BRIEFING OF CONGRESSMAN DON EDWARDS ON AGENCY POLICY AND USE OF ACADEMICS AND SCHOLARS BY CONTRACT TO CONDUCT STUDIES OR EVALUATE MATERIALS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90B01390R000801080030-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 8, 2011
Sequence Number: 
30
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 14, 1986
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90B01390R000801080030-0.pdf104.66 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP90BO139OR000801080030-0 OCA 86-1812 14 May 1986 SUBJECT: Briefing of Congressman Don Edwards on Agency Policy and Use of Academics and Scholars by Contract to Conduct Studies or Evaluate Materials 1. On 14 May 1986 representatives of the Agency met with Congressman Edwards in his office at his request to provide an unclassified briefing on the above subject. Representing the Agency were: H. Boatner (DDI), (OCA). Accompanying Representative Edwards were Catherine LeRoy, Counsel to the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights and James Demsey, a staff member of that subcommittee. Congressman Edwards chairs the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights. 2. Using the answers that we provided to Edwards in his previous letter of inquiry concerning CIA contracts with academics and scholars for various studies, Ms. Boatner explained the four types of contracts we utilize and the circumstances under which each is us of the contract categories included the type used to emplo at Harvard University. This led to a discussion of the DDCI's speech at Harvard regarding Agency policy and practice in contracting work by academics and scholars for studies and evaluations. The subcommittee staff had thoroughly reviewed the DDCI's statement and asked two questions, both of which were answered satisfactorily. 3. Mr. Nelson was interested in the number of contracts in each of the four categories. Ms. Boatner supplied the numbers and explained the secrecy clauses and publication review requirements in connection with those contractors that had access to classified material. She also explained why we were unable to provide any exact answer to a category of contract in which written material may have reached the public because there was no way in which the Agency is able to keep track of such material. Subcommittee staff said that the purpose of this question was to determine whether such untracked materials were actually propaganda efforts inside the U.S. by the Agency. Ms. Boatner, in detail, clarified and illuminated the nature and purpose of this "suspect" category by indicating that they were nearly all scientific, engineering, technical or economic in nature. Furthermore, she noted that a number of these personal services contracts resulted in no writing at all but were merely evaluative. Mr. Edwards appreciated our dilemma and appeared satisfied with our answers in this regard. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP90BO139OR000801080030-0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP90BO139OR000801080030-0 4. Next, Edwards said that he was interested in the extent to which the CIA had published abroad with the specific design and purpose of that Dublication finding its way to the United States for propaganda purposes. replied that such actions were prohibited under E.O. 12333. During the-course of this conversation Edwards was extremely critical of the FBI tactic of questioning U.S. persons who had returned from Nicaragua. He continued that the frame of such questioning was intimidating and said it had a "chilling" effect on the rights of U.S. citizens. He said he hoped that the CIA was not en a ed in similar activity. Ms. Boatner clarified the work and purpose of efforts, and that this has been a practice that has been ongoing since a the formation of the Agency. She emphasized that solicitation of such information was entirely voluntary and methods used were low key and never threatening. 5. The briefing ended on a discussion of the extent to which academic and scholastic materials are pre-reviewed by the Agency before publication. Edwards said that he was satisfied with our briefing, and the meeting concluded after about an hour. Distribution: Original - OCA/LEGIS/Subject File PROCUREMENT 1 - D/OCA 1 - ExO/OCA 1 - OCA Registry 1 - JE Si er OCA/Leg (pap) (29 May 1986) Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/03/08: CIA-RDP90BO139OR000801080030-0