(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00682R000200070139-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 31, 2006
Sequence Number: 
139
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 21, 1952
Content Type: 
NOTES
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00682R000200070139-3.pdf38.18 KB
Body: 
Approved For l ase 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP91-00682E Q00200070139-3 Journal Office of Legislative Counsel Monday - 21 April 1952 1. Discussed with Lawrence Meloy, Executive Secretary of the Loyalty Review Board, the question as to whether the replies to interrogatories in Loyalty Board cases should be sworn to, and the general question of perjury in Loyalty Board proceedings. While the LRB has issued no directive, it feels that it would be preferable if replies to charges and interrogatories were notarized and any testi- mony be taken under oath. This would facilitate any perjury prose- cution by the Department of Justice. Witnesses before a Loyalty Board can be sworn by the Chairman of the Board under the statutory authority of the head of an agency to take testimony under oath in investigative proceedings, according to Mr. Melby. 2. In accordance with the instruction from DDCI, I have made corrections in the Committee copy of Mr. Dulles' testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on March 5, 1952. 3. I informed Mr. Wilson of Sen. Knowland's office (and STATINTL subsequently Mr. Gleason of Sen. Nixon's office) that STATINTL___~ Q had mad subsequently telephoned Mr. Carey to ask him to i nore the g letter. We indicated, however, that we are informing that while we are ignoring the letter, we trust that he is also informing its other recipients to ignore it likewise. STATINTL Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP91-00682R000200070139-3