5 AMERICAN CAUGHT BY KGB SINCE CIA EX-AGENT SOLD DATA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 21, 2013
Sequence Number: 
41
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 18, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8.pdf233.26 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/21 CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8 - -F-gr WASHINGTON POST 18 July 1986 5 Americans Caught by KGB Sitite CIA Ex-Agent Sold Data By Nalte---r Pincus \A 111ashat4ton Pat Staff Writir At 9:15 p.m. on May 7, in the yard of Apartment Block No. 22 on Moscow's Malaya Priogovskaya street, a blue-jeaned American named Eric Sites strolled past car- rying a rolled-up newspaper. Sites, who worked for the U.S. Embassy's military attache office and whose wife was waiting in a nearby embas- sy car, hoped to rendezvous with a Soviet citizen who had been re- cruited by the Central Intelligence Agency. Instead, Soviet KGB secret police agents swooped down on Sites, ar- rested him and quickly expelled him from the Soviet Union as persona awr grals, awarding to as account in the Soviet government newspa- per Izvestia. Sites was at least the fifth Amer- ican official caught red-handed at espionage in the Soviet Union sinc Edward L. Howard, a disgruntl former CIA employe, began sellin secrets to the KGB in 1984, accord ing to several U.S. government sources. Three of the officials, who are named by Izvestia, are con- firmed by the State Department, which previously had acknowledged only one of the arrests. Howard had been traineilltvith his wife between January 1081 and early 1983, to handle U.S. agents in Moscow. After being briefed on some of the names and identities of those agents, however, Howard indicated deception in a polygraph test, was pulled from the Moscow assignment and eventually fired from the CIA. Identified as a Soviet espionage agent last summer, How- ard outwitted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and fled the United States in a case that attracted con- siderable publicity, including a lengthy article in The Washington Post May 30 on Howard's back- ground. American officials are now con- cluding that Howard is "the worst intelligence loss in years," as one informed official put it, and the "worst foul-up by U.S. agencies." The betrayal has left U.S. intelli- gence operations in Moscow in shambles,' according to another U.S. official, and deeply shaken the FBI's counterintelligence program and the CIA's personnel policies. After several internal investiga- tions and a sharply critical inquiry by the president's Foreign Intelli- gence Advisory Board, the CIA has begun a series of personnel re- forms. Letters of reprimand have been issued to several CIA and FBI officials. To months before Sites was caught, the Soviets picked up Mi- chael Sellers, a second secretary in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and expelled him. "What is unusual," one source familiar with the How- ard case said, Is how right the So- viets have been in their actions." The first to be caught after How- ard initially talked to the KGB was Paul M. Stambaugh, also a second secretary in the Moscow embassy. He was picked up in February 1985, as he was meeting his agent, a Soviet aviation engineer named A.G. Tolkachev. Tolkachev, who apparently was executed, was one of a still-undis- closed number of Soviet citizens acting as U.S. agents in Moscow who have recently disappeared, ac- cording to several sources. "They are 'rolling up' people," said one source, who added that since How- ard fled it has been harder to trust the agents still remaining. "It will be years before things can be put back together," he said. For example, the Methods used by CIA agents to arrange meetings and ex- change information with Soviet con- tacts evolved over many years?pe- riodically reviewed in Moscow by FBI agents?and must be restruc- tured, according to intelligence sources. In the United States, the CIA and FBI are trying to remedy the weak- nesses exposed by the Howard case, which some intelligence ex- perts see as a classic example of how not to recruit, fire and keep track of an agent. After Howard had been with the CIA for two years, an investigation of his background turned up a history of lying, drink- ing, womanizing and drug use. After he was fired and began a new job in Santa Fe, N.M., Howard also took repeated trips overseas, displayed Soviet souvenirs and a new-found wealth, all apparently without arousing CIA or FBI suspicions. In an apparent effort to improve its image, the FBI held a widely publicized news conference June 20 announcing the arrest and expulsion of the senior Soviet air attache in Washington for trying to purchase secret documents from an Air Force officer. FBI spokesmen de- tailed the operational techniques used by Col. Vladimir Izmaylov and took credit for hampering further Soviet operations. But several experienced U.S. in- telligence sources said the unusual publicity given that case was largely the result of the CIA's determina- tion to counter the impact of the Howard case and the bureau's de- sire to trumpet its successful inves- tigation. One former intelligence officer called the public revelation a "really dumb move" that ended what could have been a useful, long-term coun- terintelligence operation and may have put "good EU.S.1 people in jeopardy in Moscow" if the Soviets decide to retaliate by kicking out a U.S. military attache. President Reagan has yet to ap- prove his intelligence advisory board's study of the Howard case, which was supervised by Anne L. Armstrong, the panel's chairman. A preliminary draft, which de- tailed shortcomings in the CIA's re- cruitment of Howard and his sub- sequent handling by the agency and the FBI, caused CIA Director Wil- liam J. Casey to set aside the initial in-house agency investigation, ac- Coo(Autii STAT STAT Annrnved for Release 2013/02/21: CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8 STAT sa Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8 cording to sources. A second CIA inquiry, by the agency's inspector general, identified not only weak- nesses in the system but also spec- ified failures by individuals. In the wake of these inquiries, several changes are in motion, sources said. New recruits are being more closely screened for past drug and alcohol use and other potential per- sonal problems or disorders. The agency is not, however, taking a new look at individuals brought into the covert program at the same time as Howard, congressional sources said. At least one CIA ex-operative, who was a contemporary of How- ard's in the agency, is under inves- tigation by the FBI because of ques- tionable financial dealings, accord- ing to informed sources. Some past and current members of the two congressional Select Intelligence committees believe there should be a reexamination of all those hired during the 1981-83 period. The agency is also reinstating a policy, dropped during the Carter administration, of not immediately firing unsatisfactory employes who are involved in covert or otherwise secret operations. The practice of "drying out" or "putting on the beach" such operatives by giving them jobs that involve less sensitive material is being reinstated so that when they are released their knowl- edge of highly classified material would be more dated. In addition, departing employes in the future will be given extensive counseling, and follow-up contacts will be maintained. Although How- ard underwent psychiatric care paid for by the agency, his only contact with CIA employes after his firing occurred in late 1984 over a legal action he filed with the Labor De- partment regarding his discharge, sources said. He told those former colleagues at the time that he had contemplated going to the Soviet Embassy in 1983 to sell informa- tion, but hadn't followed through, according to sources. This admission came to the agen- cy's attention in late 1984, but did not cause the CIA to put Howard on any watch list, in part because "he was considered so pro-Ronald Rea- gan that he would never sell out his country," said one source familiar with the case. The information was also with- held from the FBI because the CIA had been criticized for circulating personnel information too freely in the past. In the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s, CIA's counterintelli- gence operations undertook many investigations of former agents and employes in the United States, which included extensive use of wiretaps. House and Senate inque., ries into the CIA in the 1970s crita icized this practice and sharply linh. ited the agency's domestic inves- tigations thereafter. The first hint that Howard was. working for Moscow came from taly Yurchenko, a KGB officer %dia., defected July 27, 1985, and gittie., the CIA descriptions of two Ainext., ican agents who were giving infort, mation to the KGB. Because Yurchenko did not know- Howard's name, the KGB offiCii.... described a former CIA agent had been scheduled to go to Mos- cow and who later met with KGB , 'officials in Austria in September. 1984. Yurchenko also said this pkr-e son was the only current or former CIA agent ever recruited by thea. KGB. CIA officials immediately ii pected Howard and "panicked," ac... cording to one source. a They asked the FBI to arrest him, but at the same time under; played Howard's importance. tit was initially described to the FBI as a disgruntled recruit; nothing wad'. said about his Moscow assignmerit- or his access to highly classified ma- terial and training in counterintel- ligence techniques. The FBI, which also has been working under stricter guidelines since the 1970s' conkressional in- ? vestigations, said it could not arrest warrant for Howard Witholat. some evidence that a crime bad. been committed. The bureau decickL, ed to watch Howard to see whollis associates were and what he was^ doing. The intelligence advisory board,. report criticizes the CIA for hiding., the significance of the informatieii:- Howard was in a position to cW' close, but then comes down hard on the failures of the FBI in its invesi" tigation, according to sources famitr iar with the report. .. In describing the Howard case to the House and Senate intelligence committees, FBI Director William' H. Webster "has admitted Vs' agents screwed up," one legislabs_ said recently. Howard, for example, realizeith:e.,.., was under FBI investigation in .047 August last year, shortly aft.ey.; agents began watching him, accercl-_, ing to sources familiar with the. case. On a trip to Seattle, SOURea/ said, Howard and his wife practiced", the countersurveillance techniques. they had learned during CIA treiltt; Mg and apparently discovered they. were being followed. When Howard returned to Sanla Fe from that trip, he took midi: several moves that, in retrospect: suggest he knew he was under =V- picion. For instance, he bought a rirtliti! scanner and said he wanted "tcPtie-s. ten to police and FBI broadcastettl? former neighbor said recently. In- addition, after an FBI agent w1iO lived close to Howard moved out ir the Santa Fe suburban development named El Dorado, that house came the bureau command center for the investigation, neighbqt,s, said. Howard also stepped up a search for a new job overseas, according to. a ,-leighbor, and took out an exiled:: sive life insurance policy. He also gave gold Kruggerands purchasext, in Europe to a local brokerage rum to start an annuity program for hit 3-year-old son. Last Sept. 20, FBI agents con. fronted Howard and accused him of peddling secrets, according to. sources. Howard initially put theat off by saying he wanted to see: x lawyer; later he agreed to cooper- ate, sources said. ron ? I/I The next day, allegedly with tile, help of his wife, he evaded the FBI-- and fled. His whereabouts are 'dn.: known. Bureau officials will not disete the case, but an inexplicable coin- cidence is that on Sept. 20, llte: same day the FBI confronted How:ard, the Soviet news service lass published an article about the arrest and expulsion of Stambaugh in gas-. cow, which had taken place =ice; than seven months earlier. rhnv Anoroved for Release 2013/02/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000605100041-8