MOSCOW'S DOUBLE GAME

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000807420002-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 11, 2012
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 27, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000807420002-2.pdf110.43 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/11: CIA-RDP90-00965R000807420002-2 "y - di New ssplss for soon leysl Miss: A Sandinista-owned Soviet Mi-24 helicopter Moscow's Double Game A mix of arms offers and Third World adventurism S oviet foreign policy these days may owe as much to Ralph Waldo Emer- son, who said that "a foolish consisten- cy is the hobgoblin of little minds," as to Marx and Lenin. Moscow's new arms con- trol proposal is clearly part of a diplomatic offensive designed to improve its world- wide image. But at the same time, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has launched an ambitious though less visible campaign to rearm a host of Third World allies who are fighting U.S.-backed rebel movements or supporting terrorist attacks on the West. While the Kremlin has stepped up support for its clients, the Reagan administration has shown a growing interest in attacking them. The danger is that both sides could be setting the stage for a confrontation that neither expects or wants. While Libya's Muammar Kaddafi has vowed to back "terrorist and suicide mis- sions," the Soviets have intensified their support for him. Some U.S. and Arab diplo- mats speculate that Moscow may have had a hand in last week's abortive coup in South Yemen (page 341. In Nicaragua, U.S. ana- lysts believe the Soviets may have reversed an earlier decision and decided to improve the quality of their military shipments to the Sandinistas; in turn, the administra- tion plans to ask Congress for as much as $100 million in military aid for the contras. The Soviets have also stepped up support to the Marxist government in Angola, and now Washington is debating whether to- respond by providing covert aid to anti- communist leader Jonas Savimbi- A classi- fied CIA study reports that Gorbachev has sharply increased overt and covert mili- tary aid to virtually all the Kremlin's Third World clients, including Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Syria and Vietnam. Gorbachev's objectives may be similar to Ronald Reagan's in 1981. Like the presi- dent, Gorbachev took over after a period of weak leadership, economic floundering at home and repeated embarrassments abroad. The succession of ailing Soviet leaders, of setbacks in Syria. Grenada and Afghanistan. and of a new challenge from the Chinese leadership all contributed to a suspicion that what Marxists call "the cor- relation of forces" had turned against Mos- cow in the early 1980s. Now Gorbachev may want to reverse that correlation of forces before settling down to serious nego- tiations about Third World hot spots. 'Low intensity warfare': But while seeking to tweak the American eagle's beak. Gorba- chev has been careful to avoid moves that might cause it to unsheath its talons. In- stead of challenging the U.S. in areas where it has an advantage-nuclear war- fare or full-scale conventional conflict-he has supported paramilitary and terrorist operations that take advantage of Ameri- ca's need to build a democratic consensus and its reluctance to risk a full-scale super- power confrontation. Recently U.S. mili- tary analysts have coined a name for the strategy: "low intensity warfare" (LIW). Last week the administration convened a conference in Washington to discuss how to fight LIW. While differing on specifics, many of the current and former officials and other experts who attended seemed to be trying to build consensus for military action. Secretary of State George Shultz criticized Congress and the European allies for balking at retaliation, and argued that America's respect for international law should not prevent it from acting in self- defense. Shultz identified four areas where the administration should focus its efforts: encouraging a national debate about LIW; making full use of nonmilitary weapons such as antiterrorist defenses, criminal laws and economic aid to the Third World; better utilization of intelligence capabili- ties, including covert action, and resolving as a last resort to use military force, start- ing with Army and Marine units trained for limited interventions. For two years Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger has publicly taken a more cau- tious line than Shultz's. Before acting, he has argued, the United States must first perceive a threat to its vital interests, iden- tify clear military objectives, muster do- mestic support-and be sure it has the will to win. At the LIW conference military authorities still sounded less bellicose than the civilians, but Weinberger seemed to modify his position. He recommended re- moving legal restriction on U.S. training of foreign police forces, renewing Vietnam- style "nation-building" efforts in the Third World, devoting more time to mobilizing consensus at home and using Special Oper- ations units when appropriate. He also said that "we must be prepared to act alone." In a number of cases Gorbachev has moved to dampen tensions in the Third World: he has hinted at a possible with- drawal agreement in Afghanistan, tried to encourage a Middle East peace conference and pressured Syrian President Hafez As- sad to arrange the release of the TWA hi- jack victims last June. But Gorbachev's actions elsewhere now stand to heighten tensions. The danger is that if Gorbachev's efforts to reassert Soviet power are rubbed energetically enough against the Reagan Doctrine, the friction could start a fire. While both sides have avoided any confron- tation, a dangerous question remains: can the superpowers escalate out-of-the-way conflicts without slipping into larger and far more dangerous showdowns? JOHN WALCOTT with KIM WILLFNSON In Washington Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/01/11: CIA-RDP90-00965R000807420002-2 27 January 1986