VIETNAM: NEAR-TERM OIL PROSPECTS
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001-2
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
S
Document Page Count:
6
Document Creation Date:
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date:
March 19, 2012
Sequence Number:
1
Case Number:
Publication Date:
May 14, 1987
Content Type:
MEMO
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001-2.pdf | 241.39 KB |
Body:
25X1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
Central Intelligence Agency
DATE
_ _6J03
DOC NO /1 g-_2
OIR -2-
P $ PD
DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE
14 May 1987
Vietnam: Near-Term Oil Prospects
Summary
Vietnam began exporting oil this year, but we doubt that output
from the Vietnamese-Soviet joint venture in the South China Sea will
reach a level high enough in the next few years to substantially ease the
country's economic woes. Although we have sketchy information on
Vietnamese oil reserves, our analysis of similar nearby Southeast Asian
fields suggests that, at current prices, Hanoi may produce 10,000-20,000
barrels per day (b/d) by 1990; current production is around 5,000 b/d,
Production in this range would provide
some $40-$75 million in export earnings enabling Vietnam to boost
imports of much-needed capital goods.
The impact of oil production on the Vietnamese economy will
depend on how much Hanoi chooses to-retain for its energy-starved
economy and on what claims Moscow lays to the output--factors that
may hold Vietnamese exports to 50 percent or less of production. Perhaps
This memorandum was prepared by Office of East Asian Analysis.
Information available as of 13 May 1987 was used in its preparation. Comments and
queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Indochina, Thailand, Malaysia -
Branch, Southeast Asia Division, OE
EA M 87-20093
25X1
25X1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
most important, from Hanoi's perspective, is whether Moscow reduces the
50,000 b/d it supplies to Vietnam as Vietnamese output rises.
Oil Production Claims Versus Reality
Hanoi's extravagant projections for its oil, following the start of production late
last year, have generated misleading press reports about Vietnam's oil production and
export potential. For example, a recent Japanese article claimed that Vietnamese oil
output would increase from 40,000 b/d this year to 200,000 b/d by 1990. Many such
reports apparently were based on Hanoi's projections last December, when the
Vietnamese said they anticipated an initial production rate of 40,000 b/d, increasing to
60,000 b/d by 1990, which would be enough to cover domestic consumption.
Adding to the unrealistically high expectations for oil production have been a
recent flurry of Vietnamese discussions with potential Japanese trading firms and
Singaporean refiners that, in our view, gave an inflated impression regarding the volume
of exports Hanoi envisions. the volume of exports
mentioned by Hanoi most often has been 40,000 b/d. We believe
Hanoi and the Japanese firms have failed to reach an agreement thus far because of the
small amount of Vietnamese crude likely to be available in the short term.
Hanoi is nonetheless making progress in boosting oil production.
current production is roughly 5,000 b/d, up from last year's average of
800 b/d. Vietsovpetro, the joint venture company set up by Moscow and Hanoi to
develop Vietnam's offshore energy resources, has five producing wells in the Bach Ho
field located about 65 miles southeast of Ho Chi Minh City (see map).
Production at Bach Ho however, is not progressing as rapidly as Hanoi would like,
according to press reports:
? Numerous delays and equipment problems have slowed development. For
example, drilling platforms function only one of every three days, and
Vietsovpetro has been slow to install essential production equipment such as gas
flares and oil-water-gas separators.
? Soviet performance is also hindered by lack of access to seismic studies and
results of drilling programs that Western oil companies conducted in the area
during the early 1970s.
? Exploiting the Bach Ho field is apparently proving beyond Soviet offshore oil
capabilities. Much of the Soviets' offshore experience is limited to the Caspian
Sea, which is relatively shallow and poses few problems. On the other hand,
undetected geological faults and large volumes of natural gas in the South China
Sea require specialized equipment and expertise.
25X1
25X1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
Boundary representation is
not necessarily authoritative
Hainan
Dao
Bach Ho oilfield
developed by
Vietsovpetro
joint venture
company
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001-2
Western industry experts believe that without a major increase in technological
know-how--which the Soviets are unable to provide--the Vietnamese will encounter
difficulty raising output much beyond 40,000 b/d. So far, however, only India's Oil and
Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) has signed an agreement, Hanoi's first with a
non-Communist country, to assist Vietnam in developing its oil and gas reserves.
Negotiations are in progress on the terms of a contract allowing ONGC to explore three
offshore blocks Hanoi is offering.
A Tough Choice: Export or Consume?
Hanoi seems to have decided to export as much as possible even though
Vietnam's manufacturing and agricultural production are hindered by lack of fuel.
According to press reports, industry is operating at less than 50 percent of capacity and
the harvesting of this year's spring crop was delayed in part because of fuel shortages.
Open sources indicate that Vietnam's oil consumption is about 50,000 b/d, nearly all of it
supplied by the Soviets, but probably a third goes to support military operations in
Cambodia.
We believe the need to earn foreign exchange was the deciding factor in Hanoi's
calculation to export most of its oil. New equipment and spare parts are needed to
upgrade the country's antiquated factories, while fertilizers, insecticides, and farm
machinery are needed to increase agricultural production. Vietnam is unable to import
these items because of a serious lack of hard currency; Vietnamese exports are primarily
agricultural products and handicraft items that generate less than $100 million annually
in foreign exchange. Hanoi's foreign exchange reserves were about $10 million at the
end of 1985, according to the IMF.
Impact on Vietnamese Economy
Much of the impact of oil exports on the Vietnamese economy will depend on the
share taken by the Soviets. Under the terms of the original agreement, Vietnamese oil
production will be divided 60-40 in Hanoi's favor for 30 years following initial
production. Moscow's oil quota was to cover costs associated with Vietsovpetro and as
partial payment for past aid.
Unless Moscow reduces its oil shipments to Vietnam, oil exports will provide a
much needed lift to the struggling Vietnamese economy by easing Hanoi's foreign
exchange constraints. Except for a few sporadic or trial shipments, Vietnam is not likely
to start exporting oil regularly until production reaches 10,000 b/d
In our judgment, that could occur as early as the end of 1988. Over the
next few years, production will probably range between 10,000 and 20,000 b/d, with 40
percent going to Moscow. Assuming the Vietnamese exported all of the remainder at a
price of $17 per barrel, some $40 and $75 million in hard currency could be generated
annually.
25X1
25X1
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001- -
Distribution:
Original - OEA/SEA/ITM
1 - Richard Childress, NSC
1 - James Kelly, NSC
1 - Bob Reed, NSA
1 - Dottie Avery, State
1 - Mike Paulson, State
1 - Paula Causey, State
1 - Rena Epstein, State
1 - David S. Lambertson, State
2 - Byron Jackson, Commerce
1 - Doug Mulholland, Treasury
1 - Robert Emery, Federal Reserve Board
LTC Richard Rice, Pentagon
LTC William Wise, Pentagon
Dr. Karl Jackson, Pentagon
LTC Ed Haydash, Pentagon
Lonna Ekimoff, Energy
D/DCI/DDCI Executive Staff (7D6015)
DDI (7E44)
NIO/EA (7E62)
PDB Staff (7F30)
CPAS/ILS (7G15)
CPAS/IMC/CB (7G07)
D/OEA (4F18)
C/OEA/SEAD
DC/OEA/SEAD
OEA/SEA/IB
OEA/NEA (4G43)
OEA/CH (4G20)
Senior Review Panel (5G00)
NIO/Economics (7E48)
OEA/Production Officer (4G48)
OGl/SRD/RAB (3G31)
C/DDO/EAD(5D 10)
C/DDI/PES (2G25)
7 C/NIC 7E62)
NIC/Analytical Group (7E48)
FBIS
FBIS
OIA
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90T00114R000200400001-2
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2
~oA1
1 - DDI Rep, CINCPAC
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/19: CIA-RDP90TO0114R000200400001-2