WHITE HOUSE DIDN'T PROMPT CISPES PROBE, FBI AIDE TELLS SENATE PANEL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90M00005R000800050003-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 28, 2012
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 24, 1988
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90M00005R000800050003-1.pdf90.05 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/28: CIA-RDP90M00005R000800050003-1 Office oi current rroauction and Analytic Supporta, CIA Operations Center News Bulletin , THE WASHINGTON POST PAGE : 8 24 FEB 1988 ITEM N5. 2 White House Didn't Prompt CISPES robe, FBI Aide Tells Se ate Panel By Jim McGee %stemma Pat Staff Writer A top FBI official told the Senate intel- ligence committee yesterday that no one in the White House prompted or encouraged an FBI investigation of a group that was publicly opposed to Reagan administration policy toward El Salvador. Testifying under oath before a panel that was openly skeptical at times, Oliver B. Revell, executive assistant director of in- vestigation, offered a spirited defense of.the FBI's probe of the Committee in Solidarity With the People of El Salvador (CISPES), rejecting any suggestion that the invest). vice's purpose WRS political spying. - 'Nothing could be further from the truth," Pe%ell taith-He-said the Federal Bureau of InvfEtigiticn has probed "a number of groups on :he other side of the political spectr_ne The FBI's conduct in the CISPES case is under ...Twiny by two congressional com- mittees and by FBI inspectors. Yesterday's hearing was prompted by the release Jan. 27 of 1,200 pages of FBI files, which showed that field agents had collected the names of church groups, college student organizations and unions that the bureau said were involved with CISPES. Agents also had photographed participants in public gatherings involving the group. Acknowledging that "we may have seen ? some wavering over that line" between a le- gitimate investigation and political spying, Revell testified that there was a legal basis for the probe: circumstantial evidence in 1983?which the FBI never documented..... thatCISPES members were sending money to the Farabundo Marti Liberation Front (FMLN), the main insurgent group trying to overthrow the government of El Salvador. The FBI classified the FMLN as a terrorist group in El Salvador and suspected that FMLN members were involved with bomb- ings in Washington in 1983-84. Because of CISPES' professed support for the FMLN, Revel asserted, It was important to gather intelligence about the two organizations. "Althoughour two-year counterterrorism investigation failed to lead to indictments of CISPES members, we did find indications that some CISPES members were at least discussing and planning violence," he testi- fiecL .? He listed several examples, based on in- formation he said was provided by FBI sources: One CISPES member was "tasked to determine response times of emergency services in a major American city"; another member "stated he had developed a system to shut down a public utility in a major mid- western city, as well as plans to violently disrupt the 1984 Republican convention." Revell did not elaborate. * After Revell's prepared statement, some panel members questioned whether the FBI's decision to conduct the probe under foreign counterintelligence /guidelines gave the bu- reau too much latitude. "There is a real straining to justify your investigation," said Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), asserting that the agency should have proceeded "on tan- gible evidence," not unconfirmed allegations. In June 1985, the Justice Department determined during a required annual review that the investigation had not produced enough evidence to warrant its continua- tion. It was closed two weeks later. Revell said the bureau had acted prop- erly. "Those in the FBI responsible for au- thorizing the counterterrorism investiga- tion believed information which had been brought to their attention that CISPES v..as acting as the agent of [the FMLNI The predication for the investigation was based upon what was known at the time.' But Sen. William S. Cohen (R-Maine), vice chairman of the Select Committee on. Intelligence, said the effect of the CISPES investigation was to impinge on the rights of U.S. citizens: "Whatever the rationale ... it resulted in the FBI subjecting many Americans and U.S. organizations to var- ious types of scrutiny without any basis oth- er than the exercise of their First Amend- ment rights.' ? Among the 1,200 pages of documents re- leased so far are several that show FBI head- quarters attempting to curtail the flow of in- formation about CISPES' political activity. A July 26, 1984, teletype sent to field of-- fices said: "Political activities or political lob- bying by CISPES ... are not, repeat not, tar- gets of this investigation and should not be monitored.' Some field offices, however, con- tinued to supply such information. On Oct. 17, 1984, a second teletype laid out specific guidelines for gathering information. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/09/28: CIA-RDP90M00005R000800050003-1