DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WILLIAM J. CASEY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
13
Document Creation Date: 
December 19, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 9, 2005
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 7, 1982
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0.pdf535.69 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR DIVISION REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ? 592(b) : No. SUBJECT: DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL : INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WILLIAM J. CASEY ? In accordance with Section 592 of Title 28, United States Code, as added by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, Public Law 95-521, I, William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States, make the following report concerning the receipt by the Department of Justice of information regarding an alleged criminal violation by William J. Casey, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. 1. The Allegation. On January 7, 1982, an article'/ appeared in The Washington Post alleging that William J. Casey had lobbied public officials in the Treasury Depart- ment and the Internal Revenue Service in the period June through September, 1976, seeking changes in agency policy on behalf of a foreign client, the Government of Indonesia, 1/ A copy of the article is attached as an Appendix. Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 ^ 2 without having registered with the Attorney General as an agent of a foreign principal. 2. Statutes Involved. The Foreign Agents Registration Act ("FARA"), 22 U.S.C. ? 611-621, and its implementing Regulations require that no person may represent the interests of a foreign principal before any agency or official of the United States by seeking changes in official policy without first registering with the Attorney General. Section 618 of FARA provides that wilful failure to register as required may be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by Imprisonment for not more than five years, or both. 3. Investigation. Because the information in the article raised the possibility that 22 U.S.C. ?.618 may have been violated by a person subject to the Special Prosecutor provisions of the Ethics in Government Act, the Department of Justice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ? 592(a), conducted a preliminary investigation of the matter. In the course of the investigation, the following information was developed: a) In April of 1976, the Internal Revenue Service issued a private letter ruling to Mobil Oil Company, which concluded that certain payments to be made by Mobil to the Government of Indonesia's oil development arm, Pertamina, under proposed oil production sharing contracts would not qualify as an Indonesian "income tax" and thus could not Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 - 3 - be credited against Mobil's United States income. It was anticipated that a Revenue Ruling of general applicability would be forthcoming. Both the affected oil companies and Indonesia were concerned about the effect the anticipated Ruling would have on their contracts and the profitability of their joint ventures to develop Indonesia's oil resources. b) On May 19, 1976, Indonesia retained the law firm of Rogers & Wells to represent its interests before the Internal Revenue Service with regard to the tax credit issue. At preliminary meetings with Treasury Department officials, Indonesia was advised that the best course would be to amend its tax code and its contracts with the oil companies to conform the oil company payments with the IRS definition of a creditable foreign tax. Indonesia decided to pursue this course. c) On June 30, 1976, William Casey, then counsel to the firm of Rogers & Wells, became involved in the firm's representation of Indonesia. Over the course of the fol- lowing three months, he obtained appointments with high officials of the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service, attended several meetings as counsel for Indonesia, and made a number of telephone calls in behalf of the client. d) As many participants in those meetings as could be identified and located were interviewed in the Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 course of this investigation, including Mr. Casey himself. Relevant documentation was obtained from the Treasury and State Departments, the Internal Revenue Service and the law firm. The evidence developed in the course of the investigation indicates that Mr. Casey's representation of Indonesia was limited to efforts to obtain, as expedi- tiously as possible, an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service as to the changes that would be necessary In Indonesian oil production sharing contracts and tax code to ensure that payments made under the contracts would be creditable under the United States tax law. At all times, the fact that Mr. Casey was representing Indonesia was made clear to those officials with whom he was dealing. The evidence does not support a conclu- sion that at any time Mr. Casey sought to persuade or influence officials to change any agency policy. 4. Analysis and Conclusions. Pursuant to the Special Prosecutor provisions Act, I must determine whether Investigation or prosecution. It does not. FARA is a disclosure statute, with its focus on protection of the integrity of the government's decision- making processes, accomplished through a requirement that agents seeking to influence United States government of the Ethics in Government this matter warrants It is my conclusion further that Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 - 5 - action to the benefit of foreign clients register with the Attorney General and make certain disclosures regard- ing their receipts, expenditures and activities. The Act and its implementing Regulations define who must register and the information that must be disclosed publicly; exempt certain types of agents from registration; and define the administrative and judicial remedies and penalties appli- cable to violations. Wilful failure to register as required is subject to prosecution as a felony. Because there is no dispute that Mr. Casey was an agent representing a foreign principal before officials of United States agencies, and that he was not registered with the Attorney General, the focus of this inquiry cen- tered on whether or not his representation fell within one of the established exemptions to the registration requirement. The exemption involved in this case is the so-called "attorney exemption" codified at 22 U.S.C. ? 613(g). This section exempts from the registration and disclosure provisions of FARA: (g) Any person qualified to practice law, insofar as he engages or agrees to engage in the legal representation of a disclosed foreign principal before any court of law or any agency of the Govern- ment of the United States: Provided, That for the purpose of this subsection legal representation does not include attempts to influence or persuade agency Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 6 - personnel or officials other than in the course of established agency pro- ceedings, whether formal or informal. By regulation, in 28 C.F.R. ? 5.306(a), "attempts to influ- ence or persuade" is defined as efforts to alter official policy or influence its formulation. Thus, so long as an attorney's representation is limited to negotations with agency officials within the context of established policies and procedures, and the client's identity is disclosed to the agency officials by the attorney, there is no registra- tion requirement. The evidence developed in this preliminary investigation indicates that Mr. Casey's activities on behalf of Indonesia clearly fell within this attorney exemption. His client was disclosed to each of those agency officials with whom he dealt, and his representation was limited to negotiations to reach agreement on changes to be made in his client's production sharing contracts and tax code, in order to con- form to the IRS's policies and procedures. The evidence fails to disclose any effort to persuade the Treasury Department or the IRS to alter those policies. Mr. Casey's representation of Indonesia was open and above-board, and his disclosure of his client's identity as required by the attorney exemption to FARA is evidence of his good-faith efforts to comply with the requirements of the Act. Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 7 The specific allegations in the Post article to the effect that Mr. Casey "was advocating specific changes in tax policy" and "attempted to win a favorable policy change for Indonesia" are not supported by the evidence developed in the course of the preliminary investigation, and given the scope of the inquiry, it is unlikely that evidence to support the allegation would be developed through further investigation. In conclusion, I find that these matters have been thoroughly investigated and there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution. Therefore, I hereby notify the Court that I find this matter to be so unsub- stantiated that no further investigation or prosecution is warranted and that no Special Prosecutor should be appointed for this matter. Respectfully submitted, .4% / 1FAID ' .. ILL Ai F CH SMI Attorney General of the United States Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 APPENDIX The Washington Post, Thursday, January 7, 1982, Page A-1 Casey Lobbied Without Registering By Patrick F. Tyler suArdreum furs Ron %Priv+ Wit/ IRM J. Carey, as a private Isw? yr working for the Indonesian gov- ernment, lobbied trip officials of the Treasury Depertment it 1976 for multimillion-dollar changes in the U.S tax Iva without registering ots fonitn went. COAry, nnw Central Intellirnce Acency director, has esontendeil in pest Senate inquiries (het he per- formed limited IrP1 flervim? and attended 'informetionel meetings with Internal Revenue Service ern- riga But government dcrumente obtained hy The Washingtne Toot indicate t,hot Orel Wel Ad MCI ting litpeS4 rk (+Angry ID tu policy outside eetehlratied channels with top pout. lea! appnintem of the Ford admin. .ration, including Treasury Secre- tary William E. Simon. The iesue of whether Cami, should have registered as a foreign agent is under Justice Department review (nitrating lot frill's Senate Intell,gence Committee inquiry, ahich concluded Casey was not unfit to serve as director of the CIA. Stan- ley Sporkin, CR general counsel, hao maintained that Cocery wax pot -required to reef* as 1 idesigta Cetiy?i, ieviaentation 11 sla, ea doctrmentad by te?Okipela fmra the IRS and Aar to the cast a trirl-eft Clifford and Paul Warnke; 167,1 mer high grvermnent o.frktak Thai Were required to register ae ,kyrign agents for Algeria In 1975 AN idle tics on-vials letreet1 that the 1114i. Id met In 1971 with U.S. gleidere- anent officials In In ttlecapI. to it. ;edit* Export-Ircip:et karat to Atga. In many *Atwell, the Justice Department requires reeistration after the fact. it 1980, Preaident Ca'ter's brother, Billy, aim was forced to register for his Libyan rep. cementation, which caused emhar. remount to the edministnition. A Weyer representing a eFent, including a foreign government, In 'eatablialled pmeeeding" such sa en IRS tax ruling caw is no re. quired to register as a foreign agent, but suppoaed to register if engeiged In 'political ectivity." The law de. fine? that as any acticin intended to ?persuade or in any other way influ- ent* any agency or andel of the United Stales svith reference to kanulating, adopting or chenrini the dornestk or foreign policies of thi. !lolled States.... Diirtitno,tta and interview" with former official, ahno thnt Gnikev met firo with the treasury secretary and the eminent secretary For tax Hwy, State Department official end !Ater with lEtS otrelials, utiv IRS to put aside AA objertiona th a)e, !Mo. mien production conU.acts. with major American oil companies and the claims for tax credits for over- sees taxation. In 1b78 the IRS came around to the position favored by Indonesia. ' ? t. On July 8, /916, Cotey met with Simnn and his amittant secretary for tax policy, ehafie. M. Walker, to enlist their aid. Walker flowed the meeting by writing a July 9, 1976, memorandum to then IRS Commis- sioner Donald C...Alexinder urging him to erpedits nis tax rulings. ? In an intervorer tht week, Ale:- ander said that Simon and Walker berArne involved in the foreign tax credit question. 1 just thought the IRS out(ht to have celled them the way we saw them without regard to polithal cortaideratione." Both Siroot andlValker said ro- an* that they do not recoil the 300007-0 unkerni Approved For Release 2006/01/03Z0,61.1.VA: shoe, Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Attorney General William berth Smith. in the Wet escent policy statrinent on foreign want migra- tion, said in a ',port last fl thst his department would require seomplett public disclosure by persons &chi* for OtIJI the interests of foreign eipals where such activities are iv litical in DAWN Or bonier on the po-, btical." Casev's arriment that Issot mos required to nester as ii foreign agent centers on the 'Exemption few attorneys performing legal service., in what the law calla an 'earahiodied igen ey proceed ing ." IRS repilationa alecifically state that only U.S. taxpayers. may apply for TRS rulings in an eotablished agency pr ding, which requires a formal applicstinn and specific gib- rnivolins Casey merle no such api. cation and iretead attempted to win a favorable prilicy change for Inein. nesis by ening throogh top Trrionirv officials. Justice spokesmen Joh1?1 Roman Mid yeaterday that private levvere have an obligation In register IP ',cents df foreign clients 'when they attempt to influence or persuade rverneint nfficiale exoept in fatale fishwr! agency proceedinp.' sir other words," &well said, bar formes inure be made in a proceed ing nrther than informally up on the Hill or over the breakfast table or in private rneetinri in the executive branch. It hu to be some sort of fo- rum, such ea a court or a hearing." Another knowledgeable Justice Department official who asked not to be named said that the circum - starves deecribod in this story would normally require registration as' a Fore ign agent. elle Ind.:exist/in tax meter born in May, 191'6, when major oil corn- pen operating in Indonesia, in- cluding Texaco, Atlantic- Richfield and Mobil, were put on notice that the IRS would no lOnger.treet their "production Owing' arrangements with the Indonegan government se a foreirn tax that could be deducted from US. taxes. ? ? On June 1, WM one et Casey's partaers at Rcgere & Wells, Peter R. Tahoe wrote a letter to Treasury International Tat Coursed Robert J. Patrick Jr. to set up a meth* bRogers & Walls woe Peaked by the government of [Monads ... to ad- eke on ways to overcome the In. term! Revenue 'SeMct's objections to the profs:furs for collecting Indo- On Ji7 Owl nut WI Simon and Walker arid delivered to them a leven.page mernorendiV. The Memo gated that Cory and Reefs & Wella 'have been inertial,- pod by the Indonesian government* use OUT best efforts to develof procedure For the prompt elide: publication of a statement to, ,the effect that Indonesian ifICOOlt .. will be eligible for the for ax eign I tcredit, either in the form al a public SIRS] revenue ruling or Oh- . ferrite." The next day, WiJkir **soli 1,11. memorandum to then IRS commis- sinner Alexander telling him that the Indonesian case could have beige. ;cant influence on the foreirn op- erations of the American oil Uy. He 'sprayed his opinion that the Indonesian government befth the advice of New York legal enure ler had adequately mini:Vied ha all contrects to get in line with IRS Iv quirementa arid would be seeking eo- oonaiderstion in the neer future. tL assume that,11.3ilIkter &xis& In view of the trent:464i' irnportance of this mattet, thiejorik awning ruling roved will be kw.. dited by you: affect"' On July 14, 1916,C other Rogere & Wells attache!, er, met with Aseittant IRS Cone* t sioner John L Wither' and other IRS oriclale For 40-ns ..kiaNra conference on the Indonesian .tagoi . according to I conference ttort. ? the IRS tam.. Withers ' 'Cy that the IRS %add not press any opinion is to whether _SC not itu credit would be given tidll ? taipwr rrluestrri* kg from the service. , :?11 'Since neither Pertiunbsi ittik docreelan state oil company WI &neat& met the lite ogi1 some other entity such akellS, sial-npahy would have An ere service before we could give a det finitive &newer on the tax credit ;11 The conference fepork'srtitteo*NA.'.- 'IRS technical branch attorney &se-.It %in.; Elkhrtes. t bi!tet, Nen* which costly Fddie~ earlier to Assistant Secretary Nabs Airm crotrautad to /FtS partaten110 On July 29. Carley it Within seven page of additional informs- tion about propelled changes in the Indonesian tax structure. Former IRS nMcials said this 1 week that none of these actions were 1, part of an 'established seamy pro- ceeding" since Ca.ey's foreign client had no standing to request an IRS revenue "That's not an established army proceeding when he's going to the I iTreaeuryi secretary," said former 1IRS commissioner Sheldon S. Cohen. One IRS branch chief, John L ! Crawford, said in an Aug. 17. 1976, Interns! note. 'The memorandum I submitted by Rogers & Wells on he.I half Perlarnina ... does not at Toed any basis for a conference sottli Pertsmina's representetivec" He added, 'I think further conferences would be counter productive.* In a suheequent meeting re- quested by Casey on Aug. 30, anoth- er conference report shows that Withers' repeated his point several times. "Mr. Withers began the too- fertnce by observing that a request for a ruling (by a U.S. taxpayers ... has not been received." ? But the discussion continued, ac- cording to the conference report. 'Mr. Casey indicated that in consid- ering the oil companies' position It was impneent to Int-lone/de to de- termine what the service will require In the way of a creditable tax. 'Mr. %there responded that the service must tell the taxpayers di- rectly concerned whether the tax is creditable rather than going indirect- ly through Indonesia.' Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 The report adds, `Mr. Casey aug? Rested Indone.is ilhnuld be afforded some status to negntiatt with the 'service, citing the example of tax treaties whirh are negotiated by the foreign government although the provisinn. ariect U.S taxpayers.' But the IRS official mitereted to .Casey that a revenue ruling involv- ing a U.S taxpayer was not &miles .to a treaty between two govern: vients. Car-ey relented by saying that his las firm would "work with the oil companies to expedite aubcnission oi a ruling request." By the end of August, the IRS bed noted in its filo that it had fused Rnger. & Well.' request and continued to wait for a U.S. taxpayer to make a ironsl application to tiste an estshlishmi agency proceed- kg. Inse In was carried fig Into the Carter administration where there were high-level discuesions on whether top Treasury officials should pet involved with the IRS de- cision.rnaking process. After considering whether totals action. Assistant Treasury Secretary C. Fred Bergsten told Semetary W. Michael Blumenthal in a Sept 23. 1977, memo that, 'There are strong argument!' against intervening in the IRS deliberatiom. sit would put the U.S.. goverd- went in the questionable poititkni of politically Intervening in the tax rul- ing process for the benefit of a for- eign government," according to the memorandum. Camy's work for Worsts fol. lowed by six months his departure from the top post at the Stoops.. Import Bank, which durtm his ten- ure had supported a multimillion. &ray lending program for technical development in Indonesia In 1977, a year after the Arm began work for Indonesia &eters & Wells registered at a foreign agent because `the firm foresaw a possible need to move to an advccacy fasi? tion with respect to the IRS: or- eimiing to a letter 'supplied to The Senate corrunittee. The firm's ttg- firtration statement said the tidy partner working an the aim "me Peter Fisher. Fisher described hit activftioull. %ogle representation before rietn- inenta1 departments or arm-iota( -the United States in connection with .obtaining United Stat* foreign 112 -credit for Indonesian income Wel paid by United Stat?il eckettio- sloe On his registration forin.-c:ert". inn asked what politica/ activitlitfbe might undertake as an agent donesia. Fisher replied, 1 called upon to pre?ent facts gurnenta before appropriate mint agencies henries 6r officials wits JO- ; sped to chancre in Indonesian * laws and practices and ecceralke thereof by ouch agencies or In 1978, the IRS reinetated Or- ! eign tax credits in Indonesia. :;.? ; Staff writer Charier R. &MU emtributti to this snide, I ** Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR DIVISION IN RE REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT No. TO 28 U.S.C. ? 592(b), No. MOTION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ? 592(d)(2) FOR LEAVE TO DISCLOSE REPORT Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ? 592(d)(2), I hereby seek leave of the Division to disclose the contents of the "Report of the Attorney General Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 592(b), No. ," filed with this Court on . This report concerns the preliminary investigation into allegations that William J. Casey attempted to influence policy decisions by the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department on behalf of a foreign client, without registering as an agent of a foreign principal. The substance of the allega- tion underlying this report was reported widely by the news media. In these circumstances, I believe that it is in the public interest for the Court to grant leave pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ? 592(d)(2) to permit me to Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 2 disclose publicly the report submitted to this Court regarding these allegations. ,Respectfully sUbmitted, Dated Attorney General o the United States Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 Approved For Release 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0 2 bre T981 Mr. Casey has made the following statement after reviewing the Senate Select Comittee's report: I am pleased that the Senate Intelligence Committee, after an exhaustive investigation, has repoiled nothing which reflects on the integrity, the business practices and the ethical standards in which I have always taken pride. I look forward to continuing to work together with the Committee to improve the nation's intelligence capabilities. Approved For Re ase 2006/01/03 : CIA-RDP91-00901R000100300007-0