FROM CONTAINMENT TO APPEASEMENT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000605120005-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 3, 2012
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 18, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000605120005-6.pdf110.41 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/03: CIA-RDP90-00965R000605120005-6 NEW YOPK POST 18 June 1985 containment From appeasement By NORMAN PODHORETZ Me(3EORUE-_Bun i not further that President Rea- ' the man he used to be. Nei- ther is Arthur Schlesinger Jr. As highly placed mem- bers of the. Kennedy adminis- tration, they both believed that the United States had an obligation to contain the spread of Soviet power and influence by any means up to and including the use of force. Today, back in the aca- demic world from which Kennedy originally elevated them, it is that obligation, rather than Soviet imperial- ism, they seem most con- cerned to contain. Only last week, for exam- ple, taking a little time out from the tireless campaign he has been waging against various aspects of American nuclear strategy. Bundy urged that Congress cut off all aid to the contras who - as arguments like his force one to keep wearily repeat- ing - are fighting to reclaim the democratic revolution in Nicaragua that has been stolen and betrayed by the Communist Sandinistas with the aid and encouragement of the Soviet Union and Cuba. Last week Schlesinger too was heard from on the sub- ject of Latin America. In a two-part article describing Fidel Castro in the kind of glowing terms he usually re- serves for members of the Kennedy family, Schlesinger called, among other things, for a halt to "the militariza- tion of U.S. policy in Central America." F. Scott Fitzgerald once said that unlike his great rival Er- nest Hemingway, who spoke with "the authority of suc- cess," he, Fitzgerald, spoke with "the authority of failure." On these matters, Bundy and Schlesinger are in the line of Fitzgerald. Thus Bund bolsters his ar- gument abandoning the contras by bringin up his in- volvement as Kin y sna- tional securit adviser with the cies of covert action lythe CIA that led tote av, of Pigs disaster. He asserts gap "is just plain wrong_ suggesting tnat enn y~8 ohs on o L ven- turis w c was indeed strop won translate today into suppor for covert operations. In his articles on Castro, Schlesinger also alludes, in similarly Fitzgerald-like tones, to Kennedy and the Bay of Pigs. And while he does not say so explicitly, he undoubtedly agrees with Bundy that Reagan's policy is inconsistent with the al- ,legedly wiser attitude Ken- nedy developed after the Bay of Pigs. Yet in a book written when he himself was still a be- liever in containment, Schlesinger admiringly summed up this attitude in a statement made by Kennedy about the Dominican Repub- lic under the right-wing au- thoritarian rule of Trujillo: "There are three possibilities in descending order of preference: a decent demo- cratic regime, a continuation of the Trujillo regime, or a Castro regime. We ought to aim at the first, but we really can't renounce the second until we are sure we can avoid the third." It would be hard to improve on this as a description of the Reagan administration's policy in Central America. In any case, it is Bundy who "is just plain wrong" in focusing the debate on covert action, which was not then and is not today the main issue. The main issue was and remains whether the United States can respond ef- fectively to Soviet expansion by proxy. Professing not to know if the Sandinistas "will inexo- rably persist in an increas- ingly Marxist-Leninist course, with increasing reli- ance on Soviet and Cuban aid and an increasing commit- ment to the export of violent revolution," Bundy is not so far gone as to deny that, If they do, the United States will have to take "fully effec- tive means ... to defeat and reverse any such Nicara- guan choice." At this point, shifting from Fitzgerald's authority of failure to Hem- ingway's authority of suc- cess, Bundy invokes the Cuban missile crisis as a model for action against the Sandinistas. . Yet even if we accept the dubious claim that Ken- nedy's handling of the Cuban missile crisis was a great success, all he accomplished was the removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba. This supposedly great victory nei- ther nudged Castro toward pluralism, nor weakened his ties to the Soviet Union, nor lessened his commitment to the export of violent revolu- tion. What Bundy is offering here is not a model for action against the Sandinistas; it is a formula for doing nothing. Schlesinger, on the other hand, does want to do some- thing: he wants to cease treating Castro as a "pari- ah." There is, he tells us, a "new Castro," more a prag- matist than a revolutionary, more a nationalist than a Communist. Does this mean that if we normalize rela- tions with him, he will re- nounce "his Soviet connec- tion and his commitment to revolutionary international- ism"? No, says Schlesinger, not at `all. There is to be no quid for this quo. In place of Bundy's formula for doing nothing, then, Schles- inger gives us a formula for positive appeasement. Obviously, Bundy and Schlesinger, like that other chastened Kennedyite Robert McNamara, are trying to atone for the other disasters they participated in during their time in office. And it is in- deedtruethatinthe - yes - noble cause ,f resisting the spread of Soviet-backed Com- munist regimes, the Kennedy administration made unwise use of American power, first covertly at the Bay of Pigs ana then directly in Vietnam. But in urging us to go the other ex- treme, the survivors of that administration, far from mak- ing up penitentially for the damage they did then to American power are instead working prevent that dam- age from finally being re paired. Norman Podhoretz, a leading neo-coreervative, is editor of Commentary magazine. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/03: CIA-RDP90-00965R000605120005-6