LETTER TO EDWARD J. MALONEY FROM W.B. JACK

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 22, 2012
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 28, 1987
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7.pdf121.24 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7 AW William B..Jadt - 1120 201h Street, N.W. District Menper Washington. DC 20036 Federal Systems Phone (202) 457-2906 May 28, 1987 Mr. Edward J. Maloney Office of Information Technology Room 2D00 Washington,,,DC 20505 to. ~ Dear M Maloney: I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and your organization to discuss your recent dissatisfaction with AT&T service. As promised in the meeting, I have attached an escalation procedure and organization chart for future reference. AT&T appreciates CIA's dependence on reliable communications and prompt corrective action of service anomalies. I assure you our entire team is dedicated to providing you with the best service that can be had thus our motto "AT&T - the right choice." I am personally dedicated to your satisfaction and support of meeting your critical national security needs. Feel free to call me day or night if I can assist you in anyway. Sincerely, w Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90GO0993R000300320002-7 Ccntral Intdh ncc Agency 19 MAY 1987 I fully unders At there a been problems associated with the T-1 STAT circuits at issue, However, in the interest of good customer relations and national security, I expected a very aggressive AT&T posture and a responsive restoration of service. Instead, I have seen a less aggressive posture and a prolonged communications outage. STAT Mr. William Jack District Manager/Special Accounts American Telephone and Telegraph 1120 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 I an writing to express my extreme dissatisfaction with the service we have been receiving from AT&T. On 17 April 1987 the responsibility for our T-1 connection from the CIA Headquarters Building to another facility was transferred, per divestiture regulations, from Bell_Atlantic.-to--AT&T. -Since that transfer of responsibility, we have been experiencing a complete outage of this carrier-provided communications. This Agency is heavily invested in AT&T for communications carrier services. We rely on good communications and prompt, responsive correction of communications anomalies. Our experience with AT&T service in the past has been very positive, reflecting a corporate commitment to meeting our communica- tions needs. Inasmuch as this particular outage continues, I would like to meet with you personally to review your planned actions to resolve this matter and receive your assurance that future outages of circuits critical to our mission will be escalated to the appropriate level in your management chain such sooner than in this instance. I look forward to our meeting. Edward J. Maloney STAT C/USNA/CSG/OI1 Director of Information Technology (18May87) Distribution: Orig - Addressee 1 - D/OIT 1 - USNA Chrono 2 - OIT Registry Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90GO0993R000300320002-7 STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90GO0993R000300320002-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90GO0993R000300320002-7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7 Explanatory Notes Subject: Self-explanatory - include ODP number if applicable. Purpose: What will action accomplish, e.g., "Reply to letter from OMB," "Obtain DDA approval to spend $100M," "Comply with periodic reporting requirements," etc. Action Officer: Name, organization, extension. References: List of pertinent references. Copies should be attached in order listed. Resource Package and Costs: Identify the Resource Package and total costs for each fiscal year if the action involves funds. Routing: Who should see the action, whether for information, comment, concurrence, or signature/approval. The individual reviewing the action should initial and date where indicated. Place an "x" under the appro- priate column for each component. If concurrences are contained on record copy of action, simply refer to the action. Discussion: Narrative discussion of action - what led up to the action, why is it necessary, what do you want done. The pertinent references should be explained insofar as they relate to this action. If the ac- tion itself contains all this information, simply refer to the action. Signature of Action Officer: Sign and date form. Classification: Mark at the top and bottom of page, as appro- priate. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/22 : CIA-RDP90G00993R000300320002-7