or, more re- fense Initiative) debate did not decision-making p ,r lfeved." have., as had been promised by of Dan Caldwell of CNS director Anne Cahn is on "' A prevailing theme was the. record as favoring 'a mutual Mora . importance of citizen participation pepperdfne University, the p:vro- ..Corium on the further testing indecision-making. It is vital, said technicpunchftheitlm,butitwas am, that the collective wisdom be ts. nuclear weapons" and it appeared that many at this regional forum, "the rudder" of U.S. policy. not Thomas without its its mo mo amenistant direr- had its peak attendance Cahn poured a single pebble from tor for multilateral affairs in the which 250 50 at Friday's opening ning session, , a tennis ball can into a saucepan, nth with a freeze Arms Control and Disarmament were in symp y explaining that the ping represent- Agency and, as he pointed out, the philosophy. ed the total megatonnage of all ? only political-level representative Why a women's conference on bombs dropped during World War of .the Reagan Administration; national security? One reason, II. Then, pouring a canful of peb- among the speakers, called the, Cahn said, is that it is an area.of bles into the pan with a great "Star Wars,, controversy "a mix- ? ? ? + policy-Making from which women , clatter, she said that is what is lure of good physics and ill will have traditionally been excluded. available today. of extraordinary proportions," Another is the special viewpoine Said Cahn: "We, you and I, have In the long run, litzold said, "I that women bring to debate on the r. to ask what is it all about? What is think the presidents strategic De- issue-for example, re-examining:- it all for? We have tolerated and ?' .fense Initiative is going to seem national security in the c octal of- endured. Now we need to confront conservativei the most proper how arms buildup affects social and and to change." _ -- t sense," in that it conserv es deter- It was a somewhat fragrnenteo -. forum, offering a glut, or what one speaker referred to as a "cumula- tive overlap," of statistics on guns and butter, megatonnage potential of state.of-the-art nuclear war- the Gorbachev mind-set and ds h , ea prospects for the 'arms control ? negotiations under way in Geneva (It is significant, perhaps, that- the principal conference speakers . 4,.CJ...,......-... -. - - - ana .man of the Committee for National rence as a basis for security Security, former director of the' emphasizes increased reliance on Arms. Control and Disarmament - defense and decreased reliance on Agency and in 1977x'-78 chief U.S. nuclear offense. negotiator at the SALT arms con- At the very least, he added, the 'trol talks, said: proposal provided the impetus for "I don't believe that (citizen the Soviets to return to negotia- input) is either a sign of weakness lions, on real reductions in both nor is it necessarily a formula ! strategic- and intermediate-range for anarchy. I think instead that, STAT STAT7 n Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ART I CLE GCE PAGE China-S. Korea Trade Is Booming Ships of Ex-Enemies Carry $800 Million in Goods Yearly Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 WASHINGTON POST Er1Rr.D< ')Q n-._., 1u4c By John Burgess Washington Post Foreign Service ization programs. Television sets, radios and textiles are common items. The trade began in secrecy in the 1970s, often using Hong Kong mid- dlemen and faked documents. To- day, wraps are slowly coming off, and ships sometimes sail directly between the two countries, which are only about 200 miles apart. t Commerce has grown to the point that cargo routed through Hong Kong alone in the first 11 months of 1984 was, worth at least $300 million and estimates of the total for 1984 run as high as $800 million. Trade has smoothed the way for government-to-government con- tacts. In the view of many analysts, the Peking-Seoul thaw has helped raise chances for serious dialogue between the intensely hostile gov- ernments of North and South Ko- rea, although few expect dramatic breakthroughs. If China is beginning to treat South Korea as a legitimate neigh- .. bor, the reasoning goes, it is prob- ably counseling its ally North Korea to do the same. South and North next month are to resume talks on family reunions and economic co- operation. The officials who run South Ko-.. rea's export-fueled economy still routinely refuse to discuss the trade. Nonetheless, a Korean ver- sion of China fever is taking hold in Seoul: Traders are studying Man- darin. Former CIA director William Colby was in the city earlier this year to address a seminar on Chi- na's economy. "The Koreans believe that China is the only large market left for the future," said one Seoul analyst who follows the trade closely..1 v-TOKYO-Although officially still at war, South Korea and China are now engaged in trade estimated at up to $800 million annually. The exchanges are increasingly open and they now extend beyond com- merce to official contacts.' :.,'China and South Korea fought each other during the 1950-53 Ko- rean war and have never officially made peace. But ships bearing the red star of the Chinese merchant marine can sometimes be seen at South Korean docks these days, unloading oil, coal and yarn for tex- tile factories. Across the Yellow Sea, South Ko- rean vessels are frequent callers in ports on the China coast, bringing consumer goods that China is pro- viding its people,as part of modern- c * * EXCzRPT.3MJ Special correspondent Dinah Lee contributed to this article from Hong Kong. STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 WASHINGTON TIMES 16 April 1985 Q: What's everyone else gossip- ing about? A: Al Neuharth of Gannett - which already has USA Tbday, for heaven's sake - rumored rarin' to launch a Washington DC rag... CBSer Bill Paley and journaliste extraordinaire Lally Weymouth - she's Kay Graham's daughter - as an Item... Rose Marie Bogley's "Before" party. It was flung last weekend at her newly- acquired, 706-acre Bolling Brooke estate in Virginia Hunt Country. (Remember, darlings? It belonged to Edwin Wilson the ex er ho's now in the pokey.) Washing- ton city-mice dragged on jeans and boots to trundle out there and munch chicken, admire the old slave school - soon to be a pool- house - and eyeball the knockout part-pre-Revolutionary, part-pre- Civil War mansion stripped-down to its plaster... The Little Dinner that Madisonmeister Marshall Coyne's tossing for Jeane Kirkpatrick on Thursday... The bubbly and chocolate binge Esther Cooper- smith's flinging to celebrate the hitching of ex-CIAer Bill Colby and Sa11y Shelton... The Prez bowling out to help his barber, Milton Pitts, celebrate 20 years snipping at the Sheraton-Carlton yesterday... And Nancy Reagan's Hair Man Robin Weir jumping into the fray, to pick out the Tbp Ten Best-Groomed Men In Washington. The envelope, please: President Ronald W. Rea- gan; Father Gilbert Hartke of Catholic U; Sen. Bob Dole of Kan- sas; Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia; Pat Buchanan, Assistant to the Prez; Prince Bandar, Ambas- sador from Saudi Arabia; George Will, columnist; KenCenner Peter Sellars; the lone baldie, Willard Scott the Weather Man (but.Robin doesn't say if he means with or sans the rug); and Jim Rosebush, Nancy Reagan's Chief of Staff. Madame Earie is proud of them. I And proud of Robin. And proud of his flack, Mary-Jo Campbell, who probably dreamed it up. And proud of herself, for not being too proud to use it. Another day's Gossip Quota filled! Tons more tomorrow. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 IN S, 5l~EFK 15 April 11)SS The Legacy of Vietnam 55 Days -.of Sha After 58,000 men had died, after billions of dollars had been squandered, America's crusade in Vietnam dwindled down to the rooftop rescue of a few Marines with a mob of abandoned allies howling at their heels. t was just after 6 o'clock on the morning of April 30, 1975, and only 11 Marines were left on the roof of the U.S. Embassy in Sai- gon. The door to the rooftop heli- pad was locked and barricaded, but on the other side Vietnamese pounded away at it, springing the hinges and cracking open the door. Clouds of tear gas billowed from the top of the six-floor embassy, and gunfire rattled randomly in the streets below. They are not coming back for us, thought Sgt. Steve Schuller. We really are stuck here. The man in charge, Maj. James Kean, never doubted that a helicopter would come back for his desper- ate dozen. But the Marines on the roof had no radio, and for nearly two hours there was no sign of another chopper. roof was six inches off its hinges. Kean ordered his men to throw tear-gas STAT L You have my assurance that we will respond with full force should the settiemenl be violated by North Vietnam. Richard Nixo: in a letter to President Thiez January 197. grenades into the stair-' nngsliorttnene icop- well. The ploy bought ter evacuation-and precious time, but the thus for leaving un- copter's whirling blades areas o1 ietnamese friends in the dust. sucked up the gas, mo- And Martin joins Henry Kissinger and mentarily blinding the others from the Ford administration who Marines and their rescu- blame Congress for a fatal cutoff of U.S. ers. Kean and his men military aidbefore thefinal offensive. Rich- scrambled aboard, and and Nixon is another forceful spokesman N the CH-46 lifted off. for the blame-Congress school. "When we First there was a diz- signed the Paris peace agreements in 1973, zying plunge; then the we had won the war," Nixon maintains in a m' tude and fluttered off to- tolosethepeace." -15 ward the U.S. fleet wait- There is plenty ofblameto go around. In. s Sea. Aboard the helicop- President Nguyen Van Tnieu wattled, his ter, the Marines found a opposition plotted another coup and key E PRC-25 radio. Its buzzer generals fled from the battlefield ahead of T TNOPPOSED: ENEMY TANK ATTACKS THE PALACE went off, and a laconic their troops. It is odd that few of the W ash- Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 yearsv ofv hitter divisiveness at home, America's crusade in Vietnam dwindled down to the rooftop rescue of a few Ma- rines, with a mob of abandoned allies howl- ing at their heels. Americans of the age will never forget the televised pictures of their countrymen dodging potshots from abandoned allies as they scrambled out of Vietnam. The French had left Saigon in 1954 after a flag-lowering ceremony on a parade ground; in 1975 the Americans sneaked outside after dark to lower the embassy flag for the last time. How could the enor- mous U.S. enterprise in Vietnam simply collapse like a house of cards? Why couldn't Washington at leasi negotiate a dignified withdrawal? Such questions are still alive in the minds of survivors. Merritt Stark, for years a public-health adviser in Kean remembers telling his men to lie Vietnam, lost his 26-year-old daughter, down so that they wouldn't be seen from Laurie, in the crash of a planeload of or- below. Schuller recalls that he set up phans in the final days. He is still searching a machine-gun emplacement facing the for "a number of answers" about Vietnam. door. "We knew eventually they were go- ing to break it down," he says now. "So we half-assed a gallant last stand." Someone passed around a bottle of Johnny Walker "If we got the answers," he says, this would be a lot more commemorative to [those] who died than putting up some statue or memorial in Washington." Black. Just before 8 a.m., they watched as! The art of deflectine blame reached new riot police escorted the country's latest and' heiehts after inefall of _ last president, Duong Van (Big) Minh, Saigon. In ar; early ~- down Thong Nhut Street to the Presiden- book. rant: Sne . a tial Palace. Then the Marines spotted their ormer CIA anaivstin helicopter, a CH-46. They signaled to Vietna blamed his it with smoke grenades-"everything we station chief and his had," says Schuller, "green, yellow, red." ambassador for neg- The pilot made a couple of passes, dodging 1ecting to organize an small-arms fire from the ground, and final-; orderly U. S. with- ly settled onto the pad. { drawai wniie there By now the door to the was still, time. The ambassador. Graham Martin, stili biames Washington for cut- Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 EARED 15 April 1985 STAT Senators collaborate on spy thriller WASHINGTON (AP) - A U.S. senator travels to Miami and Am- sterdam am on secret missions e- sign to unrave connections be- 7ween the assassination of John P'. Kennedy, organized crime and a renegade terrorist squad inside th walls of the Kremlin. He investigates the mysterious death of an aging Mafia chieftain and later meets with an interna- tionally known assassin. Truth or fiction? The answer begins at 3 a.m. on a pre-dawn morning in July, 1980, when real-life Senators Gary Hart and' William Cohen found them- selves drinking coffee in the Senate Dining Room, bored and exhausted during an all-night filibuster on an issue both have forgotten. Mr.' Cohen: "I said to Gary, 'If you were nova senator right now, what"-' would ,you rather be dotng?' - Mr.- Hart-I'd rather be in Ire- "'land writing a novel." Mr.-Cohen: "You can't go to ire- land, so why don't we write a And the publisher, William Mor- row and Company, remained inter- ested. Not until late last year was the final twist of plot complete, and it turns out that there is as much truth as fiction in the book. In the summer of 1975, Mr. Hart was pursuing links between the Mafia. Fidel Castro's Cuba, and the assasssination of President John F. Kennedy. Returning through Amsterdam from a trip to Moscow. Mr. Hart se- cretly arranged with then-CIA Di- rector William Colby to meet with a hired assassin code-named, QJWIN, to develop leads on the Kennedy killing. Mr. Hart's description of the at- tempted meeting closely parallels the same episode in "The Double Man," except in the fictional ver- sion the meetingactually takes place. "He [QJWIN] was living in Eu- rope at the time,'' Mr. Hart said. "Colby sent over a high level oper- ative who made contact with'_htm,.;.:? was no apparent motive for his death beyond his testimony before the Senate committee. "1 went to Miami." recalled Mr. Hart. "It was when Roselli was killed. I talked to the Miami Police Department." Mr. Hart tried to keep the trip quiet and recalls that he probably traveled under a pseudonym. "I was there less than an hour when I got a call from a reporter asking why I was there," he said with a laugh. In the book, the hero also goes to Miami w ere e uncovers evidence that the Soviet spy agency, the KGB, is competing with the Mafia by selling narcotics in the Unitect fates to raise money for terrorist acts. Mr. Hart also tried unsuccess- fully to arrange a trip to Havana for a secret meeting with Cuban Presi- dent Fidel Castro. After several meetings with the Cuban delegate to the United Nations, the effort collapsed because the State De- partment declined to cooperate. Neither author has illusions --- - --about the And so "The Double Man" was he was living in Europe." serious literary merit of born on the back of a large U.S... k` Unfortunately, professional their book. Nor Nor are there here plans for "'Senate manila envelope. ' a movie or television production. Over the next hour, Mr. Hart, a assassin got cold feet.' "It's just a hell of a good story," Democrat from Colorado, and Mr. "There were a whole series of says Mr. Hart. "We were conduct- I mysterious events, and he bolted," in an ex eriment to see whether Coheir; a Republican from Maine, said Mr. Hart. "I showed up at the g p crafted a spellbinding story send- bar where we were supposed to [ two elected officials could c when nei ing the hero, Thomas Chandler, rate on a work of fiction when neit :' throwgli a byzantine maze of suPer-. morninmortg. be. And d between he bad leandft.1" in the they one of them had ever done it power politics and murderous in- before." In the end, Mr. Hart said, the as- tdlli operations. - And when Mr. Cohen is asked if gence sassin found out that Mr. Hart was 'Mr. Hart and Mr. Cohen, who there is a moral to the novel, he re have both been members o the involved in investigations of the calls that the book opens with a CIA and decided to flee Amsterdam bomb attack by the KGB on an Senate intelligence Committee, fin- an hour before the scheduled clan- ished the story, outline all the way destine meeting With the senator. American secretary of state's Jim- ousine on a tree-line picturesque to a surprise ending that catches en, there was r. Hart's solo the reader off guard, and opens the 1 route through Washington c ed trip to Miami in 1973 to investigate _ question of whether to expect a se- the deaths of Mafia figures Creek Parkway. The secre- guel. They say not, gures Johnny: Oy-s wife is killed instead. During the four following [Roselli and Sam Giancana. Mr the moral, Mr. Cohen says g years Roselli a testified before the spe with a chuckle, is, "Stay off Rock that July meeting In the Senate cial Senate committee to invests Creek Parkway." Dining Room, the project intermit- . ! sate CIA abuses in the ]960s, j the panel. Like a Mafioso figure in interruptions; each ran for re-elec- suddenly and his body was found tion and Mr. Hart sought the presi- stuffed into a 55-gallon oil drum dency. found floating off-Florida. Mr. Hart and Mr. Cohen, who The deaths of Mr. Roselli and has published one book of poetry-. Mr. Giancana were mysterious. and has another in the works. say said Mr. Hart, because at the time that when they had the time to Mr. Roselli had retired and there work on the book, the writing went smoothly- with with no significant con- flicts. STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 NETWORK FEVER ... Gary Hart almost hit ABC's little whoop-de-do here, celebrating Ted Koppel's five years manning "Nightline." But his office buzzed first. What about the Star Quotient? they asked. Would Joan Collins or Linda Evans be there? Well, no, said the ABCers. So Gary didn't go. But it all got quite peppy anyway. Barbara Walters flew in specially, with chum Roy Cohn. The South African Ambassador and ABCer Ken Walker - who'd been to South Africa with Ted - grinned at each other. Assorted twinklies from the Soviet Embassy swapped vibes with the two newlywed ex-CiAers, Bill Colbv and Stansfield Turner. Mr. Demo, Bob Strauss, howdied with Republican honcho Frank Fah- i renkopf. Roone Arledge, the ABC news Prez, and honoree Ted Koppel languished in the receiving line for two whole hours, as acolytes tripped up bearing their drinks. "Room Service' "'cried David Brin- kley when turn as cupbearer came. (Or was it "Roone Service"? Everyone laughed and laughed, anyway.) "They put me next to the door in case I say something embarrassing - so I can be yanked back through it," said Ted. But of course, he didn't. He said super things. To Nouveau Republican Jeane Kirkpatrick: "Did they immerse you in Chablis for the. Conversion?" Tb someone else: "It's inevitable that anyone who squeezes bathroom tissue on televi- sion is going to become a celeb- rity!" As A-Listers like Cap Weinberger and John Block and Sam Pierce and Maggie Heckler trundled in, Roone waved his unlit Castro Cuba cigar. ("Peter Ueber- roth got it for me while he was try- ing to squeeze Cuba into the Olympics;' he explained.) Pollster Pat Caddell, his piebald beard all wild and whiskery, bobbed by to pay homage to the Tubers, then darted off to another party to cheer Fritz Mondale back aboard his law firm. Marvin Stone, ex-editor of US News and World Report, and Shelby Coffey, the new one, beamed at each other with wary bonhomie, like wolves who've just sorted out which one runs the pack. Arthur Miller, the legal eagle for Good Morning America, grumbled that Gossip Norma Nathan had spilled the beans on his wife suing him for divorce before he'd even gotten the papers. (That, Arthur, is what gossips are.for.) And stock gadfly Evelyn Y. Davis, who owns bits of ABC, went round flashing her very fine face-lift, and darkly warning that ABC Veeps will bite the dust by the dozen now that Capital's bought them. "How do you shut this goddam party off?" Ted finally enquired. No good, Ted. It's still humming on, somewhere in Wash- ington. Stick with Ear. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 NE YORK DAILY NEWS Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 loak and dagger frays are here to stay By JOSEPH VOLZ Washington (News Bu- reau)-The killing of Maj. j Arthur Nicholson by a Soviet sentry while Nicholson was photographing tanks in East Germany last week raises a question: Is it worth risking humans to gather intelli- gence in an age when sophis- ticated space satellites can count the shingles on a Kremlin roof? Is the human spy becom- ing obsolete? Ralph McGehee who s en nt 25 years as a field officer with the Central In. telligence Agency, answers ye "I don't think you can get anything more in the way of technical intelligence from military people than you can from various satellite pro- the ability to take pictures of anything inside a building- as Nicholson apparently was doing immediately before he was killed. THE SOVIETS also have become adept at putting together a schedule of when the satellites will fly over so they know when to wheel supersecret equipment into sheds. The United States con-I tinues to use highflying spy planes such as the SR-71 Blackbird, but they -have many of the same limitations as satellites. A high-ranking Pentagon Barmyantsev was trying to retrieve what he thought were stolen American sec- rets from a Maryland tree trunk when the FBI caught him. Yet, the cost of the U.S. military attaches working for the Defense Intelligence Agency is a drop in the buck- et compared to what the Pen- tagon spends for its huge National Security Agency operation, with headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., 20 miles north of Washington. The NSA uses at least 100,000 servicemen worldwide to STAT for intelligence analysts. They often complain that NSA supplies so much undi gested material portant items can that get lost in the deluge. There have been major foulups. One official recalled that during the Vietnam War NSA picked up a conversa- tion from North Vietnamese troops who knew a team from the south was going to infiltrate. But by the time analysts back in Washington got to look at the material, the team had already been man listening posts on the infiltrated-and killed . ground as well as on planes It Is almost impossible for and ships to tune in radio anyone to conduct on-the- transmissions and phone ground intelligence gather. calls. ing in the Soviet Union, official says of the on-the- THE ANNUAL cost for ground spy: "There is no this intelligence gathering by substitute for this kind of NSA is a staggering $10 Dl-- intelligence. You don't get as lion, compared with about good information from space $1.5 billion for the next as from being at the scene." largest snoop shop. the CIA. grams.. i tnmK miuiary La- Other officials say the ! The NSA overheard radio telligence just justifies its ' military man on the scene transmissions of Egyptian budget and manpower by -not only can snap closeups field commanders before the claiming human intelligence of new equipment but, if 1973 Arab-Israeli conflict is important" lucky enough to get close to, and knew that the war was BUT PENTAGON and say, a new tank, can also coming. State Department officials scratch it and take a sample NSA has also been able to say that on-the-ground in. of the paint---or even of the intercept virtually any mi- telligence is indispensable. metal. Studying new alloys crowave message around the Former CIA Director Wfl- used in tanks is necessary to world. Overseas messages liam v says that intelli- develop anti-tank warheads bounced off a communica- " i tions satellite can be picked ence agencies absolutely for missiles and shoulder. need borne anti-tank weapons. He told the Daily News up and sorted out by NSA. If NOT ALL of the intelli- analysts want every satellite last week, "We can get a gence gathered by human message mentioning, llit b t operatives comes during Jones, an NSA computer l f t e a great de rom sa es u clandestine missions, howev- can do it. there are subtleties of readi- er. One official noted last ness and discipline that can week that some of the best To try to do the same Job only be observed by humans. intelligence . the . United just a decade ago, the NSA Human intelligence is part of had to send FBI and defense States receives comes from intelligence agents to the the total."....... military attaches aggressive- , . Satellites;: despite- their Washington ~ ly probing ~g iron Curtain downtown corn- L ability to; take pictures and counterparts at cocktail par- offices of municatons international companies to infrared readings, have ties. pick up the carbons of every limits. The spy satellites are The Soviets, too, place m t verseas o . n essage se only over a target 15 minutes great importance on the use on each orbit. They cannot military attaches. of their take pictures from 100 miles up if the site is covered by clouds and they do not have . For example, Soviet Lt. Gen. Yevgeny Barmyantsev was booted out of the United States. in 1983 for spying. .given the closed nature of its society. Americans don't go wandering . unobserved around the country and de- fense attaches have been ex- pelled after being caught . peering over fences with their cameras. As a result, satellites end up doing much of that job. IN FACT, Defense Intel- ligency Agency estimates on just how much the Soviets are spending on defense are based not so much on work by military attaches as on satellite photos, remarkably accurate, of how many new tanks, planes and ships the Soviets have produced.. Despite their limits- though human snoopers such as military officers doing so-called legal esnio-na a and A officers hand-. ling networks of agents will remain on the U.S. vayroll for some time to come. One reason is obvious: The Soviet Union shows no inclination to retire its own spies.. THE VERY ability of NSA G ~~ A d to sweep up so many mes- to Fort Meade is a nightmare IF Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 WASHINGTON TIMES 21 March 1985 THE RISING SAP... Jingle those bells, again. Admiral Stansfeld Turner, Jimmy Carter's ClAmeister, has quietly shed Patricia, his mate of 30 years. This weekend - smack after her divorce from Sgt. John Gilbert, USAF, sailed through - Stansfeld up and married Ellie Karin Gilbert, his secretary. Ear, of course, always cheers for Amour. But it worries, too. Didn't Big Bill Colby, that other ex-Superspook, shuck a spouse exactly that way last year, before his happy hitching with Sally Shelton? Is there some Funny Substance in the Langley waterworks? Watch out, Bill Casey. Everyone else, just watch. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR 19 March 1985 INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS USIs beefing up its covert activities There is something abou does not fit our image of This attitude was expres tary of State Henry Stim down an operation that d grams on the theory th read each other's mail." But the fact is the US the not-quite-gentleman) vening in other nations' following World War II, der the table to Christi and moderate worker groups throughout West- ern Europe to help keep the region from turning to communism. Paramilitary teams of partisans were dropped behind the Iron Curtain. In the '50s, US envoy Kermit Roosevelt and a suitcase of money helped topple Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadeq, restor- ing the more pro-Western Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi to his throne. A somewhat gaudier campaign in 1954, including covert ra- By Peter Grier Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor waahktpton N the late 1940s, the US Central Intelligence I Agency (CIA) provided funding for guerrilla fighters in China, Albania, and the Ukraine section of the Soviet Union. These operations - among the first covert actions by the agency - were but minor annoyances to their communist targets. Forty years and much experience later, and half a world away, the Upited States is involved in "covert" operation, this one highly contro- versial. The country in question is Nicaragua; the US allies are an estimated 7,000 to 12,000 contras fighting their country's ruling Sandinista regime. As covert actions go, this is a modest affair. But intelligence experts say that since there is no national consensus on overall US policy in Central America, aid to the contras has raised old questions about when and where secret ac- tion is justified. It has also focused attention on the capabili- ties of US intelligence agencies, which are re- building after the budget. and staff cuts of the mid-1970s. Covert action, after all, represents only a small fraction of what US intelligence does. Today, there is much debate among ex- perts about the quality of the major portion of US intelligence work - research and analysis. "There have been some successes, and some significant improvement in the quality of US in- telligence," says a former military intelligence officer. But this source adds that there is still a tendency for reports to be too bland. The US has long been ambivalent about the means required to produce good intelligence. i property). Then came the Bay of Pigs. The US-backed partisan invasion of Fidel Castro's Cuba in 1961 was a military and propaganda flop. By the mid 1970s, these and other operations had come back to haunt the CIA. A pair of con- gressional committees, angered by what they perceived as CIA abuse of power, proposed a number of reforms, most aimed at tightening control over the agency. These committees considered a blanket ban on covert action. They backed off, however, after deciding the US did need-a foreign policy tool in between meye speech and sending in the Marines. "We decided there were circumstances where you wanted to do it," says an academic source who was a staffer on one of the panels. But the CIA, branded a "rogue elephant" by- the public investigations, was not eager to rush back into undercover actions. When President Carter took office in 1977, he inherited "zero" covert actions, according to his director of Cen- tral Intelligence, Adm. Stansfield Turner. President Carter and Admiral Turner eased the CIA back into secret operations. This pro- cess has continued under the Reagan adminis- tration and its agency director, William Casey. By most accounts, Mr. Casey is a director pre- occupied with covert action. Under his direction the CIA proposed (but did not get) such an ac- tion against the small South American country of Suriname, intelligence sources say. The largest "covert" operation currently be- ing run by the US ("It is a little bizarre to be debating covert action in public," says former CIA director William Colby)-,.ins probably its dio broadcasts and US-supplied warplanes, de- posed Guatemalan head of state Jacobo Arbenz Guzman (who had expropriated US corporate Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ON PAGE 7 1 n1LLW .LVHLA LNQUIXER 9 March 1995 U.S. negotiators leave for Geneva amid hope,, caution By James McCartney At"dw wamnston Errata WASHINGTON - President Reagan dispatched his new team of arms control negotiators to Geneva yester- day, declaring that the United States has "set out on a new path toward agreements" to "radically reduce the size and destructive power of exist- ing nuclear missiles.", , . But the President conceded in a statement at the White, House that "we should have no illusions that this will be, easy" and that "we know our differences with the Soviet Union are great." A new round of arms control talks with the Soviet Union is scheduled to open Tuesday in Geneva, 15 months after the Soviets walked out of an earlier series of negotiations. Reagan pleaded for "patience, strength and unity" as necessities for success, adding: "Like Americans ev- erywhere, I want these negotiations to succeed. ... I pray that the Soviet leadership is prepared to makt the same commitment" Since January, when the two,coun- tries agreed to resume talk, Reagan has reorganized his negotiating team. He named Max M. Kampelman, a conservative Democrat, as top ne- gotiator, with former Sen. John G. Tower (R., Texas) and veteran for- eign service officer Maynard M. Glit- man the two main negotiating subor- dinates. Reagan said goodbye to them and a large group of advisers and members of Congress: who are accompanying them, with a formal statement for television cameras. "Since the dawn of the nuclear era, all God's children have lived with the fear of nuclear war and the dan- ger of nuclear devastation," he said. "Our moral imperative is to work with all our power for that day when the children of the world can grow up without the fear of nuclear war." He said that above all, the United States seeks agreement "as soon as possible on real and verifiable reduc- tions in American and Soviet offen- sive nuclear arms." The United States, he added, is ready "to negotiate fair and equita. ble agreements reducing the dangers of nuclear war and enhancing strate- gic stability." The Geneva talks will include a new category of negotiation on de? fense and space weapons that will deal with the President.s proposal to develop a space-based missile de- fense system, the Strategic Defense Initiative, nicknamed "Star Wars." The meetings will also deal with long-range strategic arms and inter- mediate-range nuclear weaponry. The negotiators left Washington late yesterday and were expected tot arrive in Geneva this morning.. White House national security a& viser Robert C. McFarlane, who at- tended Reagan's meeting w" the negotiators, said the President told'- them that the strategic balance bed tween the two countries had gotten "out of kilter" in recent years as a result of Soviet weapons programs. He also told them that the Soviets had established "a poor record of compliance" on earlier arms control agreements but that the United States should be flexible and willin to "meet the Soviet Union halfway in. the talks, McFarlane said.. Over on Capitol Hill, the adminis. tration pressed its case for funds for the MX missile program by linking the issue to the Geneva talks, amid some signs its effort would succeed The State Department's top arms control adviser, Paul H. Nitze, warned a Senate panel that the United States would be vulnerable at Geneva without that approval Nitze told the Senate Appropria- tions subcommittee on that it is essential that "we caMplMe the Soviets that, as a and alli- ance, we"-stand uni "Congressional for the. MX will send just s h..e to Moscow," he added. it will send a strong signal of national resolve and will greatly strengthen our hand in Geneva." Opponents continued to reject the administration's effort to. link the MX vote with the edema con. trop talks. . . Former CIA Directott William emigm of-the arm control talks. And-Senate Minority Leader Rob- ert C. Byrd (D., W.Va.) dismissed the argument that rejecting the MX would send a sign of weakness to the Soviets me the same kind of "hot rhetoric" used when U.S. troops were in. Lebanon. It appeared, however, that Rea- gan's strategy was making major in- roads Into the opposition. Some con- gressional sources said the administration's tactic of linking the vote on the missile to the Geneva talks was "masterfuL" They predict- ed it would carry when Congress votes this month. "Six weeks ago I would have said the MX was dead," said one. oppo- nent. "Now I'm afraid the President is close to getting it." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 8 March 1985 COLBY JOINS FOES OF MISSILE WASHINGTON Former CIA Director William Colby on Friday joined congressional opponents of the MX missile, saying the weapon is irrelevant a t e e y ou F -0 arms Control talks beginning next week in Geneva. Colby was at a news conference along with Rep. Les AuCoin, D-Ore., another MX opponent who said the missile has become the "glass jaw" of the American strategic defense system. AuCoin compared the MX to the U.S. Navy fleet bombed at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese on Dec. 7, 1941. If the United States builds and installs the MX in Minuteman missile silos, AuCoin said this country will be saying, "Come attack me. Land a hard one on my glass jaw." Colby. now a Washington attorney, was CIA director in the 1970s. He has been a supporter of the nuclear freeze movement. He said the MX will not be a bargaining chip in the Geneva in part because only the Reagan administration, and not the Soviet Union, places a high priority on whether the 10-warhead weapon should become an integral part of U.S. strategic weapons strategy. "The Soviets have put all their emphasis an 'Star Wars,"' Reagan's proposed space-based defensive strategic system, Colby said. "They have hardly mentioned the MX." Colby disputed administration arguments that the MX is needed to bolster the American position in the arms talks. The former intelligence chief said he believes the president intends to complete production of at least 100 MXs whether or not they are vulnerable to a first-strike Soviet attack. "When they are in the ground, they will just stay there," Colby said. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901R000500060003-7 STAT pis NFl% YORK TI TS 17 February 1985 E GOAD AT HOME Anthony Lewis silence BY Lawsuit BOSTON ritain's Official Secrets Act must be one of the most thor- oughly discredited laws in the Western world. The act makes it a crime to disclose any Government in- formation without official approval, even if the purpose is to expose wrongdoing. It intimidates the press and limits public discussion of policy. Hard as it is to believe, the Reagan Administration is now trying to im- pose on the United States a replica of the Official Secrets Act. Few have no- ticed, because the Administration is moving crabwise toward that objec- tive. It is not asking Congress to pass a law: Congress would say no. In- stead it is seeking silence by an ingen- ious lawsuit. The vehicle is the strange case of Samuel Loring Morison, a Navy em- ployee who worked at an intelligence center in Suitland, Md. With the Navy's consent, Mr. Morison also did part-time work for Jane's' Fighting Ships, the annual British survey of the world's fleets, and for its paper Jane's Defense Weekly. Last October Mr. Morison was ar- rested for having sent Jane's Defense Weekly three U.S. satellite photo. graphs, classified secret, of a Soviet aircraft carrier under construction. He was charged with violating the Es- pionage Act and the law against theft of Government property. The charge is what makes this case so important. For it takes a press leak of the kind that goes on all the time in our Government and treats it as "es- pionage." If the Reagan prosecutors win on that theory, then ordinary leaking will become a grave crime and the United States will have a draconian Official Secrets Act. The Espionage Act was passed by Congress during World War Ito deal with just that: transmittal of defense secrets to an enemy. Only once before now has it been used in a journalistic context, against someone who turned over material for general publica- tion. That was the ill-starred 1971 prosecution of Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo for giving the Penta- gon Papers to the press - which was dismissed because of Government misconduct. Exactly the same is true of the law on theft of Government property. Only once before, in the Ellsberg- Russo prosecution, has there. been any claim that leaks to the press amount to stealing property. The Reagan Administration has made very clear that it wants to use the Morison case for large repressive purpose;. The prosecution, in court papers, has brushed aside the idea that it should have to prove a subver- sive intent on Mr. Morison's part, or indeed any bad motive. Even if Mr. Morison was motivated only by "a desire to expose obvious wrongdoing in high official circles," the prosecutors said in a memoran- dum, he was guilty of espionage and theft when he sent the photographs to be published. The memo brushed aside arguments that Mr. Morison must be shown to have acted with knowledge, or reason to believe, that he would be aiding a foreign power or harming the United States. The sweep of that argument is not hard to understand. The Government classifies millions of documents every year, most of them containing no real secrets. The fact that our satellites can photograph the Soviet Union foot by foot, for example, has been well publicized - and the Gov- ernment itself has published satellite pictures of such things as airports in Nicaragua. It is a commonplace of Washington life to leak classified but not truly dangerous items. The technical air- craft and space magazines are filled with them in every issue. Indeed, it is only the publication of such material that permits essential discussion of such things as new weapons. If the Reagan Administration can use the Morison case to turn leaks into crimes, it will have made a ra - cal change in the American system. William E. Colby, the former Direc- tor of Central Intelligence, said in 1979 that Congress "has drawn a line between espionage for a ioreLgn mower and simple disclosure of our foreign policy and defense secrets, and decided e latter roo ems are an accepts a cost of the lund o society we prefer." tag with leaks as a price of free- dom has not in fact weakened Amer- ican society. Just think of Britain, with its Official Secrets Act, by comparison. Has British policy been wiser with pub- lic debate on crucial issues dampened? Has Britain been more successful in stopping true espionage? The Morison case cries out for ex- planations. Why would the. Reagan Administration want the United States to adopt a failed British sys- tem? Why not go to Congress if it wants such a law? And why has the American press paid so little atten- tior4o this dangerous C Teat? ^ Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 4 r-? Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 --~~ 25 January, 1985 Ex-C.I.A. Aide Tells Jury of `Self Deception' by Q.J.S. By Al. A. FARBER M. Allen, who completed his testi- In addition to Mr. Adams, whoth irony yesterday as the second witness ! served as a paid consultant for the George W. Allen, a former deputy for CBS, said he wanted to assist the documentary, the individual defend- chief of Vietnamese affairs for the Cen- jury and the public in understanding ants in the case are George Crile, the tral Intelligence Agency, testified yes- "the responsibility that many officers producer of the broadcast, and Mike terday that the production in late 1967 i'n the intelligence community have, to Wallace, its narrator. of a "misleading" intelligence esti- insuring that honest estimates are pre- Under questioning yesterday by Mr. date on enemy strength in South Viet- rented to the policymakers." Dorsen, Mr. Allen acknowledged tell- nam was part of a broader "self decep- , Mr. Dorsen then brought out that, at ing Mr. Crile in early 1981, when the tion" by the Administration of Presi- the start of the second day of a pre-trial producer's investigation was getting dent Lyndon B.-Johnson regarding 'deposition in August 1983, Mr. Allen - under way, that he would not appear on progress in the war. had asked to have the oath "to tell the the documentary If it attacked the - Mr. Allen, testifying for CBS in the truth, the whole truth and nothing but C.I.A. Mr. Crile, Mr. Allen said, as- trial of the libel suit brought by Gen. the truth" repeated for him. It was sured hirn that that was not his inten- William C. Westmoreland, said the "the whole truth" part that he wanted tion. White House had tried to "head off "verified," Mr. Allen said then. "Did Mr. Crile tell you that 'I'm a mo inting public opposition to the war' Yesterday, Mr. Allen explained that journalist and I can't make any prom- ib tie summer of 1967 through a "mas- he told the truth on the first day of the ises till I hear all.the evidence?' " sive public-relations campaign to influ- deposition but hadn't listened to the '`Not as you worded-it," Mr. Allen ance, exaggerate and misrepresent." oath when it was read. He said he had ? said. "But he told me that he had Bath- - It was in this context, Mr. Allen said "lain awake" all the previous night ered considerable evidence against the do cross-examination in Federal Dis- "reviewing the seriousness of the situa- military and was not at that time tar- trict Court in Manhattan, that he once tion and the events of the last 15 geting the C.I.A." d rib d di esc e a spute over the enemyhh years," during wic time, he said, he strength estimate as "making a moun- had "rationalized and been evasive" tain out a molehill." regarding the 1967 estimate on enemy "I was referring to the fact that the strength in Vietnam. production of this dishonest estimate Having the oath "reaffirmed" on the was only a small part of that bigger second day of the deposition, he said, -Issue, that bigger exercise by the Ad- ,was a symbolic gesture by me-that- ministration, which in fact, caused its the time had come to stop dissembling, -loss of credibility," Mr: Allen told the , no matter what the personal embax- jury. And that effort, he said, ! rassment to me." "produced an area of self-deception to General Westmoreland's suit stems tl}e extent that neither the Congress, from a 1982 CBS documentary - "The nor members cf the Administration, Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Decep- ngr the population was prepared for the lion" - which charged that the gen- psychological impact mounted by the eral's command had engaged in a C,omrnunist forces on an unprece- "conspiracy" to minimize North Viet- dented scale" during the Tet offensive namese and Vietcong capabilities. As in January 1968. part of this "conscious effort," the Played 'the Good Bureaucrat' broadcast said, the general removed Mr. Allen. who retired from the the hamlet-based self-defense forces C:I.A. in 1979 but still works under con- tract for the agency, portrayed himself as someone who had compromised his .own integrity in 1967 and played "the good bureaucrat" until this case forced him to "cross the Rubicon" and con- front his own failings and those of the Government. But David Dorsen, a lawyer for Gen- eral Westmoreland, suggested that the 58-year-old witness had tailored his A testimony to help Samuel A. Adams, a former C.I.A. colleague who is one of the defendants at the trial before Judge Pierre N. Leval. -- Q. Isn't it a fact, Mr. Allen, that you are here testifying in order to rrom the ornciai ustmg or enemy would not permit that number to be in- strength known as the order of battle cluded in the estimate for the Presi- and refused to allow a current count for dent. them in a 25-page special estimate for Mr. Allen conceded that he had not President Johnson in November 1967. discussed the order of battle with Gen. Military 'Insignificance' eral Westmoreland in 1967 and that, un- like Mr. Adams, he had not complained General Westmoreland contends that to a review board. about the estimate the documentary defamed him by say- for the President before it was signed ing he had lied to the President and the and sent to the White House. Joint Chiefs of Staff about the true size He also acknowledged writing a draft ,,and nature of the enemy. He testified statement for an inquiry into the dis- that he deleted the self-defense forces pute in 1975 by the House Select Com- - newly estimated in 1967 at 120,000, an mittee on Intelligence in which h id e sa increase of 50,000 - because he had "'I am not aware of any instance in come to believe that they were insig- , which the C.I.A., as Mr. Adams sug nificant militarily and that reference to Bests, deliberately modified its assess- the higher number would mislead ments on Vietnam to acco .,.od to the D d d orse I l i .- not come to this court room simply to defend or come to the -aid of a beleaguered former col. ',league of mine. Like Mr. Allen, Mr. Adams favored the inclusion of the self-defense forces in the order of battle and argued, at a series of conferences with reppesenta. fives of General Westmoreland in 1967, that the total strength of the enemy should be estimated at about 500,000. The military successfully advocated a total of about 300,000 - which the docu- mentary described as an "arbitrary ceiling." Yesterday, as he had on Wednesday, Mr. Allen accused his superiors at the C.I.A. of "caving in" to the military. Mr. Allen said the military had let the C.I.A. and other intelligence agen- cies know of the higher estimate for the self-defense forces. But the important thing, he said, was that the military fore the committee that he was"able to accept the final agreed-upon figures as reflected in the estimate" in November 1967. STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 .1.- But Mr. Allen said that, under "in- ,/q, structions" by William Colby, then the / Director of Central Intelligence, he had .been "less than candid" with the com- mittee. "Make them dig," Mr. Allen said he was told by Mr. Colby and by Mitchell Rogovin, the C.I.A.'s general counsel. The remark brought smiles to the faces of both Mr. Dorsen and David Boies, the lawyer for CBS. "Had you on other occasions spoken to lawyers who gave you similar com- ments?" Mr. Dorsen asked. Not like "make them dig," said Mr. Allen. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT JACKSONVILLE TIMLS-uNLU.v ,rLJ 25 January 1985 ;Former spy master says CIA essential agency By Nancy Price Staff writer 1 "Hi, I'm Bill Colby," the bespectacled man said with a smile, reaching out to shake hands. Where were the cloak and dagger? The hidden microphones in the hotel suite? Could it be that this thin, gray-haired man with the professorial manner once parachut- ed behind Nazi lines into Norway and France, directed pacification efforts in Viet- nam and headed the Central Intelligence Agency for four years? William E. Colby seems like such a nice man. Who'd ever figure him for a master spy? ut don't be fooled by his mild-mannered demeanor. Colby started spying during World War II, and after joining the CIA, served in Stockholm, Rome, and Saigon as chief of the CIA's Far East Division. Repercussions from Watergate forced President Nixon 'to reshuffle his Cabinet, leading to Colby's appointment as CIA di- rector in 1973. Colby was removed by Presi-, dept Ford in 1976. Colby, 64, now works as an attorney in the Washington office of Reid & Priest, special- izing in international legal matters. He was in Jacksonville yesterday to speak at Florida Junior College's Kent Cam- pus" His talk, an. insider's look into the. CIA, was part of the Forecast '85 Lecture Series sponsored by the FJC Institute for Private Enterprise. Colby, attired in !a gray flannel suit and navy blue tie, admitted with dry humor that he is hardly a James Bond lookalike. "I know what you're thinking: He doesn't look like a spy, with glasses and gray hair," he told his 500 listeners. "You're thinking, 'Where's the cloak? Where's the stiletto? Where's the blonde?' ." , No, he said,.his appearance was not a cov- er. "The profession of intelligence is different than it used to be," Colby said. "And it was here in America that the changes were made." After 1945, when spying behind the Iron and Bamboo curtains became more and more difficult, the United States turned to aerial photography, first with U-2 planes. and later using satellites, he said. Hong Instead of sending a spy through Kong to the Manchurian border be- tween the Soviet Union and China, "we can look down at the tanks, the aircraft and artillery assembled there. We know when they move from time to time. We know what 100 spies could not tell us." In the mid-1970s, CIA operations underwent a metamorphosis - "we now insist on operating under the Constitution, not outside it," he said. "Congress has two committees in the House and Senate that have the right to know what the CIA is doing. We have developed a special court, so we can go before a judge and get a warrant to conduct an activity, "If we run it this way, it's clear the decisions are American decisions - not a CIA rogue elephant running loose, and not just the president act- ing. And when congressional commit- tees have put up barriers to certain activities, it has stopped certain ac- tivities." In an interview yesterday morning, Colby said intelligence gathering and analysis is an essential function of the CIA and critical for the nation. "You can't live in modern times iwithout intelligence," he said. "The CIA is needed to collect information, analyze the world and make sensible projections." Colby, who said he supports the nu- clear freeze movement, said arms ne- gotiations would not be possible with- out CIA-supplied intelligence. "So you've got to look at the plus- ses as well as the minuses," he said. A CIA manual distributed to Nicaraguan rebels that advocated .`neutralization" of enemies was a mistake, not an indication that the CIA is out of control, Colby said. "Mistakes happen once in a while," he said. "If the Air Force makes the mistake of paying $7,000 for a coffee pot, that doesn't negate the need for the Air Force." The word "neutralization" was an unfortunate choice because it has several connotations, Colby said. "In dealing with guerrilla prob- lems, you have to think in terms of discrediting the leadership," he said. "The term `neutralize' originally came from China. It didn't mean kill- ing, it meant political neutralization - putting a dunce cap on those peo- ple to be discredited and making them ride around in a cart. "It should not have been written us- ing that term, because it has a double meaning. But it's hard to control the far ends of a guerrilla war. I should know - I've been in them." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT WASHINGTON POST 22 January 1985 The Military and the News Me- dia: A Matter of Intelligence. A )ecember 1984 debate on the issue of national security vs. the public's right to know. Based on a make-be- lieve situation in which the U.S. decides to launch a secret spy sat- ellite as an arms control treaty with the U.S.S.R. nears. (Coincidentally, the real-life dilemma posed by the identical circumstances became public a month later). Among the panelists: former Sec. of State Al- Pxander Haig (who plays the pres- ident); attorney Floyd Abrams; for- mer CIA directors William Colb and James Schlesinger who nlav the Sec. of State); federal judges William Byrne Jr. and Antonin 'Scalia; CBS Broadcast Group xec- utive vice president Van Gordon Sauter (who plays himself in the mini-drama); Meg Greenfield and Fred Hiatt of The Washington Post; and Bill Kovach of The New York 'Times. 90 minutes (Channel 26 at II0). Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 3 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 YORK TIr1FS 24 January 1985 CBS Jury Told oFC.I.A. Sel(cae' en '67 J By M. A. FARBER /a George W. Allen, a former deputy chief of Vietnamese affairs for the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency, testified yes- terday that the C.I.A. had "sold out" to the military in 1967 on the issue of enemy strength in South Vietnam and that President Lyndon B. Johnson had beer given a "dishonest and mislead ix:g" estimate that fall. Mr. Allen said in Federal District Court in Manhattan that Gen. William C. Westmoreland was "ultimately re- sponsible" for "this prostitution" and that the C.I.A., by "going along with it," had "sacrificed its integrity on the altar of public relations and political expediency." As a result, Mr. Allen testified, Washington was left "essentially with an inadequate understanding of what we were up against" in Vietnam. During the Tet offensive of January 1958, Mr. Allen said, "the chickens came home to roost." He estimated that at least 400,000 armed troops took part in that attack - perhaps 100,000 more than the total enemy acknowl- edged by the military and the C.I.A. at that time. Mr. Allen said that, during 1967, he and some C.I.A. colleagues had actually argued for an enemy force estimate of about 500,000.. Mr. Allen, who retired from the C.I.A. in 1979 but still works under con- tract there, appeared as the second wit- ness for CBS in the trial of General Westmoreland's $120 million libel suit, against the network. f- 25-Page Estimate for President The suit stems from a 1982 CBS docu- mentary -"The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception" - which charged that the general's command engaged in a "conspiracy" in 1967 to show progress in the war by minimizing the size and nature of North Vietnamese and Vietcong forces. As part of this "conscious effort," the broadcast said, General Westmoreland removed the Vietcong's part-time, hamlet-based self-defense forces from the listing of, enemy strength known as the order of battle and refused to allow a current count for them in the 25-page special estimate for the President in Novem- ber 1967. Mr. Allen - . who testified Tuesday afternoon that the self-defense forces might have accounted for as much as 40 percent of American casualties in bitrary ceiling" of 300,000 on reports of Vietnam--said yesterday that it was a enemy strength. He testified that he "lie" th u its ould t th t b d l d l d h lf a ose n c no e counted accurately. "We existed," he said, "to make esti- mates." Mr. Allen seemed on the verge of lay- ing part of the blame for the C.I.A.'s "sellout" on Richard Helms, who was then Director of Central Intelligence and who signed the estimate for the President. Mr. Helms, he said at one stage, "made it clear to our staff that he was not prepared ." Judge Pierre N. Leval cut the witness off and called the lawyers to the bench for a private con- ference. Later, Mr. Allen said only that he heard Mr. Helms "express himself on more than one occasion" about the conflict with the military over the fig- ures. Mr. Helms is not expected to testify at this trial. In a pre-trial affidavit so- licited by General Westmoreland's e ete t e se y - efense forces -new estimated at 120,000 by his intelligence chief in 1967 - because he believed that they were insignificant militarily and that their inclusion at a higher number in the order of battle or the estimate for the President would be misleading. Until the summer and fall of 1967, when the C.I.A. and the military quar- reled over a new estimate, the military listed the enemy size at 298,000, includ- ing about 70,000 self-defense forces and the Vietcong's political cadre as well. i The new estimate - which George Carver, who was then chief of Vietnam- ese affairs for the C.I.A., has testified was a "compromise" - put enemy military strength at 223,000 to 248,000, excluding the self-defense forces. Moreover, the political cadre was rele- gated to a separate listing, numbered at 85,000. Yesterday, in response to a question lawyers, he said that the "disagree- by Judge Leval, Mr. Allen questioned ment" over enemy strength was not the diversion of the political cadre. war," that he was under no pressure from "the military or any other source" to accept low numbers and that the estimate he signed ,repre- sented the highest quality of intelli- gence analysis given the 'softness' of much of the data." Mr. Allen said that, in 1975, when a Congressional inquiry was conducted into the dispute, he was told by William Colby, who had succeeded Mr. Helms, to be "guarded" in his House testimo- ny. Mr. Allen recalled driving to Capitol Hill with Mr. Colby and others on the day of their appearance. Mr. Colby, he said, looked at him and said he "didn't want to put ourselves in the position of attacking the military." "I now see very clearly it was a whitewash," Mr. Allen told the jury, "and I regret I conformed." The C.I.A., he said, wanted to "sweep" the earlier conflict "under the rug." General Westmoreland, who com- manded American force$ in Vietnam from January 1964 to June 1968, con- tends that CBS defamed him by saying he had lied to the President and the Joint Chiefs of Staff about the true size of the enemy. The general denied a charge on the broadcast that he had imposed an "ar- enemy's command and not just a group of politicians carrying weapons," he said. "They would fit the term para- military, as I construe the term." Earlier in the 15-week-old trial, Lieut. Gen. Daniel 0. Graham, retired director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, testified that only 85,000 to . 90,000 enemy troops took part in the Tet offensive. Other witnesses for General Westmoreland used a similar figure. But Mr. Allen said yesterday that his figure of 400,000 troops was based on a trip he made to Vietnam in February 1968 with Gen. Earle G. Wheeler, chair- man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Philip Habib, a State Department offi- cial. The military's estimate for the units in the January offensive, Mr. Allen told the jury, was "a gross under- statement" and excluded hundreds of assaults on hamlets by forces not listed in the order of battle. Mr. Allen said he learned on his trip that in one region in Vietnam, where an intelligence officer in the field had re- ported that all but 3 of 33 enemy battal- ions had been wiped out before Tet - with the remaining 3 "cowering in sanctuary in Cambodia" - 45 battal- ions actually participated in the offen- sive "at essentially full strength." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 The New York Times/Maruyn Church George W. Allen testifying yester- day at libel trial. Y3essence," he testified, "not only ha0 of them not been wiped out, but the 33 had been reinforced by 12 more. Mr. Allen, who was calm and deliber- ate through most of his testimony, sud- denly became agitated when he re- called an incident in April 1968 involy- ing General Graham, who was then a colonel in General Westmoreland's command. By that time, Mr. Allen said, the C.I.A. had "broken the constraints" of the military and was insisting, at a con- ference in Washington, on higher enemy force estimates. But Colonel Graham, he said, "embarked on an- other rambling attempt" to portray the self-defense forces as old women and boys "and not important." Leaning forward in the witness chair and nearly shouting, Mr. Allen said he had challenged the point. "You don't really believe that," he recalled remarking. "Of course I don't, but it's the com- mand position and I'm sticking with it," he said the colonel replied. "That example of intellectual prosti- tution," Mr. Allen told the jury, was "a low point of my career - I left the con- ference." Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 ,y- 775 WASHINGTON POST 24 January 1985 O -Count Compromise Hi. t in CBS Trial, Ex-Analyst Calls CIA Agreement a Mistake /4 By Eleanor Randolph - Washington Pos!'Smff Writer NEW YORK, Jan. 23=Former CIA analyst George Allen said today that a CIA compromise almost iS years ago on enemy troop strength in Vietnam was "the mistake of-the century." Allen, a key defense witness for CBS Inc. in retired Army general William C. Westmoreland's $120 million libel suit, called a 1967 agreement between the Central Intelligence Agency and Westmore- land's command on how many en- emy troops were in Vietnam late that year "a prostitution of the in- telligence process." "I felt that my own professional integrity had been compromised by my going along with this particular estimate and that ... the agency had sacrificed. its integrity on the altar of public relations and political expediency by going along with the publication of a dishonest and mis- leading estimate,"' Allen said. Allen, 58, who was a former dep- uty chief of Vietnam affairs for the CIA and is under''contract to lecture on intelligence ethics at the agency, said he told CBS producer and co- defendant George Crile that West- moreland "had the fundamental re- sponsibility" for the "distortion of the [intelligence] process." He said Westmoreland, com- mander of ground forces in Vietnam at the time, established a "command position" that listed enemy troop totals in the 1967 official roster at about 300,000 instead, of as much as 500,000. The' higher .figure, was proposed by the CIA and some of Westmoreland's Army intelligence experts. - - Allen's firm defense of CBS came on the third anniversary of the broadcast at issue in this case. Called "The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception," the program accused Westmoreland of being part. of an alleged "conspiracy" to s= keep a ceiling on enemy troop strength figures in order to main- tain support for the war. Westmoreland, who has -argued that the broadcast defamed him in saying he. tried-to, hide the larger enemy count from superiors includ- ing President Lyndon B. Johnson, hi's testified that his officers dropped "home militia troops" from= the official enemy count because. they were difficult to count and were "civilians" or "non-soldiers." Allen said such. troops. should be considered dangerous in a the type of -war waged in Vietnam. "The mi- litia was organized in - much the same way as our own militia had been during the Revolutionary War," he-said. Allen said the importance of the troop estimate became apparent in January. 1968 when- communist -forces staged.the Tet offensive, the series of attacks against virtually every major city and military base that became for many Americans a psychological. turning point affect-, ing their support for the war. "This was the chickens coming home to roost," Allen said he told R codefendant Samuel A. Adams, who worked for Allen at the CIA in 1967 and early 1968. "Our having gone- along with - the dishonest estimate had contributed to the psychological impact on the administration of the Tet offensive," Allen said. Allen said lie spoke to. Crile . more candidly and forthrightly" off camera than during the two inter- views he gave the team working on the disputed documentary. "I had some feeling of guilt about my involvement ... and was reluc- tant publicly to acknowledge that guilt," Allen testified. "I was not proud of my own in- volvement in this," he said, speak- ing firmly to the jury. "I was not A proud of the-agency's involvement, and I just did not feel that I was pre- pared at that time to wash my own and the agency's dirty linen in pub- lic." Allen said he felt that he was un- der 'similar constraints for the. broadcast as those . her said - were imposed on-him by then-CIA Direc- tor William E. Colby in -1975 when Allen testified before the House. intelligence committee. - - Challenged later by Westmore- land's attorney, David M. :Dorsen, about his statements to that panel, Allen said Colby told him before his appearance that "we ... don't want to put ourselves in the position cf attacking the military or appearing to attack the military in order to save the agency on this issue." "I played my role on that occa- sion, I regret to say, of not breaking ranks and conforming to what I.now see clearly in my view was a white- wash," Allen said. Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 i rit IvtW TUKic I lflL 23 January, 1985 CBS Witness Links U.S. Losses to,' FARBER Senior C.I.A. Analyst By M A . . and various intelligence agencies, Mr. George W. Allen, a former deputy Mr. Allen - who served as a senior Adams and some CLA ll co ..- eagues un chief of Vietnamese affairs for the Cen- analyst at the C.LA.'s station in Saigon successfully opposed the deletion of the tral Intelligence Agency, testified yes- from 1964 to 1966, when he became self-defense f ith th d orces n e or er of bat - terday that the Vietcong's self-defense deputy head of the agency's Vietnam- tie. But it was not until early 1973,. forces may have been responsible for : ese affairs staff at Langley, Va. - said shortly before he resigned from the as much as "40 percent of American he had been Mr. Adams's "mentor on C.I.A., that Mr. Adams first publicly ,.losses" in Vietnam. ._-order of battle problems since we first accused the military of willful decep- Mr. Allen, who is 58 years old, took 'met" in January 1966. At that time, Mr. tion. the stand in Federal District Court in Adams had worked for six months of a Besides being used for the order of ,"Manhattan as the second witness for two-and-a-half year assignment on the battle, the enemy strength figures set- CBS in the $120 million libel trial Vietnamese affairs staff. brought by Gen. William C. Westmore- . "I sometimes wished I had the cour- tied upon in late 1967 were used for a 25-' land against the network. age of my convictions as Sam had," page special intelligence estimate for The suit stems from a 1982 CBS docu- Mr. Allen told the jury. "I regard Mr, President Johnson and other senior of- mentary that charged a "conspiracy" Adams as one having an unusually high ficials. That document-which listed a by the general's command to minimize sense of professional integrity." total enemy military strength of 223,000 the true size and nature of enemy Mr. Allen said that Mr. Adams's in- to 248,000 - said, in a paragraph, that r., strength in South Vietnam in the year tegrity "was commensurate with the the self-defense forces might have biblical en numbered 150,000 in 1966 and, though before the Te.t, offensive of January passage engraved in the en- declining and not "offensive military 1968. The broadcast - "The Uncounted trance to C.I.A. A . headquarters - `Ye -Enemy: A Vietnam Deception" - ac- shall know the truth and the truth shall forces," still "constitute a part of the cured the military of deliberately dis- make you free.' " overall Communist effort." toning enemy capabilities by deleting A - Earlier in this trial, George Carver, Yesterday, on re-direct examination the Vietcong's self-defense units from the chief of that C.I.A. unit, testified for by David Boies, a lawyer for CBS, Mr. the official listing of -forces known as General Westmoreland and portrayed Adams said that document was "not an the order of battle. Mr. Adams as someone who was "rel_ honest statement" of full enemy Mr. Allen, who appeared on the docu- dom in doubt, often in error." strength. mentary, is regarded as a particularly ? General Westmoreland, who com- But his interpretation was chal- impurtant witness for the network. manded United States forces in Viet- lenged on re-cross examination by Both George Crile, the producer of the _ nam from January 1964 to June 1968, David Dorsen, a lawyer for General t"r broadcast, and Samuel A. Adams, a contends that CBS defamed him by Westmoreland. former C.I.A. analyst who was a paid saying he had lied to President Lyndon Q. Are You suggesting that people consultant for the program, have told !B. Johnson and the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Secretary of Defense McNamara the jury that Mr. Allen was the "dean" about enemy strength in 1967. would not be aware that self-defense on Vietnamese issues: Mr. Allen him- Arbitrary Ceiling forces were not in the strength self said yesterday that he had more -'" totals? experience 'on Indochinese matters as , "'Ihe documentary specifically A. I believe he might be aware, but an American intelligence officer - - charged that General Westmoreland if he read that paragraph he wouldn't more than 17 years -than any other ',had imposed an "arbitrary ceiling" on get a proper idea of what those peo- -person, civilian or military. 'reports of enemy strength, mainly by ! pie did. c.,.,a' auvut ue-' On the documentary,- Mr. Allen said _der of battle, and had disregarded re- scribing the self-defense units as "mili- the removal of the "paramilitary" self- -ports from his officers of a higher Viet- tary," Mr. Adams said that "para- defense forces from the order of battle ,cong presence and a higher rate of military" might be an acceptable term twisted "our concept" of the war. , North Vietnamese infiltration than was but that he never doubted the need to "We were skewing our strategy," he , made known. include them in enemy strength totals. said on the broadcast. "We were not ac-. - General Westmoreland testified that Mr. Allen testified that the self-de- knowledging that indeed there was an- he removed the self-defense forces - fense forces "were responsible for important indigenous South Vietnam- :-then newly estimated at 120,000 - be- sniper fire, preparing booby traps and ese component; that, indeed, it was a cause they were inconsequential miii- terrorist-type grenades and sometimes civil war.'. followed Adams tarily and their inclusion in the order of they would actually engage in a fire- . r Alle Mr. to the f; 11 Dattle at a high figure would mislead g M He said Uiey were killing South -stand around ? ` yesterday, an Washington and the press. He said he Vietnamese and American troops "and hour before court adjourned. Mr. also wanted, in 1967, to "purify" the or- were terrorizing civilians. They were Adams completed his testimony by re-, der of battle by "separatinthe fight- an int y' egral part of the enem s mill- calling his many years of efforts to, e h tarv strength 11 rs - suc as North Vietnamese bring to light what he called the "em- regulars and Vietcong guerrillas - He said he recalled- ,-figures as_hieh barr military deception" inc Vietnmry of from what he called the "nonfighters," 1 as 40 percent of American losses being such as the self-defense units. Mr. Adams said the military's "dis At a series of conferences in 1967 be ; inflicted by militia self-defense ele- honest" position regarding enemy ments." strength in 1967 was the "kind of thing tween representatives of the military ~ Mr. Allen, who said he wa~ one of a that people want to put out of their dozen intelligence analysts who de- mind. vised the first American order of battle "It was the kind of thing people al- for enemy forces in Vietnam in 1962, most have to confess to," he said, tell- said he agreed with Mr. Adams that the ing of his repeated attempts to pry the military's position on enetny strength story loose from former military intel- , figures five years later was not in ligence officers and to acquire infor- I I good faith." mation that was still in classified docu- ments. Vietnam Self-Defense Force Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 -_--- TIN APPEARED 40 former director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, a former special Co!by,-i~iley, Werner Form Internationa in Ffrm Former CIA Director., 1lrationacl -Security Aide. join-l'orces in `Consortium' assistant to President Reagan for na-0 6S)r,zss WASHINGTON POST 21 January 1985 tional security affairs, and the Thunder of sev- eral investment -consulting firms. have joined forces to form a new international consulting firm. Colby; Bailey, Werner 'Associates, named for the firm's three partners, will pro- vide political,. economic and investment con- sulting services to a variety of potential cli- ents, ranging from' banks and brokerage firms to foreign governments and mule:t.auona;.cor- poratioxis. William E.. Colby, the most prominent part- ner, was CIA director under presidents Nixon and Ford. Since -then, Colby has been affili- ated with the Nexw York, law firm of Reid & Pr lest and has held -several political consult- ingpositions. These include a post with In- ternational Business Government Counsellors Inc., where he 'served as a senior advisor along with another of the. new firm's part- ners, Norman A.. Bailey'' Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 STAT STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 N1!"' YU1'U I1`'?131'.G 2U January 1)8S The Joseph Letyv rid rally favor the latter interpretation, reliving his youth. has tried to function as if it were so, rv v-e members, who can be tend to portray him ld of Allen h h ars , nearly as OR THE CENTRAL casting himself in the mo who as the opposite of an activist director: McCone A h , n Intelligence Agency W. Dulles and Ja . and its frequently flourished in the 19eS'ss and ea-rly rthesuis, as wa captive of a hose major Langley eb it embattled leader, before serious questions had been William J. Casey,_ raised, on either moral. or pragmatic is alleged, is to shield itself from con- the start of the sec- grounds, about covert action .2n a troversy. The two images overlap, in i and Reagan Admin- global scale. Like them, rather than that neither takes him very seriously he as an effective Director of Central In. ; redecessors t di , e p a like his imme istratian is more d in Washington telligence or an influence on policy, i c ze ogn been re than just the halfway mark in amara- has thorn. :Ronald Reagan is the first and beyond for having ready access either broadly on matters of national President in.12 years to take the oath to the President. Like them, he has security or narrowly on matters spe- of office for a second time, but it has not hesitated to make his voice heard cific to the intelligence community. been 16 years since a head of the as at the White House on policy distinct from intelligencemevalua- a clash of perceptions about Casey. It American intelligence community also a clash eptions last managed to continue in office tions. (Indeed, he might even be re- said what a Directorf of Geatral In surpassed next. On th ert ct, for a President who gence should be and, beyond that, from one he eesidea previous term to occasion, the in to sped, reluctantly Richard M. Nixon reluctantly values the Cabinet as a forum, he has about how ready the United States gave in to an argument that he should managed to become the first Director should be to intervene secretly - retain Richard M. Helms as Director D sal Intelligence ever to sit at poles the ly ~ and, especially, unhli Oy of Central Intelligence in order to the table as a participating _ both sides - those ofe her think res. do saieguar d the nonpartisan character member.) And like Dulles in parts great white casubordi- rector is se offs- think he is not neactive arly act-and i eenoughho of the sine , There have - been five di- iar - hw om no nates as fon"dly. known to one since, and Casey '- there is a tendency to forget the fun- rectors one has ever called nonpartisan - rer" because.of his consuming Pas- has now survived longest of them all. lion for espionage and related games damental insight that emerged from This can be regarded as a footnote, ._ Mr. Casey is believed to have im- the investigations of the 1970's: that a fluke, or an indication that the mersed himself deeply in the day-to- all directors, finally, are creatures of C.I.A. has essentially weathered the day management of clandestine the Presidents they serve. If Press- . investigations and strictures of the operations. dents dents that hear conflicts wience th what about the they world 1970's, that it has recovered much of 'Yet for an assortment of reasons do would that c believe, they have they times and changed ex- option of setting it aside. But no direc- its old effectiveness .and mystique. some personal,' others having to rather The present director, who would cats- with changing Joseph Leiyveld is a staff writer for pectations of a director - no one tor can ignore the President's goals, would suggest that official Washing- The different ways directors inter- this magazine. ton has learned to view William Casey pret their jobs reflect differences among the Presidents who picked them. - Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7 rR1 :-- , _ WASHINGTON TIMES 17 January 1985 BRIEFLY / Business Consulting firm started William E. Colby, former CIA director, has formed an international consulting firm to serve multi-national corporations, with partners Norman A. Bailey, former special assistant to President Reagan for national secu- rity and senior director of international economic affairs for the National Security Council, and Robert F. Werner, founder of the Washington Forum. The firm, called Colby, Bailey, Werner & Associates, will analyze international defense and economic activities. STAT Approved For Release 2008/04/28: CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500060003-7