ORD MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 8-10 OCTOBER 1980

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP91-00452R000100170014-5
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: December 20, 2016
• Document Release Date: May 16, 2006
• Sequence Number: 14
• Publication Date: September 9, 1999
• Content Type: MIN

Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-00452ROO0100170014-5
ORD MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
ATTENDEES:
pD/ORD , C/ACS
C/PATG ORD
Secy/CSP Recording Secy
STAT
STAT
The meeting began by citing the promotion recommendations. It was agreed
by the Board that this matter be discussed later in the session.
Following, the Board evaluated grades GS-04 throw h GS-14 under the evaluation
system using new worksheets. A copy of the worksheet (blank) is attached. These
evaluation worksheets are to be used by the supervisor when counselling the employees
as to his/her evaluation. These worksheets are not to be part of the official
personnel file; they can, however, be kept in the Office's "soft file." These
worksheets are only to be kept for a year (1) then destroyed.
Chairman C/CTG
was recommended for a promotion.
this. DD/ORD _asked if a PAR had been done on F_
gave the procedures for
UISB said "no."
presented the evaluations for CS personnel. He explained these
worksheets had-limited views.
was recommended for promotion. The Board concurred.
evaluation was deferred to the next CSP meeting due to her short time in mon hs).
C/CTG suggested that the Agency's recruiters concentrate more on the
D/ORD suggested that before the recruiters get
discourage possible candidates coming to us because of rumors of being "stuck." It
was agreed that C/CTG and C/PATG formulate new ideas for upward mobility slots in
ORD.
Discussion then followed concerning why it was important to have the past rankings
while viewing for the present rankings. It was agreed that it would be helpful for
the next CSP to have the past rankings available.
STAT Both
short time in uiu.
evaluations were deferred due to their
DD/ORD suggested more attention be given toward modernizing the registry. The
Panel concurred in directing more responsibility for the Registry. Consequently,
EO/ORD has instructed C/Registry/ORD how to disseminate the cable traffic for ORD.
The Panel tasked C/SB with obtaining a petty cash fund for the Office.
The Panel agreed not to send the C/ICB/MS' slot to the MI Career Service. It
was agreed that C/PATG would talk to in regard to transferring the incumbent
to FOI/PA Division. Other posse i ities mentioned: the job duties of FOI
r or ORD be transferred to the second position within ORD Registry. The
Panel agreed to pursue this in a limited sense. Because the FOI/ORD position was
less than a full-time job another possibility came to light in that it could be
combined with the Admin. Officer's duties.
XR~ TEAT,
ill" go L
STAT
STAT
Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-OO452ROO0100170014-5
 A nnor L ?fi r- STAT
STAT Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-00452R000100170014-5
The Panel recommended that the Security Officer be rntatod to
th, rr:__
ano
/
and OS as to the needs for a Security Officer in relation touORDcanddCS' needtfor/aS
security officer. ORD's Security Officer should have an AWP that is in terms of a
team of two and the spectrum of those jobs. It was suggested that the GS-07 position
do some of the SO's job duties. This would be advantageous as an outlook for the
GS-07 as an ISSD career trainee. It was agreed to re-do the AWP for the SO's job
in three weeks.
the gob responsibilities and his rotation. If doesn't want to STAT
ro a e, then go to Security for another rotatee EO
OR
y. a e e directly responsible to
CS/ORD, have an open-ended rotational date, adhere to industrial security and in-house
ORD security needs, and that his AWP be written in ORD. EO ORD will discuss with
-,- ?_-w ., . , ?a -11y3 w i to regara Lo absences. I STAT
geographically inspects the various security installations. Specifications were cited
by the Panel for the next detailee from Securit ? th t h b
Discussion followed as to the participation of the GS-15 Division Chiefs, in
regard to the evaluations of the GS-13's and 14's. They will present and answer
questions but will not have decision authority.
Discussion followed about the GS-15 evaluations from Category II to III and
their sensitivity in question that they may be STS material someday. DD/ORD suggested
a letter from D/ORD to all GS-15's informing them that their evaluations were available
if they wanted to see them. The evaluation worksheets were not done on the GS-15s
STAT (except C/CTG cited the se '
GS-15s o si e e o i c e om problems facing ORD for the
STAT Sooner or later the e slots
for these should be recov ou a ncum ents. If the offices where
these people are want to retain them, ORD would get the slots back. DD/ORD noted
that ORD has done its share of downgrading and discussed why ORD has had more
flexibility in downgrading and in promoting against our headroom.
C/PATG surfaced the grade point in comparison to the full-time/part-time ceilings.
Positions are allocated by number. Part-time positions are counted as dollars.
Example: OTS situations cited their contractors (in number) and these were more than
staffers and it was not counted against their ceiling.
The Panel agreed to discuss the clearancac - 4. _ ,_L _ STAT
9 October 1980
The Panel members explained to the Division Chiefs of their contribution toward
their evaluation of the 12's through 14's.
The Panel agreed to change the agenda and discuss the information flow in the
Front Office. Several suggestions were surfaced and discussed; C/ACS initiated this
topic. The information retained in the front office should be limited and filed
properly. D/ORD agreed to discuss this with EO/ORD will also provide guidance. STAT
1 t was suggested that a `"" ""a `" ""'~. w i Sri regara to
part-time deal might be benefi
i
l
c
a
. C/CTG agreed to ook
into this possibility. DD/ORD suggested the retirement route. It was felt by the
Panel that this matter be resolved and not reoccur at each CSP meeting. If ranked
STATCategory IV, send a letter.
The training issues and procedures will be discussed back in the Ames building
at a later date.
Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-00452R000100170014-5
 Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-00452R000100170014-5
The next ORD/CSP meeting will be held in April 1981.
Date
Attachments:
1. Blank ORD Comparative Evaluation Worksheet
2. List of ORD Personnel Evaluations
ecutive Secretary
e Panel/ORD
t Wf 00 POP/
,0 lk ft
Date
U a Y
Approved For Release 2007/10/23: CIA-RDP91-00452R000100170014-5