CAN CIA CRATOLOGY ULTIMATELY OUTSMART KREMLIN'S SHELLOLOGY?
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 8, 2011
Sequence Number:
29
Case Number:
Publication Date:
January 10, 1985
Content Type:
OPEN SOURCE
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9.pdf | 131.25 KB |
Body:
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9
"Mi E AP"EAFED
Rn}'
iJ pp,
Can CIA Cratology
Ultimately Outsmart
Kremlin'sShellology?
Study of Crateson Soviet Ships
Is a Big Help in Espionage
If Shell Game Isn't Played
By ROBERT S. GREENBERGER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
WASHINGTON - Would James Bond
study pictures of crates to figure out what
the Russians are up to?
Not likely. Crates don't do much for the
image.
But the Central Intelligence Agency has
elevated crate espionage to a science. It is
called cratology. the tongue-in-cheek name
intelligence analysts have given to the
study of crates and other containers used
by the Soviets or their allies to ship mili-
tary hardware around the world.
Currently, cratologists are keeping a
close watch on some crates that arrived at
the Bulgaria Black Sea port of Burgas last
July. The analysts believe the crates,
shipped from Libya, contain five L-39
Czechoslov akizr. aircraft that may be
bound for Nicaragua. Keeping track of
these crates on photographs is easy be-
cause the Libyans built the crates from
two different shades of wood. "They're a
piece of cake to pick up." one U.S. Official
brags.
Original Development
Cratologists have been monitoring such
shipments ever since Moscow started de-
livering arms to Third World nations al-
most three decades ago. Experts study pic-
tures, usually taken by surveillance satel-
lites at different angles, to determine the
dimensions and shapes of crates. They
then compare the crates with similar pack-
ages they have seen earlier whose contents
have been identified.
Sometimes, cratolog:sts build scale
models of the packages and their sus-
pected contents to see whether the cargo
would fit in the container. Such models
were used during the 1962 Cuban missile
crisis to help convince President Kennedy
that the cratologists' assessments were ac-
curate.
Cratology has played a largely secret
role in several other U.S.-Soviet diplomatic
flaps. During a routine examination of sur-
veillance photographs in 1978, analysts no-
ticed something unusual about crates being
loaded aboard ship at a Soviet Black Sea
port. Cratologists knew that, most Soviet
aircraft are broken down into three sec-
WALL STREET JOURNAL
10 January 1985
tions for crating and shipping: a crate for which the early findings were discussed
the wings, one for the fuselage and a third somebody said, "Hey, we've invented a
for the tail assembly. Some of the crates new science here-cratology!"
showed the characteristics of MiG-21 pack- Mr. Cline says that his analysts also
ages, yet the crates were larger. discovered that the tents used by Soviet
New Model of MiG personnel in Cuba were different from the
Intelligence analysts tracked the ship as Cubans' tents, which had a one-foot-wide
it traveled south to the Mediterranean Sea gauze ventilation band around the top. U.S.
and across the Atlantic to the Cuban port analysts using surveillance photographs,
of Cienfuegos. When the crates were un- therefore, could track the movements of
packed, intelligence sources on the ground the Russian technicians in the field who
confirmed the cratologists' suspicions: The were assembling the missiles. "We began
Cubans had received MiG-23 aircraft, a calling it tentology," Mr. Cline quips.
more advanced fighter than the MiG-21 Officials don't like to discuss cratology
i that hadn't yet been introduced into the for fear of revealing too much information
i Western Hemisphere until then. The arri- about their surveillance, photo-analysis
amount of flutter in the Carter administra-
tion," a former intelligence official says.
If cratology has a father, it probably is
Arthur Lundahl, who retired in 1973 as di-
rector of National Photographic Interpre-
tation Center. Mr. Lundahl, who did photo
capabilities. To the dismay of the intelli- I
gence community, that secrecy was
pierced in early November when certain
government officials leaked reports that
crates containing MiG-21s might be on
their way to Nicaragua.
interpretation for the Navy in World War The crates had first been photographed
II, was recruited by the Central Intelli- by satellite in late September at the Soviet
gence Agency in 1953 to organize the port of Nikoloyev, but then a heavy cloud
agency's photographic-intelligence activi- cover obscured the satellite's view for
ties. He set up shop above a Ford auto three days, according to intelligence offi-
dealership in Washington. "It was a flea- cials. When the next pictures were taken,
bag place," he recalls.
Photographic technology has advanced
so far that cameras on today's satellites
and spy planes can photograph details as
small as the numbers on a license plate
the crates were gone and a ship laree i
enough to accommodate them below deck,
the Bakuriani, also had left port. When the
ship headed for the Nicaraguan port of
Corinto in early November, stories about
Photo reading, at the same time, has its suspected cargo were leaked. However,
'
t unloaded in Corinto.
evolved into "photo-grammetry. ' or the the crates weren
science of discerning exact dimensions
from photographs. And analysts who spend
part of their time studying photographs of
crates and other containers have been
dubbed cratologists.
In the mid-1950s, the Soviets began ship-
ping arms to Egypt, Syria. Ghana and
other Third World clients. Most of the ship-
ments consisted of the same items: MiG
aircraft, T-34 tanks and artillery pieces.
Because these items were bulky, they were
transported above deck, packed in crates,
making them easy targets for the CIA's
photographic eyes. Analysts began catalog-
ing these items and soon were able to iden-
tify them from the crates.
In 1962, analysts studying satellite
photos of crates being shipped to Cuba by
the Soviets gave the Kennedy administra-
tion its initial warning that a major arms
buildup was under way. Dino Brugioni, a
CIA photo analyst at the time, says crato- I
logists identified shipments to Cuba of Ko-
mar guided-missile patrol boats, MiG-21s
and IL-28 "Beagle" bombers. Alerted by
these early signs, U.S. intelligence ana-
lysts discovered in mid-October that Mos-
cow was delivering missiles to Cuba,
touching off the Cuban missile crisis.
Ray Cline, then deputy director of the
CIA, recalls that at a staff meeting during
the recent crate crisis" Some analysts
speculate that the Soviets, pressured by
the publicity, decided the delivery would
be too provocative. Other analysts say the
crates were never loaded on the ship.
Rather, they say, the photograph showed
crates of MIGs being returned to the So-
viets for repairs, a common practice for
Third World nations.
A third theory suggests that the Soviets
may, at times, turn the science of crato-
logy to their advantage. Richard Helms, a
former CIA director, speculates that per-
haps the Soviets have converted cratology
into a giant shell game, in which they
move empty crates about in an effort to
test U.S. reactions., Even as you read this,
the shellologists may be busily at work in
the Kremlin.
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP91-00587R000100030029-9